How OTT platforms skirted warnings against ‘pornographic' content; now ALTT, Ullu, Hulchul among 25 banned
It cited the removal of over 100 web series from the platform Ullu.
'While the platform removes or edits the web series for a temporary period, it either re-uploads or publishes the unedited version after a certain period, thereby attempting to circumvent the warnings,' said sources in the union ministry for information and broadcasting.
Also read | Govt bans ULLU, ALTBalaji, 23 other OTT platforms
Among earlier interventions was the takedown of the series 'House Arrest' by Ullu in May this year.
Before this, in February, an advisory was issued to OTT platform 'to adhere to Code of Ethics prescribed under IT Rules 2021 and laws related to obscenity in India', sources said.
'Five platforms which were blocked earlier in March 2024 started publishing obscene content on new website domains,' the source added.
Also last year, in September, the 25 platforms now banned 'continued to publish obscene, in some cases pornographic content" and 'ignored warnings'.
Action was also taken by the Digital Publisher Content Grievances Council (DPCGC), a self-regulatory body headed by a former judge of the Supreme Court, of which 40 OTT platforms, including ALTT and Ullu, are members. It had found some of the scenes in an ALTT series to be 'totally distasteful and bizarre, where sex and nudity was shown without any contextual justification just to augment viewership'.
About Ullu and ALTT, in particular, the National Commission on Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) had approached the government in July and August 2024, it is learnt.
The government has thus banned 26 websites and 14 mobile apps belonging to the 25 OTT platforms.
The banned platforms include:
Big Shots
Desiflix
Boomex
NeonX VIP
Navarasa Lite
Gulab
Kangan
Bull
ShowHit
Jalva
Wow Entertainment
Look Entertainment
Hitprime
Fugi
Feneo
ShowX
Sol Talkies
Adda TV
HotX VIP
MoodX
Triflicks
Mojflix
Hulchul
ALTT
Ullu
The ministry found their content included sexual innuendos 'and in some cases long portions of sexually explicit scenes, thereby being pornographic in nature', HT has learnt.
The ban now has come under a number of laws, including the IT Act and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.
The matter had reached even the Supreme Court earlier this year in a public-interest plea, and notices were issued to Netflix, Amazon Prime, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, too, besides Ullu, ALTT and others.
But eventually the court said the issue had to be dealt with by the executive or the legislature. "It's not our domain, you do something," the court told the government.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Centre banned 25 OTT platforms
New Delhi: The government has blocked 25 over-the-top entertainment platforms for hosting obscene, vulgar and pornographic content, in a sweeping crackdown on unlawful digital entertainment that officials say violates multiple laws and degrades women. The blocking order, passed on July 23 by the ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB), targets both established and emerging platforms including Ullu, ALTT, Big Shots App, Desiflix and 21 others. The blocking order, passed on July 23 by the ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB), targets both established and emerging platforms including Ullu, ALTT, Big Shots App, Desiflix and 21 others. The action covers 26 websites and 14 mobile applications, with nine apps removed from the Google Play Store and five from the Apple App Store. The ministry acted under section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, which empowers the government to direct intermediaries to remove access to unlawful content when they fail to respond to official notices, two MIB officials told HT. 'The legal provision under which this ban was issued assumes importance, since the Government's reliance upon Section 79(3)(b) for ordering online content takedowns is currently under challenge. A petition filed by X (formerly Twitter) before the Bangalore High Court earlier this year argues that issuing content banning orders through Section 79(3)(b) bypasses legal protections available under the IT Act, 2000,' said Vikram Jeet Singh, partner at BTG Advaya and a specialist in Internet regulation laws. 'Depending on the procedure that has been followed to issue these recent bans, the affected OTT players may consider a challenge on the same grounds as X, arguing that a ban on content cannot be issued under Section 79(3)(b),' Singh added. The crackdown followed extensive consultations with the ministries of home affairs, women and child development, electronics and IT, the department of legal affairs, industry bodies FICCI and CII, and experts in women's and child rights, according to a document shared by an MIB official. According to ministry document, the flagged content contained 'sexual innuendos', extended scenes involving nudity, and depictions of sex in inappropriate contexts, including family relationships. Officials noted that much of the content lacked meaningful storylines or social messages and was largely 'obscene and vulgar'. The ministry had issued warnings to all 25 platforms in September 2024, but several ignored the notices and some resumed publishing objectionable content using alternate domains. Five platforms previously blocked in March 2024 began publishing obscene content on new website domains, officials said. Actor and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Ravi Kishan welcomed the government's move. 'Both licensed and unlicensed OTT platforms have been pushing soft porn and unlawful content. This decision reflects the sentiment of the people, who have repeatedly flagged such concerns on X,' he told PTI. 'Entertainment should have its limits, a 'Lakshman Rekha', and this step will help restore that balance.' The ministry said the content violated sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act, which prohibit publishing or transmitting obscene and sexually explicit material in electronic form, as well as section 292 of the Indian Penal Code related to sale and circulation of obscene content, and section 4 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. The action follows multiple public complaints and references from the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights in July and August 2024, particularly naming Ullu and ALTT. The ministry issued advisories and notices to OTT platforms, including a February 2025 reminder to adhere to the Code of Ethics under the IT Rules, 2021. The Digital Publisher Content Grievances Council, a self-regulatory body comprising around 40 OTT members including ALTT and Ullu, had previously ordered edits to certain shows on ALTT, citing scenes that were 'distasteful and bizarre' and featured sex and nudity without contextual justification. On Ullu, over 100 web series were taken down, but investigations found that some were quietly re-uploaded in their original form to evade oversight. Ullu's web series 'House Arrest' was pulled down in May 2025 after government intervention. 'Any depiction that degrades or objectifies women, through media, is a basis to ban platforms, especially for obscene portrayal of women. The law criminalises distribution or performance of obscene content in public places, and, by extension, digital media does not escape public morality standards,' said Gaurav Sahay, founding partner, Arthashastra Legal. The ministry is expected to take further action if violations continue. In all, the following have been blocked by the latest order: Big Shots App, Desiflix, Boomex, NeonX VIP, Navarasa Lite, Gulab App, Kangan App, Bull App, ShowHit, Jalva App, Wow Entertainment, Look Entertainment, Hitprime, Fugi, Feneo, ShowX, Sol Talkies, Adda TV, ALTT, HotX VIP, Hulchul App, MoodX, Triflicks, Ullu, and Mojflix.
India Today
31 minutes ago
- India Today
Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given Y-category security amid threats
In the wake of the ongoing controversy and threats around 'Udaipur Files', a film based on Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal's murder, the producer of the movie, Amit Jani, has been provided Y-category security, an official statement said on movie is based on Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur who was murdered by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous for allegedly sharing a post supporting former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma's controversial on-air remarks on Prophet Muhammad in per the Y-category security protocol, Jani will be accompanied by a total of 11 personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). The security cover will be provided to Jani for movement within Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. This came days after the Supreme Court allowed the producer, director and the son of Kanhaiya Lal to approach the police and seek protection as they alleged threat to their top court noted that if the threats are found to be serious in nature, concerned authorities must take steps to ensure their safety.'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' got the go-ahead for a release in theatres on August 8, 2025 after a Supreme Court ruling directed the Delhi High Court to address challenges against the government's approval of the film's court directed those objecting to it to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Centre's revisional order, which had allowed the movie to be screened with six Bharat Shrinate announced the new release date after the Supreme Court's decision, signalling the end of the legal journey for the film's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting directed the makers of Udaipur Files to implement six specific changes before its release, in line with the recommendations of a screening slated for release on July 11, 2025, 'Udaipur Files' faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The film, featuring Vijay Raaz as Kanhaiya Lal, is produced by Amit Jani and has generated considerable interest among audiences and critics tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet case was probed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Domestic nepotism' comment makes Farah Khan happy, says it 'made my day'. Here's why she earned it
Farah Responds to the Love Dilip's Story: More Than Just a Viral Face Filmmaker and choreographer Farah Khan is being widely appreciated for her popular food vlogs featuring her long-time cook, Dilip. What started as a casual cooking series has now turned into a celebrated collaboration, earning praise from fans, celebrities, and social media personalities. The series, hosted on Farah's YouTube channel, has brought attention not only to Dilip's culinary skills but also to Farah's unfiltered, humorous hosting style and her gesture of spotlighting homegrown social media personality Freddy Birdy reviewed the show on his Instagram handle, calling Farah a 'YouTube conqueror.' He affectionately referred to the series as an example of 'domestic nepotism,' but clarified that he used the term in an endearing way. According to him, Dilip is probably Farah's greatest discovery since she launched Deepika Padukone's acting career. He noted that Dilip's rise to fame includes being recognised by paparazzi and vacationing in the Maldives—clear signs of his growing was visibly touched by the appreciation. She responded to Freddy's post by saying it was the only review that truly mattered to her and promised him a roast chicken as a thank-you gesture. She expressed her gratitude on behalf of herself and Dilip, saying the review had made her sentiment was echoed by many. Hrithik Roshan's mother, Pinkie Roshan, also praised Farah, mentioning how her humour likely stems from her mother. An actor who worked with Farah on a past project recalled how the filmmaker's kindness extended even during chaotic shooting schedules, calling her down-to-earth and caring in a way that left a lasting the screen, Farah has taken steps to ensure Dilip's family also benefits from his rising fame. On one of the episodes, she revealed that she is funding English-medium education for Dilip's children. One of his children has even received a culinary diploma, supported by Farah, to help them pursue careers in professional kitchens rather than as domestic show's charm lies in its simple format—Dilip cooking while Farah chats with celebrity guests. Past episodes have featured well-known names from the entertainment industry, including Kajol, Raveena Tandon, Sonali Bendre, Vijay Varma, Kabir Khan, Malaika Arora, and others. Viewers have praised the show for its relatable tone, warm interactions, and feel-good vibe.
