Malaysia needs comprehensive AI-focused laws
Speaking after her ministry's monthly assembly and the launch of the National Legal Academy, Azalina confirmed she had formally written to Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo to initiate discussions on developing AI-specific laws.
'I've proposed a meeting between the Legal Affairs Division and the Digital Ministry to explore a legislative framework for AI,' she said.
Azalina stressed that AI operates on a fundamentally different paradigm from conventional technologies and cannot be governed under existing legal frameworks.
She pointed to the European Union's AI Act – the world's first comprehensive AI legislation – as a model Malaysia could study and adapt to local needs.
'We must look at global frameworks like the EU's AI Act, which categorises risks and defines responsibilities, to see how they can inform Malaysia's approach,' she said.
She also highlighted broader efforts to digitise the judicial system, including the use of voice-to-text transcription and online filing, noting that such systems must extend beyond Putrajaya to district courts nationwide.
Gobind had earlier announced that a detailed proposal on Malaysia's AI regulatory roadmap, currently being finalised by the National Artificial Intelligence Office, would be ready by the end of June.
The roadmap may include new legislation, regulatory rules or standard-setting frameworks.
Azalina also called for stronger corporate accountability laws, citing the recent fatal bus crash in Gerik that claimed 15 lives.
'We need serious policy discussions around corporate negligence and potential laws on corporate manslaughter, especially when public safety is compromised,' she said.
Separately, she confirmed that the Online Safety Act 2024 – which has been gazetted – is awaiting its enforcement date.
The Act will come into effect once Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil signs the enforcement order.
Once in force, the law will allow for immediate regulatory action against harmful online content and introduce a statutory duty of care on platform providers.
An online safety committee will also be formed to define and classify online harms, although child-related matters will remain governed under the Child Act 2001.
Azalina confirmed she had formally written to Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo to initiate discussions on developing AI-specific laws. – Amirul Syafiq/theSun
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
No reason to charge organisers who fail to give notice on assemblies, say lawyers
KUALA LUMPUR: There is no reason to haul people to court for failing to provide prior notification for assemblies, legal experts have said. After the Federal Court declared that Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assemblies Act 2012 was unconstitutional, the police must abide by this ruling, said former co-chair of the Bar Council Human Rights Committee and Constitutional Law Committee Andrew Khoo. "The problem is that in the past, there have been occasions where law enforcement agencies have ignored court orders with can never and no longer be the case. "What this decision affirms is the constitutional right to freedom of peaceful assembly," he said. Constitutional lawyer Joshua Wu said that there were conflicting decisions prior to the Federal Court's ruling yesterday. "The cases of Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad v PP and PP v Yuneswaran Ramaraj (at the Court of Appeal) – Section 9(5) of the PAA 2012 was held to be unconstitutional in Nik Nazmi's case, but was held to be constitutional in Yuneswaran's case," he said. Consequently, the police continued to use Section 9(5) against organisers of public assemblies who did not give the police the five days notice required under Section 9(1) of the Act, he said. "There will no longer be criminal sanctions or prosecutions for non-compliance with Section 9(1) of the Act. This will consequently open the doors for more public assemblies to be organised, particularly on short notice," he said. He explained the Federal Constitution only allowed for parliament to introduce "restrictions" and not "prohibitions", which was why Section 9(5) of the PAA 2012 was deemed unconstitutional. International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) constitutional expert Associate Professor Datuk Dr Wan Ahmad Fauzi Wan Husain, however, said local authorities must provide a space to assemble under Section 9(2) of the Act to allow operating Section 9(5). "Article 10 already imposes a limitation to a public assembly besides other constitutional restrictions. "That is why curtailing the freedom to a peaceful assembly without providing or stipulating a place can be an unproportionate balance of restrictions under Article 10. The question here is, does Section 9 provide such reasonable restrictions?" he asked. He added that subsection (5) must be read with subsection (2) of the provision. "Reading the above sections, the right approach is that the local authority must provide an assembly place under Section 9(2) before enforcing Section 9(5). "Therefore, the issue is whether Section 9(5) can be enforced by the authorities in the case before the court. In my opinion, a constitutionality issue does not arise," he said. Yesterday, the Federal Court declared it unconstitutional to criminalise the failure to notify the police five days in advance before holding a peaceful assembly. Delivering the unanimous decision by a five-member bench, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 imposed a penalty that went beyond what was allowed under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, which guaranteed the freedom of speech, assembly and association.
Borneo Post
9 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Kuching Welfare Office seeks mother of baby left at BMC hatch
The baby boy found at the BMC hatch on June 15. KUCHING (July 1): The Kuching Division Social Welfare Office is appealing to the public for assistance in locating the biological mother of a baby boy placed in the baby hatch at Borneo Medical Centre (BMC) on June 15. According to a statement issued by the office, the newborn, estimated to be around 14 days old, was found fully clothed with a feeding bottle and a handwritten note that read 'Izzy Haziq (L), 14/6/2025 @ 11.40PM.' 'A police report regarding the case was lodged by medical officer Dr Nurul Akma Laili Ramli under the report number SEKAMA/005158/25,' the statement said. The baby was later taken to Sarawak General Hospital for medical observation and has since been placed at Rumah Kanak-kanak Toh Puan Hajah Norkiah, a children's shelter in Kuching. The case is currently under the care of a Child Protector, Nurkhuzaimah Abdullah, from the Welfare Office, in accordance with provisions under the Child Act 2001. 'The Welfare Department is now actively trying to trace the infant's next-of-kin or biological family to facilitate the child's placement process and to register his birth certificate. 'The Protector's report on the matter is scheduled to be presented before the Kuching Child Court on Aug 6,' the statement added. The public who may have any information about the identity or whereabouts of the baby's biological mother are urged to contact Nurkhuzaimah on 082-507111 or 082-507999, or via email at [email protected] . All information will be treated with strict confidentiality.
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Amendment to Plant Varieties Act may raise costs, warns farmers' group
ALOR STAR: The Malaysian Padi Farmers Brotherhood Organisation (Pesawah) has expressed concern over the government's proposed amendments to the Protection of New Plant Varieties Act 2004, warning that they could disrupt the long-standing livelihoods and traditional practices of padi farmers nationwide. The amendment, expected to be tabled in parliament later this month, aims to pave the way for Malaysia to accede to the 1991 International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV 91). While the move is seen as aligning Malaysia with international intellectual property standards, Pesawah chairman Abdul Rashid Yob fears it may come at a cost to tens of thousands of small-scale padi farmers who still rely on traditional seed practices. He claimed the amendments would limit farmers' rights to save, share, and sell seeds from their own harvests — a system that has sustained rural communities for generations. "The amendment would dramatically expand corporate plant breeders' rights while stripping farmers of the freedom to reuse seeds from their own fields. "Practices such as storing seeds for the next season, sharing with neighbours, or selling them on a small scale, all of which are still actively practised, would become punishable offences," he said in a statement today. Abdul Rashid added that such practices remain common, especially in padi-growing states such as Kedah, where it is estimated that nearly 30 per cent of farmers continue to save and exchange seeds each planting season. "These practices serve vital purposes. They help cut costs, as farmers no longer need to buy new seeds each season. "They ensure seed quality, as farmers can select the best grain suited to their specific soil conditions. "And for many, selling seeds in small batches supplements their income," he added. He argued that joining UPOV 91 could dismantle this ecosystem by forcing farmers to purchase only registered seeds from corporate breeders. This, he claimed, would not only increase dependency on large agribusinesses but also raise the overall cost of farming. "When choices are restricted and monopolies allowed to thrive, seed companies can hike prices without constraint, putting further pressure on farmers already struggling with rising costs." Abdul Rashid called on members of parliament to scrutinise the bill carefully and consider the long-term impact on the nation's food security and farming traditions. On Saturday, Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu said amendments to the Act would provide more comprehensive protection for new plant varieties.
