Heir of Barne Estate ‘shocked' by €50,000 ‘luck penny' offer from John Magnier
Richard Thomson-Moore was giving evidence at the High Court on Wednesday in his defence relating to the failed €15 million agreement.
Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce the deal he claims he sealed with Mr Thomson-Moore in an alleged handshake agreement for the 751-acre farm on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to billionaire Maurice Regan.
Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not.
After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that the estate would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st and September 30th, 2023.
However, during September 2023, billionaire Maurice Regan offered about €20 million.
The trustees, who hold the estate, decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt the higher offer of Mr Regan could be seen as a 'provocative' one.
The court has heard that on September 7th, 2023 – two weeks after Mr Magnier claims he shook hands with Mr Thomson-Moore on the deal for the Barne Estate – Mr Magnier called to Barne with his son, JP.
The Thomson-Moores have told the court their estate agent, John Stokes, who had walked out with the Magniers, returned to the house with two brown envelopes given to him by JP containing a total of €50,000 in cash.
Mr Thomson-Moore told the court that he did not interrogate Mr Stokes about the purpose of the envelopes and that Mr Stokes explained their offering as a 'luck penny'.
A 'luck penny' is an amount of money given by a buyer to the seller after a deal is done to bring good luck.
The Magnier side have told the court that the money was a token of 'appreciation' to the Thomson-Moores for letting the Magnier side on to the land before any sale was finalised. The Magnier side were ultimately gazumped by US-based construction magnate Mr Regan, who offered a final €22.25 million, and was made the preferred bidder.
Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
At the High Court on Wednesday, Mr Thomson-Moore said the delivery of the money to their Barne home caused him 'shock' and said he felt the offer of 'envelopes stuffed with cash' was 'untoward'. The money was later returned by the Thomson-Moores.
Mr Thomson-Moore told defence barrister Niall Buckley SC that a guide price of €13.5 million had been advertised by the selling agents, which he thought was underpriced. He believed the property to be worth between €17.5 and €20 million, based on a comparative property in Co Kildare.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that Mr Magnier's retort to this valuation was 'slightly hostile', before an offer of €15 million was accepted by the Thomson-Moores at the Coolmore kitchen meeting.
Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, asked Mr Thomson-Moore about lists drawn up detailing the contents of the Barne mansion and asked why there were two lists – one 'complete' list, with a separate incomplete list going to the trustees of the estate.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that after the Magnier offer he was in talks organising an auction of the contents of Barne with Mealy's auction house.
Ms Geoghegan put it to Mr Thomson-Moore that his intention at this time was to give one list to the trustees that did not disclose all the items in the house.
She put it to him that his intent was to not disclose 'high-value items' to the trustees of the estate, which he denied.
'There is no ambiguity about the intention,' said Ms Geoghegan, 'a complete list and then a separate list for trustees.'
Mr Thomson-Moore said 'it didn't happen' but added: 'That is what it looks like, though, yes.'
The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
25 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘Year of change' at Rye River Brewing sees losses rise despite jump in sales
Rye River Brewing , the Kildare -based craft brewer, has reported a more than €521,000 after-tax loss for 2024 as commercial and one-off project costs ate into rising gross profits at the Celbridge -headquartered company. The brewer moved into contract brewing this year with a deal to produce the popular Galway Hooker brand of beers. In spite of the losses, chief executive and founder Tom Cronin described it as a strong period for the business amid a decline in the wider craft beer market and what he described as a 'big year of change' for Rye River. Speaking to The Irish Times this week, Mr Cronin said the brewery moved away from its 24-hour, seven-day production cycle last year after it commissioned and installed a new brewhouse. READ MORE He said Rye River, which rebranded from McGargles in 2021, is now home to the fourth-largest brewhouse in Ireland and the largest among independent brewers. 'We never stopped production throughout the installation and commissioning programme, which was a feat in its own right,' he said. 'We also took occupancy of a new 16,000sq ft warehouse on site, which again was constructed without any downtime to operations in 2024.' [ Rye River Brewing Company secures €3.3m from sale of HQ facility Opens in new window ] New accounts filed by DP Financial, the trading company behind the brewery, reveal that turnover expanded by 7 per cent in the year to more than €9.1 million, which Mr Cronin said was driven by 'strong domestic and export performance'. He said Rye River grew its sales volumes by 17.7 per cent as the company 'pivots and adapts to the industry challenges'. After-tax losses widened from €458,536 to slightly more than €521,000 as distribution costs and administrative expenses jumped. Administrative costs – which jumped by about 7 per cent to €1.85 million, largely due to one-off project costs associated with the new brewhouse – bit into the brewery's €1.97 million gross profit, leaving it with an operating loss of €297,663. Rye River's distribution costs jumped by almost 20 per cent to more than €440,000 in 2024, which Mr Cronin said related to an increase in headcount and the impact of the increase in the minimum wage. The company employed 66 people last year, an increase of four from 2023. The filings also reveal that it extended its €2.75 million loan agreement with Elm Corporate Credit in December. Elm, a credit vehicle established in 2018 to lend to Irish SMEs, is a subsidiary of Dublin-based private credit firm DunPort Capital , which controls the majority of Rye River's shares, according to its most recent annual return. Looking ahead, Mr Cronin said RY River has traded well in the first half of the year but 'will need to adapt further' in the second half, due to the likely impact of US president Donald Trump 's tariff agenda. He said rising non-domestic water charges will also impact costs. Earlier this year, Rye River announced that it would take over the production of the Galway Hooker beer range from Connacht Group on a contract basis as consolidation in the craft beer industry continues apace.
Irish Times
25 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Guinness Storehouse offered as location for Ireland's EU presidency events
The Guinness Storehouse has been offered as a potential location for events during Ireland's presidency of the European Union next year. The offer was made during a meeting between Guinness owners Diageo and Micheál Martin when US president Donald Trump's threatened import tariffs were also discussed. A Lobbying Register return shows Diageo sought the meeting to 'ensure awareness of the business impact of the US tariffs' as well as to discuss the Irish and EU response. Ireland takes on the presidency of the Council of the European Union in the second half of 2026 and it is expected a summit of leaders and 22 meetings of ministers from all bloc's states will be hosted here. READ MORE Dublin's Guinness Storehouse tourist attraction previously featured on the itinerary of the late Queen Elizabeth II during her 2011 visit to Ireland. A note of an April 11th meeting between Diageo Ireland managing director Barry O'Sullivan and Mr Martin, released by the Department of the Taoiseach in response to a Freedom of Information request, said Diageo 'offered to work with the Irish Government in context of forthcoming Irish presidency of the EU'. It is understood the company offered the use of the Guinness Storehouse at St James's Gate and other facilities as possible locations to host events. The note of the meeting also said the discussion 'mainly focused' on latest developments in EU-US trade and the 'potential implications of tariffs for Ireland-US trade, the impact of ongoing uncertainty on investment decisions, and the close integration between markets on both parts of the island, and with Great Britain'. The two sides 'agreed to stay in contact'. Diageo is also said to have 'provided an update on their business and investment plans in Ireland, noting in particular the success of the Guinness Zero brand.' Neither Diageo or the Department of the Taoiseach offered further detail in response to queries from The Irish Times on what was discussed in relation to 'uncertainty on investment decisions' and whether there were implications for any of the company's plans in Ireland. Diageo was among a number of other drinks manufacturers and representative organisations that attended a separate meeting with the Taoiseach, also on April 11th. A note of that meeting shows that lobby organisation Drinks Ireland warned that Ireland's plans for health labels on alcohol products had been 'identified as a barrier to trade by the US'. The industry was said to be 'open to labelling requirements', but was seeking a delay in their introduction. Mr Martin is said to have 'noted the comments of Drinks Ireland in this regard'. The Government decided on Tuesday to delay the labelling measure for two years until 2028 amid continuing trade uncertainty.
Irish Times
25 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor weaving ‘wholly false' narrative over nature of land deal, High Court told
Suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan is advancing a 'wholly false' narrative that two businessmen who signed a Co Mayo €250,000 land transfer deal knew that sum was never to be paid to a company of one of them, the High Court has been told. That narrative is that the 2006 deal for transfer of the lands owned by Nirvanna Holdings, a company of businessman Tom Fleming, to a now deceased businessman, Fred Preston, was 'a business venture that simply went wrong', barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin said. He was making submissions for Mr Fleming on Wednesday at the outset of an appeal by Mr O'Callaghan against four counts of professional misconduct found against him last year by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal arising from his handling of the deal. The three-member tribunal recommended Mr O'Callaghan be struck off the roll of solicitors. A strike-off application by the Law Society to the High Court is on hold pending the outcome of Mr O'Callaghan's appeal. READ MORE He has been suspended since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon . Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report included that he withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child. On Wednesday, barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he would be calling three witnesses in the appeal: Mr O'Callaghan; Niamh Creighton, a solicitor in Mr O'Callaghan's office in 2006; and another solicitor who acted for Mr Preston in various matters. Mr Ó Ciaráin said Mr Fleming was his only witness and asked Mr Justice Micheál O'Higgins to keep 'three facts' in mind throughout the hearing. These are that a deed for transfer of land for €250,000 was entered into, the land did transfer and Nirvanna never got the €250,000, he said. The appeal, he said, would involve Mr O'Callaghan's side 'trying to distract you from those three facts', which gave rise to breaches of a solicitor's duties. The breaches are a failure to ensure consideration for a transaction was on account before effecting the land transfer; failure, by acting for vendor and purchaser, to avoid conflict of interest; and failure to advise shareholders of Nirvanna separately regarding the conveyance and to get their own advice, he said. Mr O'Callaghan's side would take 'one particular true fact' – that Mr Fleming retained a share in a company called Western Concrete – and 'weave that into a narrative that is wholly false, that it was simply a business venture gone wrong', he said. In direct evidence, Mr Fleming (now aged 81) said he left school at 13, is dyslexic, can read but cannot write. After suffering a heart attack in 2005 he decided to step away from some of his work and business involvement and believed he ceased any involvement with Western Concrete in 2005. In cross-examination, he agreed his case is that the Co Mayo land was to be sold by Nirvanna to Fred Preston for €250,000 and Nirvanna never got the money. Mr Mullooly said Mr O'Callaghan would say his law firm was acting for Western Concrete regarding the deal, which arose in the context of a joint agreement between Mr Fleming and Mr Preston. Mr Fleming described as 'totally wrong' a suggestion he and Mr Preston instructed Mr O'Callaghan that they were putting together a joint venture and the Nirvanna lands were required as security for a bank's loan offer. He did not know he was still a shareholder in Western Concrete in 2006, he said. He ceased being a director of that company in 2005 and was unaware he still retained one share in 2006. Mr Preston, the court heard, held the other share. Ms Creighton phoned him in his car on November 20th, 2006, to say would need to get another solicitor in relation to the land transfer deal and, shortly after her call, Mr O'Callaghan phoned him to say he would not need another solicitor, that Mr O'Callaghan would take care of it, he said. When told Ms Creighton and Mr O'Callaghan both disputed saying what he alleged, he stood over his evidence. He disagreed with Mr Mullooly his account of the deal was 'so inconsistent' it was hard to conclude Mr O'Callaghan's account of events was not accurate. The appeal continues on Thursday.
