&w=3840&q=100)
‘Can't stand idle as China…': US Senators join call for new Taiwan law to check Chinese ‘grey zone tactics'
Amid rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific, a bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill aimed at countering China's escalating use of 'grey zone tactics' against Taiwan, particularly its undersea communications infrastructure.
The Taiwan Undersea Cable Resilience Initiative Act, unveiled Wednesday by Republican Senator John Curtis and Democratic Senator Jacky Rosen, seeks to bolster the resilience of critical submarine cables near Taiwan.
According to a report by Taipei Times, the bill calls on the US Department of State, working in coordination with the Departments of Defence, Homeland Security and the Coast Guard to deploy real-time monitoring systems, develop rapid-response protocols, strengthen maritime surveillance, and expand international cooperation to detect and respond to sabotage attempts.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The initiative comes in response to mounting concerns over China's attempts to isolate Taiwan through non-traditional means. 'We can't stand idle as China ramps up its tactics to isolate Taiwan, including by sabotaging its vital undersea cables,' Senator Curtis said.
He emphasised that enhancing monitoring capabilities and infrastructure security sends 'a clear message' that the United States remains committed to defending shared global infrastructure, sovereignty, and democratic values.
The act refers to at least 11 reported disruptions to Taiwan's undersea cables since February 2023, incidents that US officials suspect involved vessels engaged in deliberate interference. These disruptions have threatened Taiwan's internet connectivity and highlighted the vulnerabilities in the island's communication links.
In addition to the cable legislation, another bill—the Taiwan International Solidarity Act—was also introduced by Senators Curtis and Chris Van Hollen. This measure asserts that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not preclude US efforts to push back against attempts to downgrade Taiwan's international status. It encourages Washington to work with allies in resisting Beijing's growing diplomatic pressure on Taipei.
The latest Senate action follows the House's passage of a companion version of the International Solidarity Act in May, co-sponsored by Democratic Representative Gerry Connolly and Republican Representative Young Kim. A similar effort passed the House in 2023 but stalled in the Senate, necessitating its reintroduction in the current Congress.
Together, the two bills reflect a broader strategy in Washington to fortify Taiwan's global standing and infrastructure against Beijing's assertive and ambiguous tactics—often employed in the so-called grey zone that falls short of open military conflict.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Maurene Comey, prosecutor in Epstein case, fired by Justice Department
The Justice Department has fired Maurene Comey, the daughter of former FBI director James Comey and a veteran federal prosecutor who worked on the cases against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Jeffrey Epstein, three people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. There was no specific reason given for her firing, according to one of the people. They spoke to the AP on Wednesday on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters. Maurene Comey was a veteran lawyer in the Southern District of New York, long considered the most elite of the Justice Department's prosecution offices. Her cases included the sex trafficking prosecution of Epstein, who killed himself behind bars in 2019, and the recent case against Combs, which ended earlier this month with a mixed verdict. She didn't immediately respond to messages seeking comment on Wednesday. The Trump administration has moved to fire Justice Department lawyers who have worked on cases that have provoked the president's ire, and Maurene Comey was long seen as a potential target given her father's fraught relationship over the last decade with the Republican president. James Comey was the FBI director when Mr. Trump took office in 2017, having been appointed by then-President Barack Obama. But his relationship with Mr. Trump was strained from the start, and the FBI director resisted a request by Mr. Trump at a private dinner to pledge personal loyalty to the president. Mr. Trump fired James Comey in May 2017 amid an investigation into potential ties between Russia and Mr. Trump's presidential campaign. The Justice Department recently appeared to acknowledge the existence of an investigation into James Comey, though the basis for that inquiry is unclear.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump's approval on immigration fever drops to lowest level of his term: Poll
US President Donald Trump's public approval rating on immigration fell in recent weeks to 41%, the lowest since his return to the White House, as Americans took a dour view of heavy-handed tactics, a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Wednesday same share of respondents in the two-day poll - 41% - said they approved of Trump's overall performance as president, matching a June 21-23 reading that marked the lowest of Trump's second term so far. Trump's approval rating on immigration was 43% in the June Republican president has ordered a nationwide campaign to arrest migrants in the country illegally and has vowed to deport millions of people, executing raids at work sites, including farms that were largely exempted from enforcement during his first term. The raids often feature masked officials and have provoked dozens of lawsuits. Only 28% of poll respondents said they agreed with a statement that "immigration arrests at places of work are good for the country," compared with 54% who disagreed. Republicans were notably divided, with 56% in favour of workplace raids, 24% opposed and about 20% saying they were unsure. Democrats overwhelmingly one recent immigration raid of a farm in California, one worker died and hundreds were were also divided when asked if they agreed with a statement that arrests of immigrants should be carried out like military operations. Sixty percent agreed and 25% disagreed. Overall, just one in three Americans supported the notion, and one in 10 were more clearly divided along partisan lines on whether immigration enforcement officials should wear masks during raids. Some 70% of Republicans said they should, while the same share of Democrats said they shouldn' policy until recently was a strong point for Trump. In Reuters/Ipsos polling on his approval on a range of issues, from foreign policy to taxation, immigration has been the only policy area where his approval reached 50% - hitting that mark in February and March. It has since trended lower, and in the latest poll 51% of respondents said they disapproved of his performance on the issue, 10 points more than the share who liked his passed a spending law this month that provides funding to detain at least 100,000 people, a steep increase over the record 58,000 in custody by late June.- EndsTune InMust Watch


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Zuckerberg's leadership questioned as Meta privacy trial gets underway
An $8 billion class action investors' lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and company leaders current and former begins Wednesday, with claims stemming from the 2018 privacy scandal involving the Cambridge Analytica political consulting allege in their lawsuit that Meta did not fully disclose the risks that Facebook users' personal information would be misused by Cambridge Analytica, a firm that supported Donald Trump's successful Republican presidential campaign in 2016. Shareholders say Facebook officials repeatedly and continually violated a 2012 consent order with the Federal Trade Commission under which Facebook agreed to stop collecting and sharing personal data on platform users and friends without their later sold user data to commercial partners in direct violation of the consent order and removed disclosures from privacy settings that were required under consent order, the lawsuit alleges. The fallout led to Facebook agreeing to pay a $5.1 billion penalty to settle FTC charges. The social media giant also faced significant fines in Europe and reached a $725 million privacy settlement with users. Now shareholders want Zuckerberg and others to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8 first trial witness, privacy expert Neil Richards, testified Monday morning for the shareholders.'Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading,' said Richards, a professor at Washington University Law later testimony, Jeffrey Zients, who served on Facebook's board from 2018 to 2020, testified that consumer privacy and user data were priorities for both management and the he supported settling with the FTC as it investigated potential violations of the 2012 consent order, so the company could move forward.'It was difficult because this was a lot of money, but I think it was better than the alternative,' Zients if the board considered making its founder a party to the settlement, he said Zuckerberg was 'essential' to running the Zients, who served in both the Obama and Biden administrations, said, 'there was no indication that he had done anything wrong.'The case is expected to run through late next week and include testimony from both Zuckerberg and former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg. Other witnesses expected in Delaware Chancery Court, where Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. is incorporated, include board member Marc Andreessen and former board member Peter Thiel. The judge is not expected to rule for several had hoped the Supreme Court would dismiss the case. Justices heard arguments in November before deciding they should not have taken it up. The high court dismissed the company's appeal, leaving in place an appellate ruling allowing the case to go forward.- EndsTrending Reel