'My little girl's body was desecrated by twisted murderer – the law must change'
Murder victims' families - including the mum of April Jones - are calling for new legislation for killers who desecrate and hide bodies. Campaigning mum Marie McCourt, whose daughter Helen was murdered aged 22 in 1988, is being backed by the parents of Sarah Everard and April Jones.
Their loved ones were 'desecrated' by their killers in an attempt to hide evidence. Marie's 'Stop the Desecration campaign' was mentioned in PMQs on Wednesday, with leader Keir Starmer, referring to the families of such "horrific" crimes and agreeing: 'We all need to listen to what they have to say'.
Only tiny fragments of five year old April's body were recovered following her murder in September 2012 by Mark Bridger. April Jones, who would have turned 18 this spring, was just five when she was kidnapped and murdered by Mark Bridger in 2012. She vanished after being seen getting into a vehicle near her home in Powys.
Bridger is serving a whole life sentence for her abduction, murder and perverting the course of justice. Only tiny fragments of her body have ever been recovered. Her mother Coral says: 'The offences he was charged with, and convicted of, don't reflect the true horror of what he did. The law needs to be changed.'
While Sarah's body was burned and dumped by killer Wayne Couzens after she was abducted, raped and murdered in March 2021. In a statement of support, the Everard family said: 'Sarah died in horrendous circumstances. But what Couzens did afterwards – burning and dumping her body in a bid to destroy evidence has only deepened our pain, grief and torture.'
Despite buying petrol, burning her body and dumping her remains inside rubble bags, no charges relating to preventing a burial or obstructing a coroner were ever brought. In a separate victim impact statement read to the Old Bailey her mother, Susan, described the impact Couzens' cruel actions had on them.
'Burning her body was the final insult. It meant we could never again see her sweet face and never say goodbye.'
Marie McCourt, whose successful Helen's Law has seen parole denied to killers who hide bodies, wants to see further change. Her 'Stop the Desecration campaign' was raised in Prime Minister's Question Time on Wednesday by Ann Davies, MP.
The MP represents the family of murder victim Michael O'Leary, 55, who was shot and burned in January 2020. Only a tiny fragment of his remains was ever recovered.
The Caerfyrddin MP told the Commons: "My constituent Mr Michael O'Leary was brutally murdered five years ago and his body was desecrated... I've made a number of requests to discuss his and other victims' cases with ministers and to explore introducing legislation making the desecration of a body a criminal offence.
"Will the Prime Minister meet with Mr O'Leary's family along with other victims' families including April Jones and Sarah Everard and Helen McCourt to hear why they are calling for a new criminal offence of desecrating a body to be introduced."
Mr Starmer responded: "Can I thank her for raising this horrific case and the other similar cases. My thoughts and I'm sure the thoughts of the whole house are with Michael's family and all those affected by such vile crimes. I think we all need to listen to what they have to say."
He continued: "I'm sure the Justice Minister will be in touch at the first opportunity to take this forward."
In March 2022, the Ministry of Justice said it would wait until the completion of a public inquiry into the offences of murderer and necrophiliac David Fuller, who abused more than 100 bodies in hospital mortuaries, before considering Marie's proposal.
Marie, now 81, said: 'But three years on, the inquiry is still ongoing and we are no further forward. Meanwhile, the number of desecrations has soared - causing untold distress to families.'
A local pub landlord, Ian Simms was jailed for Helen's murder despite her body never being found. He was released in 2020 and died two years later.
Other supporters of her campaign include the families of Sasha Marsden, 16, who was stabbed, raped and set on fire after being lured to a fake job interview in January 2013; Jayden Parkinson, 17, who was pregnant when she was murdered and hidden in a grave belonging to the killer's uncle; Jan Mustafa 38, who was murdered and hidden in a chest freezer for a year and Lorraine Cox, 32, who was murdered and dismembered in September 2020 on her way home from a night out.
Ancient common law offences for obstructing a coroner and preventing a burial do exist – but are rarely and randomly applied, says Marie.
Marie says: 'I fought tooth and nail to have my daughter's killer charged with them only to be told it wasn't in the public interest. I was told her killer had been convicted of her murder and that's what mattered. But these cruel acts, committed after death do matter - both to the victim, their loved ones and to society.'
Marie, from Billinge in Merseyside, whose successful Helen's Law has seen parole denied to killers who hide bodies, was shocked to discover that a statutory offence of burning a body other than in a crematorium, does exist. But the CPS has confirmed that only three charges have ever been brought – with just one conviction resulting.
She added: 'Four of our families have suffered the distress of knowing their loved ones were set alight after being murdered. So why weren't the killers charged with these offences?'
She continues: 'Back when Helen first went missing, such cases were rare. But barely a week goes by without another 'human remains discovered' story hitting the news.
'So many families are living with the horror of knowing their loved one has not only been murdered – but been set alight, dismembered and scattered, stored inside a freezer, or, in my daughter's case, hidden so well they will never be found.
'Bereavement experts say it triggers a grief so complex and pathological that it's impossible to come to terms with. All of our families are living with this torture - day in, day out. Advances in forensic science and detection methods means killers are going to ever-desperate lengths to hide or destroy the bodies of their victims – and thanks to the 'dark side of the internet' and true crime programmes, there is no shortage of horrific ideas out there.'
Criminologists, forensic psychologists, police officers and bereavement experts are also supporting Marie.
Leading forensic pathologist Dr Richard Shepherd says: 'As a leading forensic pathologist in more than 23,000 autopsies, I have been a first-hand witness of man's inhumanity to man. I have also learned, over the years, that there is almost nothing a person will not do to avoid a murder charge.
'Bodies 'speak' to the pathologist. What the deceased 'says' can help bring a perpetrator to justice. In a civilised society, surely any attempt to prevent that from happening should be accountable?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves is about to be punished for doing the right thing
It is often pointed out that our main political parties are coalitions, made up of people with overlapping, rather than common, aims. This is certainly true of Labour, whose divisions over basic principle, as well as policy, have been painfully exposed in the last year. While a majority of its MPs seem willing to follow Starmer's lead on issues like welfare reform and the cutting of pensioners' winter heating allowances, a significant minority of them – supported by a worryingly large number of ordinary party members and trade unionists – would prefer to forge an altogether different set of policies and even a different type of government. On the crucial area of whether a 'soak the rich' tax policy needs to be adopted, Labour is split into two very different, opposing, camps. This issue is one that will define the government between now and the next general election. Whatever promises Labour made in its general election manifesto last year not to raise taxes for working people, now that it enjoys an overwhelming majority in the Commons, Left-wing back benchers are becoming impatient. Why can't the government just do what the party wants? And the party, as represented by former party leader, Lord Kinnock, as well as a swathe of back benchers and union leaders, wants a wealth tax. Regular claims by the Left that the rich 'don't pay their fair share' of tax are easily countered by the observation that the top one per cent of income tax payers already provide 30 per cent of all income tax revenue. A wealth tax – here envisioned as a two per cent levy on assets worth over £10 million – could hardly be seen as a tax on 'working people' because, according to Left-wing lore, wealthy people do not work but spend their days shooting grouse on their country estates and laughing at children who are forced to climb up chimneys. That a number of countries have already attempted such a tax and been forced to repeal it after it proved effective only in driving individuals out of the country is an inconvenient fact that can be ignored. And such arguments are indeed dismissed by people who give the impression that the purpose of such a tax increase would be less about raising money to spend on social programmes than about punishing rich people for the crime of being rich. That has always been a temptation of the Left and it took the election of Tony Blair as leader in 1994 to persuade them – or start to persuade them – that tax rises are not a good thing in themselves, and that they should only be used to fund a particular project rather than about signalling a particular principle or virtue. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves has learned that lesson and is robustly holding out against her comrades' urgings to take a more Left-wing approach to the 'problem' of the presence of wealthy people in our country. She recognises that as well as failing to raise the promised revenue, a wealth tax would be seen internationally as a sign that Britain has turned its back on wealth creation, a place where wealth creators – who tend to be wealthy themselves – are not welcome, which is precisely the opposite strategy that Reeves and the government wish to pursue. But back benchers have tasted blood. They got their own way by forcing a humiliating climb-down by Keir Starmer over welfare reform – the idea that the welfare budget should not be expanded while Labour is in office is anathema to the government back benches – and now they see an opportunity to get their way again by forcing an unwanted and unworkable policy on the Chancellor. No doubt this would be seen as a weapon that could be used against the threat of an emerging Jeremy Corbyn-led party that threatens to tempt Left-wing voters away from Labour. Reeves can see that this is all self-defeating nonsense. The one thing that could spell the demise of this administration would be if it proved an incompetent steward of the public purse and the economy. Attractive though populist quick fixes of the kind that can be summarised in a shouted slogan during student protest marches through central London might be (one of those slogans that is inevitably followed by the demand 'NOW!'), the Chancellor knows that real life demands real world solutions. Reeves must stand firm against the childish demands of back benchers who are too reluctant to accept that the roles of party activist and parliamentarian have very different, and often conflicting, responsibilities.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Giving 16 and 17 year olds the vote is a chance to tackle online disinformation for good
New electoral reforms mean 16 and 17 year olds will be able to vote at the next general election. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Over the last couple of days I have read countless arguments for and against giving 16 and 17 year olds the chance to vote in general elections. This is not something new up here in Scotland - this age group was first given the vote in the 2014 independence referendum, and has been eligible to vote in the last two Scottish Parliament elections. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This was a political move by the SNP government of the time, as this age group was thought to be more likely to vote Yes and then back the nationalists. There is similar cynicism now that Labour has the same motivations by lowering the voting age. A polling station in Edinburgh. | Danny Lawson/Press Association Regardless of the motivation, it created a politically engaged generation in Scotland. Research by Edinburgh University suggests those who were 16 and 17 and voted in the 2016 Holyrood election were more likely to turn out for the 2021 election than those who had been 18. Some argue young people do not have the life experience needed to be given such a responsibility, but we need to give them a bit more credit. There are plenty of engaged young people who care about who governs them. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ultimately whoever gets elected will impact their life for the next five years, and for the majority of that time they will be adults over the age of 18. Lowering the age limit may mean parties are more inclined to emphasise policies which affect this age group more, such as low wages, further education and housing costs. That is no bad thing. I was 16 during the 2010 general election and 17 at the 2011 Scottish election. I was not able to vote in either, but I still watched the televised debates and spoke at length about it with my friends. The school library held a well-attended mock election on polling day. There was even a Question Time-style debate organised in the assembly hall with some of the candidates - hundreds of pupils attended and some were even turned away because there were no seats left. Yes this was 15 years ago, but it shows young people will engage if you give them the chance. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One of the main criticisms I have seen raised is concerns about how influenced 16 and 17 year old voters will be by social media. Last year an Ofcom report suggested 88 per cent of 16 to 24 year olds used online sources to get their news, mainly social media. For 12 to 15 year olds, the ones who will benefit from the new voting age, 12 per cent said TikTok was their main news source. Using social media to reach voters is nothing new. In last year's general election, the majority of the Scottish Greens' advertising went on social media. Former US President Barack Obama pioneered the use of Facebook to help him win the keys to the White House in 2008. His successor Donald Trump did the same on Twitter and X in 2016 and 2024. We already know there are bad faith actors on these platforms actively seeking to influence young voters, but that in itself is not a reason to block these young people from enfranchisement. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Instead, there should be a renewed focus on better political education and critical thinking in schools, and better online regulation. This is a great opportunity to get on top of the spread of disinformation online.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Constance Marten moans she's ‘treated like a killer' in jail & brands inmates and lawyers ‘Dementors' from Harry Potter
Constance Marten has complained that she's "treated like a killer" in jail and brands her prosecutors like soul-sucking "Dementors." Posh prisoner Marten, 38, and Mark Gordon, 51, were convicted of gross negligence manslaughter after the death of their baby girl. 7 7 7 In a bitter rant to The View Magazine, a publication promoting reform for women in custody, Marten moaned about being 'treated like a killer' in jail. This is despite being found guilty over the death of her baby daughter. Marten and rapist boyfriend Gordon were convicted after their newborn Victoria was found dead in a Lidl shopping bag. Speaking from behind bars, Marten was very critical of her prosecutors and bizarrely told the prison magazine that they reminded her of the soul-sucking creatures in Harry Potter. "There's no empathy. I felt like I was being grilled as a serial killer." The 37-year-old aristocrat is locked up in HMP Bronzefield alongside notorious child murderers Lucy Letby and Beinash Batool following a four-month retrial at the Old Bailey. She also complained about being spoken to like a child and accused legal teams of trying to 'make angels look like devils and devils appear angelic'. Marten added: "They all use this disgusting tone, like they're reprimanding a small child. "I've heard them laugh and joke with others, but with me, it's always condescending. "I just shut down because no one wants to be spoken to like that. People say, 'Oh, they're just doing their job', but they're not. "They're paid to make angels look like devils and devils appear angelic." The mum barely mentioned her daughter, who prosecutors believe died from hypothermia or suffocation in a flimsy tent after the couple went on the run. Marten and Gordon sparked a nationwide manhunt in early 2023 after fleeing with their newborn, desperate to avoid the baby being taken into care like their previous four children. She gave birth to Victoria without seeking any medical assistance in early 2022 and kept her "their little secret". The infant had hardly any clothes or "means of keeping or remaining warm". Victoria, who spent 'much of her life' in a Lidl bag for life, was tragically discovered dumped among rubbish in a shed near Brighton. A jury found the pair guilty of gross negligence manslaughter after hearing harrowing details of how they ignored warnings and lived 'off-grid'. In a police interview, Marten later said: "I had her in my jacket and I hadn't slept properly in quite a few days and erm, I fell asleep holding her sitting up and she, when I woke up, she wasn't alive." Jurors were told Marten had been warned by social workers about the risk of falling asleep with a baby lying on her and that a tent was unsuitable. Both she and Gordon lost their appeal against the child cruelty convictions and are due to be sentenced in September. This comes as... Marten was a former Tatler 'It Girl" and her family had close links to the Royals. But her life spiralled out of control after she and Gordon, 51, met by chance in a North London incense shop in 2014. The couple went off the radar from her friends and family and formed their own self-styled cult living apart from society, with Constance even posing as an Irish traveller when she attended hospital while pregnant. Constance also travelled the world and went to festivals including Burning Man and Wireless, saying: 'Dance is my oxygen.' She spent her summer holidays in 2010 working for a film production company in Cairo. One of her colleagues there described her as being 'very decent, nice and friendly' and having 'great potential'. But she added that Constance sometimes chose the 'wrong' type of man, adding: 'She was somehow gullible.' During the trial, it was revealed that Gordon was convicted of a series of sexual offences - including rape - while living in the US. Gordon, who was 14 at the time, broke into the house of a next door neighbour wearing a nylon stocking over his face and armed with a knife and hedge clippers. He demanded the woman undress and attempted to rape her before carrying out the vile offences in the April 1989 horror. The victim of his crime told the BBC she was "floored" when she found out the man who attacked her 36 years ago was on the run from police in the UK in 2023. She said: "The four-and-a-half hours I spent with him was enough to know he is evil." On May 21 the same year, Gordon broke into another home with a shovel and battered a man inside. The fiend was sentenced in the US to 40 years in prison, of which he served 22 years. In 2017, Gordon was convicted of assaulting two female police officers at a maternity unit in Wales. Jurors were not told that Gordon was also suspected of a incident of domestic violence in 2019 which left Marten with a shattered spleen. 7 7 7 Timeline of baby 'killing' - how couple evaded cops CONSTANCE Marten and Mark Gordon allegedly sparked a 54-day manhunt across the UK after vanishing with their baby Victoria. Here's how the pair's journey began... December 20, 2022 Marten and Gordon booked into a holiday cottage in Northumberland, with the rental due to end on Boxing Day. The owner told jurors he found the property in "something of a state" on December 28. December 24, 2022 The couple claim their baby daughter was born this day but this has been disputed by prosecutors. December 28, 2022 Their Suzuki broke down on the M18 motorway so a recovery driver took them to a nearby Sainsbury's. There was allegedly no sign of the baby but the back and side windows of the car had been blocked by clothing. January 4, 2023 Marten and Gordon checked into the Ibis hotel at the Lymm Services in Cheshire then later the AC Hotel in Manchester. January 5, 2023 The couple's Peugeot 206 catches fire on the M61 motorway in Greater Manchester. Police launch an urgent probe after finding placenta, burner phones and Marten's passport, jurors were told. She and Gordon are taken to a Morrisons store in Bolton by a member of the public before being seen on CCTV at the nearby Bolton Interchange station. The couple allegedly use Marten's trust for a taxi to Liverpool, then a £400 cab to Harwich in Essex. Cab driver Ali Yaryar, who picked the couple up from Liverpool, told the court: "I think the baby had no clothes". January 6, 2023 The couple arrive in Harwich and check into a Premier Inn at around 3am. They later move to the Fryatt Hotel, where they paid in cash, it was said. January 7, 2023 Marten and Gordon travel by taxi to Colchester then to East Ham in London. The couple allegedly buy a buggy from Argos then grab another cab to Whitechapel. They ate in a Brick Lane restaurant then dump the new buggy - choosing instead to keep Victoria in a Lidl bag, jurors heard. January 8, 2023 The couple spend £475 on a taxi from Hornsey to Newhaven in East Sussex and walk to the South Downs National Park. January 9, 2023 Both Marten and Gordon claim baby Victoria died on this day - making her 16 days old, the court was told. It is said there is no way of knowing this for sure. January 12, 2023 Marten is captured buying snacks and petrol with cash but there was no sign of the baby. Prosecutors say she bought the fuel to cremate the baby but changed her mind. January 16, 2023 Marten and Gordon are seen setting up a tent in Stanmer Park Nature Reserve in the South Downs despite the cold weather. February 16/17, 2023 The couple are spotted near Hollingbury Golf Course in rural Sussex allegedly pushing a buggy with no baby. Their tent is later seen in Coldean Lane in Brighton A driver sees the pair walking towards Stanmer Park with something under Marten's puffer jacket, the court heard. February 19, 2023 Gordon and Marten are allegedly seen in their tent in the park with a very young baby with a "wobbly" head. Jurors told the baby had no socks, blanket or hat on. February 27, 2023 The couple are arrested in Hollingbury Place in Brighton but do not reveal Victoria's location at first, it is said. March 1, 2023 Tragic Victoria is found dead in a Lidl bag covered in rubbish inside a disused shed "like refuse", the court is told.
