Trump has ‘good conversation' with Zelenskyy after heavy bombardment of Ukraine by Russia
The call with Zelenskyy comes as Washington has halted its latest shipment of military aid to Ukraine including Patriot air defense missiles and other crucial munitions meant to support the country's defenses, and hours after Russia launched a devastating air attack on Kyiv using a record number of drones and ballistic missiles.
Zelenskyy called the conversation 'important and useful' and said in a post said that he and Trump had discussed Ukraine's air defense capabilities, joint defense production and 'mutual purchases and investments', all potentially avenues for Ukraine to restart aid from the United States by providing incentives for the Trump administration to rush crucial munitions to Kyiv.
He said that the two sides had agreed to 'increase aerial protection', a particular focus for Kyiv as Russia has increased bombardments of Ukrainian cities despite outrage from Trump and other world leaders.
Yet it was not immediately clear whether Zelenskyy had achieved any concrete progress with Trump and in his statement he did not mention the halt of aid shipments from the US or announce their resumption. Axios reported that a source described the call as a 'good conversation'.
Related: Russian drone attack on Kyiv injures 14, triggers multiple fires, mayor says
Trump said he was 'very disappointed' after a telephone call with Vladimir Putin on Thursday. A Putin aide told reporters that the Russian president was not willing to make concessions on what the Kremlin has called the 'root causes' of the war with Ukraine, a list of grievances that includes Nato expansion and Ukraine's desire to join western economic and security blocs.
'I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin, because I don't think he's there,' Trump told reporters after holding a rally in Iowa on Thursday evening. 'I don't think he's there, and I'm very disappointed. I'm just saying, I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad.'
The US has said that it halted the shipments, some of which were already in Poland, due to a review of US military stockpiles that suggested that the country is running low on munitions for its own troops.
Germany has said that it is in 'intensive talks' to buy the Patriot missiles for Ukraine, although it's unclear whether those stocks would be available immediately.
'There are various ways to fill this Patriot gap,' a German government spokesperson told a news conference in Berlin on Friday. One option being considered was for the German government to buy the Patriot missile batteries in the United States and then send them to Ukraine.
'I can confirm that intensive discussions are indeed being held on this matter,' the spokesperson said.
The shortage of Patriot missiles was further highlighted by the record bombardment of Ukraine in which Russia sent more than 550 drones and ballistic missiles at major cities in what Zelenskyy described as a 'deliberate act of terror'.
The strike immediately followed the call between Putin and Trump, Zelenskyy said, and was a 'clear interpretation of how Moscow interprets diplomacy'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Gavin Newsom swings through South Carolina, where Democrats will play pivotal 2028 nominating role
FLORENCE, S.C. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom is launching a two-day tour of South Carolina on Tuesday, meeting voters across rural areas — and some GOP strongholds — in the early-voting state, the latest signal that the Democrat is eyeing a 2028 run for president. Over the course of Tuesday and Wednesday, Newsom is slated to make a total of eight stops across the state, a trip that state Democratic Party officials have said includes coffee shops, small businesses and churches. The investment of time in a state pivotal to picking his party's presidential nominees, and Newsom's trajectory across some of its reddest areas, suggest that the term-limited governor is angling to shed his San Francisco liberal image, get out ahead of what it sure to be a crowded 2028 field and make inroads with the diverse Democratic electorate whose buy-in has long been seen as critical for their party's nominee. Starting in South Carolina's northeast on Tuesday, Newsom then turns on Wednesday toward the conservative Upstate, among the state's most GOP-rich areas. He kicks off that day with an event in the small town of Seneca, which four-term GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham calls home. In last year's general election, President Donald Trump won more than 75% of votes cast in surrounding Oconee County. Treading in that territory fits with the image that Newsom has been cultivating for himself ahead of a possible 2028 White House bid. Increasingly willing to break from some of the policies that have defined his brand and his deeply Democratic state, Newsom has hosted Trump's allies on his podcast, even stunning some members of his own party by agreeing with podcast guests on issues such as restricting transgender women and girls in sports. Saying dismantling police departments was 'lunacy," Newsom also kept silent when longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon falsely said Trump won the 2020 presidential election against Democrat Joe Biden. Although the 2028 Democratic primary calendar won't be set for many months, potential candidates for the party's upcoming presidential slate have already started visiting South Carolina, with the expectation that the state will continue to play a pivotal role. At the urging of Biden — whose 2020 candidacy was saved by his resounding South Carolina primary win — the state led off Democrats' 2024 calendar, and party chair Christale Spain has said that she will renew the argument to keep the state's No. 1 position in the next cycle. South Carolina has long been the first southern state to hold a primary, giving it a unique role in the Democratic nomination process due to its diverse electorate, particularly the significant influence of Black voters. In May, a pair of governors — Minnesota's Tim Walz and Maryland's Wes Moore — headlined a weekend of events hosted by South Carolina Democrats, introducing themselves and testing out their possible candidacy arguments in front of the party faithful. Both men also addressed attendees at Rep. Jim Clyburn's World Famous Fish Fry, a storied night of cold drinks, hot fried fish and raucous political stumping in which scores of Democratic presidential hopefuls have participated through the years. ___
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Today's trade deadline was no such thing
Three months later, President Donald Trump's endgame for his once market-rattling tariffs was supposed to arrive tonight at midnight. But it won't. As the clock rapidly ticked toward the long-standing July 9 end of Trump's 90-day pause on soaring 'reciprocal' tariff rates on more than 60 countries, Trump on Monday signed an executive action extending that reprieve until August 1. Despite significant progress with several trading partners, including India, Brazil, the European Union and several Asian countries, according to US officials, the global financial system has started to grapple with the reality that the deals, the details and even the deadline sit in a state of limbo. Trump's top trade and economic advisors insisted, as they have for the better part of the last two months, that deals will be announced in rapid succession this week. They also spent Sunday telling the world tariff rates wouldn't snap back into place until August 1, in an implicit hedge if those deal predictions once again proved hollow. It has been a whirlwind since then: Trump then announced on social media late Sunday night that he'd begin sending letters outlining the tariff rates or terms of bilateral agreements to trading partners. Then he announced a 25% tariff on Japan and South Korea and higher tariffs on a number of smaller trading partners Monday, with more letters expected to come in the days ahead. He also launched a new tariff threat at the 10-nation bloc known as BRICS, which he's long viewed as a direct and acute threat to US dominance in the global financial system. Trump didn't mention that several BRICS countries are top US trade partners and currently engaged in intensive bilateral trade talks with Trump's lead negotiators. The actual deadline – whether August 1 or some future date Trump announces on social media – is a lot like the months-long bilateral talks launched in early April: fuzzy on actual details, light on actual outcomes, ambiguous on actual goals, all while projecting unflinchingly bold predictions of success. All of it, most critically, contingent on the whims of the current inhabitant of the Oval Office. 'When you think about it, it's kind of the perfect window into the whole second term approach,' a trade lawyer who worked in Trump's first term told CNN. 'Everything revolves around the president, and you can safely assume he rather enjoys everything that entails.' Trump has spent the last 80-plus days fielding a steady stream of offers with concessions on market access for US products, reduced tariff rates, delayed tax and regulatory enforcement for US-based companies and a veritable potpourri of offers on unrelated policy matters thought to be important to his domestic agenda, according to multiple people involved in the process. Trump views the deadline – or deadlines – as the most critical leverage to squeeze trading partners for a few more concessions or to drop their own red lines in the ongoing bilateral talks, officials said. In other words, the pervasive uncertainty and ambiguity are kind of the point. 'I think what President Trump is concerned about is the quality of the deals, not the quantity,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday on CNBC. The US economy has held up and overcome the dire predictions of catastrophe that sent the stock and bond markets into a sustained period of tumult through the spring. Wall Street has settled into a general state of Zen about Trump's actual tariff intentions after a series of pauses and de-escalations. The general exhaustion consuming investors after months on a hair trigger isn't an insignificant factor driving that view, according to several market participants, who nonetheless expressed little anxiety about the optimism that has driven stocks to record highs. Trump just signed the cornerstone of his legislative agenda into law, a major win. At the same time, the US has collected $81.5 billion in tariff revenue through June, according to the US Customs and Border Protection, only serving to bolster Trump's position, officials say. 'In his mind, he's in a no-lose situation,' the former official said. 'He's going to keep amping up the pressure.' That's the backdrop to keep in mind throughout the critical week ahead. The Trump administration has announced two bilateral agreements and a third with China that is better described as a de-escalation than a deal. That's not to dismiss the China détente, as the de facto trade embargo between the world's two largest economies that existed in April carried with it the potential to fracture the backbone of global commerce. Trump has inked a trade framework with the UK (which wasn't actually subject to the stratospheric 'reciprocal' rates announced on April 2 in the Rose Garden). The granular details of that agreement are still in process, officials said. Trump announced on social media last week that he'd signed off on a deal with Vietnam, which was facing a catastrophic 46% 'reciprocal' rate at the end of the 90-day pause. The agreement would implement a 20% tariff on the country and a more draconian penalty on goods deemed by the US to be of Chinese origin but passed through Vietnam to avoid harsher tariffs. The details remain opaque on how exactly that would be applied – or defined – and Vietnamese officials have been more cautious about declaring the agreement final. We got our first glimpse Monday of Trump's regularly promised trade letters, with missives sent to the leaders of South Korea, Japan, South Africa, Malaysia and several others that the president posted to Truth Social. He decried America's imbalance of trade with those countries, as well as tariffs and other non-tariff barriers they place on US goods. Trump said the door was open to negotiation, but he threatened the countries with higher tariffs if they retaliate. Is this how trade talks actually work? Not normally. Bessent during his CNBC interview described the contents like this: 'Thank you for wanting to trade with the United States of America. We welcome you as a trading partner, and here's the rate unless you want to come back and try to negotiate.' The administration is not seeking or planning to secure 'trade deals' in the historical sense. Those pacts, which take years to negotiate and even longer to implement, have never really been the goal. Instead, the White House is seeking frameworks with a heavy focus on market access for US industries and products, while at the same time including commitments to reduce or remove entirely regulatory and legislative barriers to US exports. So where do the crush of bilateral talks actually stand? India has long been viewed as the most likely major partner to sign onto a framework with the US and may still do so this week, though Indian officials have hardened their positions in recent days, according to US officials. India is also a member of the BRICS group, so it's unclear what Trump's tariff threat Sunday means for trade negotiations. South Korea had also been viewed for weeks as likely to reach an agreement, though Trump's auto tariffs remain a key sticking point in those talks, and Trump's letter Monday may have thrown a wrench in those gears. Japan steadily moved further away from an outcome in recent weeks, and Trump cast significant doubt on talks that once seemed on a path to a certain agreement. Japanese officials, who just weeks ago were scrambling to lay the groundwork for an announcement by last month's Group of Seven summit, have delivered far more pessimistic messages in their public statements in recent days. EU officials have signaled more optimism in the last few days about clinching a framework with Trump's trade negotiators after an intensive series of meetings and technical discussions in the last two weeks. Indonesia, Cambodia and Thailand have all delivered substantial offers to their US counterparts in the last 10 days in an effort to move to the front of the line for an agreement and are likely candidates for any near-term deal in the next few days, officials said. Brazil has ramped up its efforts to secure an agreement, including bilateral talks at the end of last week designed to expand on an earlier offer to sharply reduce tariffs on certain US products, officials said. The most prevalent point of contention among foreign trade teams has been a lack of clarity on what their US counterparts envision for any final agreement. But the most biggest roadblock in the more expansive negotiations has been the existence – or promised imposition - of Trump's sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and pharmaceuticals, officials said.
Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Pastors who endorse political candidates shouldn't lose tax-exempt status, IRS says in filing
The Johnson Amendment is a 1954 amendment to the U.S. tax code that prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from endorsing or opposing political candidates. Advertisement The Christian media group and others filed suit against the IRS last August, stating that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights to the freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, among other legal protections. On Monday, the IRS and plaintiffs wrote that the Johnson Amendment should be interpreted 'so that it does not reach communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The New York Times was first to report the news of the court filing. The IRS has generally not enforced the Johnson Amendment against houses of worship for speech related to electoral politics. President Donald Trump has said he wanted to get rid of the Johnson Amendment and signed an executive order in 2017 directing Treasury to disregard the rule. Advertisement 'I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,' Trump said at a National Prayer Breakfast in 2017, which is a high-profile event bringing together faith leaders, politicians and dignitaries. Representatives from the IRS and the National Religious Broadcasters Association did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation to remove the Johnson Amendment.
