logo
Oahu jail killing shines a light on prison gang mayhem

Oahu jail killing shines a light on prison gang mayhem

Four inmates were packed into Cell 201 in the gang module of Hawaiʻi's largest jail, and some of them were angry. For days, cellmate Chris Vaefaga had been deep in a methamphetamine binge, and he wasn't showering. He had also urinated on himself.
Nobody talked to corrections officers about the problem. Involving the guards was forbidden in that part of the jail. Instead, one of Vaefaga's cellmates approached a leader of the prison gang known as Murder Inc., told him what was happening, and asked to be moved.
The response was quick and ferocious. Within the hour, Aaron 'Rona' Tuitelapaga and his brother, Bronson Tuitelelepaga, entered the cell with a crew of accomplices and attacked Vaefaga, according to grand jury testimony in the case.
Vaefaga screamed for help as his attackers beat him and stomped on his head, but jail staff did not intervene. Inmate witnesses said his face was battered and he was 'bleeding all over the place.'
Reputed gang enforcer Manu Sorensen then summoned another inmate with a tattoo machine and used it to cover Vaefaga's 'patch,' a gang symbol tattooed on his neck that identified him as a member, according to court records.
Vaefaga, 36, died later that day of blunt force head trauma that caused bleeding in his brain, but remained on his bunk for hours after his death. Another inmate finally used a contraband cellphone to text a woman on the outside, instructing her to call the jail and tell the staff about Vaefaga's death.
Those details of the killing on July 6, 2023, at the Oʻahu Community Correctional Center are emerging in grand jury testimony and pretrial motions for the trial scheduled to begin Monday of Sorensen, Aaron Tuitelapaga and Bronson Tuitelelepaga, who are each charged with manslaughter (the two brothers spell their last names differently).
The case has provided a rare glimpse of the control exercised by gangs in parts of Hawaiʻi's prisons and jails, and raises troubling questions about whether the correctional system is failing to manage active gang members who pose a threat to inmates and staff.
Richard Subia, a gang expert and former director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said one major concern in the case is the inmates were apparently allowed to 'conduct discipline amongst themselves without staff intervention.'
The reported screaming and yelling during the beating should have alerted corrections officers to trigger an alarm and respond, Subia said. That would include taking the inmate aggressors into custody, and immediately providing medical assistance to the victim.
'That's normal operating procedures in any prison system,' he said. 'So, there's a lot of problems here.'
The revelations in court also raise obvious questions about what happened — or didn't happen — in the hours after the attack, but Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Director Tommy Johnson declined a request for an interview about the case.
Rosemarie Bernardo, public information officer for DCR, said in a written statement that the department 'does not comment on ongoing investigations or litigations.'
Managing Active Gang Members
Mark Patterson, chair of the Hawaiʻi Correctional System Oversight Commission and a former gang intelligence officer, worries the correctional system has so many other problems — such as staff vacancies and run-down facilities — that gang activity may be going unchecked.
Patterson said he does not have inside knowledge of gang activity today because the commission does not receive that intelligence, but he said gang issues are nothing new.
'There have always been gang members, but normally with the security protocols that are already in place, you can manage them,' he said.
Gang assessments are supposed to be done on every inmate when they enter a facility based on their tattoos, he said, and every facility should have a gang intelligence officer who assesses prisoners. Intelligence should be gathered from known gang leaders by monitoring phone calls, mail and inmates' behavior.
But when there are staff shortages and people are tired, 'is the job getting done?' Patterson asked. 'Are the people being assessed? Are the people being assigned to the right housing based on what the gang intelligence is coming up with? And are they still being managed while they are in the facility?'
Patterson said department leadership is supposed to ensure it all gets done, but, 'I don't think that's happening.'
Certainly the OCCC killing points to problems in the system. For one, Subia questioned the practice of housing active gang members in a relatively open module setting where they can readily interact with other inmates.
Active gang members are typically housed together only when they are in a highly restrictive 'lockdown housing' setting that essentially eliminates their contact with one another, Subia said.
'You don't typically see high-level offenders who have a long time to serve who are active gang members housed in a modular setting, just because of the dangerousness of that,' he said.
That clearly includes at least two of the three defendants in this case.
Aaron Tuitelapaga, described in court records as 'the brains' of Murder Inc., was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole last year for second-degree murder. He received a second life term for the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, with the terms to be served consecutively.
That sentence came in connection with the fatal shooting of Sausau Togiai III on Aug. 12, 2020, during a robbery of an illegal game room in Pālama.
Bronson Tuitelelepaga was awaiting trial on a charge connected to the same incident — he was later acquitted.
Sorensen was sentenced to three consecutive 20-year prison terms last year for a botched robbery of another illegal game room in the Ala Moana area in 2018. He and another man were trying to rob the operation when Sorensen fired a single shot, killing Jacob Feliciano, 31.
Sorensen was convicted of manslaughter, use of a firearm in a separate felony and another firearms offense. Consecutive sentences were imposed because he had prior federal felony convictions for extortion and assault.
Vaefaga was awaiting trial for second-degree assault and harassment when he was killed.
A Puzzling Staff Response
Subia also said nationally accepted correctional protocols prohibit inmates from entering each other's cells, yet inmates in the OCCC case reported gang leaders actually assigned inmates to cells in Module 13, and moved them as needed.
On the day of the attack, gang leaders instructed a prisoner to clear out of Vaefaga's cell after the beating, and assigned a gang member to move in to ensure Vaefaga did not report the attack, according to court records.
Another issue is the lack of an immediate staff response after the attack.
Staff members typically are required to conduct health and welfare checks in each cell of a housing unit every hour, Subia said.
'If this guy ended up getting beat up by these guys and left in a cell, that should have been picked up by the staff members conducting the security checks,' he said.
Inmates said the assault occurred about 12:40 p.m., and that afterward, Vaefaga was lying on his bunk for hours, struggling to breathe. But the Module 13 logbook shows a standing head count of every prisoner was conducted at 3:20 p.m, with nothing out of the ordinary reported, according to one court filing.
OCCC records also show additional 'walk-through wellness and security inspections' were done every 30 minutes in Module 13 from 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. that evening, yet medical staff were not summoned to Vaefaga's cell for a 'medical backup call' until 8:30 p.m.
Yet another troubling allegation surfaced in connection with evidence recovered at the jail.
Vaefaga's body tested positive for methamphetamine, and a cell-by-cell search of OCCC was launched days after his death. An array of contraband was seized in the search, ranging from steroids and vapes to illicit cellphones and methamphetamine.
Deputy Attorney General Adrian Dhakhwa, who is prosecuting the case, told 1st Circuit Court Judge Paul Wong on May 15 that contraband seized in the shakedown 'mysteriously disappeared,' a situation Dhakhwa said is now under investigation.
Fear And Fallout
Inmates or former prisoners who agreed to speak with investigators or testify in the Vaefaga case say they have been threatened and now fear for their lives, including one who testified his son was beaten in Waiʻanae in retaliation for his cooperation with authorities.
Jared Kinikini, another witness in the case, testified on July 8 that his lawyer told him to cooperate with investigators, but 'I knew that if I cooperated, my life would be at risk.' But Kinikini said his lawyer warned him he would probably also be charged in the case if he did not cooperate.
Kinikini's sister, Lea Lani Kinikini, said Thursday her brother ended up cutting himself and swallowing part of a prison-issued razor earlier this month so he would be hospitalized to prevent corrections officials from moving him out of the protective custody module at OCCC.
Lea Lani Kinikini said the system has not done enough to protect her brother, and the influence of the gangs — particularly the gang known as Murder Inc. or Westside — has been rapidly growing inside the system.
'This whole thing has made visible what is going on at OCCC, which in my brother's view is the gang is controlling the ACOs,' she said, referring to adult correctional officers. 'They're influencing movements, and that's why he hasn't felt safe.'
'It's an institution that has been captured,' she said.
Subia said the state must provide cooperating inmates with safe housing, and move them out of state if necessary if that cannot be done within the Hawaiʻi system.
The lawyers who are defending Vaefaga's alleged attackers forced each of the witnesses who cooperated with investigators to testify in open court this summer in an effort to have the grand jury indictment in the case thrown out, a maneuver that has further exposed the witnesses to public scrutiny.
Judge Wong has banned electronic devices from the courtroom, including cellphones, apparently in an effort to limit that exposure.
To make the case even more complex, court records show another prisoner has provided the defense with an entirely new account of the killing that implicates two of the witnesses.
Almost lost in all of these courtroom machinations is Vaefaga, a father of four.
Danielle Majewski, Vaefaga's former partner and mother of two of his children, was surprised to hear the criminal case against his attackers has not been resolved more than two years after Vaefaga was killed.
She said they met in a Honolulu park and found 'love at first sight.' But the couple struggled to survive when they lived together and finally found themselves living in their cars.
He took the girls with him everywhere, Majewski said, and would watch them when Majewski went to work at an auto parts store. She watched the girls when Vaefaga found jobs as a mechanic.
Vaefaga 'very much was a family person' who had gotten into trouble and been jailed before, but did well when they were together, she said.
Majewski said she finally moved to the mainland with her daughters because she couldn't handle living homeless anymore, and Vaefaga had hoped to join them. Instead, he landed in jail again.
She said people won't understand the life he lived because they didn't walk the path that he did, and can't understand the choices that he made.
She said she tells her oldest daughter: 'Whatever was bad, just let it go, forget about it, and just remember the good times.'
___
This story was originally published by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Jury Found Tesla Partially Liable for Fatal 2019 Crash Involving the Brand's Autopilot Feature
A Jury Found Tesla Partially Liable for Fatal 2019 Crash Involving the Brand's Autopilot Feature

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Jury Found Tesla Partially Liable for Fatal 2019 Crash Involving the Brand's Autopilot Feature

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." A Florida jury ruled that Tesla was partly to blame for a fatal 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman, according to . Lawyers for the woman's family argued that Tesla's Autopilot system should have avoided the crash. The case was the first fatal accident involving Autopilot to go to a jury; Tesla has settled several cases outside of court. A Florida jury ruled that Tesla was partially responsible for a crash in 2019 that killed a 22-year-old woman and left her boyfriend seriously injured, according to The New York Times. Specifically, the jury awarded $59 million in compensatory damages to the family of the woman and $70 million to her boyfriend. The jury also awarded $200 million in punitive damages. The jury found Tesla 33 percent to blame for the crash, and the company will be forced to pay one-third of the compensatory damages. It will also be forced to pay the entirety of the punitive damages. According to the NYT report, the jury placed the rest of the blame on the driver, George Brian McGee, who previously settled with the families outside of court for an undisclosed amount of money. The 19-year-old Naibel Benavides, who was a college student at the time, died on April 25, 2019, after being struck by a Tesla Model S sedan driven by George Brian McGee. McGee had dropped his phone while approaching a T-intersection with Tesla's Autopilot software activated. The NYT report states that he drove through the intersection at more than 50 mph, crashing into the legally parked SUV of Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, on the other side. It was also reported that McGee's foot was on the accelerator pedal as he approached the intersection, thereby overriding a function of Autopilot that is capable of stopping for objects in the road. The lawyer representing Benavides' family said that data and video from the crash showed that the Autopilot system recognized the parked SUV and at least one pedestrian before the collision. While this particular case was the first fatal accident involving Autopilot to go to a jury, Tesla has settled several cases outside of court. A 2023 study by the Washington Post found that between 2019 and 2023, Tesla's Autopilot system was involved in 736 crashes, 17 of which were fatal. At the time, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg stated during an interview that he found the name misleading. "I don't think that something should be called, for example, an Autopilot, when the fine print says you need to have your hands on the wheel and eyes on the road at all times," he said. According to the NYT report, Tesla plans to appeal the verdict. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," the company said in a statement. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!

Florida Executes Machete Killer of His Wife and Children, Breaking Decade-Long Record for Capital Punishment
Florida Executes Machete Killer of His Wife and Children, Breaking Decade-Long Record for Capital Punishment

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Florida Executes Machete Killer of His Wife and Children, Breaking Decade-Long Record for Capital Punishment

Edward Zakrzewski and his wife Sylvia had been going through marital problems; he had told a neighbor that he would rather kill his family than go through a divorceNEED TO KNOW Edward Zakrzewski, 60, was executed by lethal injection in Florida for the brutal 1994 murders of his wife and two young children After committing the murders, Zakrzewski fled to Hawaii, changed his identity, and lived on a religious commune His execution marked Florida's ninth this year, the highest number since 2014A man convicted of killing his family with a machete three decades ago was put to death in Florida on Thursday, July 31, setting the state's record for the highest number of annual executions since the restoration of the death penalty. Edward Zakrzewski, 60, was executed by lethal injection at Florida State Prison in Bradford County, according to court records obtained by PEOPLE. Zakrzewski and his 34-year-old wife Sylvia had been going through marital problems; he had told a neighbor twice that he would rather kill his family than go through a divorce, according to the court documents. On the morning of Jun 9, 1994, when Zakrzewski found out Sylvia wanted a divorce, he purchased a machete on his lunch break. His day went on as usual, then went home and waited for his family, the court documents said. When his family got home, Zakrzewski first approached Sylvia, knocking her unconscious and strangling her with rope as she was sitting alone in the living room, per the court documents. He then approached his 7-year-old son Edward and killed him with the machete. According to the court documents, he then confronted his 5-year-old daughter Anna, striking her with the machete as she was in the bathroom. Following the murders, Zakrzewski drove to Orlando and took a flight to Hawaii, where he changed his name and lived with a family who ran a religious commune for four months, per the court documents. One day, the family was watching the television show 'Unsolved Mysteries' and saw Zakrzewski's picture, the court documents said. The next day, he turned himself in to local police. Over the years, Zakrzewski's lawyers filed numerous appeals but they were all denied, court documents show. On the day of his execution, Zakrzewski woke up at 5:15 a.m. and had fried pork chops, root beer and ice cream as his last meal, CBS News reported, citing state Department of Corrections spokesman Paul Walker. According to Walker, he had one visitor and 'remained compliant' as he awaited to be its lethal injection, Florida uses a combination of a sedative, a paralytic and a drug that stops the heart, the outlet reported, citing the state Department of Corrections. This year, Florida has executed more people than it has in any year since 2014. Zakrzewski was the ninth person to be executed in the state, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Read the original article on People

White House monitors coverage of Epstein controversy and can't make it disappear
White House monitors coverage of Epstein controversy and can't make it disappear

CNN

time25 minutes ago

  • CNN

White House monitors coverage of Epstein controversy and can't make it disappear

President Donald Trump has begged his base to stop thinking about Jeffrey Epstein. But 25 days after his Justice Department declared it had nothing more to say on the convicted sex offender, the drumbeat for action continues. Some officials acknowledge, at least privately, that the administration will have to release more information on Epstein in an attempt to quiet accusations of a coverup. Administration officials told CNN that they believe the best antidote to the intense public interest in Epstein is time. But they also acknowledge that without the release of more tangible details, the attention may never fully subside. 'Either we release more documents and it's a confirmation of suspicions, or there is some gap between what people think and what we actually have,' a White House official said. 'And you have to address it directly.' The White House has been intensely monitoring cable news and media coverage of the controversy, sources said. Since Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked public uproar by declaring that Epstein's so-called 'client list' doesn't exist, the administration has scrambled to quell the outrage by moving to interview Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell and release sealed grand jury transcripts related to both her and Epstein's criminal cases. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and is likely one of the only living people who could shed more light on the extent of Epstein's crimes, was moved from her Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas on Friday. The Justice Department has not said why Maxwell was transferred. Nor has Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said anything about his two days of closed-door meetings with Maxwell, aside from promising in a statement that the DOJ would share more information about what they learned 'at the appropriate time.' Trump has not been accused of legal wrongdoing related to Epstein. The White House acknowledged but did not provide a response to a request for comment on this story. The story's staying power has partly been an issue of the president's own making. Trump is clearly frustrated by reporters who have him asked Epstein-related questions, but the small snippets of responses he does give — such as saying this week that he fell out with Epstein after the financier 'stole' a young woman, Virginia Giuffre, from working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort — only serve to reignite the public interest and sow further questions about what Trump knew about Epstein and when. That statement shocked the family of Giuffre, who died by suicide in April. 'She wasn't stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump's property,' Giuffre's brother Sky Roberts told CNN. A Trump administration official acknowledged the president's statements have been unhelpful in tamping down the Epstein-related furor but added they are just manifestations of his intense anger about the situation. The posture within the administration, officials said, has been to reassure the public that it is still committed to sharing more information that has been collected and reviewed by the Justice Department. But that could present another dilemma for the administration: any document dump would likely require extensive redactions to protect the identities of children who were victims of Epstein's crimes. And pages full of black ink may serve only to raise the specter of a coverup, administration officials said. The administration is also being careful not to repeat history by overpromising, which would further upset the many high-profile figures in the president's base who have expressed their frustration over the issue. 'The frenzy and criticism we saw has abated somewhat since the first two weeks. That's in large part thanks to the administration making clear this isn't cased closed like they initially said,' a person close to Trump told CNN. 'But the idea that this can be buried, or will go away thanks to some bigger news story, is a fantasy,' this person said. 'Even if a news story sucks up the oxygen for a time, it will pop up again. It won't die until people get some real answers.' Friday was a prime example of the issue popping back up with Maxwell's surprise transfer. And there will be more court filings next week. In theory, August could bring some relief to an aspect of the Epstein news cycle with Congress on recess for the month, limiting actions from Democrats to force Republicans to take a public stand on the matter. And an attempt by House Republicans to interview Maxwell has failed for now. Maxwell made a list of demands, including requesting immunity and to be provided with a list of questions in advance. The House Oversight Committee on Friday rejected those demands. It did agree, however, to delay any deposition until after the Supreme Court weighs her pending appeal, which won't happen until the end of September. Meanwhile, while officials believe Trump's directive to Bondi to move to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the investigations of Epstein and Maxwell, as well as the Justice Department's interview of Maxwell in prison, are steps in the right direction, multiple people inside and outside of the administration maintain there's still recognition that the fury around Epstein will not abide until more substantial material is released. The limits of that information are well-established. For instance, the grand jury transcripts the Justice Department is asking to unseal from its investigation include testimony from only two witnesses, both law enforcement officials, according to a DOJ memo submitted this week. In an order Thursday evening, federal Judge Richard Berman asked for more information from the government regarding their motion to unseal grand jury transcripts from Epstein's case. Berman made several requests, including verifying the dates of all grand jury presentations in the case, providing exhibits shown to grand jurors and stating whether the government wants exhibits unsealed in addition to transcripts. Those answers are due Monday. Tuesday, meanwhile, is the deadline for Epstein's victims and Maxwell to respond to the DOJ's request to release grand jury files. The judge then has pledged to rule quickly. In the White House's version of a perfect world, the American people would be celebrating Trump's trade war successes, the record-low number of migrants crossing the southern border or the renewal of a society that is being shaped to the president's expansive vision. That may happen, but the Epstein story will remain no matter what. 'There is an acknowledgement that this isn't just going to go away,' one White House official told CNN. CNN's Annie Grayer and Casey Gannon contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store