logo
Fearful Syrian Christians demand justice, protection after church bombing

Fearful Syrian Christians demand justice, protection after church bombing

AFTER eight members of her family, including her husband, were killed in a suicide bombing in a Damascus church, Laure Nasr demanded justice while Syria's minority communities worried about their future.
"I want (Syrian interim President) Ahmed al-Sharaa to personally bring me justice," a distraught Nasr said on Monday as she received mourners at her home.
"Isn't he the president? Are we not a democratic state now?" she said, after Sunday's attack, which came more than six months after Islamist-led forces ousted longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad.
Authorities said at least 25 people were killed and more than 60 others wounded in the shooting and suicide bombing in the Saint Elias church in the Syrian capital's Dwelaa district.
They blamed the Islamic State group, which has not yet claimed the attack.
The attacker "entered the house of God and opened fire on us", Nasr, 35, told AFP.
If her husband and brother-in-law had not stopped the man from going deeper into the church, "we would have all died", she said.
President Sharaa has pledged to bring all those involved to justice, emphasising "the importance of solidarity and unity... in facing all that threatens our nation's security and stability."
"Let him investigate the case and not allow anyone else to die because of these terrorist acts," said Nasr.
"Let Daesh be eliminated from Syria," she said, using an Arabic acronym for IS.
Holding her husband's phone, belt and the remnants of his blood-stained clothes, she decried the suffering inflicted on her extended family.
"Eight of us have died, including my husband, my brother-in-law and their sister," she said.
Elsewhere in Dwelaa, 21-year-old worker Jenny al-Haddad was mourning her father.
"My father didn't do anything wrong – he was praying in church. He never carried a weapon against anyone or ever fought anyone," she said from her family home.
"His fault was that he was praying. No one there did anything wrong, they were all good people," she added.
In a corner, Haddad placed pictures of her father, a 50-year-old government worker who attended mass twice a week.
"Nothing is harder than living in a place where you do not feel safe," she said.
"I no longer want to stay here. I want to leave because death has encircled us from all sides."
Since Assad's December overthrow, the new Islamist authorities have faced pressure from the international community to protect minorities and include them in the country's transition.
Sectarian massacres in March that killed over 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor, and deadly clashes involving the Druze community the following month increased concerns about the safety of minorities.
Christians "knew our turn was coming", Haddad said, urging the authorities to hold those behind the church attack responsible and to protect minority groups.
"I am a Syrian Christian, I want to live in Syria whether people like it or not. What have I done to become a widow? Was it our fault to pray?" Nasr said, surrounded by relatives who had not yet buried their dead, while others remained in hospital.
Shops were closed in Dwelaa, while in the church, civil defence personnel collected scattered human remains after removing most of the rubble and cleaning the churchyard.
Around a million Christians lived in Syria before the civil war in 2011, but experts believe their numbers have dwindled to around 300,000.
Syria's new authorities have not officially imposed restrictions on freedoms, but several violent incidents characterised as "individual acts" by officials and measures including mandating full-body swimwear at public beaches have raised concerns.
In March, a dispute took place in front of the Saint Elias church, as residents expressed opposition to Islamic chants being played on loudspeakers from a car.
Nebras Yusef, 35, who survived Sunday's attack but lost six of his friends and neighbours, said that "today, you can no longer protect yourself or feel safe when entering a church."
He said there had been an "accumulation" of violations in the months before the attack without intervention from the authorities.
"When you don't feel safe in your belief, religion and ritual practices, you are a fourth-class citizen – not even a second-class citizen," he said.
"What we want from the authorities is security and a livelihood."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indonesia begins US$5.9bil EV battery project despite environmental fears
Indonesia begins US$5.9bil EV battery project despite environmental fears

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Indonesia begins US$5.9bil EV battery project despite environmental fears

This aerial handout picture taken and released on June 29, 2025 by Indonesia's Presidential Palace shows the prospective site of South-East Asia's largest battery industry project, inaugurated by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in Karawang, West Java. Indonesia broke ground on June 29 on a USD 5.9 billion megaproject for EV battery production backed by Chinese giant CATL, despite NGOs raising concerns over a lack of environmental guarantees. - AFP Jakarta, June 29, 2025 (AFP) - Indonesia broke ground Sunday on a US$5.9 billion megaproject for EV battery production backed by Chinese giant CATL, despite NGOs raising concerns over a lack of environmental guarantees. Indonesia is the world's largest nickel producer and it is trying to capitalise on its vast reserves, with a 2020 export ban spurring a domestic industrial boom of the key metal used in EV batteries and stainless steel. The EV battery project will include a $4.7 billion investment on the eastern island of Halmahera and a $1.2 billion investment in West Java, energy minister Bahlil Lahadalia said in a speech alongside President Prabowo Subianto. "According to my calculation, it won't take long, in probably between five to six years we will be able to reach energy self-sufficiency," Prabowo said at a groundbreaking ceremony in Karawang, West Java. Bahlil said the Halmahera complex will focus on mining, smelting and production of cathodes which are a key component in rechargeable batteries. The West Java complex will focus on battery cell production, the minister said. The two politicians did not say when the megaproject was slated to be operational, but Indonesian officials have said a CATL plant in Halmahera would open in March next year. Alongside CATL, the Halmahera complex is backed by China's Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt and Indonesia's state-owned Antam. Climate Rights International (CRI) and Greenpeace Indonesia this week issued a call for greater assurances from Jakarta that measures were in place to protect the surrounding environment at the bigger complex in eastern Halmahera. Environmental group Mining Advocacy Network (Jatam) said in a statement Saturday that Jakarta was "chasing vague economic growth while consciously ignoring the people's scream" to end damage to the environment and residents' livelihoods. Halmahera, a once-pristine island in the Maluku archipelago, has seen environmental damage increase as operations have grown at a large industrial park that hosts the world's largest nickel mine. A CRI report this month warned the Indonesian government was allowing environmental damage to go unchecked around the Weda Bay mine and the industrial park that hosts it. An AFP report last month detailed how the home of the nomadic Hongana Manyawa tribe was being eaten away by mining operations there. - AFP

Firefighters shot dead while battling wildfire in US
Firefighters shot dead while battling wildfire in US

Sinar Daily

time2 hours ago

  • Sinar Daily

Firefighters shot dead while battling wildfire in US

The incident occurred at approximately 1.30pm local time on Sunday after a brush fire broke out on Canfield Mountain. 30 Jun 2025 04:28pm The incident occurred at approximately 1.30pm local time (2030 GMT) on Sunday after a brush fire broke out on Canfield Mountain. - AFP file photo (photo for illustration purpose only) SAN FRANCISCO - At least two firefighters were shot and killed Sunday by unidentified suspects while responding to a wildfire near Coeur d'Alene in the US state of Idaho, local officials said. Kootenai County Sheriff Robert Norris told a press briefing that both victims were fire personnel, saying the number of the injured remains unknown, and the firefighting operation is ongoing, Xinhua reported. The incident occurred at approximately 1.30pm local time (2030 GMT) on Sunday after a brush fire broke out on Canfield Mountain. - AFP file photo (photo for illustration purpose only) The incident occurred at approximately 1.30pm local time (2030 GMT) on Sunday after a brush fire broke out on Canfield Mountain. As firefighters arrived at the scene about 30 minutes later, they came under gunfire from unknown individuals hiding in the woods, according to law enforcement sources. The shooter or shooters are using "modern-day sporting rifles," Norris said. The search for suspects is ongoing. According to Norris, the situation remains active and authorities are currently taking fire from multiple directions on the mountain. "We still have civilians who are coming off that mountain. We might have civilians that are stuck or in shock on that mountain, so this is a very, very fresh situation," Norris said. Authorities have not confirmed the number of shooters. Norris noted that if they aren't stopped soon, "this is likely to be a multiday operation." - BERNAMA-XINHUA

Peace is Not the Price of Palestinian Freedom
Peace is Not the Price of Palestinian Freedom

Sinar Daily

time2 hours ago

  • Sinar Daily

Peace is Not the Price of Palestinian Freedom

ACROSS political commentary and diplomatic discourse, a dangerous narrative persists. Palestinians must first prove themselves peaceful and orderly before being granted recognition as a state. Often framed as pragmatic, this demand is anything but. It reproduces a colonial logic that makes rights conditional, asking the oppressed to perform submission before they can be seen as worthy of sovereignty. Such reasoning must be confronted, whether voiced by diplomats, pundits or settler-state apologists. It is not simply a matter of misjudged policy or misplaced optimism. It is a discursive tactic that recasts colonisation as a technical failure of negotiation, allowing those in power to defer justice indefinitely while appearing reasonable. Beneath its surface lies an insistence that the oppressed must perform civility while being brutalised, that they must negotiate with the boot still on their necks. It reverses cause and effect, blames the colonised for their own erasure and casts the denial of basic rights as the path to peace. Palestinians have not refused peace. They have refused surrender. And it is long past time we stopped asking them to earn their humanity. Commentators often begin by expressing frustration with the lack of progress in the peace process. But this frustration quickly turns into blame, casting Palestinians as obstructionist. The claim that Palestinians reject peace because victimhood is more politically expedient is not only dehumanising. It is wilfully dishonest. It recasts systematic oppression as strategic manipulation. It imagines that suffering is staged, calibrated for political effect, as though Palestinian grief were a performance for international sympathy rather than a lived consequence of structural violence. In doing so, it trivialises the enormity of their dispossession and shifts attention away from the systems that produce it. It suggests that Palestinians wear suffering as a costume, rather than being forced into it by decades of siege, displacement and military rule. A Palestinian woman reacts as she sits amidst the rubble of Yaffa School in the Tuffah neighbourhood of Gaza City following overnight Israeli strikes, on June 30, 2025. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) This narrative flattens the complexities of struggle into caricature. It positions Palestinians not as political actors navigating the violence of statelessness but as cunning performers whose pain must be doubted, dissected or delayed. Such framing absolves those in power of accountability. It makes theatre out of survival and cynicism out of resistance. Palestinians have not rejected peace. They have rejected the obliteration of their political agency. There is a difference. And what is often framed as intransigence is, in truth, a refusal to be erased. It is a rejection of frameworks that ask the oppressed to forget their history, abandon their rights and sanitise their resistance in order to be granted the most basic political recognition. That refusal is not the barrier to peace. It is the condition of dignity. Assertions that recognising Palestine would hinder peace depend on a deliberate rewriting of history. From the Oslo Accords to the Arab Peace Initiative, Palestinian leadership has accepted frameworks for a two-state solution. It is Israel that has repeatedly undermined these frameworks by expanding illegal settlements, fragmenting territory and cementing a system of apartheid. Recognition of Palestine does not obstruct peace. Its denial is what has kept peace perpetually out of reach. Claims that Palestinians do not need a state are not only weak but also morally bankrupt. No people living under foreign military rule, denied the ability to move freely, bombarded from land and air and stripped of political autonomy can be said to have no need for self-determination. That such arguments continue to appear in mainstream outlets shows how comfortably colonial thought lives in the present. Some argue that recognising Palestine is merely performative. But the act of recognition is not symbolic. It is an affirmation of a right enshrined in international law. Palestinians, like all peoples, have a right to self-determination. Recognition is not a reward. It is an obligation. Those who call it virtue signalling ignore the fact that Palestinian survival depends on visibility, accountability and recognition within the global legal and political system. Critics often point to dysfunction within the Palestinian Authority as a reason to delay or deny statehood. But this misrepresents the cause of that dysfunction. The Authority operates under structural constraint. It has no real sovereignty, no control over its borders and no reliable access to resources. It is regularly bypassed by Israeli incursions and administrative control. Its weakness is not evidence of Palestinian unfitness. It is evidence of occupation. The most dangerous discourses are those that dehumanise. Palestinians are described through metaphors of animals and threats. Crocodiles. Vipers. Shadows. These are not neutral descriptions. They strip people of moral standing. They evoke fear, disgust and pre-emptive justification for violence. They make it easier to kill. And they make it harder for the world to care. Assertions that Palestinians would exploit statehood to intensify violence reinforce this same logic. The colonised are cast as innately treacherous. Their empowerment is feared. Their resistance is criminalised. Their historical trauma is erased. Palestinians gather around a huge crater after the Israeli army targeted the tents of displaced people in the northern Al-Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City on June 28, 2025. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) Meanwhile, Israel continues to receive recognition, weapons and diplomatic protection without condition. It is not held to any standard of restraint or morality. It is only the colonised who are told to earn their rights. The silences in these narratives are deafening. Nothing about the blockade on Gaza. Nothing about illegal settlements. Nothing about mass incarceration without trial. Nothing about the razing of entire communities. Nothing about the tens of thousands killed. To speak of peace without acknowledging this is not neutrality. It is complicity. Peace is not a gift to be awarded to the obedient. It is not a moral favour to be extended by the powerful. It is not something Palestinians must prove themselves worthy of. Peace follows justice. It does not precede it. And recognition of Palestinian statehood is not the final gesture. It is the first minimal step. We must abandon any framework that requires the colonised to behave according to the expectations of their colonisers. We must stop asking Palestinians to soften their demands, their voice or their grief. Justice does not accommodate comfort. It confronts power. And it reclaims the full humanity of those who have been denied it. If peace is to be real, it must begin by acknowledging that Palestinian statehood is not a prize. It is not an aspiration. It is a legal right. And it is long overdue. The world must stop rehearsing its moral credibility at the expense of Palestinian life. As long as we do, there will be neither peace nor justice. Only the deepening complicity of those who mistake neutrality for principle. Dr Siti Nurnadilla Mohamad Jamil is a linguist and discourse analyst whose research focuses on language, ideology, and the legitimisation of violence in media and political discourse. She is currently a Visiting Researcher at Lancaster University and an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at the International Islamic University Malaysia. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Sinar Daily.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store