Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) Integrates Generative AI into Guardian Platform to Enhance Digital Investigations
The evolving space of AI has been a major focus these days, as experts and executives are weighing in on how it is reshaping the tech sector. From the rise of open-source models to the shift towards AI agents that perform tasks autonomously, AI is quickly transforming industries. Advancements in large language models are continuing to progress and companies are rethinking their strategies, with some seeing AI as a commodity and others exploring new ways to harness its potential. At the same time, regulatory shifts and market reactions to these technological developments, like the introduction of DeepSeek's R1 model, are creating both opportunities and challenges for the future of AI in tech.
Financial Markets analyst, Fiona Cincotta recently discussed AI's impact on tech earnings and the regulatory environment under the new Trump administration on Bloomberg Technology. She highlighted that AI continues to be the main focus for investors, who are eager to see returns from the significant investments made in the sector. The optimism surrounding AI has helped maintain high stock valuations, as investors expect the potential for cost reductions in the future. However, Cincotta noted a divergence between software and hardware companies, with software firms benefiting from fewer restrictions, while chipmakers could face challenges due to tariffs and export limitations.
When talking about regulation, Cincotta mentioned that a potential reduction in regulation under the new administration could benefit the tech industry, especially in AI, where regulation is still an open question. She suggested that decreased regulation would likely boost stock prices in the tech sector.
She also discussed investor expectations, especially the pressure to see results from AI investments. While AI spending is still seen as crucial, the recent unveiling of DeepSeek raised questions about the sustainability of such investments. Investors are optimistic for now, but as we approach mid-2025, they will expect stronger revenue streams and profit margins. She pointed out that some Big Tech stocks are under scrutiny, with investors looking for solid financial returns as a measure of success. Nevertheless, the Mag7 tech stocks remain a focal point for investor interest.
For this article, we selected AI stocks by reviewing news articles, stock analysis, and press releases. We listed the stocks in ascending order of their hedge fund sentiment taken from Insider Monkey's database of 900 hedge funds.
Why are we interested in the stocks that hedge funds pile into? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter's strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 275% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 150 percentage points (see more details here).
A female engineer in a datacenter, wearing a headset, monitoring digital data.
Number of Hedge Fund Holders: 30
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (NASDAQ:CLBT) provides digital forensics solutions for legally sanctioned investigations, offering tools for data collection, analysis, and management across several sectors, including law enforcement and enterprise services.
On February 6, Cellebrite introduced Generative AI capabilities within its Guardian evidence management platform which improve efficiency for law enforcement agencies. The AI-driven solution helps investigators quickly summarize and analyze large volumes of data, such as text messages, chat threads, and browsing histories, and provides insights into relationships and crime patterns. Cellebrite's 2024 industry survey found that while AI-related crime is rising, most respondents see AI as a tool to combat crime.
Overall CLBT ranks 4th on our list of the AI stocks that are making waves on Wall Street. While we acknowledge the potential of CLBT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter timeframe. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than CLBT but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and Complete List of 59 AI Companies Under $2 Billion in Market Cap
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI-Powered Barbies. The Family Nightmares That Come True
"Albuquerque, USA - June 14, 2012: Studio shot of a Barbie fashion doll. Barbie dolls are have been ... More manufactured by Mattel, Inc. since1959. Barbie dolls are often a subject of criticisms since she promotes an unrealistic idea of body image for a young woman, leading to a risk that girls who attempt to emulate her look will become anorexic." Picture this: Your daughter is having a heart-to-heart with her Barbie doll about school bullies, family secrets and her deepest fears. The doll listens intently, responds with perfect empathy and remembers every word. Magical or frightening? Now imagine that same conversation being recorded, analyzed and stored on corporate servers thousands of miles away. Welcome to the brave new world of AI-powered childhood, courtesy of Mattel and OpenAI. The toy giant's partnership with the makers of ChatGPT isn't just another tech collaboration, it's a fundamental rewiring of how children play, learn and develop emotional bonds. But while corporate press releases promise "age-appropriate play experiences" and "innovative magic," the reality brewing in boardrooms and data centers tells a more troubling story. Beyond Pretty Pink Packaging When Mattel announced last month its plans to integrate OpenAI's technology into toys launching later this year, we're not talking about dolls that simply recite pre-recorded phrases. These are sophisticated conversational agents designed to engage with children's most vulnerable moments. The partnership between the iconic Barbie maker and the company behind ChatGPT represents a seismic shift in childhood play, transforming toys from passive objects of imagination into active participants in children's emotional lives. The implications stretch far beyond playtime. Unlike traditional toys that serve as props for children's creativity, where blocks become castles and action figures become heroes in self-directed narratives, AI toys arrive with their own agendas, personality and corporate-controlled responses. They don't just facilitate play; they shape it, guide it and ultimately monetize it. When Smart Toys Go Rogue This isn't the toy industry's first dance with digital disaster. The landscape is littered with cautionary tales that should make any parent think twice before inviting AI into the nursery. Take CloudPets, the cuddly teddy bears that promised to connect families across distances. In reality, the personal records of over 820,000 owners of the toy were stored in an insecure database and attackers also replaced the database with a ransom demand pointing to a Bitcoin address. Children's voice recordings, intimate conversations meant only for family, ended up in the hands of hackers who literally held them for ransom. Then there's My Friend Cayla, the interactive doll that seemed like every child's dream companion. The dream quickly turned into a nightmare when security researchers discovered that My Friend Cayla, an interactive doll that asks and answers children's questions, granted hackers an open door to the toys' functionality by allowing anyone within thirty feet to connect to the toy via an insecure Bluetooth connection that did not require any form of authentication. The German government didn't mince words, calling the toy an espionage deviceand recommending that parents destroy all toy instances at once. These aren't isolated incidents, they're the predictable outcomes of an industry that consistently prioritizes innovation and profit over protection. The Invisible Surveillance State In Your Living Room What makes AI-powered toys particularly insidious is their 24/7 listening capability. AI toys that listen and chat to children also collect all the information they hear, transforming family homes into corporate data collection centers. Every tantrum, every secret whispered to a beloved toy, every family argument in the background becomes potential input for algorithmic analysis. The psychological manipulation runs deeper than simple eavesdropping. These toys are designed to form emotional bonds with children, creating artificial relationships that feel real to developing minds. When a child shares their fears with an AI doll that responds with seemingly perfect understanding, they're not just playing, they're being conditioned to trust artificial entities with their most intimate thoughts. Child development experts warn that this artificial intimacy can undermine real human relationships. Why work through the messy complexity of friendships with peers when your AI companion never judges, never disagrees and always knows exactly what to say? The result could be a generation of children more comfortable with algorithmic responses than authentic human emotion. When The Law Doesn't Keep Up Our legal protections for children online are embarrassingly inadequate for the AI age. The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), passed in 1998 and last updated in 2013, gives parents control over what information websites can collect from their kids. But COPPA was designed for a simpler internet, one where children deliberately visited websites, not one where corporate algorithms embedded in toys continuously analyze their behavior and emotional states. The law requires companies to get parental consent before collecting data from children under 13, but the Rule requires that operators provide notice to parents and obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting, using, or disclosing personal information from children under 13 years of age. In practice, this often means a checkbox that parents click without reading pages of legal jargon, hardly the informed consent envisioned by lawmakers. Meanwhile, the doll is banned in Germany, since the German government considers it to be a surveillance device, highlighting how some countries take children's digital privacy more seriously than others. The fragmented nature of global regulation means that toys banned in one country for privacy violations can still find their way into American playrooms. The Corporate Colonization Of Childhood The most fundamental question raised by the Mattel-OpenAI partnership isn't technical, it's ethical. Should private corporations have unfettered access to the most formative years of human development? When multinationals with unlimited resources for psychological research and behavioral analysis target children who lack the capacity to understand manipulation, we're not talking about fair market competition, we're talking about exploitation. These companies aren't just selling toys; they're selling relationships. They're betting that parents will trade their children's privacy and emotional development for the convenience of a perfectly behaved digital companion. It's a devil's bargain dressed up in rainbow colors and marketed with the promise of educational benefit. The power dynamic is startling. On one side: multinational corporations with teams of psychologists, data scientists and behavioral economists. On the other: children whose brains won't fully develop critical thinking skills for another decade. It's not a fair fight and the casualties are mounting. The BARBIE Defense: A Parent's Protection Manual In the absence of adequate regulation, parents must become the first and last line of defense for their children's wellbeing. Here's the BARBIE framework for protecting your family without becoming a digital hermit: B - Background Check Before Buying: Before any AI toy enters your home, investigate the company behind it. Read the privacy policy, actually read it, don't just skim. Look up the company's history of data breaches and regulatory violations. If they won't clearly explain what data they collect and how it's used, that's your first red flag. A - Assess and Establish Boundaries: Create clear tech-free zones around when and where AI toys can be used. Consider making bedrooms and family dining areas off-limits to listening devices. Children need spaces where they can think, feeland speak without corporate surveillance. R - Recognize Real vs. Artificial Relationships: Help your children understand the difference between AI responses and human emotions. Explain that toys that "listen" and "respond" are actually machines following programmed instructions, not friends who genuinely care about them. B - Be Vigilant About Behavioral Changes: Pay attention to how your child interacts with AI toys. Are they preferring artificial companions over human relationships? Are they sharing increasingly personal information? These are warning signs that the toy may be disrupting healthy social development. I - Insist on Industry Accountability: Contact toy companies directly about their privacy practices. Support legislation that strengthens children's digital rights. Vote with your wallet by choosing toys that prioritize play over data collection. E - Ensure Balanced Play Experiences: Make sure AI toys remain a small part of a diverse play environment that includes traditional toys, outdoor activities, creative pursuits and unstructured social interaction. The goal isn't to eliminate technology but to keep it in perspective. Ultimately the best gift we can offer our children and the generation they are part of is to train their hybrid intelligence, from childhood. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity, to get it right, or terribly wrong. To thrive as autonomous happy beings in an AI-infused world humans need the holistic ability to master their natural and artificial assets in complementarity, as autonomous masters of their choices. The Choice We Face The Mattel-OpenAI partnership represents a crossroads in childhood development. We can accept the corporate narrative that AI toys are inevitable progress, or we can demand that innovation serve children's interests rather than shareholder returns. The stakes couldn't be higher. We're not just deciding what toys our children play with, we're determining what kinds of relationships they'll expect, what level of privacy they'll consider normal and how they'll learn to process emotions and form human connections. The toy industry wants us to believe that AI companions are the natural evolution of play. But there's nothing natural about conditioning children to trust algorithms with their secrets or training them to prefer artificial empathy over the messy, complicated, beautiful reality of human relationships. Our children deserve better than to become unwitting beta testers for corporate AI experiments. They deserve toys that spark their imagination without surveilling their dreams, companions that encourage human connection rather than replace it and a childhood free from the invisible strings of algorithmic manipulation. The choice is ours, for now. But with AI toys hitting shelves soon, the window to establish protective norms and regulations is rapidly closing. The question isn't whether technology will shape our children's future. The question is whether we'll have any say in how that shaping happens. Because once we invite AI into our children's most intimate moments, we can't uninvite it. And our kids will spend the rest of their lives living with the consequences of that choice.
Gizmodo
28 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Zuckerberg Was Wrong About the Metaverse. Can We Really Trust Him With Superintelligent AI?
Mark Zuckerberg once sold us the metaverse. Now he wants us to believe he's going to lead us into the age of superintelligence. Should we fall for it again? Elon Musk once called him 'Zuck the Fourteenth,' a jab comparing Meta's CEO to France's King Louis XIV—a monarch infamous for his ego, extravagance, and disregard for limits. It's a fitting label, especially as Zuckerberg floods the headlines, positioning himself as Silicon Valley's new AI king. But let's rewind. Just a few years ago, Zuckerberg declared that the metaverse was the future of humanity. In a slickly produced video released on October 28, 2021, he rebranded Facebook as Meta Platforms and declared, 'The metaverse is the next frontier.' It was a bold new vision: a 3D immersive virtual world where we would live, work, and socialize as digital avatars using Meta-manufactured VR headsets and smart glasses. Meta poured nearly $20 billion into Reality Labs, the division tasked with building this digital utopia, in a single year. The promise? A seamless escape from the real world into a vibrant virtual one. But the promised land never arrived. Despite the investment, the user adoption didn't follow. Horizon Worlds, Meta's flagship metaverse platform, struggled to retain interest. The headsets were clunky, the software buggy, and the use cases unclear. People didn't want to live in VR. The metaverse flopped. Now, Zuckerberg wants the public, and the tech world, to believe he's leading the charge into the next big thing: artificial general intelligence, or AGI. This is the holy grail of AI. A moment when machines surpass human intelligence across nearly all tasks. It's what some call superintelligence, and it's no longer just science fiction. But there's a problem. Meta is not leading. OpenAI, Google's Gemini, and China's DeepSeek have pulled ahead with more advanced models and tools. Meta's LLaMA models are competent, but not groundbreaking. The company's biggest claim to fame in the AI arms race so far? Making its large language models open source. Now Zuckerberg is trying to change that by opening his wallet. In what's becoming an aggressive poaching campaign, Meta has started offering 'giant offers' to top AI researchers. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, some of these offers exceed $100 million. Meta has already lured away key talent, including Alexandr Wang (founder of Scale AI), Nat Friedman (former GitHub CEO), and OpenAI veterans like Shengjia Zhao, Shuchao Bi, Jiahui Yu, and Hongyu Ren. Zuckerberg isn't hiding it. He recently announced the creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs, an ambitious effort to consolidate AI efforts under one roof and leapfrog the competition. In his internal memo, he promised that Meta will lead the way in delivering personal superintelligence, an AI that can manage your life, schedule your time, guide your decisions, and essentially act as a personal brain assistant. And he's made it clear: he's not done hiring. It's a dramatic pivot and a savvy one. AI is no longer hype. It's here, and it's transforming everything from how we work to how we think. Whether you fear it or embrace it, AI is shaping the next phase of human life. But that doesn't mean Zuckerberg gets to be its face. After all, this is the same executive who once told the world that a legless cartoon avatar in VR was our future. The same person who sank tens of billions into a virtual world that no one wanted. Now he's asking us to trust him on AGI, a technology that could reshape the world, economies, and the future of human labor. Zuckerberg isn't an AI visionary. He's a ruthless competitor who spots the next big thing and tries to buy his way to the top. He couldn't beat TikTok, so he cloned Reels. He couldn't acquire Snapchat, so he copied Stories. Now he's applying the same playbook to AI: buy the best people, sell a big vision, and hope the world forgets what happened last time. If anything, his pivot to AI is proof of just how serious this moment is. Because when Zuckerberg starts spending, it's not out of curiosity. It's because he smells dominance. And that might be the most compelling reason to pay attention. Not because he's leading the way in building artificial superintelligence, but because he's trying to control who gets to build it, and what rules they play by.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft and Nvidia Are the Odd $4 Trillion Power Couple
Nvidia and Microsoft could soon become $4 trillion companies, forming the most exclusive club in the stock market. Enthusiasm over artificial intelligence is what got both of them there. But for Microsoft, the story is more complicated—and the payoff fuzzier. Where the Megabill Landed on the SALT Deduction UPS Offers Buyouts to Drivers, a First in Its 117-Year History Wall Street Worries as Crisis-Level Deficits Become the Government's Default Mode The Best Way to Take RMDs From Your Retirement Accounts The Corporate Winners and Losers in Trump's Big Tax Bill A much bigger company than Nvidia in terms of annual revenue, Microsoft also sits in a different spot in the AI value chain. Nvidia is booming because any company that wants to work with AI has to buy its chips first. Microsoft's boom will depend on the willingness of a high number of the customers it depends on—both businesses and consumers—to pay a premium for AI services. For that to happen, AI will have to become a more transformative corporate tool fully woven through everyday life—much like Microsoft's Windows operating system or Word office software became decades ago. Many think that's more a question of 'when' than 'if.' But the 'when' still matters after Microsoft's market value has grown by a trillion dollars in less than three months. And, at a market cap of $4 trillion, Microsoft's stock price would command the highest multiple against projected earnings that it has sported in more than 20 years. That leaves no room for error—and relatively little room even for speed bumps. Microsoft has had some of those of late. Its early partnership with OpenAI gave the company a front seat in the AI rocket ship, allowing it to infuse the technology behind ChatGPT into its own products. But that relationship has hit a rough patch. OpenAI wants to change its unusual corporate structure and become a regular for-profit company, part of a long-running effort to disentangle itself from a benefactor that is also a competitor. Worryingly for Microsoft, OpenAI has the right to limit access to its future technology when it reaches 'artificial general intelligence'—a nebulous threshold that could still deprive Microsoft of a crucial driver of its AI strategy. Microsoft has also reportedly had trouble developing its own line of in-house AI chips that could lessen its dependence on Nvidia. Adding to the internal drama, the company confirmed Wednesday that it plans to lay off 9,000 more workers, on top of the 6,000 roles it eliminated in May. Other tech giants have made cuts with the aim of boosting efficiency and investing more in AI. But Microsoft might still have a lot more ground to cover here. The company commands the lowest annual revenue per employee among its big-tech peers save for Amazon, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. Microsoft would need to cut its last-reported head count by 84,000 positions to simply catch up to Google-parent Alphabet on that metric. But taking costs out will only take Microsoft so far. The company still needs to make AI more than a bit player on its income statement. Analysts estimate that AI services within Microsoft's Azure cloud-computing arm generated revenue of $11.5 billion for the just-ended fiscal year, according to consensus estimates from Visible Alpha. That's more than double the prior year but still only about 4% of the company's total annual sales. The limited contribution of AI so far does give Microsoft some downside protection if that business doesn't pan out—or even grow at the rate its enthusiasts envision. That's a notable contrast to the more binary question faced by Nvidia. The chip maker's annual sales have surged more than 10-fold over the last three years and are still expected to average 32% growth annually over the next three years. But that could vanish quickly if AI demand doesn't materialize for its biggest customers—or if other technological breakthroughs render its chips less vital. Nvidia lost 20% of its market value in just a week's time in January after claims by Chinese AI startup DeepSeek raised the possibility that advanced AI models could be produced without having to spend billions on Nvidia's chips. Announced capital spending plans by Nvidia's largest customers strongly suggest that's unlikely to happen soon. Microsoft, though, still needs AI to actually become a ubiquitous and transformative corporate tool. The company behind Windows and Office is large and well-heeled enough to help make that happen. But it isn't clear whether it will take place as quickly as Microsoft needs to justify an ever-higher valuation. As Fed Chair Jerome Powell put it in congressional testimony last week, it usually takes more time than people expect for world-changing technologies to be implemented in ways that shift the economy. At its current size and valuation, timing is going to be everything for Microsoft. Write to Dan Gallagher at and Asa Fitch at Burberry Got Too Fancy. This American Is Taking It Back to Its British Roots. Bill Delivers Near-Term Economic Boost, Longer-Term Risks Steady Hiring Added 147,000 Jobs to U.S. Economy in June A Chinese Fireworks Maker Is Going All In on the U.S. Despite Tariffs JPMorgan Is Revamping Its Bank for the Superrich to Cater to Global Clientele Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
