Canterbury to get more test flights
Photo: Tāwhaki National Aerospace Centre
Part of Canterbury's airspace is now permanently allocated for test flights in a move the minister for space says will position the region as a global leader in aerospace innovation.
Judith Collins said the test flight allocation would give Tāwhaki National Aerospace Centre on Lake Ellesmere and other aviation companies the freedom to safely trial next-generation technologies.
"The Civil Aviation Authority's (CAA) permanent special use airspace designation for Tāwhaki anchors Canterbury's growing reputation as a national hub for space and advanced aviation innovation."
From August 7, six 'Restricted and Danger Areas' will be permanently designated but only activated when needed, to minimise disruptions to other fliers.
Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ
Collins said the space sector in particular had grown rapidly.
"Canterbury is an ideal launchpad for the space and advanced aviation sectors due to its combination of location, test-bed facilities, research and innovation capability, manufacturing capability and workforce," Collins said.
"The space sector has grown 53% in the five years to 2023-24 to contribute more than $2.47 billion to the economy.
"The advanced aviation sector contributed $480 million in the same period, with some overlaps with the space sector."
Restricted Areas will allow Tāwhaki to manage the entry, exit and operations of aircraft in the area while Danger Areas let airspace users know there is a potential danger to flying in the area.
Tāwhaki executive director John Holt said the allocation was a win for the sector and "regulatory infrastructure" was just as vital as the physical infrastructure.
"This Special Use Airspace is a significant piece of infrastructure that will unlock huge opportunities for New Zealand. It's forward-looking, pragmatic and, most importantly, keeps safety absolutely paramount," Holt said.
Collins said the government saw space as having huge potential.
"The upcoming New Zealand Aerospace Summit in Christchurch in October will draw an international audience, providing an opportunity to showcase Canterbury's unique attributes to advanced aviation innovators."
Public consultation on the proposed changes to the Civil Aviation Rules close on July 27.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Multimillionaire couple's helipad approved despite uproar
By Jessica Hopkins of RNZ Despite uproar from the community, multimillionaire Auckland couple entrepreneur Anna Mowbray and former All Black Ali Williams will be allowed a helicopter pad at their Auckland property. After weeks of deliberation, three independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council have approved the couple's controversial resource consent application - with some concessions. The commissioners' decision, released today, stated flights would be limited to no more than two per day and 10 per month. "The use of a helicopter for property access in the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) residential zones is a permitted activity, being an activity that is inherently associated with residential land use, provided it can comply with any applicable standards. "We find that the noise effects that would be generated by helicopter take-offs and landings would not be unreasonable and would not diminish the amenity values of this residential zone to any material degree. "In particular, disturbance to sleep during normal sleeping hours will be avoided and the hours of operation and number of flights are limited: the estimated period of audibility of helicopter noise by neighbours would be around 3 minutes and 20 seconds per flight or 33 minutes per month (assuming 10 flights were conducted)." According to Auckland Council, out of 1397 written submissions made on the application, a majority - 1227, or 87 percent - opposed the helipad on Rawene Avenue. One-hundred and eight were supportive, and 12 were neutral. During a five-day public hearing at Auckland Town Hall in May, the panel commissioners heard expert evidence from the couple's legal counsel and the group Quiet Sky Waitematā as well as submissions from members of the public, including several direct neighbours, opposing and supporting the application. In their decision, the panel dismissed residents' frustrations with privately operated helicopters coming and going from the nearby suburb of Herne Bay. The panel was satisfied the couple restricting flights to daylight hours and sticking to a specified flight path avoiding residential areas would mean minimal disturbance. "We find that there is nothing untoward, unacceptable, or significantly out-of-character with helicopter noise in an urban residential environment. "What is more important in any proposal to undertake helicopter landings and take-offs in that environment is the extent/volume of that noise." The couple would also be required to get an Avifauna Monitoring Plan from a council-approved ornithologist to monitor disruption to the Meola Reef and nearby bird roost. During the hearing, the couple's legal counsel Chris Simmons said they agreed to concessions to reduce adverse impacts on neighbours and wildlife. He said opposers' submissions could be "confused, overstated, misleading, and potentially irrelevant" to the panel. In a social media post, Quiet Sky Waitematā said the panel's decision was not the outcome they were hoping for. "It sets a worrying precedent for future applications around Auckland. "We're still digesting the decision that was released this morning but safe to say given the huge number of submissions against this application it won't be a popular one." Reuben Jackson from the Hawke Sea Scouts told RNZ he was disappointed by the decision and their concerns had been ignored. He earlier told the panel their primary school-aged scouts based at Coxs Bay, about 300 metres from the proposed helipad, would no longer be able to do activities there around low tide if a helicopter could land nearby. "The consent has a lot of information for us to digest. At first glance, the council have done nothing to address the safety of youth who might be walking along the coast during a landing," he said.
Otago Daily Times
11 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Kiwi turned away at US border gives advice for travellers
The majority of travellers entering the US will have no problem, says writer Alistair Kitchen. But if you're not fine, he warns, "let me tell you, it will be a traumatic experience". Alistair Kitchen flew from Melbourne to New York to visit friends two weeks ago. During a stopover in Los Angeles, the 33-year-old writer was pulled from the customs line, detained for around 12 hours by border agents, and questioned about his views on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Kitchen was a student at Columbia University in New York last year, where he covered pro-Palestinian rallies on his personal blog. He realised something was wrong when he first got off the plane, he told RNZ's Afternoons. 'I stepped into that hall at LAX where they process your passport. And before I could even get in the queue, my name was called over the loudspeaker. 'And that by itself is pretty strange when you're in a crowd of a thousand people. And I was pulled into the backroom and my phone was demanded and my passcode was demanded. 'And I realised at that moment that this wasn't random or ad hoc, but they had been waiting for me.' Border agents told him, he says, the reason he was being questioned was because of posts he wrote about the protests at Columbia University which he says would be considered mainstream views in Australia or New Zealand. He had taken those posts down days before he boarded the plane, he says. Even though he felt he had prepared sufficiently prior to the flight, in hindsight, he says, he was never going to be let in the country. 'I prepared for a situation which I think most travellers in Australia and New Zealand are right to prepare for, which is you go through the passport control, and you do make sure that your social media has been cleaned up, that your phone is missing messages that might have been critical of Donald Trump, for example. 'I think that's prudent and wise. In my case, it was not sufficient, exactly because they had already done this background search on me. Because they had already done that work, in my view, I was never going to get through.' When he was taken into detention, he says he was told that if he did not hand over his passcode and phone, he would be immediately deported. 'Obviously, I hesitated and declined to give them my passcode when they first asked for it. 'They then said, that's fine, we'll deport you right now. And I made the mistake at that moment of complying. And I did that because I still had hope. 'I still had the sense that, hey, I write a blog that no one reads. Surely these are reasonable people. Surely, they'll see that I don't pose a threat to anyone.' The Department of Homeland Security has denied Kitchen was deported over his political views. 'The individual in question was denied entry because he gave false information on his ESTA application regarding drug use", it said in a statement. Kitchen says they downloaded the contents of his phone and after 'grilling' him on his views on Israel-Palestine they said they'd found evidence on his phone he'd misrepresented himself to them about drug use on his ETSA form and would have to send him home. 'What happened in that moment is that I, 15 hours off a flight from Melbourne, started imagining all manner of evidence on my phone that I now know does not exist.' He admitted he had done drugs before. 'Among other things, I bought weed in New York, which is legal in the state, but illegal federally. Having admitted to it, they had even more grounds to deport me. 'That's not something I'm disputing. What is clear is that I was only selected at the beginning because of my political speech. And I know that because they told me.' He advises people travelling to the US take a basic burner phone. 'Buy a second phone, text your mum on it, take a bunch of pictures, but have only content on it that you can absolutely account for.' He did a 'cursory and superficial' cleanup of his phone which 'turned out to be totally insufficient".
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
How to prepare for a US trip from someone rejected at the border
The majority of travellers entering the US will have no problem, says writer Alistair Kitchen. But if you're not fine, he warns, "let me tell you, it will be a traumatic experience". Alistair Kitchen flew from Melbourne to New York to visit friends two weeks ago. During a stopover in Los Angeles, the 33-year-old writer was pulled from the customs line, detained for around 12 hours by border agents, and questioned about his views on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Kitchen was a student at Columbia University in New York last year, where he covered pro-Palestinian rallies on his personal blog. He realised something was wrong when he first got off the plane, he told RNZ's Afternoons. 'I stepped into that hall at LAX where they process your passport. And before I could even get in the queue, my name was called over the loudspeaker. 'And that by itself is pretty strange when you're in a crowd of a thousand people. And I was pulled into the backroom and my phone was demanded and my passcode was demanded. 'And I realised at that moment that this wasn't random or ad hoc, but they had been waiting for me.' Border agents told him, he says, the reason he was being questioned was because of posts he wrote about the protests at Columbia University which he says would be considered mainstream views in Australia or New Zealand. He had taken those posts down days before he boarded the plane, he says. Even though he felt he had prepared sufficiently prior to the flight, in hindsight, he says, he was never going to be let in the country. 'I prepared for a situation which I think most travellers in Australia and New Zealand are right to prepare for, which is you go through the passport control, and you do make sure that your social media has been cleaned up, that your phone is missing messages that might have been critical of Donald Trump, for example. 'I think that's prudent and wise. In my case, it was not sufficient, exactly because they had already done this background search on me. Because they had already done that work, in my view, I was never going to get through.' When he was taken into detention, he says he was told that if he did not hand over his passcode and phone, he would be immediately deported. 'Obviously, I hesitated and declined to give them my passcode when they first asked for it. 'They then said, that's fine, we'll deport you right now. And I made the mistake at that moment of complying. And I did that because I still had hope. 'I still had the sense that, hey, I write a blog that no one reads. Surely these are reasonable people. Surely, they'll see that I don't pose a threat to anyone.' The Department of Homeland Security has denied Kitchen was deported over his political views. 'The individual in question was denied entry because he gave false information on his ESTA application regarding drug use", it said in a statement. Kitchen says they downloaded the contents of his phone and after 'grilling' him on his views on Israel-Palestine they said they'd found evidence on his phone he'd misrepresented himself to them about drug use on his ETSA form and would have to send him home. 'What happened in that moment is that I, 15 hours off a flight from Melbourne, started imagining all manner of evidence on my phone that I now know does not exist.' He admitted he had done drugs before. 'Among other things, I bought weed in New York, which is legal in the state, but illegal federally. Having admitted to it, they had even more grounds to deport me. 'That's not something I'm disputing. What is clear is that I was only selected at the beginning because of my political speech. And I know that because they told me.' He advises people travelling to the US take a basic burner phone. 'Buy a second phone, text your mum on it, take a bunch of pictures, but have only content on it that you can absolutely account for.' He did a 'cursory and superficial' cleanup of his phone which 'turned out to be totally insufficient".
