
Inside the European centres favoured for cross-border tax planning
Countries are estimated to be losing €416 billion ($492 billion) in tax revenue each year due to profit shifting by multinational corporations and offshore tax arrangements by wealthy individuals, according to the State of Tax Justice 2024 report by the Tax Justice Network.
The UK, along with its Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, is cited in the report as the largest contributor to global tax revenue losses, accounting for 26% of the total.
The report finds that Europe and its associated jurisdictions are collectively linked to over 70% of the risk of corporate tax base erosion globally.
So, which European jurisdictions are most frequently used in international tax planning structures? Which countries play a prominent role in enabling such practices? And where do current rules make it easier for corporations to minimise their tax liabilities?
The Corporate Tax Haven Index (CTHI) assesses jurisdictions based on how much they contribute to enabling multinational corporations to shift profits and reduce tax payments, using a system of scores and indicators developed by the Tax Justice Network.
A jurisdiction's CTHI value reflects the extent of its involvement in facilitating global corporate tax base erosion, as calculated by the index. According to the 2024 report, countries are ranked by the scale and aggressiveness of their tax systems in offering corporate tax avoidance opportunities.
The UK's network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies features prominently. The British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, and Bermuda occupy the top three positions in the index, each scoring over 2,400 points.
Among European jurisdictions, Switzerland holds the highest score outside the UK network (2,279), while the Netherlands (1,945) ranks highest within the European Union.
Among Europe's top five economies, the UK (894) has the highest CTHI value, closely followed by France (883). Germany scores 590, with Spain at 557. Italy performs the best with a score of 342—since a lower score indicates better performance in limiting corporate tax avoidance.
The CTHI Share is a critical metric that measures the proportion of global corporate tax avoidance risk attributed to each jurisdiction. According to the report, the UK and its network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies are responsible for one-third of global corporate tax avoidance risks, while EU countries account for another third.
Breaking it down further, just three British Overseas Territories account for 19.7% of global corporate tax avoidance risks: the British Virgin Islands (7.1%), the Cayman Islands (6.7%), and Bermuda (5.8%).
In comparison, the UK itself accounts for just 2.1% — still the highest share among Europe's top five economies, followed closely by France, also at 2.1%.
Germany and Spain have similar shares, at 1.4% and 1.3% respectively, while Italy is responsible for just 0.8%.
Switzerland holds a 5.3% share. When other European countries and their associated jurisdictions are included, Europe's total share reaches 72%.
The Haven Score is another key indicator used in the report. It measures the extent to which a jurisdiction's laws and regulations create opportunities for corporate tax avoidance, whether intentional or not.
In 2024, the UK's network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies dominated the rankings, with eight jurisdictions receiving the highest possible score of 100. The UK's score is 59.
Aside from the UK network, Switzerland (89) has the highest Haven Score in Europe, while Ireland and Cyprus (both 79) lead within the EU. Portugal has the lowest score at 46.
In 2021 alone, multinational corporations are estimated to have shifted €1.2 trillion worth of profits into jurisdictions with low or no tax rates, contributing to a €294 billion loss in direct tax revenue for governments globally.
Global Scale Weight is another indicator that measures how much financial activity conducted by multinational corporations enters or exits a given jurisdiction.
Europe and its overseas territories account for 61% of global financial activity, with the UK and its network holding the largest individual share at 16%.
Among individual European countries, the Netherlands has the highest scale weight at 11.1%, followed by Luxembourg at 8.8%. The UK (8.3%), Germany (4.2%), Switzerland and Ireland (both at 3.4%), and France (3.1%) are also among the European countries with the highest scale weights.
When a country offers special tax incentives or preferential tax arrangements to multinational corporations, these companies often end up paying significantly less than the statutory corporate income tax rate on their profits. This can result in much lower lower effective tax rates—known as the Lowest Available Corporate Income Tax Rate (LACIT). This measure is produced by the Tax Justice Network through analysis of potential legal disparities and tax planning strategies.
According to the OECD, the statutory corporate income tax rate is zero in all eight of the UK's Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. However, there are significant discrepancies between statutory rates and the documented lowest available corporate income tax rates (LACIT) in several jurisdictions.
The gap between statutory corporate tax rates and LACIT rates highlights the potential for tax planning strategies that can result in much lower effective rates. For example, in Luxembourg, the statutory rate is 24.9%, while the LACIT is just 0.3%.
In Switzerland, the statutory rate is 19.7% vs. 2.6% LACIT, and in Ireland, the gap is 12.5% vs. almost zero. Belgium shows a difference of 25% vs. 3%, while Malta has the largest gap, with a statutory rate of 35% and a LACIT of just 5%.
The Netherlands also demonstrates a sharp contrast, with a statutory rate of 25.8% vs. 5% for the LACIT. In its overseas territories, such as Aruba and Curaçao, statutory rates drop from over 20% to 0%.
Nvidia's shares surged 5.6% on Tuesday, boosted by a tens-of-billions-of-dollars artificial intelligence (AI) investment plan agreed between the US and Saudi Arabia. However, the AI powerhouse's stock remains down 4.5% year-to-date as of market close on 13 May, facing challenges stemming from US-China trade tensions and the launch of China's DeepSeek, a lower-cost AI model.
CEO Jensen Huang was among the US tech leaders—alongside Tesla's Elon Musk, OpenAI's Sam Altman, AMD's Lisa Su, Palantir's Alex Karp, and other executives—who accompanied President Trump on his visit to Saudi Arabia. At the investment conference, the White House announced a $600 billion investment pledge by the Middle Eastern kingdom into the US, including a nearly $142 billion defence sales deal, an $80 billion commitment into 'cutting-edge transformative technologies' in both countries, and other agreements across energy, aerospace, and sports sectors.
Trump also vowed to lift all sanctions against Syria during his visit, a political gesture to warm the relationship with key Middle East countries. He is also going to meet leaders of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) later this week.
Nvidia announced it will partner with HUMAIN, a subsidiary of Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund focused on AI, to transform the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) into 'a global powerhouse in AI, cloud and enterprise computing, digital twins and robotics.' Nvidia will supply its most advanced AI chips over the next five years, including 18,000 units of the GB200 Grace Blackwell AI supercomputer with its InfiniBand networking in the initial phase. The purchase forms part of a broader project for HUMAIN to build AI factories in the kingdom, with a projected capacity of up to 500 megawatts.
The announcement also includes a deal with the Saudi Data & AI Authority (SDAIA), which will 'deploy up to 5,000 Blackwell GPUs for a sovereign AI factory and enable smart city solutions.' Aramco Digital, the technology arm of oil giant Saudi Aramco, will also collaborate with Nvidia to develop AI infrastructure in the country.
Saudi Arabia, an oil-rich nation, is seeking to diversify its economy, which still relies heavily on crude exports. The kingdom aims to attract $100 billion in foreign direct investment annually, as outlined under its Vision 2030 strategy.
According to a Bloomberg report, the Trump administration is also considering a deal with the UAE, which would permit the import of over one million advanced Nvidia chips—well above the export limits imposed under the Biden administration.
Other major US tech firms, including AMD, Global AI, Amazon, Cisco, and OpenAI, also announced AI investment plans in Saudi Arabia during the event.
Trump's Middle East trip is shaping up to be a major win for US AI chipmakers, as the president looks to ease export curbs to China. On the same day, the US Department of Commerce (DOC) announced that it is rescinding the AI diffusion rule imposed during former President Joe Biden's administration, which had been due to take effect on 15 May.
Biden's administration had implemented fresh restrictions on AI chip exports to China in January, its final month in office, expanding controls to much of the world, amid concerns that China was accessing US AI chips via third countries. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE had also been subject to those restrictions.
'The Trump administration will pursue a bold, inclusive strategy to advance American AI technology with trusted foreign partners, while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries. At the same time, we reject the Biden administration's attempt to impose its own ill-conceived and counterproductive AI policies on the American people,' stated the DOC.
The department added that the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued new guidance to strengthen controls over overseas exports of AI chips to limit China's access to advanced US technologies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
19 hours ago
- Euronews
Europeans are buying frozen food to reduce waste, survey shows
Sustainability is playing a bigger role in how people shop, but does that influence what they buy in the frozen food aisle? A new survey from Europe's largest frozen food company suggests yes. Nearly half of European consumers (47 per cent) are opting for frozen food products to reduce food wastage, according to Nomad Foods, owner of Birds Eye, Findus and other household brands. Almost 59 million tonnes of food waste are generated annually in the EU, according to the European Consumer Organisation. So, in the words of one UK supermarket giant, every little helps. But what difference does buying frozen make exactly, and which countries are embracing it? How does frozen food help reduce waste? It's obvious, really - that freezing food preserves it for longer, meaning less needs to be thrown away and bought. When food goes to waste, it is not only the food itself that is lost, but also the resources used in production and transportation, including fuel, water, land, labour, fertilisers, and packaging. And as food breaks down in landfills, it produces methane - a potent greenhouse gas. 'In 2021 and 2022 combined, food waste accounted for around 18m tonnes of GHG emissions in the UK,' says Ben Ashmore, head of external affairs at FareShare, a charity which works across the food industry to help identify and redistribute surplus food. 'By redistributing surplus food to people, and making it longer-lasting through freezing, we can help reduce food waste and the associated emissions, while helping people in need." There are many reasons why people are leaning more heavily on the freezers, but Nomad Foods' inaugural 'Frozen in Focus' report indicates that sustainability is a prominent factor. 'The freezer is no longer just a place to store food; it's becoming the cornerstone of a more efficient, sustainable, and nutritious lifestyle,' claims Stéfan Descheemaeker, CEO at the UK-headquartered company. The UK leads the way on the food waste front, according to the new multi-market study of 7,500 adults. Nearly 60 per cent of Brits prefer to buy frozen food as it reduces food waste. That figure is followed by 50 per cent in Italy, 49 per cent in France, 43 per cent in Sweden, and 44 per cent in Germany. A smaller, but still significant portion of consumers recognise the potential of frozen food to contribute to more sustainable food chains. 15 per cent in Sweden, 7 per cent in Italy, 9 per cent in the UK, 8 per cent in Germany, and 7 per cent in France agreed with this statement. 'European consumers are increasingly aware of the link between food waste and sustainability,' says David Pettet, head of sustainability at Nomad Foods. 'Freezing food isn't just about convenience; it's a powerful tool for preserving freshness, maximizing resources, and building a more sustainable food system.' Reducing the energy consumption of freezers Research is also going into making the freezer itself a more eco-friendly space, given the significant energy usage and associated emissions of the always-on appliances. Launched in 2023 at COP28, the Move to -15°C Coalition aims to make a difference in food supply chains by "resetting frozen food temperature standards". Featuring big names, like shipping giant Maersk and supermarkets Iceland and Morrisons, the coalition challenges the received wisdom that -18°C is the correct freezer temperature. Studies have shown that -15°C works too, and can deliver significant energy savings. One recent study from Campden BRI, a food and drink research centre, and Nomad Foods found that a 3°C increase in frozen food storage temperatures could reduce freezer energy consumption by 10 per cent, with no significant change in most products.


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Jeff Bezos weds Lauren Sánchez in lavish Venice ceremony
Billionaire Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez tied the knot in a wedding ceremony on the island of San Giorgio Maggiore in Venice on Friday. Sánchez posted a photo to her Instagram of herself beaming in a white gown as she stood alongside tuxedo-clad Bezos, the world's fourth-richest man. Dozens of private jets flocked to Venice's airports and yachts pulled into the city's waterways as guests arrived for the ceremony. Celebrities including members of the Kardashian family as well as Oprah Winfrey were in Venice to attend the wedding. It was the second day of events spread across the Italian lagoon city. On Friday afternoon, Sánchez emerged from her hotel wearing a silk scarf on her head and blew a kiss to journalists before stepping into her water taxi. It carried her through the canals to San Giorgio island, across the lagoon basin from St. Mark's Square, where the couple reportedly held their wedding ceremony. The wedding has divided the Italian city. Some activists protest it as exploitation of Venice by Bezos while ordinary residents suffer from over tourism, high housing costs and the constant threat of climate-induced flooding. About a dozen Venetian organisations, including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups, have united to protest the multi-day wedding under the banner 'No Space For Bezos.' Protesters have staged small-scale protests, unfurling anti-Bezos banners on iconic Venetian landmarks. Critics cite Amazon's labour practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments and Bezos' political associates as reasons for concern. The city's governor Luca Zaia has strongly defended the wedding as an economic and reputation boon for Venice, saying the price tag he had seen was between €40 million and €48 million. Bezos donated 1 million each to three environmental research organisations working to preserve Venice, according to Corila, the Venetian environmental research association.

LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
French debt surges to new record, but IMF intervention ruled out
French debt is rising, and rising very quickly. Despite the government's efforts, the freezing of certain funds and promises of massive savings, France's public debt increased by another €40.5 billion in just three months, reaching €3.346 trillion at the end of March, according to figures released on Thursday, June 26, by the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE,). In one year, the debt, described by Prime Minister François Bayrou as the country's public enemy number one, grew by €185 billion, or 6%. Could this massive debt burden soon force France under the supervision of Brussels, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)? Could this troika impose an austerity plan on France, as happened to Greece in the 2010s when it was revealed the country had falsified its accounts and its budget deficit was three times higher than the official figure? For several weeks, the government has been wielding this dramatic threat as Bayrou prepares to unveil highly anticipated fiscal recovery measures, expected after July 14. "If we do not make these choices now, our creditors or the IMF will impose them on us," warned Public Accounts Minister Amélie de Montchalin in Le Journal du Dimanche on June 7. "This is the last moment to be courageous." De Montchalin hammered home the message again on radio station RTL on June 10: "There is a risk of being placed under the supervision of international institutions, European institutions or our creditors."