logo
NZ First bill seeks to protect cash payments up to $500

NZ First bill seeks to protect cash payments up to $500

NZ Herald5 days ago
Winston Peters pushes bill to ensure cash acceptance in stores. Photo / Mark Mitchell
As a members' bill, lodged July 14 in the name of NZ First MP Jamie Arbuckle, it's still a long while from possibly becoming law, but it does propose sweeping changes in how businesses treat cash and looks at who gets left out in a digital economy. Here's what you need to know.
The Cash Transactions Protection Bill would mandate businesses in trade accept cash payment for goods valued up to $500.
'The bill ensures that New Zealanders maintain freedom of choice in how they pay, preserving cash as what it should be: an enduring private and reliable option,' Peters said in introducing it.
'By protecting the sanctity of cash transactions, the bill upholds personal privacy, maintains sovereign control over New Zealand's monetary system, and lessens the risks posed by digital-only payment systems.'
The bill aims to protect cash use, citing impacts on rural communities, the elderly, and low-income earners. Photo / Dean Purcell
Exceptions given to the bill's requirements include online retailers and land purchases.
The bill also would propose that 'payment in cash must be accepted for essential goods or services' – which it defines as food, water, fuel, health care and household utilities.
Another part of the bill would require businesses to keep cash on hand for emergencies.
'A vendor must ensure they have sufficient access to cash to allow them to continue to trade in the event of a digital or electrical outage that lasts longer than 24 hours.'
In the introduction, the bill says it 'preserves cash as an explicit privacy-preserving payment method, ensuring both freedom of choice and freedom from unwarranted surveillance in financial transactions'.
Critics argue the bill doesn't reflect business realities, with a shift towards digital payments.
'It puts New Zealanders' interests above global trends toward digital currencies, maintaining sovereign control over New Zealand's monetary policy and mitigating the risks associated with digital-only financial systems, like restricted access to funds.'
The bill also calls for fees or fines from $1000 to a maximum of $5000 for infringements.
But as a members' Bill, it's not yet guaranteed it will ever go to the House for a vote.
The Bill first will have to be randomly drawn from the ballot to be considered at all in the House, and then undergo the same process of debate and referral to select committees as any other Bill.
While it's on the members ballot, MPs are allowed only one Bill in the lottery at any given time. NZ First has swapped out its Bills on several occasions this term, so there's also no guarantees over how long this legislation will remain in the ballot.
Speaking to Checkpoint recently, Retail NZ CEO Carolyn Young said she wondered if the Bill was 'kind of a sledgehammer for a small problem'.
Carolyn Young, CEO of Retail NZ.
Marisa Bidois, chief executive of the Restaurant Association of New Zealand, said the bill ignored realities many businesses deal with.
'We understand the intent behind the proposed bill – no one wants to see people excluded from accessing essential goods and services. However, requiring all businesses to accept cash for transactions under $500 doesn't reflect the operational realities many businesses face.
'We believe businesses should be trusted to make the right decisions for how they operate and serve their customers.'
Can businesses refuse cash?
Yes, as long as they 'clearly inform customers in advance that they don't accept cash before you start shopping or receive services from them', the Reserve Bank of New Zealand said.
They can do that with a sign on the premises or telling customers in person before you pay.
'Most hospitality businesses still accept cash, but a small and growing number are moving away from it, particularly in busy urban areas,' Bidois said.
'Some customers do push back when cash isn't accepted, especially if they haven't been informed ahead of time. That's why we encourage clear communication.'
You're also only allowed to pay so much of a bill in coins, by the way, in case you're thinking of clearing out that piggy bank – you're allowed up to $5 of 10 or 20 cent coins, $10 of 50 cent coins or $100 worth of $1 and $2 coins.
According to the Reserve Bank's latest data released in June, 45.8% of the population are still using cash sometimes in 'paying for everyday things' – although 79.1% are using debit cards/Eftpos also.
Only 3.6% of people say they 'never use cash', while 33.2% said they hadn't used cash in the past seven days.
Cash isn't quite the king it once was.
'We know that less than 10 per cent of transactions that happen across New Zealand throughout the year now happen in cash,' Retail NZ's Young said.
'In the cities a lot less cash is used and in rural areas and areas of deprivation there is a higher percentage of cash that is used.'
The bill aims to protect cash use, especially for rural and elderly populations. Photo / Chris Tarpey
Bidois said in the Restaurant Association's latest survey, 40% of respondents said cash made up just 5 to 10% of their transactions.
Still, when it comes to essentials, 'there's no supermarket that doesn't take cash', Young said.
On Peters' Facebook page, the post announcing the bill has gathered nearly 3000 comments and 15,000 likes, with many expressing support for the idea.
'Thank you! I use cash as a way to keep within my budget, as my mother did,' one wrote, while another said it was 'an essential bill - especially for many of our elderly population'.
On the other hand, Young said that electronic transactions are often easier for businesses to deal with.
'Electronic transactions are much safer for a wide number of reasons,' she said, including less chance of being targeted by thieves or counterfeit money, and less time for staff dealing with transactions.
'For many retailers and for hospitalities - cafes and things - cash is not always their favoured method of payment because of those challenges.'
However, frequently complained-about surcharges such as those for PayWave are 'not ideal', she said.
Many also have concerns about the privacy and security issues around digital payments and the records they leave behind.
Cash also comes back to the table during disasters, such as Cyclone Gabrielle, which knocked out infrastructure.
'We do know that when the cyclones happened in Auckland and Gisborne and Hawke's Bay 18 months ago that the supermarkets were really critical for being able to, especially in those provincial areas, … provide the cash that people needed to be able to pay for goods and services,' Young said.
Bidois said that while there was a clear shift towards digital payments, it was all about striking the right balance for businesses.
'Many businesses are finding that tap-and-go is what most customers expect, and it makes day-to-day operations simpler.
'That said, our members care about customer experience, and most continue to accept cash to accommodate older New Zealanders, tourists, or regulars who prefer it.'
- RNZ
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FIANZ Calls For ‘Hate Speech' Laws Again; Is Their Harmony Accord Commitment Real?
FIANZ Calls For ‘Hate Speech' Laws Again; Is Their Harmony Accord Commitment Real?

Scoop

time22 minutes ago

  • Scoop

FIANZ Calls For ‘Hate Speech' Laws Again; Is Their Harmony Accord Commitment Real?

The Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand (FIANZ) once again is calling for 'hate speech' laws against their critics in the name of social cohesion. This undermines the spirit of the Harmony Accord, which is a promising document to foster mutual understanding through dialogue, says Stephen Franks, Chairperson of the Free Speech Union. 'The Accord expressly commits the parties to respecting freedom of speech. If FIANZ has immediately reneged, their commitment is suspect. Defining and seeking punishment for 'Islamophobia' has been the Trojan horse for resuscitating blasphemy laws in other free societies. Leading politicians in the UK are currently fighting against such an attempt. 'Censorship is poison to social cohesion. People charged or jailed for expressing fears about a religion will rationally resent the groups asking the Police to silence their fears. We're seeing the results right now in the UK, in the disorder fueled by long suppression of the truth about the rape grooming gangs, and the gags on questioning illegal immigration. 'Proposals to criminalise criticism of religion, even under the banner of combating 'hate', would grant religious beliefs legal privileges that conflict with liberal democratic values. New Zealanders must remain free to challenge and debate religious doctrines without the threat of prosecution. 'Censorship is counterproductive. It does nothing to change views. It often draws more attention to the very opinions it's trying to ban. Counter-speech is more constructive. It allows bad ideas to be challenged, not buried. The Government has already rightly rejected 'hate speech' laws after tens of thousands of Kiwis pushed back. 'We should not risk turning an Accord that shows tolerance and mutual respect into scheming to undermine core democratic freedoms. A forced silence is not social cohesion.'

All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle
All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle

New Zealand's national passenger rail advocacy group, The Future is Rail, has announced its strong support for the Green Party's proposal to establish a new passenger rail service connecting Auckland and Tauranga. The group is calling the service a vital link that would serve nearly half of the nation's population and build on the proven success of inter-regional rail. 'This service is a logical and vital next step for New Zealand's transport network,' said Dr. Roger Blakeley, Chair of The Future is Rail. 'By linking Auckland, Hamilton, and Tauranga via the existing rail corridor, the train would serve up to 2.5 million people. It's time to connect our country's most significant economic and population centres with modern, efficient transport.' The proposed service would complement and extend the existing Te Huia train, which connects Hamilton and Auckland seven days a week. 'Te Huia's ahead-of-schedule ridership growth is evidence that Kiwis will embrace inter-regional rail when it's provided,' Spokesperson, Lindsey Horne, said. 'We see this as completing a critical missing link in our national transport system.' The Future is Rail highlighted the significant advantages passenger rail has over current travel options between the two cities. 'Currently, the 225km journey between Tauranga and Auckland forces people onto roads or into expensive flights,' Ms Horne stated. 'Passenger rail offers a better alternative that is safer, greener, more affordable, and more comfortable. It allows for a productive journey with significantly lower carbon emissions, where passengers can work or relax instead of facing the stress of driving.' South Island Spokesperson, Dave Macpherson, noted that the project aligns with a growing 'passenger rail renaissance' in New Zealand, citing broad public and political support. 'There is a growing public demand for passenger rail, from campaigns to re-establish the Southerner train between Christchurch and Invercargill to upgrades for the Capital Connection and Wairarapa rail services. Investing in passenger rail has wide and growing support from across the political spectrum, and this project is a perfect opportunity to deliver what New Zealanders are asking for.' About The Future is Rail: The Future is Rail is a national advocacy group dedicated to promoting the benefits and expansion of passenger and freight rail services throughout New Zealand.

Axing Same-Day Enrolment To Vote Exposes Impact Of Govt Starving Another Key Agency Of Enough Funding
Axing Same-Day Enrolment To Vote Exposes Impact Of Govt Starving Another Key Agency Of Enough Funding

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Axing Same-Day Enrolment To Vote Exposes Impact Of Govt Starving Another Key Agency Of Enough Funding

The PSA is condemning proposed changes to New Zealand's electoral laws as undemocratic and the result of a systematically underfunded public service. "We were shocked to see the Government propose several changes to electoral laws, especially the end to same-day voter enrolment," Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi national secretary, Fleur Fitzsimons, says. "They say that the system - in other words, the Electoral Commission - can't handle the strain of same-day enrolment in the years to come. "Why has the Government chosen to build obstacles around people's basic right to vote, instead of funding the Electoral Commission properly?" Like many other public service agencies, the Electoral Commission has been forced to tighten its budget by the National-led Government and restructured its staff last year. "At the time, we criticised that restructure process as rushed - and it eventually resulted in several highly skilled staff leaving the organisation. "New Zealanders are rightfully proud of our democracy. But we also know that to maintain our democracy, we need to care for it and invest into it. "New Zealanders want the public service to be given the tools - including the funding - to make sure voting is as easy as possible for everyone. "100,000 people used the same-day enrolment process at the 2023 election. This is not a nice-to-have - this is a basic function of our democracy."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store