logo
Jim Sillars: John Swinney should resign as SNP leader

Jim Sillars: John Swinney should resign as SNP leader

Polling suggested the SNP would win the crunch by-election but instead Labour took the seat pushing the SNP into second while Reform was placed third.
The result prompted calls on Friday by SNP veteran Alex Neil for Mr Swinney's resignation as leader before the Scottish Parliament elections in 2026, when the SNP will have been in power for 19 years.
Speaking to The Herald Mr Sillars echoed Mr Neil's views that Mr Swinney should quit though added he did not think a change of leadership would be sufficient to put the SNP on the front foot in time for the election next May saying better delivery on public services and a review of policy priorities was needed.
"Look at yesterday's result," he said.
READ MORE:
SNP veteran calls for Swinney to quit after Labour shock by-election victory
Sarwar: Swinney ran a 'disgraceful' campaign and is running down the clock as FM
Rows with press, claims of racism and misinformation - a by-election that turned ugly
"The SNP went down to 29%. If that was repeated in 2026 the SNP will have a disaster on their hands, they would get nowhere near the seats they need to get and therefore not be in government.
"It is very difficult to see how they can reverse their position. They are also being judged by voters on the basis of their performance in government.
"They have spent more time in Holyrood arguing about the identity of women than they have about the 85,000 children living in abject poverty.
Former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars (Image: PA) "It is not just a leadership replacement they would have to rethink their whole policy priorities. They have lost the people."
He noted the difference in support for independence and for the SNP.
"When you get polling showing that support for independence is around 50% but the so-called party of independence is getting 29% of the vote in a critical by-election then there is a real problem," he added.
"I never thought John Swinney would make a good leader. I think he should go on the basis that he is a failure, though it doesn't mean that him going would really change things substantially."
Along with Mr Neil, Mr Sillars is a longstanding critic of Mr Swinney and former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
Both were supportive of the late former First Minister Alex Salmond when he fell out with Ms Sturgeon.
Turning to the First Minister's message that the by-election was a straight contest between the SNP and Reform, Mr Sillars said: "He punted Reform instead of dealing with the real opposition which was Labour.
Scottish Labour's victory rally in Hamilton on Friday (Image: Colin Mearns) "It showed a man with a lack of judgment and someone who could not read the street."
Former SNP health secretary Mr Neil was the first senior party figure to call for a change of leadership following the SNP by-election defeat.
In a post on X on Friday Alex Neil, who held Cabinet roles in the administrations of both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon, said it was time for a new leadership.
READ MORE:
Keir Starmer: John Swinney hasn't raised independence referendum with me
Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election
Not a shot that's been fired across SNP's bows, it's a cruise missile
"Poor by election result for the SNP despite having the best candidate," wrote the former Cabinet minister on X.
"It shows that the opinion polls appear wide of the mark. Most importantly it shows the current SNP leadership needs to be replaced urgently."
Mr Sarwar and his party celebrated in the early hours of Friday morning after Labour's Davy Russell was elected as the new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, winning the seat from the SNP.
With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have "voted for change".
The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie.
When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088.
And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election.
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were "delighted" with coming third - despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory.
Speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a "disgraceful" campaign" and insisted the by-election could "help lead the way" to him becoming Scotland's next First Minister.
Mr Swinney said the SNP was "clearly disappointed" with the result.
The First Minister and party leader said Labour had "won by an absolute landslide" in Rutherglen and Hamilton West - noting the SNP "came much closer" this time round.
But he added: "The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do.
"Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully."
The SNP was approached to seek comment on the interventions from Mr Sillars and Mr Neil.
Since coming into office in Spring last year Mr Swinney has attempted to refresh the SNP's policy agenda with a renewed focus on addressing child poverty and improving public services, in particular tackling waits for NHS treatment.
He has attempted to steer away from the public debate on gender politics which dominated the end of Ms Sturgeon's time in office.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out
Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out

Scottish Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out

FRENCH FARCE Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out MIGRANTS could dodge deportation under Labour's 'one-in, one-out' swap deal with France by lodging lengthy human rights appeals. The trial, which started yesterday, includes a clause where anyone making a human rights claim cannot be sent back until their case is heard in the courts. Advertisement 3 Small boat migrants could dodge deportation by lodging lengthy human rights appeals Credit: Getty 3 Lawyers will seize on a loophole to get round Sir Keir Starmer's migrant swap plan Credit: Getty 3 France has agreed to take back a limited number of boat migrants, pictured French President Emmanuel Macron Credit: AFP Tories last night warned lawyers will seize on the loophole to delay or block deportations. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'This deal is likely to be completely unworkable and will be ruthlessly exploited by lawyers to prevent people being returned to France. 'This deal has no numbers in it — presumably because they are so small. 'Returning just six per cent of illegal immigrants, as reported, will have no deterrent effect whatsoever — because 94 per cent get to stay.' Advertisement READ MORE ON MIGRANTS HERE WE GROW UK's immigration hotspots revealed... how does YOUR hometown fare? France has agreed to take back a limited number of boat migrants — one for each the UK accepts legally from French soil. But conditions must be met before someone is removed. Britain picking up tab And Tories say that even those with human rights claims which have been certified as 'clearly unfounded' by officials cannot be sent back until their case is dealt with in the courts, which could take years. The Home Office denies this is the case. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Government won't set targets for how many will be deported. Advertisement She added: 'We will provide regular updates. People will be able to see how many are being detained, how many are returned. It is right we should be transparent. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' Watch moment migrant boat arrives on Spain hols beach before they are chased & tackled by angry locals Ministers hope the new route — where migrants in France apply online — will offer a 'safe and legal' alternative to the boats. But those who have already crossed are not eligible, meaning thousands already here won't be affected. Advertisement Only around 50 people a week are expected to be returned, equivalent to only one in every 17 boat arrivals. The new legal route to Britain only applies to people already in France who have not tried to cross illegally. To qualify, they must prove they have close family in the UK, are at risk of being trafficked or exploited, or come from a country with a high level of successful asylum claims, such as Afghanistan. This Starmer/Macron wheeze has zero chance of working. Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK Unaccompanied children, people with criminal records, and anyone who has previously been deported from the UK cannot apply. Advertisement The deal also reveals that Britain is picking up the tab for both directions of travel — paying for the transport of migrants we send back to France and those we bring in legally. Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said: 'This Starmer/Macron wheeze has zero chance of working. "It won't discourage migrants, while smugglers will be tempted to pile more people into flimsy vessels.' The deal will remain in force until June 2026. But the legal route can be paused automatically if France slows down on taking people back. Advertisement More than 25,000 migrants have crossed in small boats in 2025, up 49 per cent on the same point last year.

Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America
Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America

Scottish Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America

Some will enjoy hotel-quality facilities at Hope Hostel SCHEME TRUMPED Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20million of British taxpayers' money to house our unwanted migrants is to receive its first deportees — from America. Rwanda is taking in 250 migrants thrown out of the US under Donald Trump's mass removal programme. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Rwanda is taking in 250 migrants thrown out of the US under Donald Trump's mass removal programme Credit: Getty Some will enjoy hotel-quality facilities at Hope Hostel, which was readied under the then-Tory government's deportation scheme last summer. The £700million plan was ditched when Labour won the election. Trump is now pushing ahead with his scheme. A Hope Hostel source told The Sun yesterday: 'We are always ready to provide the best services to the customers.' Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo confirmed those arriving in the country would be given support. She added: 'Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. 'Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jump-start their lives in Rwanda.' The initial agreement — signed last month — is for 250 people but can be extended if both countries agree. Britain signed its agreement in 2022. Four UK arrivals were sent to Rwanda but that was under a separate voluntary scheme and did not involve their moving into Hope Hostel. Ismael Bakina, boss of the private operator of the hostel, said the US arrivals would be surprised at the quality of the services offered, adding: 'This is not a prison or a detention centre.' I visited Rwanda's £20m 'migrant hotel' where UK asylum seekers will stay – it's got Premier League on TV & footie pitch

Police face weeks-long delay before they can reveal suspects' nationalities
Police face weeks-long delay before they can reveal suspects' nationalities

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Police face weeks-long delay before they can reveal suspects' nationalities

Police face a weeks-long delay before they are allowed to reveal suspects' nationalities because Downing Street is waiting for new independent guidance before changing the rules. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is urging forces to give more information about suspects' nationalities and migration status after Reform accused Warwickshire Police of a 'cover-up' over the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. However, an official rule change on when foreigners can be publicly identified as suspects has been delayed because of a review that is not expected to be published until the autumn. It came amid criticism of the Government's broader strategy on illegal migration, after Ms Cooper was unable to say whether a new deal with the French would allow small boat migrants to be deported this month. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, warned that the deal was 'wide open to abuse' because France does not have to share any data on who is coming to Britain – meaning new arrivals could include criminals and terrorists. Ministers have asked the Law Commission, an independent advisory body, to update guidance on contempt of court rules, which currently prevent police or officials from giving details about suspects. The review, commissioned in February, is not expected to report until the autumn, and a change in guidance for police forces could be implemented weeks after that. Without an urgent change, ministers fear a repeat of the riots that followed the Southport stabbings last summer, while Downing Street has said police should be more 'transparent' about their suspects. There is concern among law enforcement officials and in Whitehall that public debate about crime by migrants and the threat of violent protests at asylum hotels will culminate into a summer of 'disorder' on the streets. Ms Cooper told the BBC on Tuesday: 'We do want to see more transparency in cases, we think local people do need to have more information.' One police leader told The Telegraph that while the previous system of 'saying as little as possible in order to preserve a fair trial' had worked well in the past, the rise of social media had 'driven a coach and horses' through that approach. He said the absence of information all too often created a vacuum, which was filled by mis- or disinformation, and said the risk to public order meant police must provide more information. The review of police protocol follows inaccurate speculation on social media of the Southport attacker's identity last year, with users alleging that Axel Rudakubana was an illegal immigrant. George Finch, the 19-year-old Reform leader of Warwickshire county council, on Monday accused the Government of covering up alleged crime by migrants in Nuneaton, claiming that the two men charged with the rape of a 12-year-old girl were Afghan. That claim has not been confirmed by police. There is not currently any guidance issued to forces about disclosing the ethnicity or immigration status of an individual on charge. The rules state only that a suspect should be named unless there is an exceptional and legitimate policing purpose for not doing so, or if reporting restrictions apply. Philip Seccombe, the Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner, has said that any release of information by police should 'follow national guidance and legal requirements'. The review of the guidelines on contempt of court was commissioned by Ms Cooper, Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, and Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, earlier this year. The Law Commission's review is expected to find that police officials and ministers should be allowed to reveal more information about suspects in cases where there is a 'threat of serious public disorder'. However, despite a request from ministers to publish new guidelines 'as soon as feasible', the body is not expected to report for some weeks. The delay has effectively left police forces defenceless against accusations of a cover-up, while Downing Street is urging them to make more information available. Another senior officer told The Telegraph any change to the rules would create new issues for the police because they do not routinely collect nationality and ethnicity data unless it is relevant to an investigation. 'The police's job is about gathering evidence and I can see some real practical difficulties in requiring forces to provide extra information,' the officer said. A Home Office source said: 'Not only are we deporting foreign criminals at a rate that Chris Philp and Robert Jenrick never managed when they were in charge at the Home Office, but we are also publishing far more information about that group of offenders than the Tories ever did.' Sir Keir is separately facing criticism over the one in, one out migrant deal agreed with Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, under which migrants who come to the UK illegally are meant to be swapped for people in France who have a legitimate asylum claim in Britain. The Prime Minister announced on Monday that the process of deporting the first Channel migrants under the deal will begin within days. But Mr Philp said the details of the agreement, published on Tuesday, show it will be a 'lawyer's paradise' that will make it too easy for migrants to stay. The agreement states that people who have made 'clearly unfounded' claims under the Human Rights Act will not automatically be deported, meaning lawyers will be able to create lengthy delays. The agreement states that anyone claiming to be under the age of 18 will be able to stay in the UK. Mr Philp said that because Britain does not carry out robust age checks, it means that people in their 20s who could they are under 18 could be allowed to stay. In addition, under the deal France will not have to hand over any data on the people they are sending to the UK, meaning they could be criminals or terrorists. 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse,' he said. 'It's exactly what we've been warning about – a bureaucrat's dream and a lawyer's paradise set to prevent people ever being returned to France. 'There are no numbers specified, presumably because they are so small they would embarrass the Home Secretary. France won't even tell us any information about who we have to accept back, so they could be criminals or terrorists, and we wouldn't know. 'This is a pathetic deal, which simply won't work. No wonder this Government has presided over the worst channel crossing figures in history.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store