US government employee banned from leaving China
WASHINGTON (AP) — A U.S. government employee has been banned from leaving China after traveling there in a personal capacity, the State Department said Tuesday, marking the latest case where Beijing has stopped U.S. nationals from departing the country.
The State Department did not reveal the identity of the employee at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which is part of the Commerce Department, but said it is 'tracking this case very closely' and that it is engaged with Chinese officials to resolve the situation as quickly as possible.
'The Department of State has no higher priority than the safety and security of American citizens,' it said.
The Chinese government restricts people from leaving the country if they are involved in investigations, including business disputes, but it has been accused of using the tool to arbitrarily keep both Chinese and foreign nationals in the country.
China's use of the exit ban and other concerns previously prompted the State Department to tell Americans to reconsider travel to China. The travel advisory was only eased in November after China released three U.S. citizens who were detained for years.
It's one of the latest instances of such travel restrictions. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Chenyue Mao, a U.S.-based Wells Fargo banker, was blocked from leaving China, prompting the bank to suspend all travel to the country.
Citing 'privacy and other considerations,' the State Department did not comment on Mao's case.
Wells Fargo said Tuesday that it is 'closely tracking this situation and working through the appropriate channels so our employee can return to the United States as soon as possible.'
Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, said Mao is 'involved in a criminal case currently being handled by Chinese law-enforcement authorities' and that she is 'subject to exit restrictions in accordance with the law.'
'Let me stress that it is an individual judicial case,' Guo said. 'China will as always welcome people from all countries to travel and do business in China and ensure their rights and interests in accordance with the law.'
Asked about the case involving the U.S. government employee, Guo said: 'I have no details to share. China upholds the rule of law and handles entry and exit affairs in accordance with the law.'
Other Americans have faced China's exit ban. Two American siblings were only allowed to leave China in 2021 after they were stranded there for three years after visiting their relatives.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wells Fargo Raises PT on Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT); Maintains ‘Buy' Rating
Health Catalyst, Inc. (NASDAQ:HCAT), having a share price under $10, strong hedge fund interest, and a low price-to-earnings ratio, ranks among the . A data center operator working on a rack of servers, emphasizing the company's cloud services. On July 1, 2025, Wells Fargo set its price target at $10 for Health Catalyst, Inc. (NASDAQ:HCAT), maintaining a 'Buy' rating. HCAT's shares are currently trading at around $4, implying a significant upside as per the analyst. The analyst believes that Health Catalyst, Inc. (NASDAQ:HCAT) is valued much lower than its peers, which sets the company up for future growth through consistent performance. The firm expects positive growth in the company's bookings in the upcoming Q2, which is likely to boost investor sentiment. Meanwhile, the company's strong revenue visibility for 2025 is noted, along with an anticipated acceleration in its DOS client growth. Looking ahead, the analyst expects the company to improve its dollar-based retention rate, enhancing its customer loyalty and revenue base. Legislative uncertainties, on the other hand, are expected to be short-term concerns with minimal long-term impact. Lastly, the company's EBITDA growth was also highlighted as a key reason for the optimistic outlook. With Health Catalyst Ignite, a cloud-based data and analytics platform, Health Catalyst, Inc. (NASDAQ:HCAT) serves healthcare entities, enhancing clinical, financial, and operational results. It is included in our list of the best cloud stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of HCAT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 14 Cheap Transportation Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Best Mineral Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carney's ministers say Hong Kong's new arrest warrants for exiles a threat to Canadians' security
Two ministers in Prime Minister Mark Carney's government are condemning Hong Kong police's new arrest warrants for 19 overseas-based activists and their offer of rewards for information leading to their capture. Officers have accused the activists of violating a national security law imposed by Beijing. In a joint statement Saturday afternoon, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand and Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said "the actions taken by Hong Kong threaten the sovereignty of Canada and security of the people in this country." "This attempt by Hong Kong authorities to conduct transnational repression abroad, including by issuing threats, intimidation or coercion against Canadians or those in Canada, will not be tolerated." On Friday, a Hong King police statement said the group, called Hong Kong Parliament, aimed to promote self-determination and establish a "Hong Kong constitution," alleging it was using illegal means to overthrow and undermine China's fundamental system or overthrow the institutions in power in the city or China. At the request of police, the city's court issued arrest warrants for activists Elmer Yuen, Johnny Fok, Tony Choi, Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai and 14 others. They are alleged to have organized or participated in an election abroad for the Hong Kong Parliament, as well as setting up or becoming members of the group. While the group calls itself Hong Kong Parliament, its electoral organizing committee was founded in Toronto in 2022 and its influence is limited. Anand and Anandasangaree said the people targeted by Hong Kong authorities "include Canadians and people with close ties to Canada." The ministers also said Canada reiterates previous calls to repeal the national security law and withdraw all related warrants and bounties. Ministers say bounties amplified online Among the 19 activists, police have already offered 1 million Hong Kong dollars ($174,580 Cdn) for information leading to the arrest of Yuen, Ho, Fok and Choi when warrants for separate activities were issued. For the remaining 15 people, rewards of 200,000 Hong Kong dollars ($34,915 Cdn) were offered, urging residents to provide information about the case or the people. WATCH l Victor Ho of B.C. was among 6 named in a previous announcement: Anand and Anandasangaree said this "marks the third time that international bounties were issued by Hong Kong and represents a deeply troubled escalation in the use of transnational repression by the People's Republic of China." In their statement, the ministers added that Rapid Response Mechanism Canada, which supports Canada's global push to counter foreign state-sponsored disinformation, detected the bounties were being amplified "in an inauthentic and co-ordinated way" through online accounts targeting Chinese-speaking communities. Hong Kong authorities have issued other arrest warrants over the past two years for various activists based overseas, including former pro-democracy lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk may not be the president, but he still has cards to play against Trump
"Knowing Elon the way I know him, I do think he's going to do everything to damage the president." So declared Elon Musk's former friend and business associate Philip Low, who has known the Tesla and SpaceX tycoon for 14 years, in a recent interview with Politico. Those remarks seemed to be borne out last week when Musk renewed his on-again, off-again feud with Donald Trump by attacking Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" and proposing to form a new political party — which he now claims to be moving forward with. Trump responded in kind, suggesting he would "take a look" at revoking Musk's citizenship and that he "might have to put DOGE on Elon". As The Independent reported last month, there are a great many ways that Trump could try to hurt Musk, from targeting his companies with federal investigations to deportation or even criminal investigations. But Musk is not without cards to play. Through his vast wealth, his business empire, and his ability to martial a zealous online fanbase, he has plenty of ways to make life difficult for his erstwhile "buddy". So if the world's richest person really wants this fight, what punches could he throw? A money hose for Trump's opponents The first and most obvious weapon in Musk's arsenal is his vast wealth: an estimated $405 billion, according to Forbes. In the 2024 election, Musk plowed $295 million into supporting Republican candidates, chiefly Trump himself. That's a huge amount in American politics, but it's chump change for today's mega-rich. For context, across the whole of 2023 and 2024, the total amount of money raised by all presidential candidates was only $2 billion, according to the Federal Election Commission. Congressional candidates raised $3.8 billion, while PACs raised a more respectable $15.7 billion. Matching those amounts wouldn't be trivial for Elon Musk, because like most of the world's richest people his wealth is tied up in stocks that can't easily be unloaded all at once. Still, based on Wednesday's share prices, he could pay for the entire 2024 election cycle by liquidating just one fifth of his reported $130 billion stake in Tesla. We have a sense already of how Musk might use this money. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he said on Monday. He's suggested he'd donate to Republican representative Thomas Massie, a persistent critic of Trump's. And there's still another $100 million Musk previously promised Trump that he could decide to withhold. He could even give money to Democrats, who will likely take it (although Trump has threatened 'serious consequences' in that scenario). They are politicians, after all. Then there's Musk's proposed new party, dubbed 'the America Party'. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' he said on Saturday. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' In a follow-up tweet, he suggested the party would be a 'centrist' entity aiming to slash government spending, cut regulations, stimulate technological progress, increase birth rates, and support 'free speech' (though Musk himself has a troubled relationship with that last term). Musk's proposed strategy is to 'laser-focus' enormous effort on just a few Senate and House districts, in the hope of acting as a tiebreaker in tight votes between Republicans and Democrats. In general, the USA's first-past-the-post electoral system means third parties find it almost impossible to get a seat in Congress. The America Party would need a sizeable grassroots contingent in order to get any campaigns off the ground. Meanwhile, Musk's notion that 80 percent of the USA agrees with his opinions seems disconnected from reality. The polling expert Nate Silver puts his net favorability rating at a weighted average of -18 percent, which is considerably worse than Trump himself. Nevertheless, his billions mean the new party won't want for resources. And even if third parties don't win, they can still leech votes from larger parties and force them to change their policies. Of course, money isn't everything — as Musk himself found out when his attempt to sway the Wisconsin Supreme Court election in March and April crashed and burned. Luckily for him, it's not his only asset. Musk's cult of personality rivals Trump's own Musk's overall popularity may have dropped dramatically since the election. But his pull with Republican voters specifically was still very high as of early June. That's testament to his ability to build and maintain a fanatical fanbase. Like Trump, he has a knack for inspiring loyalty and whipping up his supporters against new targets, as well as a keen instinct for controversy. And also like Trump, he doesn't need to be popular with all Americans to cause trouble for his enemies. He only needs enough dedicated partisans on his side. 'Elon has wooed enough of Trump's supporters to be an actual threat politically,' Musk's old friend Philip Low told Politico. "[Trump] doesn't realize the battle that he has on his hands." Musk's ownership of X, formerly Twitter, will help him there. Having already turned the social network into a hub of the MAGA media universe — and reportedly tweaked its algorithms in favor of his own posts — he now has enormous control over the conservative information stream. Given how many Americans now essentially live in a parallel media universe, maintained by fake news entrepreneurs and skewed social media algorithms, that gives him influence over what Trump's base even believes to be reality. Granted, Trump remains the unquestioned ruler of the GOP. And when polls pit Musk against Trump directly, Republican voters largely side with the king. Yet Musk's combination of financial and social capital makes him a powerful ally to anyone within the party hoping to chart their own course. From fiscal hawks opposed to Trump's spending spree to centrists with one eye on their purple state majority, there are plenty of people in Congress who won't always back Trump 100 percent. Musk can boost and sustain them, helping them resist the eye of Sauron effect that Trump has traditionally used to beat his coalition into line. Musk's influence crosses countries and industries Other threats are more esoteric. NASA would be pretty stuck without SpaceX, which currently offers the only reliable way of ferrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Musk's satellite business Starlink is relied on by governments and militaries across the world, including some U.S. agencies. Having helped kickstart China's world-leading electric vehicle industry, he also has a serious fanbase in China — and good relationships with the Chinese Communist Party. "Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you," said one user on the Chinese social network Weibo on Wednesday. Most juicily of all, he has information. Musk spent months at the heart of the Trump administration, attending cabinet meetings and undertaking highly controversial projects. What might he have learned or witnessed during that time that could damage Trump politically? We got a taste of that when Musk accused Trump of being "in the Epstein files". That's nothing new: we've known since 2015 that Trump was in Jeffrey Epstein's address book (which is not evidence of wrongdoing), and his ties to the child-abusing financier are long documented. Yet as Trump knows all too well, in today's politics truth has only a passing relevance to how much chaos a lurid allegation can cause. None of these factors are a slam dunk for Musk. His born-again MAGA conversion has trashed his former reputation as an apolitical business genius, and toxified his image among Democratic voters. Getting more involved in politics would only prolong investors' disquiet about his ability to focus on running Tesla and SpaceX. Trying to dish dirt on Trump could also tempt revenge in kind, which could be dangerous given the sheer range of allegations about Musk's personal life. Most of all, to misquote a line from the early 19th century writer Hilaire Belloc that Musk seems to be fond of: whatever happens, Trump has got the nukes, and Musk does not. Then again, when has the near certainty of adverse consequences ever stopped Elon Musk?
