Lawmakers push forward on game-changing law that could eliminate common feature in new homes: 'Help households transition away'
If Gov. Kathy Hochul signs the bill into law, certain natural gas line expansions will come to a halt.
As the Democrat and Chronicle reported, lawmakers voted to repeal a rule that stretches natural gas lines to new construction within 100 feet of existing lines. The repeal means utility companies won't have to supply gas to customers in these new construction zones at the customers' expense.
Richard Schrader, the director of New York government affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the decision is a step in the right direction yet only the beginning of what the state needs to do to achieve its clean energy goals.
"To fully align New York's gas utility system with its climate and affordability goals, lawmakers must pass the broader reforms in the NY HEAT Act," Schrader said.
The Home Energy Affordable Transition Act, Sen. Liz Krueger said, "would save ratepayers billions of dollars every year on avoided gas infrastructure costs [and] help households transition away from dirty and expensive methane gas."
The Assembly did not pass the NY HEAT Act, and natural gas advocates oppose it.
The NRDC found that New Yorkers are relying less on natural gas because they have more sustainable power solutions available. But the state continues to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on gas line expansions and billions on replacement pipes.
Though repealing the 100-foot rule alone will not make energy cleaner and more affordable, it is encouraging progress.
Across the nation, states are passing laws to end gas line expansions into new homes and reduce communities' reliance on natural gas. Environmentally focused policies demonstrate states' sustainability commitments and set examples and precedents for others to follow.
Do you think governments should ban gas stoves?
Heck yes!
Only in new buildings
Only in restaurants
Heck no!
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
As a voter, you can keep this momentum going by supporting pro-climate action candidates and discussing local laws related to climate issues with people you know.
One of the New York bill's supporters, Jo Anne Simon, said it prevents gas companies from getting a "blank check to expand polluting gas pipelines" and encourages people to choose electric and heat pump options that are "less expensive, more reliable, and better for our environment."
Liz Moran, the New York policy advocate at Earthjustice, said, "Today, lawmakers took a stand by putting the needs of everyday New Yorkers over the profits of greedy fossil fuel companies."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump denies knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer
President Donald Trump says he 'didn't know' that Jeffrey Epstein's ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas. Trump adds, 'it's not a very uncommon thing.'
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal appeals court sides with Texas on ID requirements for voting by mail
A federal appeals court has upheld Texas' requirement that potential voters must list their identification information in their application for a mail-in ballot. In Texas, voting by mail is only available for certain groups of people, including elderly voters and people with disabilities. Under Senate Bill 1 passed in 2021, voters must also include an ID number — such as a driver's license number — on both the vote-by-mail applications and the mail-in ballots and both numbers need to match. Opponents of the law said this provision discriminated against voters with disabilities and that it would not meaningfully cut down on voter fraud. In a Monday ruling, a panel from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the updated requirement does not violate federal law. It also reversed a lower court's decision. 'We have no difficulty concluding that this ID number requirement fully complies with a provision of federal law known by the parties as the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,' wrote Judge James Ho, a Trump appointee. Judge Patrick Higginbotham and Judge Don Willett, who were appointed under the Reagan and Trump administrations, respectively, joined Ho's ruling. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton lauded the ruling Tuesday. 'Voter ID is one of the most crucial tools in the battle against election fraud, and I'm pleased to see the court affirm our fundamental right to defend the integrity of our democratic process,' he said in a news release. Prior to this decision, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas had ruled in 2023 that the requirements infringed on the Civil Rights Act. Though later that year, Paxton's office was able to stop that decision from going into effect. These voter ID requirements were also the target of legal challenges from several civil rights groups, along with other provisions of SB 1. Groups that were part of this case — including the League of Women Voters of Texas, OCA-Greater Houston and Rev Up Texas — didn't immediately respond to comment requests from The Texas Tribune Tuesday. A recent study from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School found that the state's requirements pushed many voters whose mail ballots or vote-by-mail applications were rejected during the 2022 primary to change their method — or not vote at all. Disclosure: League of Women Voters of Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Essentially Epstein Island': Law firm calls for federal probe into L.A. County sex abuse
A prominent law firm suing L.A. County over childhood sexual abuse is pushing for a federal investigation into how so many children were harmed on the government's watch. The county agreed in April to a $4 billion settlement to resolve roughly 7,000 cases of sexual abuse inside the county's juvenile detention facilities and foster homes dating back decades. But attorney John Manly, who has about 200 cases against the county, said despite the eye-popping sum, there's still no clear picture of who is responsible for the rampant abuse. No one has been criminally charged since the deluge of cases began. 'This is essentially Epstein Island being supervised by Los Angeles County probation officers,' said Manly, referring to Jeffrey Epstein, the notorious financier who died by suicide while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. 'It's shocking, and there's no outrage, none, zero. It's like, 'Oh yeah, okay, we'll just take $4 billion of public money and we'll settle, and then it'll be gone.' No, we want answers.' Read more: California school district faces sex abuse lawsuit. Did L.A.'s $4-billion payout open floodgates? Manly served as lead counsel for victims abused by USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar and former USC gynecologist George Tyndall. His firm, Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, is one of several firms that are not part of the L.A. County settlement. The first trial for his cases is set to begin this month. In a letter addressed to U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, Manly wrote that he wanted to see the U.S. Attorney's Office conduct an 'immediate investigation' into any federal crimes committed by staff within the L.A. County Probation Department, which is responsible for overseeing the juvenile facilities where much of the alleged abuse took place. 'The sad and unbelievable truth is these camps were dens of sexual predation where LA County probation officers in charge of helping these children get on track turned them into human sex toys,' the Aug. 4 letter stated. 'The lack of interest in prosecution of those literally engaged in a massive human trafficking operation where thousands of vulnerable children were savaged sexually reeks of politics, corruption and a malignant indifference to the children.' Read more: A.G. Rob Bonta seeks takeover of scandal-plagued L.A. County juvenile halls The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment. The deluge of litigation against the county is rooted in a change in state law, known as AB 218, which gave victims of childhood sexual abuse a new window to sue their abuser. Since then, the county, along with many school districts, have been flooded with lawsuits, some dating back to the 1950s. A county spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The county has said in the past they've taken many steps to try to prevent abuse in recent years, including strengthening the vetting of foster parents and probation staffers and winding down the use of group homes, where some of the alleged abuse took place. Read more: Faced with paying hundreds of sex abuse claims, LAUSD authorizes up to $500 million in bonds County officials have said it has been nearly impossible to defend themselves against these cases because many of the records were discarded long ago. Prosecuting those cases has been similarly difficult, as many victims, who were children at the time of the abuse, never knew the first names of their abusers. The perpetrators are usually identified in the lawsuits as some variation on John Doe, with few identifying details. Since the flood of lawsuits began, county officials referred only two of the cases to the District Attorney's Office for investigation: Altovise Abner, a probation supervisor who was investigated for having sex with a minor at a camp in 2006, and Thomas Jackson, a former probation official who was accused by more than two dozen women of sexually abusing them when they were minors. Jackson resigned in 2023 after three decades with the county. The cases against both were outside the statute of limitations, according to a memo by the DA's office explaining the decision not to prosecute. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
