Stephanie was told she would never get better. Now she's at the forefront of treating her illness
'It is not fair that I was in that state for as long as I was, repeatedly reaching out for care and being called 'treatment resistant' and [my condition] 'severe and enduring',' Boulet said.
Evidence-based treatments for adults with eating disorders do not work for roughly half of patients, and there is no standalone evidence-based treatment for anorexia or other specific disorders, meaning clinicians rely on guesswork to find ways to help.
But a promising new US trial has found a personalised treatment approach targeting unique combinations of symptoms for each patient led to a greater decline in symptoms compared to the current gold-standard treatment, enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-E).
Loading
The results of the small randomised controlled trial, the first trial of personalised treatment for any mental illness, were presented at the Australian Eating Disorders Research and Translation Centre's (AEDRTC) conference in Sydney last week. The findings are yet to be peer-reviewed.
Lead researcher Professor Cheri Levinson, director of the Eating Anxiety Treatment (EAT) Laboratory at the University of Louisville, said current treatments were based on averages that don't account for the huge variations in the symptoms, behaviours, thought processes and characteristics of people with eating disorders.
'Patients with the same diagnosis can present with extremely different symptoms,' she said.
'Growing data shows that about 50 per cent of patients have weight and shape concerns as their central or most important symptoms, meaning 50 per cent do not,' she said, floating the concept of an 'eating spectrum disorder' approach to diagnosis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 days ago
- ABC News
Queensland hospital given permission by Supreme Court to perform abortion on 12yo girl
A Queensland court has granted permission for a pregnant 12-year-old girl to have a surgical abortion. An unnamed hospital applied to the Supreme Court for orders after being asked to perform a surgical termination for the child, referred to as "E", who was about nine weeks pregnant. In a decision from mid-June, published online on Wednesday, Justice Catherine Muir said the girl wanted to terminate her pregnancy, and her mother was supportive, but under the law, "a parent cannot consent to the termination on behalf" of her. "The hospital seeks orders from the court in its parens patriae jurisdiction to authorise the termination," Justice Muir said. "These orders were sought because hospital staff are concerned the girl lacks capacity to consent to the termination herself. Justice Muir said the pregnancy was "a result of consensual intercourse between E and her 13-year-old boyfriend, who is aware of the pregnancy, and of the desire for the termination". The girl was starting to experience the symptoms of pregnancy and "missing out on school," the judgement said. "She wants to obtain the termination before she begins to show signs of pregnancy, so that her father and her sister are not alerted to her pregnancy," she said. Justice Muir said the "real question" for the court was whether E had reached a "sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable her to understand fully what is proposed". She said the girl gave evidence to the court and "did very well in answering questions". "Although court was closed and these proceedings, ultimately, will be suppressed, it is a daunting thing for adults to come to court and give evidence, let alone for a child to do so. I am satisfied that E did this bravely," Justice Muir said. She noted the girl was able to explain to her what she understood she was doing by choosing to terminate the baby, and also that there were risks with this procedure, including bleeding, risks for future pregnancy, cramping and infection. She said the hospital had "excellent" facilities and support systems in place to support young people such as E. A psychologist assessed E and was satisfied that she was clear that she wanted a termination and that she knew that having a baby would impact her life. An obstetrician and gynaecologist also met with E on two occasions and considered she had a "rudimentary view" of what it meant to terminate a pregnancy "consistent with that of a 12-year-old," the judgement said. The court also heard from a midwife, who gave evidence that the girl required assistance to understand some of the questions put to her about the termination, and believed she did not demonstrate sufficient insight into the operation's risks and benefits. "But this evidence needs to be seen, now, in light of the evidence that E gave before me, where she clearly articulated the risks associated with the surgical intervention," Justice Muir said. The judgement also said that the girl's mother believed her daughter shows "maturity beyond her years" and that she is very aware of her body and how it functions. Justice Muir said the application seemed to "distil down to the concern of the hospital staff about E's understanding of the risks associated with this surgery". "That, I accept, is an understandable concern," Justice Muir said. "But having heard from E in court, I am satisfied that she does sufficiently understand not only what is proposed, that is the surgical termination, but also the risks of having that termination." She said she was satisfied that the child in this case was "competent". "That is, she is competent to consent to undergo the termination of her pregnancy, and she may give valid and lawful consent for such treatment," she said. "I am prepared to make a declaration in those terms". Queensland decriminalised abortion in 2018.
ABC News
05-06-2025
- ABC News
A Premier ousted, life in Gaza right now + banning e-scooters
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has been forced out of the top job and will request a snap election. And as pressure mounts on Israel to allow more aid to reach those at risk of starvation in Gaza, we hear a first-hand account of what life's like in the war zone. Plus, a fatal collision has prompted Perth to suspend e-scooter hires. Should they be banned everywhere? Listen now: 01:03 - Tasmania's political upheaval 04:35 - Inside Gaza 17:08 - Are e-scooters worth the dangers? Guests: Josh Duggan, reporter, ABC Hobart Josh Duggan, reporter, ABC Hobart Abeer Abou Mutlak, aid worker in Gaza Abeer Abou Mutlak, aid worker in Gaza Anna Lindstedt, injured by e-bike Anna Lindstedt, injured by e-bike Madison Bland, PhD candidate, Griffith University's Cities Research Institute Get the whole story from Hack:
ABC News
04-06-2025
- ABC News
Death of Perth pedestrian in e-scooter crash sparks calls for overhaul of rules
Pressure is mounting for a major overhaul of Western Australia's e-rideable laws following the death of a pedestrian in Perth's CBD on the weekend after he was hit by an e-scooter. It is alleged British tourist Alicia Kemp was three times over the legal blood alcohol limit when her rented e-scooter ploughed into a 51-year-old man at the weekend. Thahn Phan suffered critical injuries and later died in hospital. Ms Kemp has been charged with causing death while driving dangerously under the influence of alcohol. The incident has sparked debate about e-scooter regulations in WA, with Mr Phan's family calling for a review of safety measures for hired e-rideables. Pedestrian Council of Australia chief executive Harold Scruby said pedestrians had been left out of the conversation of e-scooter safety. "The whole thing is upside down," he told ABC Radio Perth. "Number one, they've put the pedestrians last. Number two, they've invented some penalties which are a joke. Number three, there's absolutely no enforcement." Mr Scruby said introducing a ban on e-scooters on footpaths was one way to prevent further harm. "Very few other states or territories allow [e-scooters] on a footpath or even a shared path," he said. "In the old days … [footpaths] were there to protect people from vehicles. Now we're inviting vehicles onto them, and they're high-speed vehicles." He said another solution could be to implement bans in the Perth city centre and other areas of high pedestrian traffic. WA's Deputy Premier Rita Saffioti said it was clear not everyone was following the rules. "We have very strict regulations about the speed of e-scooters … and power of e-scooters, but its obvious we need to do more on compliance," she said. But Ms Saffioti said of equal concern was the modification of private e-scooters. "We have rules and regulations in relation to using e-scooters, but it's clear that some are modified and that they're roaming the streets," she said. "I'll talk to the minister for road safety [about] how we can do a joint compliance blitz, in particular in relation to the modification, because that seems to be the real issue." It comes after WA's Road Safety Commission last month released a review of the state's e-rideable road rules. It found that crash rates were relatively low, but many pedestrians felt unsafe using footpaths after experiencing near-misses. The report stated there was a "concerning" lack of compliance with e-rideable road rules, noting incidents of speeding, riding without a helmet and failing to give way to pedestrians. It recommended increased enforcement to encourage compliance on the roads, and a review of penalties for e-rideable offences, which were found to be weak in comparison to other states and territories. According to data from Royal Perth Hospital, between 2017 and 2022, 74 people either suffered a major head injury resulting from an e-rideable that requiring hospitalisation for more than 24 hours or died. In WA, e-scooters are permitted to reach up to 25 kilometres per hour on shared paths, bicycle paths and roads with a speed limit of 50 kph or less, but only 10 kph on footpaths. They are banned from pedestrian malls, on roads with a speed limit above 50 kph or roads with a median strip, and any road or carriageway with a 'no bicycles' sign. Only one rider can use the scooter at a time, and they must be over the age of 16. There is little consistency in e-scooter laws and penalties across Australia. In Queensland, the ACT and Tasmania, riders can be fined up to $150 if they are caught without a helmet, but in WA the penalty is just $50. Queensland also slashed the maximum speed limit for e-scooters on shared paths from 25 kph to 12 kph in late 2022 following concerns about pedestrian safety. Overseas, Korea, Spain and Sweden have banned e-rideables from footpaths completely. Only hire scheme e-rideables are permitted in the UK, while in Paris it is the opposite, with only private devices allowed.
