logo
Here's how Congress is wading into crypto regulation

Here's how Congress is wading into crypto regulation

Boston Globe4 days ago
Here's a look at what each would do.
Regulate stablecoins
The so-called Genius Act would establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins, a type of digital currency that is pegged to the value of the US dollar.
Stablecoins are often seen as a sort of bridge between crypto and traditional currency. They are designed to avoid the wild and much-publicized fluctuations in value of some popular cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.
Advertisement
Proponents of the legislation have argued that the bill would help modernize the US financial system and break down the barriers between existing financial markets and cryptocurrency. Opponents argue it is overly lax and fails to prevent abuses or protect consumers.
Many Democrats also have warned that the bill lacks strong anticorruption provisions to prevent fraud and money laundering. They pressed unsuccessfully to include provisions that would prevent Trump and his family from continuing to profit from cryptocurrency.
Advertisement
That issue galvanized some lawmakers after a Trump-affiliated crypto firm secured a deal to take $2 billion from a fund backed by the government of Abu Dhabi. It also became a wedge among Democrats when the Senate debated the bill last month.
But the legislation passed with bipartisan support, marking the first time the Senate had approved major cryptocurrency legislation. House lawmakers passed it on Thursday, sending it to Trump, who has promised to sign it.
Create a new regulatory framework for crypto
Legislation known as the Clarity Act is more expansive and faces a longer road to enactment. It would lay out a regulatory framework governing a vast universe of crypto assets.
In particular, the bill would shift power away from the Securities and Exchange Commission to police digital currency. The agency was central to the Biden administration's enforcement actions against the crypto industry, arguing that digital currencies should be regulated like publicly traded stocks and bonds.
The Clarity Act, which is strongly supported by the industry, would push more control and oversight to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, an agency perceived as being more friendly to crypto.
Proponents say the bill is needed to provide regulatory clarity to a young industry that has occupied an ambiguous space between agencies. Opponents, including many Democrats, argue that changing the SEC's role would allow the crypto industry to skirt critical financial regulations and leave consumers unprotected.
House passage of the bill on Thursday sent it to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain.
Ban central bank digital currencies
A third bill would stop the Federal Reserve from issuing its own digital currency. Central banks in other countries have been exploring and experimenting with their own digital offerings, which are broadly known as central bank digital currencies — or CBDCs.
Advertisement
Unlike existing cryptocurrencies, a Fed-issued digital currency would be backed by the US government. Cryptocurrency investors have long objected to the creation of a central bank digital currency, arguing that it would raise privacy issues for consumers.
Trump, fulfilling a campaign promise, issued an executive order this year that bars federal agencies from developing a central bank digital currency. A group of ultraconservative House Republicans threatened this week to sink all three cryptocurrency bills because they wanted stronger assurances that the ban on CBDCs would be enacted.
Many Democrats oppose a ban on central bank digital currencies, arguing that they would help foster stability in crypto markets.
Representative Maxine Waters of California, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, has said that she believes an American CBDC would help build public trust for digital currencies, and that tying the Federal Reserve's hands might allow other countries to promote their own digital currencies at the expense of the dollar.
The House is expected to pass the measure, which would send it to the Senate. As part of their deal with conservatives to allow the crypto package to move this week, House Republican leaders also committed to including its provisions in the annual defense policy bill, in hopes of ensuring it will be signed into law.
This article originally appeared in
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Cleveland-Cliffs Stock Is Red-Hot Today
Why Cleveland-Cliffs Stock Is Red-Hot Today

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Cleveland-Cliffs Stock Is Red-Hot Today

Key Points Cleveland-Cliffs reported smaller-than-expected losses this morning. Steel prices fell in Q2, but management is cutting costs to mitigate the damage. With a little help from President Trump's tariffs, Cleveland-Cliffs could turn profitable again. 10 stocks we like better than Cleveland-Cliffs › Shares of Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE: CLF), one of the nation's biggest steelmakers, soared 13.7% through 1:20 p.m. ET Monday after beating on earnings this morning. Analysts had forecast a rough quarter for Cleveland-Cliffs, with $0.63 per share in losses expected on sales of $4.9 billion. The company nailed the revenue target, and beat on earnings with a loss of "only" $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs' Q2 earnings Cleveland-Cliffs set a new record for steel shipped in the quarter: 4.3 million net tons, up 7.5% from a year ago. Average selling prices on that steel, however, slid 10%, turning what should have been a revenue improvement into a decline -- and turning its gross profit margin negative. On the bottom line, Cleveland-Cliffs ended up with $470 million in net losses, or $0.97 per share, reversing the tiny profit it earned in Q2 2024. Is Cleveland-Cliffs stock a buy? But if Cleveland-Cliff's news was so bad, why are investors buying the stock? Partly because management said $323 million of its net loss -- about 69% -- came from "previously disclosed non-recurring charges related to idled facilities." And partly, because management says it's making progress cutting both costs and inventories. Turning to guidance, Cleveland-Cliffs notes that it's on track to cut its 2025 cost of production by about $50 a ton in comparison to 2024 -- enough to offset about half the decline in steel prices seen in Q2. Combined with reductions in capital spending and in selling, general, and administrative expenses, plus the absence of the "non-recurring charges" that hurt Q2 results, and of course the benefits Cleveland-Cliffs might enjoy from Trump administration tariffs on imported steel, there's every chance profits will perk back up soon. Management didn't quite promise this, mind you. But investors seem to be betting on it. Should you buy stock in Cleveland-Cliffs right now? Before you buy stock in Cleveland-Cliffs, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Cleveland-Cliffs wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Cleveland-Cliffs Stock Is Red-Hot Today was originally published by The Motley Fool

Epstein's ghost is haunting Trump, and America's enemies could summon more
Epstein's ghost is haunting Trump, and America's enemies could summon more

The Hill

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Epstein's ghost is haunting Trump, and America's enemies could summon more

It's the irony of all ironies: How could President Trump put his credibility on the line with his hard core MAGA supporters over Jeffrey Epstein? Trump has survived a felony conviction and was twice impeached and acquitted. He was found liable by a judge of sexual assault, owes potentially millions of dollars in libel suits for his actions and avoided possible prosecution and considerable jail time for gross mishandling of highly classified material. None of these mishaps prevented Trump from being reelected as America's 47th president. Yet, despite this graphic history, Trump is now threatened by the ghost of a convicted sexual predator. How can this be? As Epstein's attorney Alan Dershowitz wrote in the Wall Street Journal on July 16, Trump was free and clear of any and all entanglements with his client. And it was reported that Trump had once barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Extreme elements of his MAGA constituency have turned against Trump. For what seem to be irrational reasons, they have accused the president of a cover-up and lying about not providing full transparency on the Epstein saga and releasing the so-called 'client's list' that Dershowitz asserted was nonexistent. Conspiracy theories sprouted like mushrooms: for example, that Trump was obviously hiding his relationship with Epstein or protecting others in his administration and circle of friends from the Epstein stain. Shrill calls reverberated through Washington's political gasosphere for Attorney General Pam Bondi to resign over this failure to release the Epstein files. Having bragged that he could shoot someone dead on Park Avenue and be absolved, it is incredible that Trump could be attacked by his MAGA allies on such an extraordinarily trivial matter, given the magnitude of obstacles he has previously faced and overcome. Worse, so far, the explanations of why part of his base is incensed make little sense. That Trump has somehow now become part of the 'deep state' that he vowed to eliminate is nonsensical. Promising to release all 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' on Epstein (and, for that matter, JFK's assassination) and not following through has been part of Trump's lifelong pattern of deception and disinformation, if not outright lying. It is quite possible — again, quoting Dershowitz — that there simply was no there there regarding the Epstein files, and that Trump simply exaggerated or distorted that possibility to play to his base. Then he got caught. And now Trump is lashing out against this base. Whether this is a minor tempest and will dissipate soon or has tsunami-like consequences remains to be seen. Why has this brouhaha over Epstein been so explosive? Is this the state of American politics today when a leader's credibility among his followers fractures over literally nothing, as occasionally happens in marriages? Has Trump violated some mythical bond or unspoken oath with this base? Or is the MAGA movement's instability or irrationality causing such a backlash? The timing is not helpful to Trump. In the midst of what could be a major global tariff war, the conflict in Gaza still blazing and Vladimir Putin given 50 days to put up or shut up on a cease-fire and peace negotiation in Ukraine, how do these outside players react? Do all or many shake their heads believing that this is simply the vulgarity of U.S. politics and ignore this display? Or do others, probably in Beijing and Moscow, see this as a fatal weakness in American culture and society to be exploited? Despite Trump's refusal to believe Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election, make no mistake: Chinese and Russian, as well as other intelligence services, are exploring how these flaws and cracks in American politics can be exploited. For example, assuming that ex-KGB officer Putin wanted to alter the 2016 election, imagine how he could have exploited the so-called Steele dossier that alleged Trump's sexual misconduct in Moscow. The internet would have been filled with torrid stories and deep fake shots of Trump in compromising positions. With AI and other technical means, identifying seemingly minor issues that could have otherwise profound political consequences would not be difficult for an adversary or for anyone wishing to meddle in politics. This happened during Brexit. With social media as a force multiplier, it is easy to see how political fractures could be generated. As a thought experiment, suppose the resurrection of Epstein's ghost originated in a certain building in the Kremlin or inside Beijing's Forbidden City. That, I am sure, did not happen. But it could. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at Washington, D.C.'s Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and David Richards are authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.

Hunter Biden suggests Ambien contributed to Joe Biden's poor debate performance
Hunter Biden suggests Ambien contributed to Joe Biden's poor debate performance

The Hill

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hunter Biden suggests Ambien contributed to Joe Biden's poor debate performance

Hunter Biden in an interview published Monday suggested former President Biden had been taking Ambien leading up to the June 2024 presidential debate and that the drug was partly to blame for his poor performance in the debate. 'I know exactly what happened in that debate,' Hunter Biden told YouTube personality Andrew Callaghan. 'He flew around the world basically the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old. He's tired as sh–,' Hunter Biden said. 'They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage, and he looks like a deer in the headlights.' The interview was posted online on the anniversary of the former president's announcement that he would not seek reelection. A spokesperson for the former president did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Biden's debate performance was a turning point in the 2024 campaign. The former president spoke haltingly, mixed up words and struggled to complete his thoughts. Biden aides that nit attributed it to a cold and Biden later asserted in the days after the debate that he had been sick. Some Biden allies have in the year since the debate offered up other explanations, including that the then-president was overworked and exhausted by a taxing trip to Europe before the debate. But Biden had spent roughly a week holed up at Camp David preparing for his debate with President Trump before taking the stage. Hunter Biden took aim at several critics of his father during his interview with Callaghan, including actor George Clooney, who penned a New York Times op-ed urging the former president to drop out, and former Obama White House staffers like David Axelrod. 'David Axelrod, who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama, and that was because of Barack Obama, not because of fuck— David Axelrod,' Hunter Biden said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store