logo
Where are the 21/7 bombers now? The true story of the failed terrorists and their attack on London

Where are the 21/7 bombers now? The true story of the failed terrorists and their attack on London

Cosmopolitan10 hours ago
Netflix has had a fascinating run of devastatingly powerful true-crime series and films of late. We're talking the deeply disturbing A British Horror Story, revisiting the horrific crimes of Fred and Rose West and their killing spree back in the 1980s. And Grenfell: Uncovered, a documentary which looks at the safety failings that resulted in 72 people dying when a London tower block caught fire in 2017.
Another four-parter that you should add to your watchlist is Attack on London: The 7/7 Bombings. The documentary, released 20 years after the July 7 bombings that killed 52 people and injured a further 700, looks at how four British citizens became extremists.
The series also touches on the eerily similar suicide bomber plot which took place just two weeks after the 7/7 bombings. Known as the 21/7 bombings, this plot also involved extremists targeting the London underground and bus routes.
Luckily, their plan failed when the explosive devices they were carrying didn't detonate properly. All five men fled the scene, sparking a high-pressure international manhunt to find the would-be terrorists before they potentially struck again.
Here, we explore what happened to these men, where they are now and the events that happened followed the botched terror attack.
At 12.26pm on 21 July 2005, Osman detonated a bomb at Shepherd's Bush Market tube station on London's Hammersmith & City underground line. The homemade explosive device failed to work because the solution of hydrogen peroxide used in the weapon was not strong enough. Instead of causing the chaos, carnage and casualties hoped by the terrorists, the bomb only had the strength of a small firework.
Osman fled the scene immediately, and a manhunt was sparked as the Met Police scrambled to find him and his accomplices. However, officers discovered a gym membership card with Osman's name on it in the bag with the bomb. It linked him to an address in Scotia Road, Tulse Hill. When surveillance was placed on the property, officers wrongly identified Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes as Osman and shot him dead.
Osman himself had fled the country on a false passport, and was hiding in Rome at an apartment owned by his brother-in-law. Police, who were now monitoring Osman's phone, were alerted to Osman's whereabouts after he put an Italian SIM in his device.
Osman was arrested in a raid by Italian authorities on 29 July 2005 and extradited to the UK. In a lengthy and well-documented trial, Osman's defence team claimed his bomb was a hoax, and was not intended to hurt bystanders; instead, this was only meant to be a protest about the Iraq war.
However, this was rejected by the court and Osman was sentenced to life in prison, serving a minimum of 40 years. In 2008, the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge by Osman and the four other bombers to have their convictions overturned. He is thought to be in the high security British jail, Belmarsh Prison.
At 12.30pm on 21 July 2005, a small explosion was reported at Oval Underground station. However, the bomb did not detonate properly, resulting in Mohammed fleeing the scene. When police released images of the assailants, a member of the public recognised Mohammed and gave his name to the authorities.
With Mohammed's name now on file, police were able to trace him to Dalgarno Gardens, a block of flats in west London by 29 August. Because there were fears Mohammed may have explosive devices on him, police told those who lived in the area to evacuate over a gas leak.
They then raided the property, using tear gas to try and lure Mohammed out of his flat.
Police ordered him to come out in his underwear with his hands up to ensure that he was not wearing any explosive devices. He followed orders, giving himself up to the police alongside Muktar Said Ibrahim, another suspected failed bomber, who was also hiding in the flat.
At trial, Mohammed was found guilty of conspiracy to murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of forty years. A 2008 appeal was rejected.
In 2014, Mohammed and two of the other failed bombers appealed to the European Court of Human Rights about overturning their conviction. They claimed their convictions were unfair as they were denied access to lawyers during police questioning and statements they gave were subsequently used at trial. However, this was rejected.
Mohammed is also thought to be serving his sentence at Belmarsh Prison.
At 12.45pm on 21 July 2005, a small explosion was reported between Warren Street and Oxford Circus tube stations on the Victoria Line. Yasin Hassan Omar was the man carrying the homemade device, but — just like Osman's bomb — it wasn't strong enough to cause the carnage Omar had hoped.
Omar escaped capture but, after the police appealed for information, he was identified by a neighbour who lived in the same block of London flats.
When police raided Omar's address, they found evidence of extremist paraphernalia, but he was no longer there. He had, however, been recognised by a member of the public in Birmingham. When police reviewed CCTV, they found Omar had managed to travel openly by wearing a full Burka (a long, loose garment which covers the wearer and is traditionally worn by Muslim women).
It was down to West Midlands Police to investigate the flat Omar had been traced to in Birmingham. When they arrived on 27 July, they found Omar in a bathtub wearing a backpack he claimed was full of explosives. However, one officer chose to taser Omar, and the backpack was actually empty.
Omar was found guilty at Woolwich Crown Court of conspiracy to murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum of 40 years before being considered for release. His 2008 appeal was rejected.
In 2014 Omar, alongside Mohammed and another failed bomber, appealed to the European Court of Human Rights to have their conviction overturned. They claimed their sentences were unfair as they were denied access to lawyers during police questioning and statements they gave were subsequently used at trial. However, this was rejected.
Omar is thought to be serving his sentence at Belmarsh Prison, alongside Mohammed and Osman.
At 1.30pm, Muktar Said Ibrahim's bomb on the 26 bus from Waterloo to Hackney Wick failed to detonate. After the police released CCTV of Ibrahim on the bus, his own father recognised him and gave his name to the police. In a statement released at the time, Ibrahim's family distanced themselves from the failed bomber and said they had no knowledge of his terrorist activities.
A statement issued by police read: 'The family wish to express their shock regarding recent events and in no way condone any acts of terrorism.'
Ibrahim was arrested on 29 July 2005 after police raided a property in west London linked to Ramzi Mohammed. As Ibrahim was hiding alongside Mohammed, the pair were arrested together.
At the 2007 trial, Ibrahim was found guilty at Woolwich Crown Court of conspiracy to murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, to serve a minimum of forty years before being considered for release.
In 2014, Ibrahim joined Omar and Mohammed in appealing to the European Court of Human Rights about overturning their conviction. They claimed their convictions were unfair as they were denied access to lawyers during police questioning and statements they gave were subsequently used at trial. However, this was rejected. He is thought to be held at Belmarsh Prison.
Asiedu was linked to the attempted 21/7 bombings – however, he ditched his device in little Wormwood Scrubs Park in west London and later turned himself in to the authorities.
During the 2007 trial, he testified against the other five defendants and later pleaded guilty to conspiracy to cause an explosion. On 20 November 2007, he was sentenced to 33 years in jail. He is thought to be held at Belmarsh Prison.
In the weeks following the bombing, Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezies was wrongly put under surveillance by the Met police. He lived in the same block of flats as Hussain Osman — and police mistook him for the Shepherd's Bush bomber.
He was fatally shot at Stockwell station on 22 July 2005. In a statement, the Met Police said what had happened to de Menezies was 'a tragedy, and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets'. They also agreed to pay compensation to the de Menezes family. While the amount has not been publicly confirmed, reports at the time believe the payment was around £100,000.
In 2015, the de Menezes's family took the British government to the European Court of Human Rights over the decision not to prosecute any police officer for the fatal shooting, which ultimately proved unsuccessful.
Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers is available to watch on Netflix now
Kimberley Bond is a Multiplatform Writer for Harper's Bazaar, focusing on the arts, culture, careers and lifestyle. She previously worked as a Features Writer for Cosmopolitan UK, and has bylines at The Telegraph, The Independent and British Vogue among countless others.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 new arrests in case of U.K. nurse convicted of murdering 7 infants
3 new arrests in case of U.K. nurse convicted of murdering 7 infants

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

3 new arrests in case of U.K. nurse convicted of murdering 7 infants

London — Three former senior leaders at the British hospital where nurse Lucy Letby was convicted of murdering seven babies have been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter, police said Tuesday. All three were part of the senior leadership team at the Countess of Chester Hospital in the northwest of England between 2015 and 2016, when Letby was found to have killed the babies and attempted to kill seven others. Letby, 35, is serving 15 consecutive life sentences with no chance of parole, but there have been questions raised about the evidence used in her trial, and her lawyer has filed for a formal review of the case. In October 2023, following Letby's conviction, the Cheshire Constabulary police force launched an investigation into potential corporate manslaughter at the hospital, focusing on the decision-making of senior bosses, "to determine whether any criminality has taken place concerning the response to the increased levels of fatalities," according to a Tuesday statement by Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes. That investigation was widened to include the charge of gross negligence manslaughter, leading to the arrest of the three former leaders. All three have been released on bail pending further investigation, the police said. "Both the corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter elements of the investigation are continuing and there are no set timescales for these," Hughes said. "It is important to note that this does not impact on the convictions of Lucy Letby for multiple offenses of murder and attempted murder," he added. The Cheshire police are also investigating deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital between 2012 and 2016, where Letby did her training. Lucy Letby's controversial murder conviction Since her conviction, there have been significant concerns voiced over the evidence used to secure Letby's conviction, with The New Yorker, The Guardian, Private Eye and other outlets reporting on possible alleged flaws in the trial proceedings. In February, a group of experts held a news conference to dispute the medical evidence used to convict Letby. Dr. Shoo Lee, a retired Canadian neonatologist, said the group of 14 doctors had concluded that the newborns died either of natural causes or from insufficient medical care. "In summary then, ladies and gentlemen, we did not find murders," Lee said at the time Letby has maintained her innocence. Her defense attorney Mark McDonald said in April that the experts' findings had "completely demolished" the case against Letby, whom he argues was wrongly convicted. McDonald said he had submitted an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which has the power to send cases back to the Court of Appeal. The CCRC has given no date for when a decision might be reached. In a statement sent to CBS News on Tuesday, McDonald said that despite the news of the three new arrests, "the concerns many have raised will not go away, and we will continue to publicly discuss them." "What is needed is a proper and full public inquiry into the failings of the neonatal and paediatric medical care unit at the Countess of Chester hospital," McDonald said, repeating his assertion that Letby was wrongfully convicted. Jury has more questions in Sean "Diddy" Combs trial Details on the "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center Last-minute rural health care change helped Senate pass Trump budget bill, lawmakers react

Man convicted of raping and murdering woman in 1967 gets life sentence
Man convicted of raping and murdering woman in 1967 gets life sentence

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Man convicted of raping and murdering woman in 1967 gets life sentence

A 92-year-old British man convicted of the 1967 rape and murder of a woman in her home has been sentenced to life in prison. Ryland Headley was found guilty by Bristol Crown Court in southern England of the rape and murder of Louisa Dunne, who was 75 years old when Headley killed her nearly six decades ago. Headley was convicted on Monday and the verdict brought an end to a cold case that remained unsolved for 58 years. He was sentenced on Tuesday. He was told during sentencing that he had committed a 'pitiless and cruel act,' according to PA Media news agency. The judge, Derek Sweeting, sentenced Headley to life in prison, setting a minimum term of 20 years. 'You broke into her home, you sexually assaulted her and in doing so, you caused her death,' Sweeting said, per PA Media. 'You may not have intended to kill, but you planned to rape her, and you brutally attacked her. When you did so, you met her screams and struggles in a force sufficient to kill. The nature of these offenses demonstrates a complete disregard for human life and dignity,' the judge added. 'Mrs Dunne was vulnerable. She was a small, elderly woman living alone. You exploited that vulnerability. You treated her as a means to an end. The violation of her home, her body, and ultimately, her life, was a pitiless and cruel act by a depraved man.' The judge added that, given Headley's age, he will 'never be released' and will 'die in prison.' Dunne was found dead in her home in Easton, in the suburbs of Bristol, in June 1967. The police determined at the time that she had been raped and died of strangulation and asphyxiation. The local constabulary launched a major investigation: they took palmprints from 19,000 men, collected 1,300 statements and made more than 8,000 house-to-house calls, the Avon and Somerset Police said in a statement on Monday. Yet none of it led anywhere, and the case went cold. It wasn't until the police began reviewing the case in 2023 that investigators were able to get a full DNA profile of Dunne's killer from the skirt she was wearing when she died – using technology that was not available at the time of the crime. That DNA profile was then matched with samples taken from Headley following his arrest for two rapes in 1977, leading to his arrest in November 2024. 'For 58 years, this appalling crime went unsolved and Ryland Headley, the man we now know is responsible, avoided justice,' crown prosecuting solicitor Charlotte Ream said in a statement by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Headley denied committing the offences, according to the CPS. A partial handprint found at the scene was also re-examined as part of the case review, the CPS said. The print of a part of a palm, between the wrist and the base of the little finger, was discovered on a window at the back of Dunne's house and was matched to Headley's hand by four experts. 'Headley never featured in (the) original investigation as he lived outside the area where the house-to-house enquiries were carried out,' senior investigating officer with the Avon and Somerset police, Detective Inspector Dave Marchant, said in a statement. Marchant said the 'extensive and meticulous work' that was done by the officers in the initial investigation paved the way for the police to solve the crime. He said that as part of the re-investigation, 20 boxes of original material were reviewed by the police. The CPS said that all but one witness in the case have died over the nearly six decades since the crime was committed, but that old statements were read in court as part of the trial. The CPS said that Headley's other offenses were also considered during the trial. While earlier convictions are not automatically admissible in courts in England, the CPS said that the similarities between the Dunne murder and rape and Headley's two previous convictions for rape were 'too great to ignore.' The CPS said Headley was convicted after pleading guilty of breaking into the homes of two elderly women in Ipswich and raping them. One of the women was in her seventies and the other in her eighties. Their accounts of the attacks to the police at the time were read out to the court. He was initially sentenced to life imprisonment, but this was reduced following an appeal to a seven-year jail term. Ream said the verdict on Monday was a 'demonstration of the commitment of the CPS, and our partners in the police, to relentlessly pursue justice for the victims of crime, no matter how many years – or decades – have passed.' But advocacy groups say rape convictions remain low in the UK and the justice process is incredibly slow. The Office for National Statistics says 71,227 rapes were recorded by police in 2024. According to Rape Crisis, a UK charity, just 2.7% of these cases resulted in charges being brought by the end of 2024. Official government data shows that it currently takes on average 344 days for the police to charge the suspected offender, 30 days for the CPS to authorise the charge, and 336 days for the court to complete the case. CNN's Olivia Kemp contributed reporting.

Two people arrested after Palestine Action claimed it blocked Israeli defence firm's UK site
Two people arrested after Palestine Action claimed it blocked Israeli defence firm's UK site

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Two people arrested after Palestine Action claimed it blocked Israeli defence firm's UK site

Two people have been arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. The move comes ahead of under anti-terror law. A Palestine Action spokesperson said on Tuesday that activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol, and covered it in red paint "to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed". Avon and Somerset Police later said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. The force said officers were called to the site at around 6.30am. A police spokeswoman said: "Two people have been arrested following a small protest outside a premises at the Aztec West Business Park, in Almondsbury. "They remain in police custody and inquiries are ongoing. "We're committed to facilitating people's right to peaceful protest, but will not tolerate any criminal behaviour." The arrests come as a draft order was laid before parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. MPs and peers are set to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. A Palestine Action spokesperson said: "While the government is rushing through Parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. "Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid, and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes." Read more: The spokesperson also said the group had occupied the rooftop of UK subcontractor Guardtech Group. Officers are also at the scene at the site in Brandon, Suffolk. A Suffolk Police spokesman said: "Officers and specialist negotiators are currently at the location and our immediate priority is to bring this to a conclusion and to ensure the safety of everyone at the scene." Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. "Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store