The Latest: Trump administration sanctions UN investigator probing abuses in Gaza
The State Department's decision to impose sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, follows an unsuccessful U.S. pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post. It also comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visiting Washington this week to meet with President Donald Trump and other officials about the war in Gaza and more.
It's unclear what the practical effect the sanctions will have and whether the independent investigator will be able to travel to the U.S. with diplomatic paperwork.
Here's the latest:
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio holds talks with Russia's Lavrov as Ukraine tensions soar
They met Thursday in Malaysia as tensions between the countries rise over Moscow's increasing attacks on Ukraine and whether Russia's leader is serious about a peace deal.
Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held talks in Kuala Lumpur on the sidelines of the annual Association of Southeast Asian Nations Regional Forum, which brings together 10 ASEAN members and their most important diplomatic partners including Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, European nations and the U.S.
The meeting lasted around 50 minutes. Rubio was seen winking at Lavrov afterward as reporters shouted questions, which they both ignored.
The meeting was their second encounter since Rubio took office, although they've spoken by phone several times.
US weapons deliveries to Ukraine will not stall peace talks, Kremlin says
The Kremlin insisted Thursday that the resumption of weapons deliveries between the United States and Ukraine and harsher rhetoric from Trump would not stall peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv.
'We are still waiting for a signal from Kyiv's representatives as to their desire or unwillingness to enter into a third round of direct negotiations,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told journalists. 'We have always said that we would prefer to use peaceful political and diplomatic means. But until this happens, the military operation continues,' Peskov said, using the Kremlin's euphemism for the invasion of Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
15 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Russian drone and cruise missile attacks kill at least 2 in Ukraine
At least two people were killed overnight into Saturday as Russia continued to pound Ukraine with hundreds of drones as part of a stepped-up bombing campaign that has further dampened hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the more than three-year-old war. Two people died and 14 were wounded when Russian forces attacked the Bukovina area in the Chernivtsi region of southwestern Ukraine with four drones and a missile, regional Gov. Ruslan Zaparaniuk said Saturday. He said that the two people died due to falling debris from a drone. A drone attack in Ukraine's western Lviv region wounded six people, regional Gov. Maksym Kozytskyi said. Three people were wounded in Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine when the city was hit by eight drones and two missiles, Mayor Ihor Terekhov said. Russia fired 597 drones and decoys, along with 26 cruise missiles, into Ukraine overnight into Saturday, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 319 drones and 25 cruise missiles were shot down and 258 decoy drones were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. Russia has been stepping up its long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities. Earlier this week, Russia fired more than 700 attack and decoy drones at Ukraine overnight, topping previous nightly barrages for the third time in two weeks and targeting Lutsk near the border with Poland in western Ukraine, a region that is a crucial hub for receiving foreign military aid. Poland's air force scrambled fighter jets in areas bordering Ukraine, Polish officials said. Currently on hiatus A review of funny, uplifting news in Winnipeg and around the globe. Russia's intensifying long-range attacks have coincided with a concerted Russian effort to break through parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, where Ukrainian troops are under severe pressure. Russia's Defense Ministry said it shot down 33 Ukrainian drones overnight into Saturday.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Musk, Trump and Mao
Opinion The only place where some people still see Elon Musk as a political genius is China. 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you,' wrote a fan on Weibo, China's biggest social media site. 'If Elon Musk were to found a political party,' wrote another, 'his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics.' Distance lends enchantment, but the home market is a harder sell. Back in the U.S. a few days later, when Musk announced the foundation of the 'America Party,' the public response fell considerably short of rhapsodic. Tesla shares fell 7.5 per cent the next day and Musk's personal stake in the company fell by US$10 billion. U.S. President Donald Trump pretended pity for his former ally for about 10 seconds — 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely off the rails' he posted online — before reverting to form: 'The one thing third parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos.' Like a stopped clock, Trump is occasionally right, and this may be one of those times. Musk may seem completely out of control, but if he gets the strategy right, his new political party could spread disruption and chaos right within the ranks of the Republican Party. Most American political analysts have dismissed the electoral prospects of Musk's new party. After all, new third parties have not broken the grip of the two-party system in the United States for more than a century. However, third parties have often determined the outcome in races between the two big parties. There isn't time for Musk to build a countrywide third party in the 20 months between now and the midterm elections for the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives in November 2026. That's when he plans to launch his first challenge to Trump, but he doesn't need a nationwide party for that. Indeed, he probably never intends to go that route. All Musk has to do in 2026 is unseat two or three Republican incumbents in the Senate and half a dozen in the House, and the Republicans lose control of both houses of Congress. Concentrate on 20 Republican-held Senate seats and 50 marginal House seats and spend a hundred million dollars in each one. That ought to do the trick. Would Musk really do that? It would be one of history's biggest tantrums, and all he would get out of it is the satisfaction of creating a potential majority in congress that might repeal or at least modify Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Trump would still be president, but Musk really seems to believe that an extra US$3 trillion on the national debt matters. Would Musk get away with it? Of course not. However, the measures Trump would take to thwart Musk's strategy might mark a decisive break with the current constitutional order. Many people fear it's coming anyway, but in practice it needs a crisis. This could be it. Foreign analysts can sometimes see analogies and parallels in American politics that Americans themselves miss. Some Chinese scholars, in particular, make disturbing comparisons between Trump and Mao. Zhang Qianfan, a constitutional law professor in Beijing, calls the rapid Trumpist takeover of U.S. politics against only feeble resistance 'America's Cultural Revolution.' Ding Xueliang, once a Red Guard and now professor of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, says 'It's not identical, but there are certainly parallels.' Many people in China see the war on 'woke' and on elite universities in America, the mistrust of bureaucracy, the hatred of the 'deep state,' and the cult of the leader as symptoms of an anti-intellectual drive as strong as that in China under Mao. Above all, they remember that Mao destroyed the bureaucracy, purged the Party, and effectively made himself emperor. 'During Trump's presidential inauguration speech, Republican lawmakers all stood up and applauded with such fervor that it rivaled North Korea. These are deeply troubling signs,' Zhang said. Or as Trump said when Xi Jinping abolished term limits and made himself president-for-life: 'I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot someday.' Gwynne Dyer's new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World's Climate Engineers.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Another day, another Trump tariff threat
Opinion We apologize. We apologize deeply for going back to the same ground we worked in our July 11 editorial, when we said, about U.S. President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff levy on Brazil, 'It was Canada a couple of weeks ago, when Trump was railing about the unfairness of a Canadian dairy tariff that he actually agreed to in the last Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact and that hasn't been levied, and it's Brazil's turn now. And it will be Canada again.' Because it is Canada. Again. Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post U.S. President Donald Trump Thursday night, on his own social media outlet, Trump posted a letter that he was sending to Prime Minister Mark Carney, decrying drugs 'pouring into our Country' from Canada, and complaining about the aforementioned tariff on dairy products. (Which American dairy exporters would face if they reached certain export levels — which they never have reached, and hence, are tariffs they never have paid. But why bother to worry about facts?) The letter starts out 'It is a great honour for me to send you this letter in that it demonstrates the strength and commitment of our trading relationship, and the fact that the United States has agreed to continue working with Canada, despite Canada having financially retaliated against the United States…' Trump then goes on to say that he is ordering a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian products to come into effect on Aug. 1, over and above tariffs already announced on steel, aluminum and auto parts, and threatens to increase that rate if Canada retaliates with tariffs of its own. It doesn't explain whether, like his last threat of 10 per cent or 20 per cent, the tariff only applies to products outside the CUSMA trade agreement. 'If Canada works with me to stop the flow of fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter. These tariffs may be modified upwards or downwards, depending on our relationship with your country. You will never be disappointed with the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Far from never being disappointed, we are, in fact, deeply disappointed with the United States of America. Or, at least, with its threatener-in-chief. He does not negotiate in good faith, he changes his demands and the reasons for them at the drop of a hat, and seems to think that disrupting global trade, roiling global financial markets and upending relationships with long-standing friendly nations is somehow 'doing business.' It's not. At this point, we should be looking at cutting our losses in the best way we can. It's time to leave Trump behind: we can make nice in trade talks, do our best to mollify a president who can't even be bothered to use facts to bolster his 'national security' tariffs, but in every possible way, we should be moving to separate ourselves from trade with the United States under Trump. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. We should avoid American products, decline to vacation or travel in the United States, and refuse to absorb American tariffs into the prices Canadian sellers charge American customers. Americans should feel the full cost of their president's unilateral 'negotiations.' As well, we should look to enter trade agreements with nations that negotiate honestly and fairly, and that then live up to the terms and spirit of those negotiations. And move every bit of trade we can to those countries. It took just seven hours from when our earlier editorial was written until Trump proved the editorial's central thesis to be correct: 'There is a simple truth President Trump is making more and more clear with each passing day and each passing edict. If you give in to blackmail, the blackmailer will just come back later for more.' He'll be back, demanding even more. Depend on it.
