Man accused of grabbing colleague by throat and using homophobic slur loses unfair dismissal case
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC).
Seamus Behan lost his job of 12 years as a van driver for Liberties Recycling Development and Training CLG in February of last year following the altercation with another worker just before Christmas 2023.
At a hearing of Mr Behan's complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 2014, Liberties Recycling told the WRC his behaviour on December 20th, 2023 amounted to gross misconduct.
The company said the finding was arrived at after what it described as a fair investigation and disciplinary process.
READ MORE
Company manager Adam Moloney said 'multiple' statements from staff recounted 'off the charts' behaviour from Mr Behan towards the other worker, Mr A.
Mr Moloney said workers told him Mr Behan was 'verbally abusive, behaving aggressively, and damaged company property' during the incident.
He said it 'wasn't clear' from the statements what had first happened other than that the two men 'pushed each other'.
Mr Moloney said Mr Behan was at reception in the depot 'shouting abuse' at Mr A, would not leave when asked and 'kept trying to go at him'.
Management tried to persuade gardaí to come, but there was no response by closing time. A duty manager suspended Mr Behan and Mr A and sent them away via separate exits.
The complainant's representative, Thomas Behan, argued that witness statements had been 'handpicked' to support a case that his client was 'violent' and that CCTV had been 'purposely left out' of the investigation.
The company said any footage of the incident was taped over during the Christmas break, so it was not available when the investigation began in the new year.
The tribunal was told the row followed a complaint made by Mr A about Mr Behan's alleged conduct towards him six days earlier. It was alleged the complainant on that occasion grabbed Mr A's hand and squeezed until Mr A asked him to let go. Mr Behan then turned to another worker and allegedly said: 'Watch how I shake a real man's hand.'
Mr Behan said he knew nothing of this informal complaint until after the incident on December 20th, with his representative arguing any difficulties between the men ought to have been addressed sooner by management.
Mr Behan said Mr A was 'an hour late' returning with a van for a shift handover on December 20th and he was 'in a hurry to get out' so as to avoid working late without pay.
'I went to your man ... he was just numb about everything. Because I didn't know anything about the 14th, I was at the van, and he was at the van. He started mumbling stuff about something, and then he got aggressive towards me,' he said.
'This guy pursued me, I went away from the van, he's aggressive, in my face, spitting in my face,' Mr Behan said, adding that the spitting was not 'intentional'.
'He's giving me lackery about Pope John Paul, lackery about my religion. He deeply upset me,' he said.
The complainant said he 'wouldn't repeat' his colleague's remarks during the disciplinary process that followed because it was 'filthy' and 'vulgar' language.
Mr Behan denied using a slur toward Mr A in the course of the altercation, as had been indicated in statements gathered by the company. 'I don't even use the word 'f****t',' he said. 'Everyone's twisting and turning statements.'
He said a female supervisor was standing between him and Mr A, so it would have been 'impossible for me to grab the man by the neck'.
He told the tribunal Mr A pushed him as the altercation continued and that the CCTV footage 'would prove that as well'.
He said he was 'well warmed up' by his colleague by the time he reached the office.
'I raised my voice. Is that a sacking offence?' he said. 'No one wanted to investigate my statement ... My statement is the truth, on my religious beliefs.'
In her decision, WRC adjudicator Eileen Campbell stated: 'Taking all the circumstances into account I find, as a matter of probability, the complainant's actions on the day and his behaviour on the day to be aggressive, uncontrolled and unacceptable.'
She added that, on balance, the company's version of events was 'more convincing than that of the complainant' and there were 'substantial grounds' justifying Mr Behan's dismissal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
French police investigate ‘electrocution' death of Irish cyclist at Paris metro station
French police have opened an investigation into the death of an Irish cyclist following an incident at a metro station in Paris. Tomás Walsh, from Waterford, died in the early hours of Monday in circumstances that remain unclear, but it is believed the 25-year-old may have been electrocuted after falling on to the underground railway's tracks. The Paris prosecutor's office has confirmed it has opened an investigation into his death. It said there was no evidence at this stage to suggest foul play. Police said the body of Mr Walsh was discovered lying on the tracks inside the Grands Boulevards metro station in the northeast of the city. READ MORE He had travelled from Ireland to watch the 16th stage of the Tour de France cycling competition. Online tributes to the cyclist described him as a 'pleasant young man with the world in front of him', a 'credit to his parents' and a 'really great lad'. In a statement, Comeragh Cycling Club said it had learned of his death with 'great sadness' and said Mr Walsh had been the 'life and soul' of the club. Altitude, a bike shop in Waterford city, described him as 'one of a golden group of talented cyclists'. The Department of Foreign Affairs said it was aware of the case and was providing consular assistance.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Man who repeatedly raped foster daughter must pay her €328,000 in damages, court rules
A man who admitted to repeatedly raping his foster daughter over a seven-year period must pay more than €300,000 in damages to her, a High Court judge has ruled. Stephen Murray, formerly of Humphreystown, Valleymount, Co Wicklow, was jailed for 11 years in 2022 after pleading guilty to multiple counts of rape, oral rape and sexual assault of Kelly Kemmy. The offending occurred between February 2009 and December 2015, when Ms Kemmy was aged between 11 and 18 years old. Ms Kemmy (27), who waived her right to anonymity following Murray's sentencing, subsequently issued civil proceedings against Murray and Tusla. Ms Kemmy's claim against Tusla, which sought damages for negligence for placing her in the care of Murray, was later settled for €250,000. READ MORE In February, 2024, Mr Justice Paul Coffey ruled in favour of Ms Kemmy in her claim against Murray, which sought damages for personal injuries as well as rape, sexual assault, assault, battery, false imprisonment and trespass to the person. Murray did not participate in the proceedings and judgment was made against him in default of appearance. In a judgment on Wednesday, Ms Justice Emily Egan ruled Ms Kemmy should receive damages of €328,000 from Murray. Ms Justice Egan, who characterised the nature and severity of abuse suffered by Ms Kemmy as a 'worst case scenario', said Ms Kemmy should be awarded €578,000 arising from her action against Murray. This would comprise €450,000 in general damages and €128,000 in special damages. However, the judge ruled that Tusla and Murray were 'concurrent wrongdoers' in the case and as such, the €250,000 settlement with Tusla should be deducted from the total award. '[Ms Kemmy] suffered damage as a result of the tortious and criminal actions of Murray and that damage was not prevented, interrupted or ameliorated by Tusla, as it ought to have been,' the judge said. An award of €450,000 in general damages reflects 'the nature, severity, timing and duration of abuse and the severity of the injury' to Ms Kemmy, Ms Justice Egan said. This award is greater than damage previously awarded for other child sexual abuse cases, the judge said. The judge noted the current upper limit for awards of general damages in personal injuries cases is €550,000. The €128,000 in special damages arises primarily from Ms Kemmy's claims of loss of earnings. Referring to Ms Kemmy's evidence in the civil case, Ms Justice Egan noted that it is estimated she suffered hundreds of separate incidents of rape, occurring three to four times a week. Murray's abuse of Ms Kemmy began when she was 11 years old, some seven years after she and two of her siblings were fostered by Murray and his wife. 'For years, [Ms Kemmy's] dignity and autonomy were taken from her, causing her to suffer humiliation, frustration, helplessness, loneliness and despair,' the judge said. It was Ms Kemmy's evidence that Murray told her the abuse was normal but secret, and if she told anyone, 'it would ruin the family', the judge noted. Ms Kemmy said she felt trapped, helpless and frightened, and that her shame was so overwhelming she felt she had no one to turn to for help, the judge said. Ms Kemmy reported Murray's abuse to An Garda Síochána in July 2019. After this, she was rendered effectively homeless and her relationship with her two siblings was 'devastated', the judge noted. Murray would later plead guilty to 14 counts of rape, two counts of oral rape and one count of sexual assault. Ms Kemmy continues to suffer with post-traumatic stress disorder, the judge noted. The judge also said Ms Kemmy is a resourceful and intelligent woman, keen to gain security for herself and her young child, and who has ambitions of becoming a social worker.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account
A solicitor is facing three allegations of professional misconduct linked to his handling of a €100,000 deposit placed into his practice's client account. Michael A O'Brien, solicitor and principal of a firm of the same name based in Carrick on Suir, Co Tipperary , denies any wrongdoing. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority 's case against Mr O'Brien, being heard by the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal , follows a complaint by Dolores Barrett Burke who sought to invest €100,000 in a scheme to purchase the Heritage Hotel and Spa in 2018. She told the tribunal she was 'shocked' to read in a newspaper that the Co Laois hotel had instead been purchased by FBD Hotels & Resorts, yet Mr O'Brien made no attempt to return her money to her. READ MORE Ms Barrett Burke, who is retired and lives in Castlebar, Co Mayo , said she transferred the money after receiving a letter from Mr O'Brien in June 2018 that she believed provided the required assurances. The investment opportunity had been suggested to her by her brother-in-law Cyril Burke. The proposed purchase was being led by Mary Parton, a woman she never met, she said. However, she said she later learned FBD had purchased the hotel. She believed she would receive her money back 'in the same way I had sent it', but did not immediately worry about why it was not returned. More than a year later, she consulted her solicitor, Thomas J Walsh, who sent the first of a number of letters to Mr O'Brien seeking the return of the funds. After no reply to initial correspondence, the tribunal heard, Mr O'Brien responded to explain that the terms of his undertaking had been adhered to and the money had been dispensed in accordance with the instructions of his client, Ms Parton. Barrister Mark Finan, for Mr O'Brien, put it to Ms Barrett Burke that the letter his client sent to her clearly stated his understanding was that she would be paying the money into the client account 'for and on behalf of Mary Parton'. It was also put to her that, while she had indicated when making a complaint about Mr O'Brien to the Legal Services Regulatory Authority that she had engaged Mr O'Brien, she had never actually done so and was not, in fact, his client. 'I figured because I sent him the money and it was a client account, I was now a client,' she said. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on October 29th. In the interim, it is to be clarified whether the tribunal's chair, Tom Coughlan, is acquainted with Ms Barrett Burke's brother-in-law Cyril Burke. He told the hearing he became aware of a possible connection after seeing the list of witnesses and hearing the evidence but was not sure if it is the same Cyril Burke who he knows but not well.
