Heir of Barne Estate ‘shocked' by €50,000 ‘luck penny' offer from John Magnier
Richard Thomson-Moore was giving evidence at the High Court on Wednesday in his defence relating to the failed €15 million agreement.
Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce the deal he claims he sealed with Mr Thomson-Moore in an alleged handshake agreement for the 751-acre farm on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to billionaire Maurice Regan.
Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not.
After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that the estate would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st and September 30th, 2023.
However, during September 2023, billionaire Maurice Regan offered about €20 million.
The trustees, who hold the estate, decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt the higher offer of Mr Regan could be seen as a 'provocative' one.
The court has heard that on September 7th, 2023 – two weeks after Mr Magnier claims he shook hands with Mr Thomson-Moore on the deal for the Barne Estate – Mr Magnier called to Barne with his son, JP.
The Thomson-Moores have told the court their estate agent, John Stokes, who had walked out with the Magniers, returned to the house with two brown envelopes given to him by JP containing a total of €50,000 in cash.
Mr Thomson-Moore told the court that he did not interrogate Mr Stokes about the purpose of the envelopes and that Mr Stokes explained their offering as a 'luck penny'.
A 'luck penny' is an amount of money given by a buyer to the seller after a deal is done to bring good luck.
The Magnier side have told the court that the money was a token of 'appreciation' to the Thomson-Moores for letting the Magnier side on to the land before any sale was finalised. The Magnier side were ultimately gazumped by US-based construction magnate Mr Regan, who offered a final €22.25 million, and was made the preferred bidder.
Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
At the High Court on Wednesday, Mr Thomson-Moore said the delivery of the money to their Barne home caused him 'shock' and said he felt the offer of 'envelopes stuffed with cash' was 'untoward'. The money was later returned by the Thomson-Moores.
Mr Thomson-Moore told defence barrister Niall Buckley SC that a guide price of €13.5 million had been advertised by the selling agents, which he thought was underpriced. He believed the property to be worth between €17.5 and €20 million, based on a comparative property in Co Kildare.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that Mr Magnier's retort to this valuation was 'slightly hostile', before an offer of €15 million was accepted by the Thomson-Moores at the Coolmore kitchen meeting.
Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, asked Mr Thomson-Moore about lists drawn up detailing the contents of the Barne mansion and asked why there were two lists – one 'complete' list, with a separate incomplete list going to the trustees of the estate.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that after the Magnier offer he was in talks organising an auction of the contents of Barne with Mealy's auction house.
Ms Geoghegan put it to Mr Thomson-Moore that his intention at this time was to give one list to the trustees that did not disclose all the items in the house.
She put it to him that his intent was to not disclose 'high-value items' to the trustees of the estate, which he denied.
'There is no ambiguity about the intention,' said Ms Geoghegan, 'a complete list and then a separate list for trustees.'
Mr Thomson-Moore said 'it didn't happen' but added: 'That is what it looks like, though, yes.'
The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding water infrastructure: the €12 billion spanner
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, or perhaps in the case of Uisce Éireann the dripping tap gets the €12 billion spanner. For months, the utility has been decrying its lack of funds at every opportunity in a concerted and coordinated fashion to ensure the Government and the public could be in no doubt that unless pipes went into the ground there would be no more homes. In March the utility's chairman Jerry Grant told a Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland conference that the State's water and sewerage systems were in 'a desperate state' because of 'extraordinary complacency' and 'passive indifference' to investment in infrastructure. The goal of building 50,000 homes on average each year could not be met unless there was a 'new approach from the Government' in developing water services, Grant said, READ MORE The utility has to be commended for taking this forthright approach. After all, the strategy worked. A hefty chunk has been allocated to Uisce Éireann u nder the National Development Pla n – €2 billion in equity funding, another €2.5 billion for new large-scale projects, and €7.6 billion to improve water services. The establishment of Irish Water was predicated on a model where, like other utility providers such as electricity and gas companies, user charges would provide its core funding. When in 2016 household charges were suspended and subsequently scrapped, the utility was left – so to speak – high and dry, largely reliant on the annual State budget which mitigated against long-term planning. Finally, the Government appears to be realising that certainty is funding is needed for these vital infrastructural investments, rather than State organisations having to wait to see what emerges in each budget. Private sector infrastructure investors in national projects need similar reassurance. Ministers now recognise the need to guarantee a flow of funding over a long period of years. Whether they can deliver on this if the budget numbers get tight is, of course, the big question.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account
A solicitor is facing three allegations of professional misconduct linked to his handling of a €100,000 deposit placed into his practice's client account. Michael A O'Brien, solicitor and principal of a firm of the same name based in Carrick on Suir, Co Tipperary , denies any wrongdoing. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority 's case against Mr O'Brien, being heard by the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal , follows a complaint by Dolores Barrett Burke who sought to invest €100,000 in a scheme to purchase the Heritage Hotel and Spa in 2018. She told the tribunal she was 'shocked' to read in a newspaper that the Co Laois hotel had instead been purchased by FBD Hotels & Resorts, yet Mr O'Brien made no attempt to return her money to her. READ MORE Ms Barrett Burke, who is retired and lives in Castlebar, Co Mayo , said she transferred the money after receiving a letter from Mr O'Brien in June 2018 that she believed provided the required assurances. The investment opportunity had been suggested to her by her brother-in-law Cyril Burke. The proposed purchase was being led by Mary Parton, a woman she never met, she said. However, she said she later learned FBD had purchased the hotel. She believed she would receive her money back 'in the same way I had sent it', but did not immediately worry about why it was not returned. More than a year later, she consulted her solicitor, Thomas J Walsh, who sent the first of a number of letters to Mr O'Brien seeking the return of the funds. After no reply to initial correspondence, the tribunal heard, Mr O'Brien responded to explain that the terms of his undertaking had been adhered to and the money had been dispensed in accordance with the instructions of his client, Ms Parton. Barrister Mark Finan, for Mr O'Brien, put it to Ms Barrett Burke that the letter his client sent to her clearly stated his understanding was that she would be paying the money into the client account 'for and on behalf of Mary Parton'. It was also put to her that, while she had indicated when making a complaint about Mr O'Brien to the Legal Services Regulatory Authority that she had engaged Mr O'Brien, she had never actually done so and was not, in fact, his client. 'I figured because I sent him the money and it was a client account, I was now a client,' she said. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on October 29th. In the interim, it is to be clarified whether the tribunal's chair, Tom Coughlan, is acquainted with Ms Barrett Burke's brother-in-law Cyril Burke. He told the hearing he became aware of a possible connection after seeing the list of witnesses and hearing the evidence but was not sure if it is the same Cyril Burke who he knows but not well.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Financial consultant who misappropriated funds to repay money, court told
A financial consultant has given a number of undertakings to the High Court to take steps to repay money he misappropriated from two companies he was engaged to wind up. Accountant David Kennedy and David Kennedy Financial Consulting of David Kennedy Financial Consulting Ltd, Orwell Shopping Centre, Templeogue, Dublin, consented to several orders, including judgment against him personally in the sum of €588,301 in favour of the two companies owned by third parties. On Wednesday, the court was told Mr Kennedy was taking steps to wind up his business, as he had a number of other liquidations which he had to deal with beforehand. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said it was a matter of significant concern that in circumstances where Mr Kennedy admitted misappropriation and breach of duties that he could 'possibly continue for a day longer as a liquidator'. READ MORE Micheál D O'Connell SC, for the defendants, said the orders made preclude him from misappropriating funds for other 50 companies he was dealing and it was necessary that they be wound down in an orderly fashion. It is anticipated allowing him to continue in his role for the time being will enable him to improve the situation not only in relation to the clients in this case but to others who are affected. Jarlath Ryan SC, for the plaintiff companies, said his side was satisfied that was addressed by obligations in the part of the orders restraining him from only to paying €1,000 per business transaction apart from normal wages, all monitored by the liquidators put in to replace him. He also must 'come clean' and disclose all other assets, he said. The judge said he wanted the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) to be notified and supplied with court papers so that it could tell the court whether it wished to be a notice party in the case. The other orders require that Mr Kennedy is only entitled to €15,000 in living expenses until the end of October and that he repay funds he had diverted from the plaintiff companies and restraining him from reducing assets in his consulting company below €588,301. He must also transfer €300,000 from a Bank of Ireland account he held to Micheál Leydon, the receiver who has now been appointed by the court to recover the funds. The court heard he had already transferred €200,000 from that account back to receivers who replaced in as liquidators of the plaintiff companies. He must deliver to those liquidators all books and records of those companies. The court heard gardaí were investigating him and had removed records and the Office of Corporate Enforcement had also been notified. The orders provide that proceedings against his wife, Danielle Colgan, who is also a defendant, can be adjourned generally on payment of €19,000 to the receiver. Mr O'Connell said she was the unknowing recipient of funds from her husband. Ms Colgan is the sole shareholder of David Kennedy Financial Consulting. Earlier this month, the court granted orders freezing assets of the defendants below €800,000, the sum which Mr Kennedy was engaged to capitalise on behalf of the two plaintiff companies. When the case returned, the court was told Mr Kennedy had 'put his hands up' in relation to the misappropriation and wished to be as much assistance as he can in recovering the money. Mr Justice Cregan adjourned the case to October but said in the meantime he would like to hear from the ACCA in relation to possibly making it a notice party.
