
Trump's South African Refugee Program Is 'Whites Only'
I told y'all.
Back in May, I warned that Donald Trump's executive order launching a so-called 'refugee' program specifically designed to fast-track white South Africans into the United States wasn't about humanitarian relief. It was about rescuing whiteness. It was about giving apartheid a second passport and smuggling settler colonialism through the back door of U.S. immigration law.
And just like that, the warning became policy.
The first arrivals are not climate refugees. Not war refugees. Not famine refugees. They are white farmers. They are the descendants of Dutch and British colonizers who helped construct and uphold one of the most violently racist apartheid systems in modern history. And now they're being recast as persecuted innocents, worthy of American sanctuary.
On July 25, Reuters confirmed what critics already suspected. A senior U.S. embassy official in South Africa asked if mixed-race 'coloured' South Africans or Black Khoisan people who speak Afrikaans could qualify for the program. The response from Spencer Chretien, a top official in the State Department's refugee bureau, was blunt: 'The program is intended for white people.'
Although the exact phrasing wasn't verified, three sources confirmed the substance of the message. The State Department later tried to backpedal, claiming the program was open to all who met the criteria. But the numbers speak louder: By late July, 88 white South Africans had been resettled. Not a single Black or mixed-race applicant has made it through.
That comment, spoken out loud by a U.S. government official, wasn't a shocking slip. It was a confirmation. In an era where racism no longer bothers to wear a disguise, the quiet part wasn't whispered; it is policy. No more winks. No more dog whistles about 'heritage,' 'culture,' or 'farmers under siege,' or lies about 'white genocide.' Just raw, unvarnished racial preference embedded into federal immigration strategy.
The Reuters report simply confirms what has been clear all along: this isn't immigration policy. It's racial recruitment. These people aren't being rescued from danger. They're being rescued for whiteness. And not just any whiteness.
Source: Chip Somodevilla / Getty
Whiteness trained in domination. Whiteness with generational expertise in occupying land, extracting labor, and turning Black suffering into white capital. Whiteness fluent in settler colonialism but repackaged as 'agrarian' and 'hard-working.' Whiteness that knows how to police Black movement.
This is a whites-only asylum pipeline. A state-sanctioned apartheid rescue mission. And while officials try to dress it in the language of humanitarian concern, refugee programs from across sub-Saharan Africa remain partially or fully frozen. A travel ban on dozens more, including key student-sending nations, is under review, awaiting possible restriction imminently.
This is not a contradiction. It is the blueprint. The logical endpoint of a xenophobic, white-first immigration model.
Nobody in power is confused about who's actually at risk in South Africa. Crime is real, but it's not white farmers who are the most vulnerable. It's poor Black people. Women. Children. It's the descendants of those who were disenfranchised and traumatized by apartheid. Poverty, unemployment, overcrowding, and inadequate policing have concentrated risk in townships and informal settlements, areas that are predominantly inhabited by Black South Africans. But there are no emergency task forces or pilot refugee programs for them.
Instead, America imports the lie of 'white genocide,' a myth cooked up by white nationalists, echoed by conservative media, and now embedded in U.S. foreign policy. Even white Afrikaner farmers acknowledged that crime affects all farmers, not just whites. They emphasized that isolation, not race, is the real risk on rural farms. Government and academic reports echo that stance, refuting systemic racial persecution.
Because for all the talk about vetting and security and quotas, the real rule of American immigration remains: If you're white, we'll find a way to let you in.
This country turns away Haitian refugees. Sends Latino migrants to an alligator swamp in Florida. It lets Palestinian families starve under siege. It deports African migrants by the plane-load. But for white South Africans, suddenly there's room. Suddenly, there's urgency. Suddenly, merit is redefined to look like a Boer in nice clothes.
This is white ethnostate expansion by other means.
Source: Chip Somodevilla / Getty
It echoes Cold War immigration policy, which favored white Cubans, Hungarians, and Russians fleeing communism, while excluding African, Caribbean, and Asian refugees escaping Western imperialism. The message then, as now: We rescue whiteness. We reject the rest.
What's also behind this refugee program is the right-wing panic over 'replacement theory.' But these racists are not afraid of being replaced. They're afraid of being treated the way they've treated Black people, Indigenous people, immigrants, and the colonized world for centuries. So, they're fast-tracking reinforcements. Importing whiteness. Strengthening the walls with people already trained in racial dominance.
And America, as always, gets to pretend this is generosity, when really, it's laundering apartheid into patriotism.
And let's not forget about Trump's refusal to visit Africa. In two presidencies, he hasn't stepped foot on the continent. No summits. No symbolic visits. No photo ops with African schoolchildren. But chartered planes for white South Africans are the kind of diplomacy that makes the cut.
During his first term, Trump called African nations 'shithole countries.' He imposed sweeping travel bans on Nigeria, Sudan, Eritrea, Tanzania, and Somalia. Those bans blocked thousands of students and researchers, many mid-degree at U.S. universities, from reentering the country.
Thousands of African and Muslim-heritage students studying in the U.S. had their lives upended when Trump's travel ban stripped their visas or froze processing. Many are now too afraid to leave the country, too terrified they won't be allowed back in. Families are fractured. Degrees are at risk. And yet, while Black students face closed borders, white South African colonizers are being fast-tracked with federal approval. American institutions are bleeding talent because Black excellence is expendable, but white grievance is priority.
So no, this refugee program isn't surprising. It's not an exception. It's consistent. It's a racial sanctuary program for white discomfort. A strategic asylum pipeline for settlers fleeing equity.
It is whiteness demanding sanctuary from a world where it might be held accountable. It is empire offering amnesty to its foot soldiers. It is apartheid, rebranded for a softer landing, complete with a visa and federal benefits.
This is about building the next frontier of white supremacy. About stacking the deck with settlers who already know how to dominate, exclude, and erase. Because in America, you don't need to flee a war to qualify as a refugee. You just need to flee the end of white rule.
Dr. Stacey Patton is an award-winning journalist and author of 'Spare The Kids: Why Whupping Children Won't Save Black America' and the forthcoming 'Strung Up: The Lynching of Black Children In Jim Crow America.' Read her Substack here.
SEE ALSO:
South African Refugee Program Is White's Only, Report Says
Trump Prioritizes White Afrikaners Over Black And Brown Migrants
'It's for White People': Trump's South African Refugee Program Confirms What We Already Knew was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Latest Trump tariffs unlikely to budge, top negotiator says
(Reuters) -The tariffs U.S. President Donald Trump imposed last week on scores of countries are likely to stay in place rather than be cut as part of continuing negotiations, Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Sunday. Ahead of a Friday deadline, Trump set rates including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 25% for India, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, according to a presidential executive order. In trade talks since Trump returned to office, the White House has lowered some rates from levels initially announced, including halving import duties set last week as part of a deal with the European Union. Greer told CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday, however, that this would not be the case on the most recent round of tariffs. "A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," he said. "These tariff rates are pretty much set." Greer also said recent trade talks with Beijing had been "very positive" and were focused on the supply of rare earth magnets and minerals. "We're focused on making sure that the flow of magnets from China to the United States and the- and the adjacent supply chain can flow as freely as it did before ... and I'd say we're about halfway there."


USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
White House backs away from IVF mandate despite Trump's campaign pledge, Washington Post
WASHINGTON − The White House has no current plans to mandate insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization, despite President Donald Trump's campaign promise to expand access to fertility treatments, The Washington Post reported on Saturday. Trump signed an executive order earlier this year directing the government to expand access to IVF and reduce the costs of the popular fertility treatment. More: Some workers are job hopping for fertility benefits. Employers are trying to keep up. White House officials say expanding IVF access remains a priority, but legal constraints prevent mandating coverage without Congressional approval, and no bill is currently planned, the Post reported. Officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment by USA TODAY. Contributing: Francesca Chambers


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russian Lawmaker Responds to Trump Moving Nuclear Subs
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian lawmaker Viktor Vodolatsky responded to President Donald Trump's decision to move two U.S. nuclear submarines to "appropriate regions" near Russia by saying that Moscow can count on far more submarines than Washington. "There are significantly more of our [nuclear] submarines in the world's oceans, [and they] have the strongest, most powerful weapons," Vodolatsky, who is also first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Commonwealth of Independent States Affairs, Eurasian Integration and Relations with Compatriots, told Russia's government-controlled news agency TASS. "This is why, let [Trump's] two boats float, they have been at gunpoint for a long time," he added. Why It Matters Vodolatsky's provocative comments follow the U.S. president's announcement on Friday of the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia. The announcement itself can be seen as the latest escalation in the increasingly sour relationship between Moscow and Washington, which has been worsening in recent weeks as Russia's President Vladimir Putin has appeared deaf to Trump's repeated request to end the war in Ukraine. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House on August 1, 2025, in Washington, D.C. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House on August 1, 2025, in Washington, Trump's declared admiration for Putin and his willingness to accept an end to the war in Ukraine that would undoubtedly favor Moscow over Kyiv, the relationship between the two leaders have become frayed in recent weeks, and tensions are now running high between the two countries. With the both holding a significant nuclear arsenal, the threats exchanged between them carry a particularly heavy weight. What To Know On Thursday, Trump said that if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by next Friday, August 8, he will impose a package of economic sanctions on the country. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, now Moscow's military leader, responded to the announcement on social media on Friday, saying that Trump's threat was "a step towards war." This triggered Trump's announcement about the nuclear submarines. On Friday, the U.S. president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social: "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." It is not clear whether the U.S. submarines moved in the unidentified "appropriate regions" near Russia are nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday: "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances." Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on the same day: "Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10. He should remember two things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Vodolatsky told TASS: "There can be no answer from us, because we understand perfectly well who Donald Trump is. These last months have shown that he is changing his mind 24 hours a day." What Happens Next While there have been comments by both Medvedev and Vodolatsky, Putin has not responded to Trump's ultimatum or his decision to move the nuclear submarines. On Friday, however, the Russian president said: "As for any disappointments on the part of anyone, all disappointments arise from inflated expectations. This is a well-known general rule." It is hard to tell whether Trump's nuclear submarine announcement will further escalate tensions with Russia, but some experts said it is unlikely to make a difference, as the U.S. already had submarines deployed, including near Russia.