
Trump Wields Trade Threat as Peacemaker in China's Backyard
Before shaking hands at a briefing following their ceasefire agreement Monday — ending five days of fighting that killed at least 42 people — both Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai thanked Trump in their remarks.
The US president had wielded his top bargaining tool only days before, using access to the US market to end the fighting and to help his aspirations to be recognized as a peacemaker.
While China also sent a representative to the talks, it kept a much lower profile than the US and made no similar threat of economic harm — in line with its approach to generally avoid intervening in conflict beyond seeking to facilitate discussions. And that allowed Trump to claim credit for stopping the bloodshed.
'Trump will see this as a win. He wants to be seen as a peacemaker,' said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University. 'And the fact that China also took part is good, because involving both the US and China — the top two superpowers in the world — gives it balance, legitimacy, and material support.'
The ceasefire reached Monday — in a conflict that traces its roots back more than a century — was the culmination of events that started only on Saturday, when Trump called both leaders and then posted on social media that US negotiators 'do not want to make any Deal, with either Country, if they are fighting.'
The stakes were high for both countries, facing 36% tariffs as soon as Aug. 1, while neighboring exporters Indonesia and Philippines had been granted rates of 19% and Vietnam stands at 20%.
Trump said Monday the trade talks would restart with both countries. Meanwhile, landing back in Bangkok, Thailand's Phumtham told reporters he spoke to the US leader and that 'we will get something very good out of it. He will do his best to give us as much as he can.'
'I am proud to be the President of PEACE!' Trump posted.
The truce — negotiated in Malaysia, as the current chair of the regional grouping Asean — appeared to be holding after military officials from Thailand and Cambodia met Tuesday, although sporadic clashes have still been reported.
The contrasting responses from Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping highlight the different ways they think major powers should engage with the world. Trump is intent on redrawing trade relationships, and has threatened to cut off access to the world's richest consumer market as a bargaining chip. Trump claims to have used a similar tactic to end the fighting earlier this year between India and Pakistan.
The tariffs-for-peace strategy builds on White House efforts to leverage the duties for other geopolitical ends. Earlier this month, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on Brazil as he called on local authorities to drop charges against former President Jair Bolsonaro over an alleged coup attempt.
China's principle of non-interference in other countries' affairs means it's long kept out of foreign entanglements. That's allowed Beijing to distinguish itself from Washington in the Global South, where it has pursued ties primarily by offering loans and development and refraining from calls for political change.
'China hopes to mediate via regional organizations,' said Tang Xiaoyang, chair of the international relations department at Tsinghua University, referring to Asean. 'It's not like a country outside the region must use power to directly intervene — that's what Trump is doing. That doesn't align with China's usual diplomacy approach.'
Still, China quickly took the opportunity to show it's engaged. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday said Vice Minister Sun Weidong met with representatives of both countries, as 'part of China's ongoing constructive effort to support peaceful resolution between Cambodia and Thailand.'
Foreign Minister Wang Yi had earlier used the conflict to address grievances that go back more than a century to British and French imperialism, saying last week that 'the root cause of this problem is the legacy of Western colonizers in the past, and now we need to face it calmly and handle it properly.'
The tensions between Thailand and Cambodia trace back to maps based on the Franco-Siamese treaties of the early 1900s that laid out the boundaries between Thailand and Cambodia, which was then part of French Indochina. Sovereignty remains a point of contention over a handful of areas and ancient temples along the border.
Southeast Asia has long sought to balance its economic and security relationships with China and the US, while still maintaining a sense of regional autonomy through Asean.
China has made deeper inroads in recent years with Cambodia, which has the most at risk economically from the clash.
Under Xi's flagship Belt and Road Initiative, Chinese companies have helped finance and build much of Cambodia's manufacturing and infrastructure — including new airports in Phnom Penh and Siem Reap, and the country's first expressway linking the capital to the port city of Sihanoukville. During Xi's visit to the country in April, they agreed to move forward with the $1.2 billion Funan Techo Canal, linking Cambodia's manufacturing belt with the Gulf of Thailand.
Trump created a further opening for Chinese soft power when he decided to decimate the US Agency for International Development. Two projects in Cambodia that were canceled in February, focusing on child literacy and nutrition, were quickly replaced by Beijing with almost identical programs.
For both Thailand and Cambodia, China is their top trading partner, comprising more than 20% of each of their total trade. The US comes in second, with about 13% for Thailand and 19% for Cambodia.
But both Bangkok and Phnom Penh run trade deficits with the US, selling almost $44 billion and $12 billion more, respectively, than they buy. That's the type of trade relationship Trump wants to reverse, regardless of either countries' need for American exports.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
3 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump influence? US museum receives backlash for removing Potus's impeachment display
The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office read more Signage for the exhibition, titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden", is displayed at the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2025. Reuters The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office. The Smithsonian Institution, which runs the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, said on Sunday that it removed the 'temporary' placard for failing to meet the museum's standards in 'appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation'. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the institution said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government officials to remove content from the exhibit," the statement further reads. The American institution runs around 21 museums and the National Zoo. In the statement, the Smithsonian Institution made it clear that the museum would be updating the impeachment section in the coming weeks to 'reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history'. What led to the clarification? The statment came after The Washington Post on Thursday reported that the museum removed an explicit reference to Trump's impeachment last month. This resulted in the exhibit about impeachment incorrectly reading that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal'. The Post cited an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans and reported that the display was taken down following a 'content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director'. The museum's decision to remove the display swiftly drew backlash, with critics of Trump calling the development the latest capitulation to the whims of an authoritarian president. 'You can run, but you cannot hide from the judgment of history,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday. 'So, here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached – not once, but twice," he added. Since the start of his second term, Trump has been seeking greater control over political, cultural and media institutions as part of his transformative 'Make America Great Again' agenda. In March this year, the US President signed an executive order to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian Institution's properties and deny funding for exhibits that 'degrade shared American values' or 'divide Americans based on race'. It is pertinent to note that during his first term in the White House, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice, in 2019 and 2021. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he was eventually acquitted by the US Senate on both occasions. Trump was the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and the only US president to be impeached twice. Interestingly, former US President Richard Nixon faced a near-certain impeachment before his resignation in 1974 following the Watergate Scandal.


Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers'
'If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers' Satviki SanjaySwati Gupta Bloomberg Aug 3, 2025, 15:52 IST IST Indian businesses are scrambling to cope with the fallout of Trump's tariff shock as New Delhi weighs options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump 's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate last week. While government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up.

Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's Crude Oil Imports From U.S. Jump 51% Since Donald Trump's Return To White House
India has sharply increased crude oil imports from the US during President Donald Trump's second term, marking a major energy policy shift. In the first half of 2025, US crude imports rose over 50% year-on-year, reaching 0.271 million barrels per day. The April–June quarter saw a 114% surge, with the value rising from $1.73 billion to $3.7 billion. In July, imports rose 23% over June, increasing the US share in India's oil mix from 3% to 8%. LNG imports nearly doubled to $2.46 billion, and LPG imports also grew. Talks are ongoing for a long-term LNG deal. Despite growing energy ties, a setback emerged as Trump announced 25% tariffs on Indian goods, effective August 7, citing trade barriers, imbalances, and India's ties with Russia. He posted strong criticism of India on Truth Social, dismissing its economic relationship with the US and calling for separation from Russia-linked economies.#crudeoil #indiaustrade #trumptariffs #energytrade #indiarussia #lng #lpg #truthtalk #geopolitics #internationalrelations #toi #toibharat Read More