logo
Wife of obliterated Hamas leader dubbed 'The Butcher' takes her mind off his grisly death by fleeing Gaza on a fake passport - and remarrying in Turkey just nine months later

Wife of obliterated Hamas leader dubbed 'The Butcher' takes her mind off his grisly death by fleeing Gaza on a fake passport - and remarrying in Turkey just nine months later

Daily Mail​a day ago
The wife of the architect of the October 7 terror attacks has been dramatically smuggled out of Gaza and is now living a new life in Turkey with a new husband, according to explosive reports from Israel.
Samar Muhammad Abu Zamar, widow of Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas military commander who was killed by IDF forces in October 2024, allegedly escaped the war-torn enclave using a fake passport and carrying 'significant sums of cash'.
Sources in Gaza told Israeli news site Ynet that Abu Zamar remarried in Turkey just months after Sinwar's death, in a wedding and relocation operation overseen by Hamas political bureau member Fathi Hammad, long linked to smuggling fighters and their families out of the Strip.
The claims come as footage from 2024 resurfaced showing Abu Zamar walking through a Hamas tunnel just hours before the October 7 massacre - carrying what appeared to be a designer handbag.
Although officially unconfirmed, the story has been widely reported in Israel.
An Israeli security official told Ynet that Abu Zamar, along with Najwa Sinwar, the wife of Mohmmed Sinwar - who succeeded his brother as Hamas chief after his death - both crossed into Egypt through the Rafah crossing using forged documents.
'She's no longer here - she crossed through the Rafah border using a fake passport,' a source said of Abu Zamar, saying the escape required 'high-level coordination, logistical support, and large sums of money that regular Gazans don't have'.
The revelations have sparked fresh outrage among ordinary Palestinians, many of whom remain trapped in Gaza after 19 months of relentless war, while the families of senior Hamas figures reportedly live in comfort abroad.
'They send their children to study in Turkey and Qatar – and send ours to the grave,' one Gazan civilian said. 'What makes them different from any corrupt ruler in the Arab world? They only look after themselves'.
Hamas, which styles itself as the vanguard of Palestinian resistance, has long been accused of exploiting the suffering of its own people while sheltering its leadership and their families overseas.
The Islamist group's military network has been shattered since the October 7 attacks, with only one senior commander, Izz al-Din al-Haddad, believed to still be alive.
Abu Zamar's former husband, Yahya Sinwar, was assassinated in October last year after being hunted by intelligence services and the Israeli Defence Forces for over a year.
Ultimately, his assassination was seemingly by chance, with the group of trainee soldiers responsible for the Hamas chief's death not knowing his true identity at the time, according to reports.
Israeli officials have said the 61-year-old - who has long been dubbed the Butcher of Khan Younis - was killed after he emerged from the underground tunnel network where he had been hiding.
A unit from the IDF's 828th Bislamach Brigade was patrolling Tal al-Sultan, an area of Rafah, when it came across a group of three Hamas fighters in the street and engaged them in a firefight.
The terrorists were 'on the run' moving from house to house, the IDF said, and became split up.
One of them, since identified as Sinwar, 'ran alone into one of the buildings'. He went up to the second floor, and troops responded by firing a tank shell in his direction.
The unit, made up of trainee infantry commanders and reservists, then began to sweep the area, according to Israeli reports from the time.
Two grenades were thrown at them, one of which exploded while the other failed to go off.
The troops decided it was too dangerous to proceed and pulled back, sending in a mini drone to trace the fleeing fighter instead.
Dramatic footage released by the IDF showed the bloodied Sinwar, his face concealed by a scarf, throwing a stick in a final attempt to defend himself against the drone just seconds before he was assassinated.
Two 120mm tank shells slammed into the building, as well as a surface-to-surface Matador missile, with shrapnel scything across the upper floors and killing Sinwar.
Unaware they had taken out Israel's prime target, the soldiers did not return to the site until the following morning, when soldiers from the 450th Infantry Battalion were sent in to get a closer look.
As they inspected the dead, they realised one bore a striking resemblance to the Hamas leader.
Graphic images emerged of his corpse lying on the rubble surrounded by Israeli soldiers, while close ups showed a catastrophic head wound and multiple injuries.
He was found with a weapon, a flak jacket and 40,000 shekels (£8,250).
'Yahya Sinouar had a lot of cash and fake passports on him, he was ready to flee,' Israeli army spokesman Colonel Olivier Rafowicz told French outlet CNEWS.
He claimed that the items Sinwar had on him, which allegedly also included a card from UNRWA, the UN aid for Palestinian refugees, 'may show that he was ready to flee and leave Gaza and his men behind.'
Booby traps around the area meant the corpse had to be left in place, but part of one of his fingers was removed and sent for testing.
Confirmation of his death took several hours, with multiple tests carried out, and his identity eventually confirmed with dental records and fingerprints.
Four hours after it confirmed it was investigating whether the Hamas leader had been killed, the military issued a simple message on social media: 'Eliminated: Yahya Sinwar.'
Pictures show Israeli troops carrying a body, believed to be Sinwar's, out of the destroyed building on a stretcher.
Recently, hostage talks have stalled, reportedly due to the difficulty of even reaching Hamas's scattered leadership in Gaza.
But despite occasional deadly ambushes on Israeli troops, Hamas is no longer capable of large-scale coordinated operations, analysts have said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future
AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future

Telegraph

time29 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future

'AOC funds genocide in Gaza', announced a sign posted outside the Bronx campaign office of progressive New York Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In a particularly chilling gesture, the office's windows were splattered with red paint, including a splotch big enough to blot out an image of her face. An anti-Israel group called the 'Boogie Down Liberation Front' took responsibility for Monday night's act of vandalism in a message to a local journalist, stating 'The Bronx is sick and tired of people like AOC … using us as a stepping stone for their own political careers'. It added that their community 'stands with the people of Palestine and we denounce the hypocrisy of AOC who voted to fund Israel's ongoing genocide and starvation campaign in Gaza.' At immediate issue was Ocasio-Cortez's vote last Friday against an amendment to a military spending bill that would have cut millions in aid to Israel for its air defence systems. The amendment, which only six Congressmen supported, was proposed by Ocasio-Cortez's polar political opposite, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican Congresswoman from Georgia, whose apparent motivation was her belief that Israel no longer requires American taxpayer assistance due to its successful military operations earlier this year. Greene's amendment was also supported by noted anti-Israel Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. Ocasio-Cortez has argued that the amendment would have done 'nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza'. She maintains that she still believes Israel is committing genocide, but that it should not be denied defensive weapons. That was not enough for some increasingly extreme factions on the Left, however, which consider approving any amount of support for Israel to be unacceptable. It should go without saying that nobody should be cheering on the vandalism of any politician's campaign office. Ocasio-Cortez's campaign has also revealed that she has received an increased number of death threats in recent days – a disturbing reminder that political violence is never far from the surface in American politics today. It also says something very concerning about where the American Left is heading that she should become a target of their vitriol. Back in 2018, she had a roaring start on the Left-wing of the Democratic Party. A one-time barmaid who claimed to speak progressive, working class truth to corporate power, regardless of party, she rode the anti-incumbency trend in the midterm elections of Donald Trump's first presidency to become the youngest woman ever to sit in the US Congress. She went on to be one of the very few American politicians so well known that her initials often supersede her name, a distinction usually reserved for presidents of the order of FDR or JFK. In office, AOC emerged as the best known member of the 'Squad', a small group of Left-wing Congresswomen whom many progressives hailed as the future of US politics. Her radical agenda made her a role model for young Democrats who distrust their party's older and more moderate leadership, and a bugbear for flustered Republicans who only made her more popular in constant media attacks. In recent years, however, AOC seems to have lost her progressive lustre, even if her politics haven't really changed. Last year, her stance on Israel caused the Democratic Socialists of America – a national progressive organisation that had backed her since her first standing for office – to withdraw its endorsement, accusing her of 'deep betrayal'. AOC clearly retains substantial popularity among Democrats – at over $15 million, her campaign contributions in 2025 exceed those of all other members of Congress this year as she considers greater ambitions, possibly including a primary challenge to fellow Democrat Chuck Schumer for his New York Senate seat. Some 72 per cent of those funds came from outside her congressional district. But the vandalism at her office – alongside other trends, like the emergence of Zohran Mamdani as the Democrat nominee for mayor of New York City – suggests that the Left is beginning to turn in a far more sinister direction. Paul du Quenoy is a historian and president of the Palm Beach Freedom Institute.

Sir Keir Starmer is caught between Trump, Macron and MPs over Palestine recognition
Sir Keir Starmer is caught between Trump, Macron and MPs over Palestine recognition

Sky News

time39 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Sir Keir Starmer is caught between Trump, Macron and MPs over Palestine recognition

Parliament may have shut up shop for a six-week summer break, but MPs and the French president are turning up the heat on Sir Keir Starmer over the Middle East. More than one in three of all 650 MPs have written to the prime minister calling on the UK to recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations conference next week. In response to the call, his answer is essentially: Yes, but not yet. That, of course, won't satisfy the 222 MPs backing an all-party letter to the PM penned by the Labour MP Sarah Champion. The majority of names on the letter, predictably, are Labour, Lib Dem and SNP MPs. But there are some Tory big hitters too, including Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh and former cabinet minister Kit Malthouse. Until now, the PM and foreign secretary David Lammy have argued that the gesture of recognising Palestine on its own won't end what Sir Keir himself calls "the appalling scenes in Gaza". But the pressure for recognition isn't just coming from MPs. French President Emmanuel Macron has said France will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. 1:20 Might Mr Macron - whose bromance with the PM during his state visit to the UK could not have been warmer - persuade Sir Keir to do the same? Possibly. He's not ruling it out. But there's one big obstacle to Sir Keir bowing to the pressure from MPs and the French president. And that's the towering figure who's in Scotland this weekend: the golfing president of the United States. When Donald Trump was asked about President Macron's vow to recognise Palestine in September, his response was brutal and bordering on condescending. "What he says doesn't matter," the president told reporters at the White House as he headed for Air Force One. "He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight." 0:45 Ouch! But the US president's unflinching support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu places Sir Keir in an awkward spot: Caught between the opposing stances of the French and US presidents. The PM is, therefore, also under pressure from President Trump, and he won't want to fall out with him when he meets him this weekend. Hence, his carefully worded statement responding to the letter from the MPs. Appearing to try and please the US and French presidents - and the large number of Labour MPs backing Sarah Champion's letter - Sir Keir said he's "working on a pathway to peace" in the Middle East. He spoke of "concrete steps" to turn a ceasefire into a lasting peace and said recognition of a Palestinian state "has to be one of those steps", adding: "I am unequivocal about that." And he concluded: "But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis. "This is the way to ensure it is a tool of maximum utility to improve the lives of those who are suffering - which of course, will always be our ultimate goal." As well as his own statement, the PM issued a joint statement with President Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, both of whom have held talks with Sir Keir in the UK in the past fortnight. That statement was tough, beginning: "The time has come to end the war in Gaza." It went on: "The humanitarian catastrophe that we are witnessing in Gaza must end now." Yet there's little sign of either the war or the humanitarian catastrophe ending any time soon. And that means that throughout parliament's summer break, MPs will no doubt continue to turn up the heat on the PM.

Macron's pledge on Palestinian statehood is not the way to bring about peace
Macron's pledge on Palestinian statehood is not the way to bring about peace

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Macron's pledge on Palestinian statehood is not the way to bring about peace

SIR – Emmanuel Macron, the French president, has pledged that France will recognise Palestine as a state (report, July 25) – without first demanding agreement from all Palestinians and the wider Arab world that Israel has the right to exist. Unless that point is accepted, there will never be peace in the Middle East. Mina Bowater Blandford Forum, Dorset SIR – How can you recognise a state with no agreed borders? This is a reckless move from a G7 nation. Brian Hoffmann York SIR – The humanitarian disaster now unfolding in Gaza must be remedied. No one could possibly exonerate Hamas for October 7, nor for a minute imagine that Israel is not under intense and perpetual threat from its enemies in the region, including Iran. The hostages also go unmentioned. I write this letter as a plea from all those who cannot bear to see how the women and children of Gaza are suffering. It is unconscionable. In 2014, with massive support from the Conservative front benches, I brought forward my International Development (Gender Equality) Act. It imposed a statutory duty on the British government to guarantee the protection of women and children in deprived countries as a cardinal principle of British humanitarian policy. The tragedy of Gaza has gone too far. I call upon Sir Keir Starmer to concentrate on providing the necessary aid, rather than grandstanding like President Macron, with his calls for a Palestinian state. Sir Bill Cash London SW1 SIR – As one of the 82 per cent in Israel who want the hostages home and the war against Hamas to end, I have been struck by the pronouncements of David Lammy, the British Foreign Secretary, on the matter. Israel has negotiated with terrorists, and bent over backwards making major additional concessions so that a ceasefire could succeed. Yet Mr Lammy stood up and stated that, if there was no ceasefire, he would punish Israel. Hamas, as expected, decided to move the goalposts, making further absurd demands, and talks have now collapsed. Britain and the world deserve better than Mr Lammy's naivety and incompetence. Michel Norman Hod Hasharon, Israel SIR – I fundamentally disagree with A Lloyd (Letters, July 23), who asserts that 'the Israeli government has been responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent men, women and children'. The responsibility for those deaths and the ongoing suffering lies squarely with Hamas. Israel will never abandon the hostages and will always defend itself, whatever the consequences. Alan Tomlinson Cheadle, Cheshire SIR – Hamas's attacks on October 7, its hostage-taking and its targeting of civilians are indefensible. But they do not justify Israel's punishment of an entire population. The idea that Hamas can be destroyed to bring about peace is dangerously naive: like the heads of the mythical Hydra, it will emerge again. From the ashes of Gaza, something even more dangerous may rise. Violence breeds extremism. If our Government truly believes in human rights and international law, it must demand accountability from Israel. Suzanne Temperley Sale, Cheshire

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store