Malcolm Kenyatta: David Hogg has ‘very casual relationship with the truth'
Kenyatta argued in an interview on MSNBC that he has tried to ignore what Hogg has been saying recently to avoid party infighting and Democrats divided, but Hogg's statement after the DNC's Credentials Committee voted in favor of holding a new vice chair election 'pushed me over the edge.'
'David has a very casual relationship with the truth,' he told host Symone Sanders Townsend. 'And he has not been truthful on so many points that have been raised on this show.'
The Pennsylvania state legislator added that he's 'frustrated' with the decision to hold the election again given that he received considerably more votes than necessary to clinch one of the vice chair positions, but he respects it.
'But David's first statement out of the gate was, here's the Democratic Party doing some maniacal thing to push me out because of what he's doing with his PAC,' Kenyatta said. 'David knows that that is not true.'
'And so for all of the people who have, like I had, really high hopes for what David could bring for this party and who are now looking at the message that he's been pushing out and the e-mails that they have been getting from him about how he wants to reform the party, you have to be honest with people,' he added.
The comments came after the Credentials Committee voted on Monday to support nullifying the results of the February election that made Hogg and Kenyatta vice chairs. The decision came as a result of a complaint that a losing candidate for a vice chair position had filed months earlier challenging the procedure in which the election was held.
That candidate, Kalyn Free, argued that having a combined ballot for both positions rather than holding the elections separately violated the DNC's rules, to which the committee agreed. A full vote of the DNC is necessary for a new election to be held.
But Hogg argued that the decision must be viewed in the context of the backlash he's received for his group, Leaders We Deserve, calling for primary challenges to longtime Democratic incumbents serving in safe Democratic districts. He's called for generational change among Democratic leaders and said he is not supporting challenges to those serving in battleground districts or who have adequately stood up to President Trump.
The move has sparked considerable pushback within the party, with DNC Chair Ken Martin calling for DNC officers to maintain neutrality in primaries.
Kenyatta noted that Hogg said the party is trying to oust him from his position, but the complaint was filed well before he signaled his group would push to primary incumbents. He said the reason this happened now is because the party has due process that allows losing candidates to submit appeals and for him and Hogg to respond.
'I know that this party has to change. It has to change in massive ways. And I did not run because I thought everything was going great. I ran because I thought that we needed to be a Democratic Party that, as I have said now, is focused on working people, working families, and how we're going to make their lives better,' he said. That's what we should be doing. That's what I have tried to do.'
Hogg told The Washington Post in an interview that he wouldn't engage in a 'back and forth about this' and that he doesn't take what people say personally, 'every if they try to make it personal.'
'This is purely about a strategic disagreement, and should be treated as such, because we're all on the same side here. It's about, how do we create the strongest Democratic Party possible?' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NYC voters torn over Zohran Mamdani's big plans to hike taxes on wealthy, corporations: poll
Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani's plans to hike taxes on corporations and wealthy New Yorkers has general election voters split, a new poll showed. Some 48% of voters were in favor of increasing the corporate tax on Big Apple-based companies to pay for free public transit and affordable housing — while 42% were in favor of upping taxes on the five boroughs' wealthiest residents, according to the poll by Honan Strategy Group. But support for corporate taxes plunged to 36% when voters were asked if they'd support a higher corporate tax if it meant chasing businesses out of Gotham. 4 New Yorkers are split on Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plans to raise taxes on the rich and corporations, according to a new poll. AFP via Getty Images 'Should the city consider increasing the corporate tax for NYC-based companies to finance affordable housing and free public transit?' participants were asked initially. While 48% said yes, 42% said no, according to the poll. The poll also asked, 'Would you support free public buses if funded by a wealth tax?' Only 42% said yes, while 47% were opposed and 11% were unsure, the poll found. Slightly more than half — 53% — backed Mamdani's proposal for city-run grocery stores aimed at lowering food prices, even if that requires moderate tax increases on high earners, according to the poll. But 35% were opposed to the government-run stores while another 12% said they were unsure, the poll said. 4 A Mamdani supporter holding a sign calling him a 'champion' for working people at a rally on July 2, 2025. Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images Meanwhile, 51% supported a rent-freeze on rent-stabilized apartments even if it meant increased taxes on millionaires, while 28% opposed the proposal and 20% are unsure, according to the poll. Mamdani has proposed a new 2% tax on millionaires, and shifting the property tax burden to wealthier, 'whiter' neighborhoods. But voters are divided when asked what is the single most important issue facing today: 21% cite housing affordability, while another 21% say crime and violence. Another 14% of respondents cited Donald Trump, 8% said corruption and 7% said quality-of-life issues. As the Democratic nominee, Mamdani is considered the frontrunner in the mayor's race in deeply blue New York. He'll be facing incumbent Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo — both running on independent ballot lines — as well as Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden. 'While there is consensus about some of the financial burdens that New Yorkers are feeling, opinions are more mixed and divided about some of the proposed policy solutions,' pollster Bradley Honan said. Mamdani's tax-the-rich proposals that would require approval in Albany and Gov. Kathy Hochul has so far seemed unwilling to support the measures. Still, voters overwhelmingly agree that the Big Apple is too expensive a place to live, according to the survey. For example, 93% of respondents said the city is having an affordability crisis and 80% agreed with the statement that New York City is increasingly only affordable for the rich people of Manhattan. 4 Mamdani supporters with 'Freeze the Rent' signs in Coney Island on June 21, 2025. Michael Nagle The poll also found that 72% agree their family is struggling to achieve the American Dream despite their hard work and effort and 61% agree that their personal income has stagnated and are not sure whether they can get ahead or not, while 56% say they are struggling every month to pay their rent/mortgage. Nearly two-thirds of voters said inflation had caused them moderate or significant hardship in the past year, while 25% said no hardship and 10% weren't unsure. Many voters are concerned about the city's condition. 4 The Post's cover on Mamdani's plan to give 'white neighborhoods' higher property taxes. Only 15% believe that the city is heading in the right direction, while 53% feel it is on the wrong track and 32% said they didn't know. The mobile phone text survey of 817 likely voters was taken June 25-26 — right after Mamdani's primary victory. It has a margin of error of +/-3.42%.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Trump administration extends timeline for tariff negotiations
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent speaks to press at the podium before Democratic and GOP luncheon press conferences in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on June 24. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo July 6 (UPI) -- Tariffs are set to return to previous levels on the first of August for countries that haven't agreed on new deals, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday. Bessent said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday, just three days prior to the Trump administration's July 9 deadline for tariffs to return, that it would be notifying 100 smaller countries that "if you don't move things along, then on August 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level." The tariffs were originally set to take effect in April but were pushed back to this Wednesday while countries worked with the Trump administration to reach new deals on products from their countries, a window that allowed dozens of countries to work out the details of between 10% and 50%. The Trump administration has said reaching deals with some countries has been increasingly difficult. August 1st is not a new deadline, Bessent said Sunday, but an opportunity to arrive at new tariff deals. "We are saying this is when it's happening," Bessent said Sunday. "If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice." The administration has signaled that there may be some flexibility around the new timeline for key trading partners, but National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on CBS's "Face the Nation" President Donald Trump would make the ultimate decision. "There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, and so maybe things will push back the dead, past the deadline," Hassett said. "In the end the president's going to make that judgment." The administration did not name the 12 countries that it would be communicating with this week about the tariff negotiations.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fears
ATLANTA — President Donald Trump and other Republicans have long criticized states that take weeks to count their ballots after Election Day. This year has seen a flurry of activity to address it. Part of Trump's executive order on elections, signed in March but held up by lawsuits, takes aim at one of the main reasons for late vote counts: Many states allow mailed ballots to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day. The U.S. Supreme Court last month said it would consider whether a challenge in Illinois can proceed in a case that is among several Republican-backed lawsuits seeking to impose an Election Day deadline for mail ballots. At least three states — Kansas, North Dakota and Utah — passed legislation this year that eliminated a grace period for receiving mailed ballots, saying they now need to be in by Election Day. Even in California, where weekslong vote counting is a frequent source of frustration and a target of Republican criticism, a bill attempting to speed up the process is moving through the Democratic-controlled Legislature. The ballot deadline section of Trump's wide-ranging executive order relies on an interpretation of federal law that establishes Election Day for federal elections. He argues this means all ballots must be received by that date. 'This is like allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct, which would be absurd,' the executive order states. It follows a pattern for the president, who has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of such ballots even though there is no evidence they are the source of widespread fraud. The issue is tied closely to his complaints about how long it takes to count ballots, his desire for results on election night and his false claims that overnight 'dumps' of vote counts point to a rigged election in 2020, when he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. But ballots received after Election Day, in addition to being signed and dated by the voter, must be postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service indicating they were completed and dropped off on or before the final day of voting. Accepting late-arriving ballots has not been a partisan issue historically. States as different as California and Mississippi allow them, while Colorado and Indiana do not. 'There is nothing unreliable or insecure about a ballot that comes back after Election Day,' said Steve Simon, the chief election official in Minnesota, which has an Election Day deadline. In his executive order, most of which is paused by the courts, Trump directs the attorney general to 'take all necessary action' to enforce federal law against states that include late-arriving ballots in their final counts for federal elections. He also directs the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to condition federal funding on compliance. Republicans in five states have passed legislation since the 2020 election moving the mail ballot deadline to Election Day, according to the Voting Rights Lab, which tracks election legislation. Earlier this year, GOP lawmakers in Kansas ended the state's practice of accepting mail ballots up to three days after Election Day, a change that will take effect for next year's midterms. Problems with mail delivery had prompted Kansas to add the grace period in 2017. Kansas state Sen. Mike Thompson, a Republican who chairs the committee that handles election legislation, compared the grace period to giving a football team extra chances to score after the game clock expires. 'We need this uniform end to the election just so that we know that all voters are operating on the same time frame,' he said. California has long been a source of complaints about the amount of time it takes for ballots to be counted and winners declared. 'The rest of the country shouldn't have to wait on California to know the results of the elections,' U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the Committee on House Administration, said during an April hearing. He said California's 'lax election laws' were to blame for the delays. The nation's most populous state has the largest number of registered voters in the country, some 22.9 million, which is roughly equivalent to the number of voters in Florida and Georgia combined. California also has embraced universal mail voting, which means every registered voter automatically receives a ballot in the mail for each election. The deadline for election offices to receive completed ballots is seven days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked by then. A survey of some 35,000 Los Angeles County voters during last fall's election found that 40% waited until Election Day to return their ballot. Election officials say the exhaustive process for reviewing and counting mail ballots combined with a large percentage of voters waiting until the last minute makes it impossible for all results to be available on election night. Under state law, election officials in California have 30 days to count ballots, conduct a postelection review and certify the results. Dean Logan, Los Angeles County's chief election official, told Congress in May that his team counted nearly 97% of the 3.8 million ballots cast within a week of Election Day in 2024. Jesse Salinas, president of the state clerks' association, said his staff in Yolo County, near Sacramento, already works 16-hour days, seven days a week before and after an election. Assemblyman Marc Berman introduced legislation that would keep the state's 30-day certification period but require county election officials to finish counting most ballots within 13 days after the election. They would be required to notify the state if they weren't going to meet that deadline and give a reason. 'I don't think that we can stick our heads in the sand and pretend like these conspiracies aren't out there and that this lack of confidence doesn't exist, in particular among Republican voters in California,' said Berman, a Democrat. 'There are certain good government things that we can do to strengthen our election system.' He acknowledged that many counties already meet the 13-day deadline in his bill, which awaits consideration in the Senate. 'My hope is that this will strengthen people's confidence in their election system and their democracy by having some of those benchmarks and just making it very clear for folks when different results will be available,' Berman said.
