logo
Letters to the Editor: Criticism of Israel on college campuses isn't inherently antisemitic

Letters to the Editor: Criticism of Israel on college campuses isn't inherently antisemitic

To the editor: The U.S. government has pressured Columbia University to pay fines and introduce controversial policies because of what it labels antisemitism ('Columbia genocide scholar may leave over new definition of antisemitism. She's not alone,' July 28). But criticism of the Israeli government's policies, and of the country itself, is not a reflection of antisemitism, just as criticism of the United States and its Republican-majority government and its policies is not anti-Christian. Both countries allow dissent, and we have witnessed massive protests against both governments by citizens of all stripes.
Two things can be true at once. Hamas militants committed heinous crimes in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, while Israel is arguably committing crimes against humanity in Gaza. There is more than enough criticism to go around of atrocities committed by both Hamas and Israel. Feelings are running high on both sides, but students should not be suspended or expelled from universities for peacefully demonstrating against the Israeli government.
As distasteful and disgusting as some statements have been, the 1st Amendment to the Constitution protects freedom of speech. Yet, the Trump administration's policies and actions are repressive to basic freedoms. It has taken one side, Israel's, while scapegoating the other.
Richard Z. Fond, Sherman Oaks
..
To the editor: Marianne Hirsch, daughter of Holocaust survivors and Columbia scholar, correctly opposed President Trump's inclusion of criticism of Israel in defining antisemitism. Thousands of Jews worldwide are anti-Zionist (as in, disapproving of Israel's occupation of Palestinian-sought territories) and we can rest assured they're likely not antisemitic.
With Columbia University's suspension or expulsion of nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, we may reasonably fear that President Trump is steadily marching toward making pro-Palestinian or anti-Zionist protest or commentary a detainable offense for any citizen.
Phil Barnes, San Pedro
..
To the editor: The federal shakedown of universities continues. Cornell, Harvard — and now the White House extortion ring has come for the West Coast ('UCLA violated Jewish students' civil rights with 'deliberate indifference,' feds say,' July 29).
The government wants to suppress free speech and student protests. It wants to intimidate the faculty's teaching and writing. Instead of opening young minds to opposing views and critical thinking, it wants to impose a government group-think mentality and stifle free expression.
Blackmailers are never satisfied. They return at the slightest perceived infraction. Don't let the Trump administration hit the mute button in higher education.
Donna Sloan, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: One would have thought the Democrats would have been the defenders of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that makes it illegal to discriminate against race, color or religion, whether in the workplace or on school campuses. Not so. It took the Republicans to take action against antisemitism on college campuses. While Democrats took the 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' stance against antisemitism, Republicans are actually doing something about it.
Neil Snow, Manhattan Beach
..
To the editor: How truly sad to see the Department of Justice leveling such charges against my alma mater. Former UCLA Chancellor Gene D. Block's attempts to control the chaotic situation may have not worked as successfully as hoped, but to assert that the situation was due to antisemitic bias on the part of the campus administration seems like a ridiculous stretch.
Noel Johnson, Glendale
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests

Politico

timea few seconds ago

  • Politico

Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests

A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'

Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back
Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back

NEW YORK (AP) — A public document filed by a company that just hired President Donald Trump's two oldest sons as advisers included a sentence early Monday that said it hoped to benefit from grants and other incentives from the federal government, which their father happens to lead. But when The Associated Press asked the Trump family business about the apparent conflict of interest, the document was revised and the line taken out. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are getting 'founder shares' worth millions of dollars in New America Acquisition 1 Corp., a company with no operating business that hopes to fill that hole by purchasing an American company that can play 'a meaningful role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing,' according to to the filing. The president has geared his trade policy toward boosting manufacturing in the U.S. The original version of the securities filing said the target company should be 'well positioned' to tap federal or state government incentives. That reference was taken out of the revised version of the filing. The Trump Organization didn't reply to a question about whether New America still planned to benefit from government programs or why the line was cut. But the outside law firm Paul Hastings that helped prepare the document sent an email to AP saying it was 'mistake' made by 'scriveners,' an old term for transcribers of legal papers. Kathleen Clark, an expert in government ethics, said any excuses are too late because the Trumps had already tipped their hand. 'They just deleted the language. They haven't committed not to do what they said earlier today they were planning to do," said the Washington University law professor and Trump critic. "It's an attempt to exploit public office for private profit.' New America is what's know as a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. It's a publicly traded company that exists solely to use its funds to acquire another company and take the target public. New America plans to raise money by selling stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $10 a share. That will hand the two Trump sons a total of $5 million in paper wealth on the first day of trading. The company hopes to sell enough shares to raise $300 million, which it then plans to use buying a yet unidentified manufacturer. A press release issued by New America saying it was focused on 'American values and priorities." It made no mention of the aim to get government incentives. The filing to New America's potential new investors to the Securities and Exchange Commission was explicit about what it was looking for in a target company. It said, among other things, it wanted a company that can ride 'public policy tailwinds" by benefiting from federal or state 'grants, tax credits, government contracts or preferential procurement programs.'

Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests
Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests

New York Post

timea minute ago

  • New York Post

Charlamagne slams ‘The View' for not featuring any conservative guests

'The Breakfast Club' host Charlamagne tha God slammed 'The View' on Monday for lacking conservative voices on the show. 'Thank you, Lara Trump, for having me on 'My View.' I enjoyed the conversation. I think it's ridiculous that 'The View' has had … 102 left-leaning guests and zero conservatives,' Charlamagne said on 'The Breakfast Club' on Monday, after appearing on Fox News' 'My View with Lara Trump' on Saturday. Advertisement 'That is ridiculous to have a platform and … only talk to people that you agree with. That makes no sense whatsoever to me,' he said of the liberal ABC daytime talk show, which features Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg, among other hosts. None of the show's six current hosts, including former Donald Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin, supported Trump in 2024. Charlamagne appeared on Lara Trump's Fox News show to share his thoughts on who should make a White House run in 2028 and the lack of viewpoint diversity in the media. 3 Charlamagne appeared on Lara Trump's Fox News show to share his thoughts on who should make a White House run in 2028. Getty Images Advertisement The discussion touched on 'The View,' a notoriously anti-Trump show, being the subject of a recent study by the Media Research Center (MRC). The ABC News program continued to display an overwhelming lack of balance during the first seven months of 2025 with 102 left-leaning guests and zero conservatives, according to the MRC. It was unclear how many Republicans or conservatives, if any, had been invited, who may have then declined. The MRC analyzed every episode of 'The View' from January 6, when the program returned from a winter hiatus, through July 25, and found that it failed to book a single right-leaning guest to discuss politics. The watchdog previously found in April that the show booked 63 liberal guests and zero conservatives. 3 None of the show's six current hosts, including former Donald Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin, supported Trump in 2024. ABC Advertisement 3 The discussion touched on 'The View,' a notoriously anti-Trump show, being the subject of a recent study by the Media Research Center (MRC). Invision ''The View' is not shy about the fact that what they say and do is all meant to push the agenda of the Democratic Party, whether it's smearing Trump and his allies or specifically elevating Democratic politicians. It's why they've only spoken to liberals about politics on the show so far this year,' NewsBusters associate editor Nicholas Fondacaro told Fox News Digital. Fox News Digital reached out to representatives from 'The View' for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store