Heir of Barne Estate ‘shocked' by €50,000 ‘luck penny' offer from John Magnier
Richard Thomson-Moore was giving evidence at the High Court on Wednesday in his defence relating to the failed €15 million agreement.
Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce the deal he claims he sealed with Mr Thomson-Moore in an alleged handshake agreement for the 751-acre farm on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home.
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to billionaire Maurice Regan.
Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not.
After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that the estate would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st and September 30th, 2023.
However, during September 2023, billionaire Maurice Regan offered about €20 million.
The trustees, who hold the estate, decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt the higher offer of Mr Regan could be seen as a 'provocative' one.
The court has heard that on September 7th, 2023 – two weeks after Mr Magnier claims he shook hands with Mr Thomson-Moore on the deal for the Barne Estate – Mr Magnier called to Barne with his son, JP.
The Thomson-Moores have told the court their estate agent, John Stokes, who had walked out with the Magniers, returned to the house with two brown envelopes given to him by JP containing a total of €50,000 in cash.
Mr Thomson-Moore told the court that he did not interrogate Mr Stokes about the purpose of the envelopes and that Mr Stokes explained their offering as a 'luck penny'.
A 'luck penny' is an amount of money given by a buyer to the seller after a deal is done to bring good luck.
The Magnier side have told the court that the money was a token of 'appreciation' to the Thomson-Moores for letting the Magnier side on to the land before any sale was finalised. The Magnier side were ultimately gazumped by US-based construction magnate Mr Regan, who offered a final €22.25 million, and was made the preferred bidder.
Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
At the High Court on Wednesday, Mr Thomson-Moore said the delivery of the money to their Barne home caused him 'shock' and said he felt the offer of 'envelopes stuffed with cash' was 'untoward'. The money was later returned by the Thomson-Moores.
Mr Thomson-Moore told defence barrister Niall Buckley SC that a guide price of €13.5 million had been advertised by the selling agents, which he thought was underpriced. He believed the property to be worth between €17.5 and €20 million, based on a comparative property in Co Kildare.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that Mr Magnier's retort to this valuation was 'slightly hostile', before an offer of €15 million was accepted by the Thomson-Moores at the Coolmore kitchen meeting.
Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, asked Mr Thomson-Moore about lists drawn up detailing the contents of the Barne mansion and asked why there were two lists – one 'complete' list, with a separate incomplete list going to the trustees of the estate.
Mr Thomson-Moore said that after the Magnier offer he was in talks organising an auction of the contents of Barne with Mealy's auction house.
Ms Geoghegan put it to Mr Thomson-Moore that his intention at this time was to give one list to the trustees that did not disclose all the items in the house.
She put it to him that his intent was to not disclose 'high-value items' to the trustees of the estate, which he denied.
'There is no ambiguity about the intention,' said Ms Geoghegan, 'a complete list and then a separate list for trustees.'
Mr Thomson-Moore said 'it didn't happen' but added: 'That is what it looks like, though, yes.'
The case continues before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Tapped out: What went wrong for Killarney Brewing and Distilling?
ONCE considered one of Ireland's most ambitious independent drinks ventures, the Killarney Brewing and Distilling Company confirmed it would cease operations this week following the unsuccessful conclusion of its examinership process. The business, which was appointed a liquidator this week, had diversified over time to offer craft brewing and whiskey production, as well as hospitality and tourism offerings. The brewery had been trading since 2015, after garnering strong interest from Irish-American investors to create something new and sellable to the US market. But a challenging few years, underpinned by the pandemic and significant overspends, led to a pile-up of debts that could not be paid, ultimately resulting in the collapse of the multimillion-euro enterprise. Among the list of creditors mentioned in court filings are individual investors and local small businesses, with amounts owed ranging from €147 to over €823,000, the effects of which will be felt from Killarney to across the Atlantic in Illinois. The Killarney Brewery began its story in August 2013, when it was founded by Paul Sheehan, Tim O'Donoghue, and Liam Healy, who set out to develop a craft brewery and restaurant in Killarney. The three founders all had deep ties to the US, with Mr Sheehan and Mr O'Donoghue having both lived and worked in Chicago for more than a decade, while Mr Healy resided there full time. The trio set out to raise funds in the US for the ambitious project. They ultimately raised €1.2m, which was used to renovate the property they had leased on Muckross Rd in Killarney. The company commenced trading in 2015 and, just three years later, had already begun formulating an expansion plan to create a larger brewery, distillery, and visitor experience. To achieve this, the company purchased a site spanning over four acres at Killalee in Fossa. It then set about raising additional funds using its network of US investors. The successful funding round saw the group raise more than €12m, commencing construction in 2019. A further €6m was raised throughout 2020 and 2021 through EII schemes, an Irish tax relief scheme for investors who fund qualifying Irish SMEs. In addition, the company also anticipated preselling 1,000 casks of whiskey that it said would have yielded up to €7m. While it secured ample funding from a diversified pool of investors, the construction phase was heavily disrupted by the pandemic. Related costs soared by 36%. This was compounded by the company's limited trading ability due to lockdown restrictions. The total overspend on construction rose to €8m, impacting the company's profitability and cashflow, High Court documents show. This led to the business having a limited ability to promote and sell the intended presale of 1,000 casks, which added to its cashflow challenges. To offset pandemic overspends, the group borrowed some €4.4m from a number of sources in late 2022. Killarney Brewing & Distillery Company, Fossa, Killarney. Picture: Don MacMonagle The new Fossa facility eventually opened around the same time, with the distillery commencing operations around 12 months later in late 2023. Around this time, the group went back to the market to raise a 'Series C' €7m in additional capital to repay debts, launch and market its whiskey product in the US, and provide working capital to secure future profitability. The group also anticipated raising a further €4m through the EII scheme. THE 'Series C' funding round proved to be more challenging than anticipated, with just €3.5m being raised. Complications also arose with investments through the EII scheme, which the company said were a result of changes to the government scheme in 2024. At the end of last year, the company's cumulative trading losses had grown to almost €2m, according to High Court documents. The company also had liabilities in excess of assets of €3.27m at the end of last year, which made it balance sheet insolvent. Between 2020 and 2024, it incurred cumulative trading losses of €3.35m. It was also cashflow insolvent and not in a position to discharge related outstanding loans. The group entered discussions with potential investors in 2024, which were unsuccessful. In January of this year, the group attempted to strike a deal with a US-based private equity investor group. This would have potentially seen an injection of up to €15m in the company. However, rapid changes in the global trade climate and a rising threat of tariffs led to one of the parties involved dropping out of the process in early April, causing the group to ultimately withdraw its investment intent in the immediate short term. On April 17, an interim examiner was appointed to the company. At that time, the business had dozens of creditors and owed more than €8m. Included in the list of creditors of the brewing company were Kerry County Council, which was owed an outstanding amount of just over €108,000, and the Revenue Commissioners, who were owed €143,400. But the repercussions extend far beyond just government bodies, with High Court filings of creditors showing the sizeable human cost felt by the brewery's financial challenges. It also had an outstanding loan with Bailmo Limited, which held an all-assets debenture of the company, totalling almost €2.9m at the end of March this year. On Tuesday, the Killarney Brewing and Distilling Company the unsuccessful conclusion of its examinership process. The High Court appointing James Anderson, of Deloitte, as a liquidator over the company. More than 50 jobs will be lost as a result. In its last public statement, the company said: 'Like many in the drinks manufacturing industry, KBD has faced significant and sustained challenges in recent years, stemming from the lasting effects of the pandemic, delays in opening our state-of-the-art distillery in Fossa, global supply chain disruptions, rising input costs, and ongoing geopolitical and trading pressures. 'More recently, high tariffs on Irish whiskey exports to the US and wider economic uncertainty have further impacted the business. The company would like to express its sincere and heartfelt thanks to our exceptional employees, whose dedication, resilience, and passion never wavered throughout this incredibly difficult time. 'We are also deeply grateful to our shareholders and wider investment community for their support and belief in our vision, and to our loyal customers, partners, and the local community in Killarney who have stood by us at every turn. 'We remain proud of what we've built together and the craft, care, and creativity that defined our journey.' Read More Killarney brewing company collapse: covid cost overruns and whiskey tariffs blamed
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Amazon is not the only multinational losing confidence in Ireland. Will a €102bn plan fix it?
This week we got a State investment plan with no list of projects and a pre-budget document with no estimate of the likely position of the public finances next year. Economic nerds like me felt short-changed. The first document was all uppy stuff about boosting investment and securing the future. The second doubled down on the scary backdrop provided by a changed world and the unpredictable actions of Donald Trump . The Government has clearly made a political decision to 'go for it' on State investment. But the document published this week was more a manifesto for the multinationals than a plan. It was a pitch to foreign investors, who have become increasingly outspoken about Ireland's energy and water infrastructure and the lack of housing for their staff . And it was a bid to try to allay public concern – on housing in particular. The head-wrecking details, including how to deliver it all – most notably in housing – are still being worked out. The decision by Amazon to abandon a project in northwest Dublin because of problems getting an electricity connection is by no means a first. There has been a building crisis of confidence in corporate headquarters in the US about Ireland's ability to deliver on these areas – and this week's plans are an attempt to send a message to these American boardrooms, who are central to our economic wellbeing. They will also look for evidence that Ireland can actually make this happen - reassurances over the years that the key infrastructure areas were being addressed have not been delivered on. READ MORE And so we have a €102 billion, five-year investment plan. It is, for sure, heading in the right direction. The Fiscal Council has estimated that Ireland's infrastructure is 20 per cent to 25 per cent behind other richer EU countries. In this context, the recent growth rate of the economy has been remarkable. But Ireland is now running hard into the infrastructural buffers. Turning this investment manifesto into a fully coherent plan and then implementing it will be a big task. Ireland has struggled to deliver on the scale of promised investment in recent years; Covid was factor, for sure, but the State missed opportunities to cash in on a time of fiscal plenty. Now, it plans to boost investment plans just as the outlook is getting uncertain. It is necessary – but it also carries some risk. It looks like a turning point may be approaching in the national finances, when more difficult decisions await and trade-offs have to be faced up to. The State has been swimming in cash in recent years – but the budget surplus is being eaten away. And this means some politically difficult choices, which have yet to be squarely faced. Corporate tax is still funding a spending rise across the board. The Government plans to increase current spending by almost 6.5 per cent next year, well ahead of inflation. However, the combination of a big investment plan and Donald Trump's policy decisions are changing Ireland's fiscal arithmetic. In the spring, the forecast budget surplus of revenue over spending for next year was €6.3 billion. And that was before any tariffs. This week's document does not update that figure. But on the basis of what we now know from this week's documents, economists have cut this forecast to around €2 billion. [ Taoiseach to 'delve into' Amazon's scrapping of Dublin plant over failure to secure power supply Opens in new window ] As Goodbody stockbroker economist Dermot O'Leary pointed out, this is a small margin for error in the light of the tariff threats and the hugely concentrated nature of our tax base. And the gamble is not so much that the State might have to borrow a bit for a few years to ramp up investment. It is that a bigger hole might appear, because such a large part of our corporate tax is potentially transitory – based on multinational tax planning rather than economic activity here – and that policy changes in the US could lead to some of this cash leaving. The Fiscal Council estimates that subtracting the tax planning froth, the public finances would be heading for a deficit next year of €13 billion. [ Corporation tax surge a sign investors have not been put off by economic uncertainty just yet Opens in new window ] Now we are, of course, into 'crying wolf' territory here. The council, Central Bank, Department of Finance and most of us who write about economics have been warning about this risk for years. In the meantime, the tax paid by multinationals has just kept heading higher. And this may not be over yet. The Fiscal Council has said that corporate tax may again outperform this year compared to forecasts, which could give the Government some leeway in 2026. But that does not remove the risk of hanging on to a tax pile which has grown so large than it has now attracted jealous eyes not only from the rest of the EU but from Washington DC. And the State investment plans lower the room for manoeuvre if something goes wrong. If you plan to spend another €34 billion over the next five years, it has to come from somewhere, and using an expected budget surplus each year to help pay is part of the plan. Already, there are signs of the budget scope tightening. We are seeing the potential juggling in Budget 2026, with the hospitality VAT rate possibly deferred until midyear to leave scope for an income tax package. But that is a bet that the cash will be there to pay for a full-year VAT cut in 2027. And this is really only budgetary small beer, if the Government is to really slow the growth of day-to-day spending to leave room for more State investment. If it does not, then any fall-off to corporate tax will leave tricky decisions. For example, the Government is committed to putting money into two State funds for the future. It is legally obliged to do so, though can stop if there is a downturn. But if the numbers do get tight, does the State borrow cash to then invest in these funds – which would look very strange? Or does it divert money from other cash holdings? Sitting watching will be the National Treasury Management Agency, which was set up to borrow on behalf of the State. It has had a quiet time on this front in recent years, with the budget in surplus and a requirement just to keep things ticking over and refinance maturing debt. Now, as the State finances tighten, it may soon be back in business.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Can former building giant CRH boss Albert Manifold bring clarity to struggling BP?
BP's appointment of Albert Manifold , former CEO of Irish building materials giant CRH , as its new chairman sparked a muted response from investors. BP shares barely budged, reflecting scepticism over Manifold's lack of oil and gas experience. Reports suggest Manifold was not BP's first choice. At 62, he steps into a role far removed from cement and construction, with an energy giant struggling with debt, strategic confusion, and activist investor pressure. It is, said Panmure Liberum, a 'panic' and 'proper left-field appointment'. The counter argument is that Manifold's credentials speak volumes. CRH shares more than tripled under his 11-year leadership, turning a modest regional player into a US-listed $63 billion (€53.6 billion) global powerhouse through disciplined capital allocation, aggressive portfolio reshaping, and operational efficiency. READ MORE BP shareholders will hope his reputation as a shrewd operator who cuts bloat and boosts cash flow is what the company needs after years of costly missteps in renewables and faltering upstream performance. Critics worry Manifold's skills as a CEO may not translate to chairmanship. However, BP's board clearly values his pragmatic approach and investor-focused track record. On that front, there is already speculation Manifold might consider switching BP's listing to the US, as he did with CRH, aiming for a higher valuation. With BP pivoting back to oil and gas, amid ongoing asset sales and cost-cutting drives, Manifold faces a daunting challenge: to bring strategic clarity and restore shareholder faith. It may be an unconventional hire, but BP shareholders will hope a fresh perspective is just what the doctor ordered.
