Market-based lifestyle has reduced relationships to mere transactions: RSS leader Hosabale
India has never been a land of rigid ideologies which obstruct independent thinking. "Bharat has never lived just for itself, it has always existed for the well-being of the world," Hosabale said on Tuesday.
He was speaking at a discussion here on the book 'Integral Humanism: A Distinct Paradigm of Development' by Ashok Modak, published by the Indian Council of Social Science Research.
"A market-based, government-oriented life is damaging for society. E-commerce is a glaring example. It has reduced relationships to mere transactions," the RSS leader said.
Explaining his concerns, Hosabale said, "If I want to get Modak's book in a village in Tamil Nadu, I can easily order it online. It seems convenient. I pay and they deliver. But is it really that simple?"
"Traditional marketplaces were rooted in long-standing relationships. A farmer would borrow from a trader who knew him and his family for years. Will Amazon ever understand or replicate that kind of trust? It is faceless. We are slowly losing the essence of such human connections," he said.
In the United States, "society has practically disappeared", Hosabale claimed, adding only individuals and the state are left in that country.
"This model of a welfare government and a market-centric life is not sustainable for a healthy society," the RSS leader added.
He also raised concerns about the modern world's approach to nature and lifestyle.
"We can not live without electricity, but we must think about how to generate it efficiently and integrate it into our lives in a way that respects the environment," Hosabale said.
Education should focus on imparting values and not just information, he said, adding that "new knowledge must be created to build a cohesive society."
Referring to Modak's arguments in the book, Hosabale said, "The western world view revolves around individual rights, survival of the fittest and exploitation of nature. But we discuss a different approach, one based on compassion, concern and compatibility. A human being is part of society, and society cannot exist without nature."
He also lauded Bhutan's 'Gross National Happiness model' as an alternative vision to economic indices. "Human and societal well-being are complementary. Both cannot exist without nature," he said.
"A society cannot live in the past alone. People may draw lessons and inspiration from history, but they must also look ahead to the future and live fully in the present. Bharat has never lived just for itself, it has always existed for the well-being of the world," he said.
About the notion that India has failed to produce ideologues in recent centuries, the RSS leader said, "We do not accept this claim made by the West. The western civilisation, particularly in Europe, has been the cradle of ideologies like communism, capitalism and feminism. In contrast, Bharat has contributed philosophy."
An ideology is a closed system which can not be changed, Hosabale said, adding that it comes in the way of independent thinking.
"Bharat's contribution lies in philosophy, which offers light and guidance but encourages each person to find their own path. Buddha, Mahavir and Swami Vivekananda were not ideologues, they were philosophers. Bharat has never been a land of rigid ideologies," he said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Congress infighting intensifies in J&K: Call for state chief Karra's removal, separate Jammu unit
For the Congress, when one problem is resolved, another seemingly crops up in short order. As soon as the differences in the Karnataka unit appear to have been put to rest for the time being, the Congress's Jammu and Kashmir unit has a full-blown rebellion on its hands. And not for the first time. A section of J&K Congress has rebelled against J&K Pradesh Congress Committee (PCC) president Tariq Hameed Karra for allegedly sidelining senior leaders, several of whom are pushing back and want him to be replaced. While this is not the first time that infighting has led to calls for the removal of the Pradesh Congress president, it is the first time that a group of leaders from Jammu has sought a separate Pradesh Congress unit. 'There is huge resentment against him (Karra),' said a senior leader, who is part of the group that had written to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, seeking a meeting with him. 'He has sidelined the senior leaders and created a coterie of people, who are outsiders (those who have joined the party coming from other parties). We are not being consulted.' Among the leaders whose return to the party fold has not gone down well are Taj Mohiudin and G M Saroori. However, according to the pro-Karra camp, the state Congress president had nothing to do with their return and the high command took the decision. A disgruntled leader said the dissatisfaction had reached such a point that the Jammu leadership is seeking a separate Pradesh Congress unit. In Maharashtra, the Congress has an overall Pradesh Congress Committee for the state and an independent Mumbai Regional Congress Committee. Leaders loyal to Karra, however, see this as a BJP-RSS ploy to sow divisions in the party. 'The trifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir was always an RSS agenda, and they are now making calls to implement it. As Rahul (Gandhi) ji says, there are BJP sleeper cells in Congress. These leaders are among those sleeper cells,' said one such leader. 'We lost the elections because of him,' alleged another. Despite dissatisfaction against the BJP-led government at the Centre, the Congress failed to register an impressive performance in the Assembly elections last year, winning only six seats, including five in the Valley and one (Rajouri) in Jammu. The Congress functionary alleged that the dissidents were 'deliberately instigating' some party workers to keep their positions safe. 'There are four or five leaders. One of them was a former Pradesh Congress president. He could not digest the fact that he was divested of his post. Two other leaders have always benefited from infighting in the Congress. They have no standing in the party and have benefitted from conflict by pitting Congress workers against each other and managing to get themselves well placed in the party'. This is not the first time the J&K Congress president is facing pushback from his party colleagues. In the last decade, all four people to have held the post have faced revolts. In 2015, then Pradesh Congress president Saifuddin Soz faced a rebellion when many party leaders seen as close to then senior Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad demanded his resignation. It ended with Ghulam Ahmad Mir replacing Soz. But, Azad loyalists were not on board with Mir's elevation, and the latter faced many rebellions in his six-year tenure. After Mir, Vikar Rasool Wani took charge of J&K Congress. However, his tenure, too, was marred by the dissent from the party rank and file, leading to the party choosing Karra. Karra, however, enjoys the backing of Mir, who is now a member of the Congress Working Committee. While their win in the Assembly polls has bolstered their position in the PCC, the dissidents either did not contest the polls or lost. 'He (Mir) has been a former state president. He is well aware of the machinations of the party leaders. It is the same set of people who were first against Soz sahib, then Mir sahib, and now Karra sahib,' said a leader in the Karra camp.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: What the special revision of electoral rolls means in Bihar
As per the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls ordered by the Election Commission ahead of the Bihar Assembly polls, residents of Bihar whose names did not figure in the 2003 electoral rolls must provide one of 11 documents notified by the EC to prove their 'citizenship'. But when The Indian Express visits Bihar, many do not have these documents. This story plays out in village after village in the state, from Nitish's turf Harnaut in Nalanda district, to RJD chief Lalu Prasad's Raghopur in Vaishali. The Raghopur Assembly seat is currently represented by Lalu's son and senior RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav. In the next 20 days or so, as the monsoon moves in, over 77,000 booth level offices along with other government staff and political party workers must check the antecedents of over 7.8 crore registered electors as part of the revision exercise. While a declaration that an applicant is a citizen is required for all new registrations, this time the EC is asking for citizenship proof for all new as well as existing voters. Across villages in Bihar, this has meant both disquiet and a desperate scramble for residential and caste certificates, the most commonly available of the 11 documents specified by the EC. RSS pitch RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale last week said that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble to the Constitution should be reviewed. This is not the first time the issue has come up. BJP Rajya Sabha MP Rakesh Sinha moved a Private Member's Bill in 2020, and others have petitioned the courts. The Supreme Court examined the matter, and in 2024, a two-judge Bench led by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjeev Khanna upheld the insertion of 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble. The timing of the Sangh's move today is of as much interest as the move itself. After the fulfilment of its core agenda — Ram temple, Article 370, Uniform Civil Code — the Sangh may want to push its agenda further in its centenary year as it looks to create a Hindu civilisational entity. The RSS's suggestion can complicate an already difficult situation for the BJP brass. First, the party will have to decide what it will do about the allegiance to secularism that is mentioned in its party Constitution. In 2014, PM Modi said that secularism 'flows in our blood'. Second, the BJP's NDA allies, on whom the party is dependent in its third term, are not likely to bite the bullet easily. Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan has already made it clear he is not in favour of amending the Preamble. Third, it will give another handle to the Congress to target the BJP. Neerja Chowdhury unpacks in her column Majithia's bail plea On Friday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court will hear Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia's plea against his arrest and subsequent remand in a disproportionate assets case registered against him by the Vigilance Bureau. Majithia was sent to a seven-day vigilance remand by the Mohali court on June 26. The court Wednesday extended the remand by four more days after his seven-day remand ended. The VB on June 25 arrested Majithia in the case allegedly involving laundering of Rs 540 crore of 'drug money'. Majithia on July 1 moved the high court, calling the arrest 'political witch-hunting and vendetta' for being a vocal critic of the current dispensation. In his petition, he sought appropriate relief against 'illegal' arrest and subsequent remand granted in the FIR registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He submitted that the FIR registered against him is 'patently illegal' while his arrest was carried out in 'gross violation of settled legal procedures'. In 2021, Majithia was booked under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The action was taken on the basis of a 2018 report of the anti-drug Special Task Force. Majithia spent more than five months in Patiala jail and walked out of prison in August 2022 after the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted him bail. – With PTI inputs
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
As RSS calls for amending Preamble, why it puts BJP in a tricky position
When the RSS general secretary says that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble to the Constitution should be reviewed, it is more than a casual call for a debate, for the Sangh is measured in its utterances. Dattatreya Hosabale's comment last week is not the first time the issue has come up. BJP Rajya Sabha MP Rakesh Sinha moved a Private Member's Bill in 2020, and others have petitioned the courts. The Supreme Court examined the matter, and in 2024, a two-judge Bench led by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjeev Khanna upheld the insertion of 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble. It is true, as the RSS says, that B R Ambedkar, and indeed Jawaharlal Nehru, did not feel it was required to explicitly include secularism and socialism in the Preamble when the Constitution was being framed. Ambedkar felt the idea was embedded in the essence of the document and did not need an overt expression. In 1976, Indira Gandhi decided to include the words in the Preamble amid the Emergency when fundamental rights were suspended, the press muzzled, the judiciary's oversight role withdrawn, and Opposition leaders in jail. In the preceding months, there had not been any demand for their inclusion in the Preamble, and there was hardly any discussion on the matter before it happened. The change came as part of the 42nd Amendment that concentrated power in the hands of the executive. Whatever be Mrs Gandhi's motivation — whether it was to insert 'socialist' to retain the support of the USSR, or add 'secularism' to make amends and send a signal to Muslims who were angry about enforced sterilisations during the Emergency — the Janata Party government chose not to remove the two words from the Preamble. The government, of which the BJP's precursor Jana Sangh was a part, clearly thought it politically prudent to retain them even though it undid many of the Emergency provisions through the 44th Amendment. The two 'S' words that have suddenly become so controversial did not create a kerfuffle back then and a few questioned if India was, or should be, a secular and socialist nation. Over the years, socialism has evolved into a widely accepted generic concept, understood as economic and social justice for the last person. PM Narendra Modi is more of a social-welfarist than several of his predecessors. Secularism, too, had near-universal acceptance till it began to be equated with minority appeasement. The RSS wants to turn the clock back. But in politics, sometimes it's easier to do than undo. To remove 'secular' from the Preamble today will signal that India is now moving towards a Hindu Rashtra. It is like talking about undoing reservation for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes given after Independence (22.5%), or quota for the Other Backward Classes (27%) that was given in 1990 following the Mandal Commission report. V P Singh had once said even if he wanted to undo the Mandal decision, he could not go back because it could lead to widespread violence. When RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat in 2015 spoke about moving beyond reservation, the resulting backlash only helped bring Lalu Prasad and Nitish Kumar to power in Bihar. The timing of the Sangh's move today is of as much interest as the move itself. After the fulfilment of its core agenda — Ram temple, Article 370, Uniform Civil Code — the Sangh may want to push its agenda further in its centenary year as it looks to create a Hindu civilisational entity. The response, or otherwise, of the BJP to Hosabale's comment is instructive. Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan — who has been one of the Sangh's favourites for BJP presidentship — was the first to endorse the idea. Chouhan said 'sarva dharma sambhava (all religions are equal)' and not secularism (the French concept of separation of church and state) was a part of Indian culture. His Cabinet colleague Jitendra Singh also spoke in the same vein as did Chief Ministers Devendra Fadnavis and Himanta Biswa Sarma. The RSS's suggestion can complicate an already difficult situation for the BJP brass. First, the party will have to decide what it will do about the allegiance to secularism that is mentioned in its party Constitution. In 2014, PM Modi said that secularism 'flows in our blood'. Second, the BJP's NDA allies, on whom the party is dependent in its third term, are not likely to bite the bullet easily. Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan has already made it clear he is not in favour of amending the Preamble. Third, it will give another handle to the Congress to target the BJP. Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has already said the BJP prefers the Manusmriti to the Constitution. Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav has also accused the party of quietly going for a change in the Constitution because it is unable to openly oppose reservation for Dalits and OBCs. Both the BJP and the Opposition are manoeuvring to get the support of Dalits and OBCs. The ruling party knows how fraught with risks any talk of changing the Constitution can be, given that the Opposition's narrative dented it in the Lok Sabha elections last year and brought the party down to 240 seats. There is a growing perception today about the Constitution. The founding document (also, Constitutional secularism) is identified with Ambedkar, more than was the case in the 1970s and 80s. And Ambedkar is equated with Dalits and Dalits with reservation. Even though the RSS is saying it wants to return to the Preamble approved by Ambedkar, we do not know which way the cookie will crumble. Both the Congress and the BJP realise the Constitution is a live political issue today and observing the 50th anniversary of the Emergency is more than a mere recall of what happened then. We can discuss what kind of secularism suits the country. We can accept or reject the French model, and back the Indian concept that emphasises the equality of religions before the state. However, at the end of the day, secularism is not a luxury for a diverse nation such as India. It is a necessity that enables us to co-exist as one entity. (Neerja Chowdhury, Contributing Editor, The Indian Express, has covered the last 11 Lok Sabha elections. She is the author of How Prime Ministers Decide)
