Sarawak group proposes voluntary DLP tests for SJKC pupils
PETALING JAYA : Some Chinese primary schools (SJKC) in Sarawak are considering allowing pupils to voluntarily sit for the dual language programme assessment, despite their exclusion from the programme.
Jonathan Chai, president of the Association of Aided Chinese Primary Schools in the Kuching, Samarahan, and Serian divisions, said the proposal is being considered as a way to assess pupils' academic performance in science and mathematics.
However, Chai warned that the results might not offer a complete picture, The Borneo Post reported.
'Since SJKCs are not officially part of the dual language programme, any data gathered would mainly serve as an internal benchmark,' he told reporters after a visit to SJKC Chung Hua Batu 11 in Matang.
He said SJKC pupils could potentially sit for the test voluntarily within their own schools for self-evaluation purposes.
He emphasised that full participation in the DLP would require formal approval from the federal education ministry. 'For now, we continue to teach science and mathematics in Mandarin, which remains the most effective method for the majority of our students,' he said.
Chai also pointed to a changing student population, noting that around 40% of SJKC pupils now come from non-Chinese backgrounds – prompting a reassessment of the current language policy.
'We are also paying close attention to the outcomes of DLP assessments in national primary schools,' he added. 'If those results indicate significant gains in student performance, it may influence our future direction,' he added.
In May last year, state deputy education minister Annuar Rapaee said the DLP programme, currently implemented in national primary schools, will be extended to secondary schools across the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Philippines asserts arbitral win at Beijing forum
MANILA: Representatives from the Philippine Embassy in China attended a July 10 forum in Beijing where they reaffirmed the 'legal authority' of the 2016 arbitral ruling in favour of the Philippines' exclusive sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea (South China Sea). In a statement on Sunday (July 13), the embassy said the forum organised by a Chinese think tank was held two days before the ninth anniversary of the landmark ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, where the Philippines brought its case against China in 2013. The forum 'claimed to bring together scholars, legal experts, and policymakers to engage in in-depth discussions on the historical and legal dimensions of the South China Sea,' the embassy said. But embassy representatives who attended that gathering noted the 'predominant criticism of the [arbitral] award and of Philippine policy and actions in the [South China Sea] region.' The embassy is headed by Ambassador Jaime FlorCruz, a veteran journalist who had reported extensively on Beijing. During an opportunity for an intervention, the Filipino officials asserted before that audience that the ruling, along with its annexes, 'proves the validity and legality of Philippine claims and they are available for everyone to study and read.' They also rejected the notion that the Philippines was the 'troublemaker' in the South China Sea and was refusing to engage in proper dialogue with China. 'We disagree with the notion that the Philippines is not willing to engage with China. In fact, even with the arbitral award, the Philippines has continued to make efforts to keep lines of communication open, maintain proper dialogue, and engage positively with China as well as other claimant states, both bilaterally and regionally, within the context of our legally settled claims in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) and international law,' they told the forum. 'We hope China's actions demonstrate genuine willingness to engage and to produce constructive and positive outcomes,' they said. The Hague ruling also dismissed China's nine-dash-line claim as having no legal basis, noting that Unclos 'superseded any maritime entitlements based on historic rights in excess of the limits imposed' by that international treaty. Meanwhile US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement on July 12, the anniversary of the landmark ruling, urging Beijing 'to abide by the 2016 arbitral ruling and to cease its dangerous and destabilising conduct' in the South China Sea. He also called out China for its continued defiance of the ruling, its assertion of 'unlawful and expansive maritime claims,' and aggression against its neighbours. 'Beijing's expansive claims directly infringe on the sovereign rights and jurisdictions of Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia, and undermine peace, stability, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific,' Rubio said on Saturday. He pointed out that the 2016 arbitral ruling was a 'significant milestone and useful basis' to resolve disputes over the South China Sea. He said the United States supports a 'free and open Indo-Pacific,' as it aims to maintain peace and stability and prioritize freedom from maritime disputes. 'We seek to preserve peace and stability, uphold freedom of navigation and overflight, maintain the free flow of trade, and oppose coercion to settle maritime disputes,' Rubio said. Foreign Secretary Teresa Lazaro on Friday also expressed concern over China's continuing rejection of the ruling, emphasising that it 'persists with illegal, coercive, and aggressive actions under cover of a revisionist, self-serving interpretation and application of international law, particularly Unclos.' She said the government continues to assert the sovereign rights of the Philippines, uphold international law and utilise the bilateral consultation mechanism on the South China Sea as well as the bilateral consular consultations mechanism with China to maintain dialogue and diplomacy at appropriate official levels. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
With Bersatu split over change of PN leader, where does PAS stand?
Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional chief Muhyiddin Yassin and his deputy Hamzah Zainudin are the focus of moves for a change of leadership. PETALING JAYA : Political analysts see a clear divide in Bersatu over whether Muhyiddin Yassin should remain as party president – or even as head of Perikatan Nasional – but differ on PAS support for Hamzah Zainudin to take over. Mazlan Ali of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia says Bersatu's coalition ally PAS appears non-committal about backing either of them, while Ahmad Fauzi Abdul Hamid of Universiti Sains Malaysia said it was clear PAS was gunning for Hamzah to take charge, but was wary about antagonising Muhyiddin and his allies. Mazlan said there is a growing view in Bersatu that Muhyiddin should pass the baton, specifically to Hamzah, the opposition leader and party deputy president. Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional have appeared ineffective as opposition parties, he said, while a change in leadership now would give Hamzah enough runway to plan for the next general election (GE16). 'In Bersatu, there is that belief that it's time for a change of leadership, hence the motion from Port Dickson Bersatu for Hamzah to essentially take over the party presidency. 'I think the grassroots and leadership in PN, especially Bersatu, are restless because they see that PN has been unable to put up a good performance as the opposition, what more form the government after GE16. 'In my opinion, PN needs a new face for GE16 and the most suitable person is Hamzah. PN must have a clear poster boy, then its goals, messaging and campaign will be more organised and streamlined,' he told FMT. While Mazlan believes PAS is non-commital about a new PN leader, Fauzi said it was clear PAS was gunning for Hamzah to take over. Mazlan said it was likely PAS also believed a change in PN leadership was due, though it has not committed to backing anyone, and had been open to a proposal that the PN chairmanship be rotated among the presidents of the coalition's four component parties. 'For now, PAS hasn't taken an official stand between supporting Hamzah or Muhyiddin, but if Muhyiddin does step down and Hamzah takes over, I think PAS will support that,' Mazlan said. Muhyiddin has claimed that he has the backing of PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang to stay on as PN chief, but Mazlan viewed this as Hadi 'speaking as a friend' while seeking to preserve harmony in PN. 'To me, it doesn't mean Hadi will oppose it if another candidate is proposed to replace Muhyiddin. Because Hadi has taken the stand of pushing for reconciliation and harmony in PN.' PAS doesn't want to provoke Muhyiddin Fauzi said PAS was wary about antagonising Muhyiddin and his allies, as evident in a proposal for Hamzah to be made PN's leader while Muhyiddin is relegated to a senior adviser role. Fauzi also said Bersatu's opposing factions realised the need to avoid all-out hostilities between them for fear of fragmenting the party, like PKR after its internal elections in May. 'Division raises doubts as to its capacity to govern the country effectively. For an aspirant to governmental power, the image of a united party is essential to convince voters, especially fence-sitters, even though the reality on the ground might differ somewhat.' With GE16 an unavoidable inevitability, Fauzi said a smooth transfer of leadership would be crucial to Bersatu and PN's survival. 'It will also act as a safeguard against the concentration of power in one particular individual or faction.' He also played down Muhyiddin's claim that he had Hadi's backing, saying it appeared that it was other leaders surrounding the Bersatu president who were keeping him from stepping down, likely to protect their own interests. 'Even if it were true that Hadi wanted him to stay on as PN chairman, why should Muhyiddin be beholden to another party's leader?' Fauzi said.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
New CJ only after next Rulers' Conference, says Azalina
The constitution must be amended if the Judicial Appointments Commission's recommendations are to be made legally binding, said Azalina Othman Said. (Facebook pic) PETALING JAYA : The appointment of a new chief justice to head the judiciary will be decided only after the next Conference of Rulers scheduled for July 15-17, according to the minister for law and institutional reform, Azalina Othman Said. Azalina said recommendations by the Judicial Appointments Commission on the appointment of new judges are not binding, Bernama reported. However, her assertion was disputed this evening by former law minister Zaid Ibrahim who said the prime minister is bound to forward the commission's recommendations. Azalina, speaking to reporters in Pengerang, Johor, said the commission's role under current law is to screen, evaluate and recommend candidates for appointment as judges. 'The commission's recommendations are 'not a final step in the appointment process. It only recommends names, and these recommendations are not binding'. The commission's recommendations are made to the prime minister. Under the constitution, appointment of judges on the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and the High Courts are made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the prime minister, and after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Azalina said the constitution would need to be amended if the commission's role is to be made legally binding. She cited a previous explanation by former law minister Nazri Aziz, who had stated in Parliament that the commission is an administrative provision without binding legal effect. The minister's comments come amid criticism over delays in the appointment of senior judges following the retirement of the chief justice and president of the Court of Appeal, and impending vacancies in the superior courts. The Malaysian Bar has planned a protest march tomorrow. Azalina said it is within their democratic right, as long as it is carried out professionally and within the boundaries of the law. 'If they want to march, that is their right. As lawyers, I believe most of them are professionals who understand the constitution and the JAC Act,' she said. Zaid calls for clarity Zaid, in a Facebook posting, said the law requires the prime minister to forward the names recommended by the commission to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. 'This duty is not optional. If the PM refuses to do so, he is in breach of the law; plain and simple,' he wrote. 'To now pretend that the law doesn't bind them, while quietly ignoring or defying its provisions, is to mock the very idea of the rule of law.' He called for clarity and not vague statements that 'only serve to confuse and deceive the public'. Zaid said: 'The people deserve clarity, not confusion — and certainly not a government that treats the law as optional.' (Under the Judicial Appointments Commission Act, the prime minister may ask for two more names to be submitted for consideration, and where he has accepted any of the names, he may proceed to advise the king, as required by the constitution.)
