
Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change
The Albanese government trumpeted the passage of its legislation banning under 16s from social media – which will come into effect in December – but new industry codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant under the Online Safety Act will probably have much larger ramifications for how Australians access the internet.
Measures to be deployed by online services could include looking at your account history, or using facial age assurance and bank card checks. Identity checks using IDs such as drivers licences to keep children under 16 off social media will also apply to logged-in accounts for search engines from December, under an industry code that came into force at the end of June.
The code will require search engines to have age assurance measures for all accounts, and where an account holder is determined to be aged under 18, the search engine would be required to switch on safe search features to filter out content such as pornography from search results.
Six more draft codes being considered by the eSafety commissioner would bring similar age assurance measures to a wide range of services Australians use every day, including app stores, AI chatbots and messaging apps.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Any service that hosts or facilitates access to content such as pornography, self-harm material, simulated gaming, or very violent material unsuitable for children will need to ensure children are not able to access that content.
In her National Press Club speech last month, Inman Grant flagged that the codes were needed to keep children safe at every level of the online world.
'It's critical to ensure the layered safety approach which also places responsibility and accountability at critical chokepoints in the tech stack, including the app stores and at the device level, the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign-up and first declare their ages,' she said.
The eSafety commissioner announced the intention of the codes during the development process and when they were submitted, but recent media reporting has drawn renewed attention to these aspects of the codes.
Some people will welcome the changes. News this week that Elon Musk's AI Grok now includes a pornographic chat while still being labelled suitable for ages 12+ on the Apple app store prompted child safety groups to call for Apple to review the app's rating and implement child protection measures in the app store.
Apple and Google are already developing age checks at the device level that can also be used by apps to check the age of their users.
Founder of tech analysis company PivotNine, Justin Warren, says the codes would 'implement sweeping changes to the regulation of communication between people in Australia'.
'It looks like a massive over-reaction after years of policy inaction to curtail the power of a handful of large foreign technology companies,' he says.
'That it hands even more power and control over Australians' online lives to those same foreign tech companies is darkly hilarious.'
One of the industry bodies that worked with the eSafety commissioner to develop the codes, Digi, rejected the notion they would reduce anonymity online, and said the codes targeted specific platforms hosting or providing access to specific kinds of content.
'The codes introduce targeted and proportionate safeguards concerning access to pornography and material rated as unsuitable for minors under 18, such as very violent materials or those advocating or [giving instructions for] suicide, eating disorders or self-harm,' Digi's director of digital policy Dr Jenny Duxbury says.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'These codes introduce safeguards for specific use cases, not a blanket requirement for identity verification across the internet.'
Duxbury says companies may use inference measures – such as account history or device usage patterns – to estimate a user's age, which would mean most users may not have to go through an assurance process.
'Some services may choose to adopt inference methods because they can be effective and less intrusive.'
However, those that do may be caught by surprise when it comes into effect, says Electronic Frontiers Australia chair John Pane.
'While most Australians seem to be aware about the discussion about social media, the average punter is blissfully unaware about what's happening with search engines, and particularly if they go to seek access to adult content or other content that is captured by one of the safety codes, and then having to authenticate that they're over the age of 18 in order to access that content, the people will not be happy, rightly so.'
Companies that don't comply with the codes will face a fine similar to that of the social media ban – up to $49.5m for a breach. Other measures such as eSafety requesting sites be delisted from search results are also an option for non-compliance.
Pane says it would be better if the federal government made changes to the privacy act and introduced AI regulation that would require businesses to do risk assessment and ban certain AI activities deemed an unacceptable risk.
He says a duty of care for the platforms for all users accessing digital services should be legislated.
'We believe this approach, through the legislature, is far more preferable than using regulatory fiat through a regulatory agency,' he said.
Warren is sceptical the age assurance technology will work, highlighting that the search engine code was brought in before the outcome of the age assurance technology trial, due to government this month.
'Eventually, the theory will come into contact with practise.'
After recent media reporting about the codes, the eSafety commissioner's office this week defended including age assurance requirements for searches.
'Search engines are one of the main gateways available to children for much of the harmful material they may encounter, so the code for this sector is an opportunity to provide very important safeguards,' the office said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why this picturesque Aussie city could soon be wiped off the map
Thousands of North Queensland jobs could be lost as Swiss mining giant Glencore considers shutting down its operations in Mount Isa and Phosphate Hill. Business advocacy group Townsville Enterprise said the ripple effects could put up to 17,000 jobs at risk across the Northern Queensland economy. Mount Isa, a city with a population of about 20,000 in the state's Gulf Country region, is largely dependent on mining, in particular Glencore's copper and silver-lead zinc facilities. A memo circulated to staff on Wednesday painted a bleak outlook. Glencore's interim CEO warned the company is 'fast reaching the point' where it must place both facilities into care and maintenance unless a rescue deal is reached. 'To date Glencore has been absorbing losses hopeful that a viable solution could be found,' the memo stated. 'However, we are fast reaching the point at which Glencore cannot continue to absorb these losses. We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments.' The closure of the two copper operations would directly impact around 550 Glencore workers, with an additional 500 jobs under threat at Dyno Nobel's Phosphate Hill operations. Roland Lobegeiger, field services manager at mechanical firm Isadraulics, said the consequences for Mount Isa would be far-reaching. 'Without it, the town's not going to be here,' he told 'There are other mines, there would be other work in the area, but would the town recover? It's hard to say,' he said. 'It would be a significant change for a lot of businesses, homes, house prices – you name it. It's definitely a bit of a dark cloud over the area. Everyone's still optimistic that they won't shut it down, but no one knows.' Senior Glencore executive Suresh Vadnagra told The Australian the miner was still hopeful of a partnership with government to keep the sites alive, potentially including a public equity stake. 'We have been engaging with government for the past five months,' he said. 'We need to know in the coming weeks whether there is a viable solution on the table from governments or whether we start to planning to transition the copper smelter and refinery into care and maintenance. Time is running out.' Glencore expects the two copper assets could lose billions of dollars over the next seven years, citing rising costs and an increasingly uncompetitive business environment. The warning comes amid broader struggles across Australia's smelting sector. Rio Tinto-owned Tomago, the nation's largest aluminium smelter, is also seeking government support as it battles soaring energy prices and competition from China. Industry Minister Tim Ayres signalled the federal government was open to stepping in, telling The Australian Financial Review. 'The truth is, if these facilities didn't exist, governments would be trying to build them,' he said. Meanwhile, Dr John Coyne, Director of National Security Programs at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute warned the closure could risk national security. 'Without access to local smelting, transport and processing costs will increase, threatening their viability and accelerating the decline of Australia's domestic metals processing sector.' Coyne said. He argued that China, the United States and Europe were moving to secure their own supply chains, in the case of a crisis. 'Australia's failure to think strategically puts its long-term prosperity at risk. Copper demand is expected to double over the next decade' he said.


The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
House prices rise in every Australian capital city together for first time in four years
Australia's eight state and territory capital cities posted simultaneous house price rises for the first time in four years last quarter as interest rate cuts underpinned a wave of buying. After a brief reprieve in 2024, prices accelerated in Sydney and Melbourne while Australia's smaller capitals retained momentum, according to June quarter data from property portal Domain. 'It doesn't matter the capital city, it doesn't matter the property type, prices are rising,' Domain's chief of research and economics, Nicola Powell, said. More than 1,700 suburbs around Australia saw house values rise over the year to June, with suburban Perth seeing some of the biggest jumps. About 400 suburbs saw prices fall over the year. Prices picked up in every capital city across building types over the three months to June, the first time in four years for houses and the first time in two years for units. Broad-based demand surges saw prices rise on an annual basis for both houses and units across most capital cities, excluding houses in Darwin, units in Melbourne and both types in Canberra. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Demand jumped nationwide after the Reserve Bank's two cuts to interest rates in 2025 increased borrowing capacity, which Cotality data indicated had pushed more bidders to auctions and driven clearance rates close to 70%. Clearance rates refer to the percentage of properties sold at auction, compared with the total number of properties listed to go under the hammer. Prospective buyers shared stories with Guardian Australia of trying to purchase a house during a fast-rising market, with many repeatedly outbid. While prices are still rising, buying momentum has eased in some overheated capitals, including Brisbane and Adelaide, after median prices surpassed $1m. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'That just locks out so many people from purchasing a house, and it does shift demand towards units … because of the landscape of affordability,' Powell said. 'Some buyers have to seek more affordable alternatives, and units obviously present that.' While Brisbane houses saw prices rise 7.5% in the year to June, apartment prices rose 13.3%. The three months to June saw apartment price growth outstrip house price hikes in Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Canberra and Darwin. Apartment prices were starting to catch up to the pace of house prices as homebuyers and investors switched their focus towards relatively cheaper units, according to Chyi Lin Lee, professor of property at the University of New South Wales. 'What we've seen here is houses leading the units, so we can see the unit prices actually catching up,' Lee said. He said interest in apartments had likely also risen as buyers looked to escape renting and investors seek to take advantage of the persistent surge in rental costs. Cotality data released on Thursday indicated rents had leapt more than 40% since 2020, with median asking prices up nearly $200 per week, or more than $10,000 annually. Rent hikes have since slowed to just 3.4% annually in the year to June, the weakest 12-month increase since 2021 and the equivalent of a $22 weekly increase on the median rent, Cotality found. Property prices, though, are expected to continue to accelerate as the Reserve Bank cuts interest rates further, with a third cut expected when the RBA board meets in August. Analysts have not forecast a property price boom given so many Australians have already been priced out of the market, with AMP predicting home prices will rise no more than 6% annually.


The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia's surge in household battery installations is ‘off the charts' as government subsidy program powers up
A federal government program that gives a 30% subsidy on home batteries has sparked an 'off the charts' surge in installations, with more than 11,500 applications to the scheme in its first three weeks. Industry analysts said the battery boom was reminiscent of the surge in rooftop solar 15 years ago, and that it was ushering in a second revolution in home electricity. According to data provided to Guardian Australia by the Clean Energy Regulator (CER), 11,536 batteries have been installed since the government's $2.3bn Cheaper Home Batteries Program opened for connections on 1 July. More than 1,000 batteries were being installed every day. The managing director of solar consultancy SunWiz, Warwick Johnston, said on some days more battery systems had been registered than stand-alone solar systems – a first for Australia. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Before the scheme was announced, there were about 75,000 battery installations in 2024 compared to 300,000 solar PV systems. So to go from one in six, to one [for] one, shows this [program] has unleashed a wave of interest,' he said. The CER data showed about 40% of the installations since 1 July were in New South Wales, 20% in Queensland, 17% in South Australia and 12% in Victoria. Residents in NSW can also claim hundreds of dollars against a battery from a state-based scheme if they connect it to a virtual power plant provider that aggregates available power and then uses it to keep the electricity system stable. The CER data showed the average size of the batteries under the scheme was 17 kilowatt hours, which Johnston said was much bigger than the ongoing average of 10-12 kWh. Eligible batteries are between 5 kWh and 100 kWh, although fees under the program are only paid up to the first 50 kWh. The chief executive of the Energy Efficiency Council, Luke Menzel, said interest in the battery program was 'off the charts'. 'It underlines just how hungry households are for solutions that can help them manage their energy costs,' he said. In recent months companies have been allowed to sell and install batteries under the scheme, as long as they were not turned on until after 1 July. Andre Scott, a director at solar and battery installer 1KOMMA5, said in May and June, total sales of solar and batteries were up 76% on the same period in 2024. 'We've also seen a significant spike in battery-only purchases – a 459% increase. If we include July, the demand has been at unseen levels across the board,' he said. Scott said the surge in battery-only installations had come from people with existing solar systems. Typical prices for a battery were between $1,000 and $1,200 a kWh before discounts, he said. Most batteries were installed in a way that would provide homes with back-up power in the case of outages. The director of analysis and advisory at Green Energy Markets, Tristan Edis, said the 'demand for batteries has gone nuts'. He said if the current rate of installations was maintained then within five years there would be about 10,000MW of battery capacity installed. 'That's a big deal when you think we have 20,000MW of coal capacity [in Australia]. He said adding batteries in homes would help to spread the use of solar energy into the evening and cut electricity demand during peak periods – a time, he said, when gas turbines traditionally ramp up. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion '[The boom in batteries] completely destroys the business case for a gas turbine and also the high evening prices that coal generators rely on.' Johnston said the levels of interest in home batteries was reminiscent of a period between 2008 and 2010 when the rooftop solar boom took hold. 'There's been a latent interest in batteries and people have been waiting for them to get cheaper. This program has improved the financials of it,' he said. Since the solar boom, the amount that households are paid for feeding electricity back to the grid has dropped significantly. The general manager of distributed energy at the renewable industry's Clean Energy Council, Con Hristodoulidis, said it had taken four years to accumulate 185,000 installed batteries, but that figure could be at 300,000 by the end of the year. 'Solar was the first wave with people realising they could have energy independence. I think this is the second wave of a revolution,' he said. Menzel said Australia had become a world leader in the adoption of rooftop solar with more than 4m systems now installed. 'The early interest in home batteries echoes the early ramp up in solar. 'This is a sign that with the right support the suburbs will step up again to invest in the efficient, electric technologies that will help them drive down their bills.' But he said considering the demand so far, it was 'very unlikely the $2.3bn that has been allocated by the government will last through to 2030 as advertised.' The government allocated $2.3bn in forward estimates for the program, and a further $1.2bn to 2030-31. The discount value per kWh will fall each year as battery prices are also expected to fall. In a statement, the federal energy minister, Chris Bowen, said more than 10,000 people had already claimed on the scheme 'to cut their power bills for good – slashing up to 90% off their energy bill from day one.'