logo
Driving the 2025 Omoda C7 PHEV from Shanghai to Wuhu

Driving the 2025 Omoda C7 PHEV from Shanghai to Wuhu

NZ Autocar06-05-2025
Driving a 2025 Omoda C7 PHEV from Shanghai to Wuhu was a test of the vehicle and the mettle of motoring journalists from nine countries, who were challenged to equal or better the car's claimed range of 1200km.
I was joined by expatriate Australian, Stuart Masson, The Car Expert UK editorial director in the #4 Team Australia car, with Omoda Jaecoo product manager Alaric Wang and Omoda Jaecoo UK PR representative Hannah Burgess. Following the Auto Shanghai show, the Omoda brand gathered the teams at the historic Shanghai Glass Museum on the outskirts of the city for the official start of the endurance marathon. To ensure there was no cheating, the Omoda staff asked the journalists to officially seal both the fuel filler flap and the EV port flap with some ceremonial tape.
The two-day endurance marathon saw the teams challenged by torrential weather, miscreant motorists and pedestrians and some very dodgy truck driving on local roads. However, the standard of driving on the tolled, high-speed highways was far superior. The #4 car left Shanghai with 59km on the odometer, 97 per cent battery charge and the distance to empty reading 1109km. From Shanghai, the drive route headed through Hangzhou and onto Qiandao Lake on day one, then onto Xuancheng and finally Wuhu. The car arrived in Wuhu with 822km on the odometer, 19km of battery range and 414km distance to empty for a range total of 1177km. A team from Brazil won the Omoda C7 endurance challenge with a total driving range of 1457km, while a team from Italy scored the worst result with a total driving range of 1119km.
Read more Omoda 7 PHEV another crossover with huge weekend range
After the event concluded, the nine teams were greeted at Omoda Jaecoo headquarters by the brand's chief executive Mr Shawn Xu. Xu thanked the media for their efforts and confirmed that the Omoda Jaecoo brand will continue to develop its super hybrid technology to bring yet more fuel-efficient vehicles to export markets.
Omoda C7 PHEV facts and figures
At 4.6 metres long with a 2700mm wheelbase, the mid-size Omoda 7 PHEV offers comfortable seating for four people, and rear legroom that is usually found in much larger vehicles. The boot will accommodate two full-size and two carry-on-sized suitcases.
The #4 Team Australia car offered a similar level of interior comfort and specification as the Jaecoo J7 SHS Summit, which NZ Autocar recently drove in Australia. The uniquely quartic-shaped steering wheel and seats were finished in a light grey leather-like upholstery, and the full-length sunroof is likely to be offered on export vehicles. A positive note about the C7 is that it is one of the few cars where the head-up display is visible through prescription polarised sunglasses. Two unique party tricks exclusive to the C7 were the ability of the central screen to move across the dashboard and park itself directly across from the front seat passenger. The other was the climate control system's ability to ionise the air quality and also allow the choice of three fragrances for the cabin.
The Omoda C7 uses the same 1.5-litre plug-in hybrid powertrain as the Jaecoo J7 PHEV, with the manufacturer claiming outputs of 105kW/215Nm for the Miller Cycle petrol engine and 150kW/310Nm for the electric motor. Combined output is reputedly 258kW/524Nm. In hybrid mode, the two units work in unison to deliver a total claimed driving range of 1200km.
Power is sent to the front wheels via a single-speed Dedicated Hybrid Transmission (DHT). The powertrain offers various driving modes including pure electric, series, parallel and energy recovery. Ordinarily, it allows drivers to enjoy pure electric operation at low speeds and is ideal for city commutes under 40km/h while providing efficient fuel performance at speeds above 80km/h.
Travelling up to 90km on a charge, the Lithium Iron Phosphate battery has a capacity of 18.3kWh and can be charged from 30-80 per cent at up to 40kW on a DC fast charger in 20 minutes. Above 30 per cent charge, the C7 can run as a pure EV up to speeds of 120km/h.
Omoda C7 PHEV driving impressions
Much like its sibling the Jaecoo J7 PHEV, the Omoda 7 is quiet and powerful and sits solidly on the road, with excellent steering response and strong brakes. At the legal limit of 120km/h on the Chinese highways, it felt composed and quiet. Even when torrential rain hit on the first day's run between Shanghai and Quindao Lake, the C7 didn't flinch, it just kept calm and carried on. The high-quality interior impressed with its fit and finish, and the overall build quality of the car was excellent for what we understood was a pre-production vehicle.
It augurs well for the future of the brand here. The Omoda C7 PHEV is expected to land in New Zealand in the first quarter of 2026, but final specifications and prices are yet to be confirmed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tourism Holdings picks up speed as NZX trades flat on low volumes
Tourism Holdings picks up speed as NZX trades flat on low volumes

NZ Herald

time10 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Tourism Holdings picks up speed as NZX trades flat on low volumes

The NZX Briscoe Group compounded Monday's gains, lifting 3.1% to 5.99. Robertshawe said the stock is continuing to benefit from joining the share market's main index in June. 'It shouldn't happen this way, but it does, just because it's in the 50, more people are looking at it, and so you'll get more people researching it.' NZ's largest electricity lines company, Vector, rose 2.26% to $4.53. According to Robertshawe, a couple of analysts from broking houses ('I think Forsyth Barr and Jarden') have upped their longer-term forecast and valuations for the stock recently. Tourism Holdings (THL) gained 9.09% to $2.16 on volumes worth just over $63,000. The campervan company informed the market in June that it had received a buyout offer. The $2.30 per share offer price represented a 57.5% premium over the at-the-time trading price of $1.46. 'It got under $2 when there's a bid at $2.30, potentially just around the corner. That seems a bit wrong. So that's not a surprising move,' Robertshawe said. Another company that is potentially being taken over, Vital, was up 1.16% to 43.5 cents. In June, Tait Communications, a Christchurch-based critical communications systems provider, made a formal offer to purchase the company for 45c per share and 13c per employee option. A significant product holder (SPH) notice released to the NZX by Vital on Tuesday showed Tait had upped its stake to 30.4%. The US Unlike the United States' S&P 500 and the Australian bluechip ASX 200, which are trading at all-time highs, the NZX 50 is still down nearly 3% for the year to date. Overnight, President Donald Trump threatened Russia with 'severe' tariffs and other financial penalties if the war in Ukraine does not end soon, in a meeting with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. That came after Trump said he would impose a 30% rate for Mexico and the European Union, which would kick in on August 1 if they did not accept better terms in the ongoing trade discussions with the two trading partners. Robertshawe said a state of inertia had set in and that markets appear to be ignoring news that would, in normal circumstances, move global stocks. 'Risks are clearly higher than February. Even if a tariff is stuck at 10%, it's still higher than they were before then. Earnings have been downgraded to 3% to 4% globally, and markets are at new highs. 'The market's saying, 'Despite it being riskier than it was, I'm happy to pay more for stocks'. And I think that is hard to understand from a fundamentals perspective.'

Supermarkets impervious to bad headlines and court fines
Supermarkets impervious to bad headlines and court fines

Newsroom

time10 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Supermarkets impervious to bad headlines and court fines

Opinion: If you have the impression the big supermarket chains have been facing a lot of court cases over allegations of abusing competition, heavying suppliers or exploiting customers, then you're not wrong. The Commerce Commission reveals it will be filing civil proceedings against Foodstuffs North Island and its wholesale arm, Gilmours, for alleged cartel conduct. Essentially, it alleges they pressured a big food producer to cancel a deal to supply direct to a hospitality customer, and instead transact via the Foodstuffs firms. We've been hearing these sorts of allegations for more than 10 years now. In 2014, Shane Jones (who was then a Labour MP) sparked an inquiry by claiming in Parliament that New Zealand suppliers were being 'blackmailed' into making payments to the Australian-owned chain Countdown, to ensure their products continued to be stocked. He called it a 'shakedown' and an example of the ruthless 'dingo culture' of Australian corporations. Back then, I remember talking to big Kiwi food suppliers. Really big companies. Companies whose brands are household names. One senior manager at a food multinational told me the supermarket brought in top Australian managers to its south Auckland HQ, to review suppliers' terms. 'Suddenly you get invited into a windowless room at Favona Rd and you get ambushed.' But they were too scared to speak out publicly – 'people are nervous about getting that phone call inviting them to that windowless room' – and that's only slowly starting to change. Today, the focus is on both Woolworths (as Countdown is now branded) and perhaps more so, the New Zealand cooperatives that make up Foodstuffs. It started with the Commerce Commission market study of grocery competition. And from July 2021, one after another, Kiwi suppliers mustered the courage to speak publicly to Newsroom. First Sarah Hedger, the founder of a the small Yum Granola breakfast cereal maker in Nelson. Then Orchard Gold, Bloomsberry Chocolate and even the big fishing company Sealord. Yet just last week, the commission issued a warning to Foodstuffs North Island for its treatment of another supplier, arbitrarily obstructing and delaying the business from raising its wholesale prices. The commission is already prosecuting Woolworths for allegedly misleading consumers about the price they'd pay for groceries, and fake 'specials'. The owners of Foodstuff's Pak'nSave supermarkets in Mill St and Silverdale have pleaded guilty to similar charges. Earlier, Pak'nSave Mangere was fined $78,000 for promotional price discrepancies. The commission has taken action against both supermarket chains over restrictive land covenants. Last year, the High Court penalised Foodstuffs $3.25m for lodging anti-competitive land covenants with the purpose of blocking competitors. There are more ongoing Commerce Commission investigations, that may yet result in criminal charges or civil proceedings. And it's not just the commission that has unscrupulous supermarket behaviour in its crosshairs. Newsroom revealed in 2023 that police had won a judicial order forcing grocery giants Foodstuffs and Woolworths to change the way they do business. It was the result of a test case against Silverstream New World for illegal discounting of alcohol. That was followed last year by the Alcohol Regulation and Licensing Authority ordering more than 30 New World supermarkets' off-licences to be suspended, after a wider police case of illegal discounting. The question has to be, are these bad corporate citizens? Certainly, senior politicians in both National and Labour seem to have drawn that conclusion. Finance Minister Nicola Willis, like her Labour predecessors, has spoken loudly and firmly about her determination to crack down on supermarkets in order to rein in rising food prices. Foodstuffs managing director Chris Quin says his cooperatives are very focused on managing down prices. He claims a basket of food from Pak'nSave compares favourably in price with a basket from Aldi in Australia. He claims Foodstuffs has surveyed New Zealanders and most of them understand that rising prices are driving the continuing food inflation. 'Facts do matter a little bit. I know they can appear pretty complicated, but keeping it simple like that matters,' he told broadcaster Mike Hosking a month ago. 'But none of that makes it easier in terms of households meeting budget.' In response to the latest court case, spokesperson Stefan Herrick says Foodstuffs North Island and its stores are committed to complying with all their regulatory obligations, and cooperated fully with the Commerce Commission throughout its investigation. 'We strongly deny any unlawful conduct,' he says. 'As this matter will be before the court in due course, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.' Jon Duffy, the Consumer NZ chief executive, welcomes the Commerce Commission cases, which he says are difficult for regulators to detect. 'Complainants reporting this type of conduct often face the risk of retribution. When you are dealing with businesses on the scale of supermarkets, targeted retribution could wipe out a supplier's business.' Consumer NZ, too, reports heading off-the-record comments for years, about how supermarkets conduct their business and treat suppliers. 'We understand there is a significant number of other active cases on the commission's books relating to a range of supermarket conduct under the Commerce Act, the Grocery Industry Competition Act and the Fair Trading Act.' Duffy believes the series of cases, with warnings and guilty pleas, could indicate a culture issue within the Foodstuffs North Island cooperative – a belief it can act without consequence. It's got to the extent that last week, Willis said she planned to meet Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell to discuss how to get affordable cheese, milk and butter to New Zealanders. Willis said she was interested in how much of the recent price increases were due to Fonterra's wholesale prices, and how much was about a lack of supermarket competition. It's true that last month, Stats NZ figures showed the price of milk was up 15 percent, cheese was up more than 30 percent, and a 500g block of butter had risen 51 percent – and that's not entirely down to rising global dairy prices. This is an exemplar of populist retail politics – and her own coalition partner David Seymour was quick to differentiate Act's position. At the party conference this weekend, he acknowledged concern at people 'driving across the country just to buy butter at Costco in Auckland', but warned that Willis' proposal to break up the private grocery firms would scare off international investment. Jon Duffy acknowledges the politics involved. 'Yes, politicians have got headlines calling out the behaviour of the supermarkets in respect of consumers and suppliers,' he says, 'but that doesn't mean there isn't a significant issue to be addressed'. 'There is a clear difference in robust dealings between commercial actors and what could amount to anti-competitive behaviour. What's been alleged in the proceedings announced today is reminiscent of the excesses of the robber barons of the early 20th century which led to the establishment of competition law in the first place.' What's clear is that 10 years of increasingly robust Commerce Commission action has thus far failed to solve the problem. Chair Dr John Small says the commission does not tolerate this kind of behaviour and will not hesitate to take court action, where appropriate. What's also clear, after 10 years, is the supermarkets seem able to absorb the bad publicity, convictions and fines without it seriously hurting their businesses. They seem impervious. And that goes to the heart of the problem: no matter what Kiwi suppliers and consumers may think of the supermarkets' behaviour, they have few other choices about where to buy and sell their groceries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store