This 2-hour 20-minute film made every Indian proud, made for Rs 25 crore, it earned Rs 342 crore, lead actors are…, movie is…
The name of this film, released in 2019, is 'Uri: The Surgical Strike'. It is based on the terrorist attack in Uri in 2016 and the subsequent surgical strike carried out by the Indian Army in Pakistan. This film shows the story of revenge in which the Indian Army gave a befitting reply to the terrorists and carried out strikes on the terrorist bases in PoK. In which many terrorists were wiped out.
Vicky Kaushal was in the lead role in this film. He played the role of Major Vihaan Shergill in it. He was seen leading the surgical strike in the film. Apart from Vicky, Yami Gautam, Paresh Rawal, and Mohit Raina were also in it. This film was directed by Yami Gautam's husband, Aditya Dhar. Whoever saw this 2-hour 20-minute film, his chest swells with pride after seeing the bravery of the army. The theatre echoed with thunderous applause after seeing the bravery of the army, and every Indian became emotional.
This film dominated the box office for many days after its release. According to media reports, its budget was around Rs 25 crore, and its worldwide collection was Rs 342.06 crore. This film even holds the record of being the highest-grossing film of the year 2019.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sarzameen: Ibrahim Ali Khan's terrible film accidentally gets you to root for a terrorist to kill an Indian soldier, and you can't even deny it
In Sarzameen, a stern military man allows his only son to be murdered by terrorists in Kashmir because… nation comes first or something. You often hear about parents who proudly declare that they are willing to sacrifice their children for the country, and perhaps Prithviraj Sukumaran's Vijay Menon is cut from the same cloth as those folks. The only difference is that his son isn't a soldier on the front-lines, but a child for whom he feels no love. Played by Ibrahim Ali Khan, the child's name is Harman, and the only reason his father hates him is that he isn't like the other boys; he's timid, he can't play sports, and he speaks with a stutter. Bizarrely enough, Sarzameen implies that Vijay wouldn't have let his son die had he conformed to the 'norms' of boyhood. If Harman didn't have a speech impediment, the movie suggests, he'd likely have lived. It's an astounding thought that struck absolutely nobody in the Dharma writing incubator that coughed up this script, which relies almost exclusively on contrivance, convenience, and coincidence to keep the plot moving. Sarzameen expects us to root for a reunion of some kind after it reveals that Harman miraculously survived a bullet to the head — nobody dies in this movie, even after being shot at point-blank range — but unintentionally gets us to cheer for a terrorist to kill a member of the Indian Army. Also read – Nadaaniyan: Ibrahim Ali Khan makes one of the worst debuts in years; is Karan Johar determined to set fire to his career before it even begins? Only a complete failure in storytelling can send a viewer so wildly off track. Sarzameen is directed by Kayoze Irani, who showed such promise with his heartfelt short film in Ajeeb Daastaans. For him to have selected this as his feature debut makes no sense; as it is, it feels like he wasn't involved in the conceptualisation and execution of the action scenes at all. His focus, presumably, was on the drama. And it's drama straight out of a poor '90s movie; you can imagine how competent Sarzameen is when you realise that even Netflix, which gave an enthusiastic thumbs-up to Nadaaniyan, drew the line. As with that film, it feels like every line of dialogue here has been dubbed in a booth and not performed on set. Hindi isn't Prithviraj's mother tongue, and acting doesn't come naturally to Ibrahim. He shows up only after the first act, when Harman inexplicably escapes from the clutches of his captors and reappears in his parents' lives. For some reason, his mother, played by Kajol, is still married to Vijay, even after he abandoned Harman and left him to die. Had Sarzameen shown us what happened during those eight years, her decision would've made sense. But because it doesn't, you're left to assume that the only reason she stuck around is because she has a job to fulfil in the film's third act. Unlike Brody from Homeland, who was closely monitored by the CIA after he returned from captivity tried to begin his life afresh, Harman is simply allowed to go home to his parents. They barely recognise him. He no longer has a stutter, and he seems more confident than he used to be. Vijay is convinced that he's an imposter — the fact that he believes Harman would be the same person who 'died' eight years ago is bananas. Vijay knows that Harman was living with terrorists; he knows that Harman was probably tortured and brainwashed. And still, he welcomes Harman into his house without having him cleared first. Sarzameen seems to think that the dramatic conflict of these scenes rests in whether Harman is Vijay's son, and not whether he's a terrorist. The more suspicious Vijay becomes of Harman, the more you want to lean in and remind him that it's all his fault. Consequently, you root for the kid to shoot him in the face. This almost happens in the pre-interval scene, by the way. But the scene ends with a twist so wild that its sole purpose, seemingly, is to disarm you for the further insanity that Sarzameen has prepared for the climax. Let's talk about it. It is revealed that Harman was, indeed, a militant brainwashed against his father, who, it wouldn't be a stretch to assume, is the living manifestation of India. The villains didn't have to work too hard; Vijay did have him murdered, after all. The movie would've been far more complex had Harman come from a loving home, or if it had shown Harman commit a terrible crime before resurrecting himself. It's almost as if the most interesting chunk of the story — the eight years that Harman spent away from home — was deliberately edited out. Read more – Ae Watan Mere Watan: Heartbreaking, the worst film you've seen just made some strong political points Vijay, of course, has an awakening. But nothing can redeem him; he's like the dad from Udaan, but if he was also a child-killer. The real twist — and Abbas Mustan would be so proud of Kayoze — is that Kajol's character was a double agent all along. It's like they're gifting the Saiyaara generation with their own version of Gupt: The Hidden Truth. She was sent to spy on the Indian Army, but she fell for Vijay and had a child with him. Why she fell in love with a man like him isn't something that the movie feels confident enough to explain. And, having seen what sort of guy he is, it's impossible for the viewer to fill in the blanks either. Sarzameen is, after all, a movie that paints an Army officer as the villain and projects militants as morally justified in their actions. So, why can't it be appreciated like the scores of films made about America's war crimes after 9/11? Why does Sarzameen have more in common with Kajol's own Fanaa — the film's Harry Potter connections deserve a separate article — than it does with something like The Forever Prisoner, a film that understands the difference between empathising with a wrongdoer and actively cheering them on. By relying on trivial tropes, the movie does a disservice not only to its own characters, but also a very real geopolitical issue.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' box office collections day 5: Pawan Kalyan's film crosses Rs 75 cr; epic period drama sees weekend growth
(Picture Courtesy: Facebook) Pawan Kalyan's much-anticipated epic 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' has crossed the Rs 75 crore mark at the Indian box office within just five days of release. As reported by the Sacnilk website, with an estimated Rs 10.91 crore earned on its first Sunday. The film gained a notable upward momentum after a sharp Friday dip. From its Wednesday premiere to the weekend, the period action-drama saw fluctuations in its daily figures, yet sustained enough audience interest to build a solid five-day total of Rs 75.56 crore net. Mixed trends through opening days Reportedly, the Telugu-language historical drama opened with Rs 12.75 crore on its premiere day, before delivering a massive Rs 34.75 crore haul on Thursday, its official Day 1. However, Friday saw a sharp drop to Rs 8 crore, which was majorly due to negative reviews for the Pawan Kalyan starrer. According to the sources, Saturday brought a modest recovery with Rs 9.15 crore, and Sunday further jumped to Rs 10.91 crore in all in Telugu. This gave the makers reason to breathe easy heading into the week. Monday's collection is still pending, but all eyes are now on the weekday hold to see if the film's momentum can continue. A star-driven spectacle with a historical backdrop Set in the 17th-century Mughal Empire, 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' stars Pawan Kalyan as the legendary warrior tasked with recovering the Koh-i-Noor diamond to liberate a city under siege. The cast features Bobby Deol, Nidhhi Agerwal, Sathyaraj, Nargis Fakhri, Nora Fatehi, and Jisshu Sengupta. Hari Hara Veera Mallu | Song - Evaradi Evaradi On the negative side, with all these high prospects, the movie has failed to impress the audiences. 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' is getting only mixed reviews from the audieces and majority of them are complaining about the inconsistent story telling and poor VFX. Let's wait and watch whether the film's collections will maintain in the coming days.
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'I want to bring same disruption, charm like Shah Rukh Khan': Tahir Raj Bhasin on ushering change in cinema
As the Hindi film industry stands at a crossroads—navigating fierce competition from South Indian cinema, the rise of OTT platforms, and shifting audience preferences—actor Tahir Raj Bhasin sees this moment not as a setback, but as a turning point. Drawing inspiration from icons like Shah Rukh Khan, who redefined stardom and genre in the '90s, Tahir, in a candid interview with Hindustan Times, hopes to bring a similar blend of charm and disruption to today's cinematic landscape. Tahir Raj Bhasin, who is currently enjoying rave reviews for his villainous role in Special Ops 2, embraces the duality of cinema and OTT as complementary storytelling mediums. Tahir on bringing SRK-like disruption in Hindi cinema Tahir is currently enjoying rave reviews for his performance as 'Collector', the antagonist in Neeraj Pandey's Special Ops 2, alongside KK Menon. The actor is one of those rare talents in the Hindi film industry who has managed to remain relevant and respected without the traditional support of a film family or "Godfather." Tahir opens up about the evolving landscape of Indian cinema and the influences which continue shaping his artistic journey. "90s SRK was disruptive. It was the villain in Baazigar and the charmer that we saw in DDLJ. SRK today is an icon, but what he was doing in the 90s, were all the kind of heroes like Kabhi Haan Kabhi Na, who were flawed and had an element of charm to them. And so comes the idea to me that I would lend my skill to stories that are disruptive and drive them as entertainingly as possible," Tahir said. Reflecting on the current state of the Hindi film industry, especially amid comparisons with the booming South Indian cinema, Tahir describes Bollywood as a 'living organism.' 'It evolves and has to change and adapt to the time and to the audience,' he says. For him, this moment of flux isn't one of crisis but of opportunity. 'Only in times of change can new experiments and new things be tried out,' he insists, viewing the disruption as a fertile period for creative innovation. On OTT vs Cinema Tahir believes that cinema and OTT platforms aren't in competition but are complementary media. 'There's a charm in seeing a film in a theatre with a large community in a dark room and great surround sound,' he explains. 'But then there are some stories that are better told in an episodic format on OTT.' He sees this duality as a win for audiences, offering more choices and richer storytelling. On getting adulation from female fans for Special Ops 2 His recent role as 'The Collector' in Special Ops 2 earned wide appreciation, surprisingly from a large number of female fans. 'I thought the genre would appeal more to a male audience because of the action and espionage. But the response has been very balanced,' he says, adding that such feedback makes him hopeful about exploring the character more. 'You always want to leave the audience feeling like they want to know more. Curiosity is the best way to engage with your audience.' Tahir's future plans On the professional front, Tahir recently wrapped a mystery thriller for Netflix alongside Parineeti Chopra, directed by Renzil D'Silva and produced by Siddharth P. Malhotra. Though tight-lipped about his role, he reveals that it's a genre he's exploring for the first time, adding another feather to his diverse acting cap. When asked whether audiences will see him on the big screen soon, Tahir responds enthusiastically. 'Absolutely. We're looking at a bunch of scripts. It's always about finding the right part.' He feels fortunate to be part of a generation where actors can move seamlessly between cinema and digital platforms. 'The audience accepts you, whether you're playing a hero or an antagonist. They relate to the story.' A self-confessed Bollywood romantic, Tahir grew up during the golden era of 90s cinema. 'I'm a hardcore Bollywood buff. Any 90s kid is a romantic at heart, especially if you grew up watching a lot of Shah Rukh Khan and Aamir Khan,' he says with a smile. While fans have loved his intense villainous roles, many now want to see him play the quintessential lover boy on screen — a shift he's more than open to, provided the script is right.
