logo
If You Think the School Lunch Battle is New — Go to Philadelphia

If You Think the School Lunch Battle is New — Go to Philadelphia

New York Times23-04-2025
Surrounded by a group of 10th graders, Alex Asal, a museum educator at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia, read aloud from three school lunch menus. She asked the students to raise their hands for which sounded best.
One menu had options such as pizza, Caribbean rice salad and fresh apples. Another had grilled cheese, tomato soup and green beans. The third featured creamed beef on toast and creamed salmon with a roll.
That menu — which did prompt a few raised hands — was from 1914, Asal revealed. A century ago, butter and cream were considered as vital as fruits and vegetables are today because the concern was less about what children ate than whether they ate enough at all.
The exhibition that had drawn students from the Octorara Area School District of Atglen, Pa., was 'Lunchtime: The History of Science on the School Food Tray.' It examines how this cornerstone of childhood became deeply intertwined with American politics, culture and scientific progress.
From the earliest school food programs until now, 'what's been interesting for us about this topic is how discourses of nutrition and science have always been present,' said Jesse Smith, the museum's director of curatorial affairs and digital content.
Smith didn't anticipate just how timely the exhibition would be when it opened about a month before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., appointed secretary of health and human services by President Trump, promotes the removal of processed foods from school lunches. History shows that his isn't the first attempt to change what people eat.
'Lunchtime' was developed from the Science History Institute's collection of books and scientific instruments related to food science. Located just down the street from Philadelphia's Independence Hall, where the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were signed, the small museum and research library teaches the history of how science has shaped our everyday lives.
In 1946, President Harry Truman signed the National School Lunch Act authorizing the creation of the National School Lunch Program. Today, according to the Food Research & Action Center, the program reaches approximately 28 million students. Of those, 23.6 million are in high-poverty districts that qualify for free lunch for all.
'It's a service to students, and something we provide on a daily basis to help the students learn,' said Lisa Norton, executive director of the division of food services for the Philadelphia school district. 'And we know that there are students that this is the only meal they are going to see.'
The exhibition opens with the 1800s, as industrialization brings people to cities, far from the source of their food. Producers would cut corners, mixing wood shavings with cinnamon and chalk into flour.
'Probably the most notorious example was the dairy industry, which routinely added formaldehyde to milk to keep it from spoiling,' Asal said.
And school medical inspections found that children were severely undernourished. Scurvy and rickets were widespread.
The Institute of Child Nutrition, at the University of Mississippi, maintains an archive of photographs, oral histories, books and manuscripts, and Jeffrey Boyce, the institute's coordinator of archival services, provided several photographs for the exhibit. One shows a baby being fed cod liver oil, an old-fashioned remedy for vitamin A and D deficiency, in the age before vitamin-fortified cereal.
Philadelphia became one of the first cities to have a school lunch program and, over the next few decades, local programs spread across the country in a movement led largely by women. A federal response to school lunches would come from the National School Lunch Act.
'The National School Lunch Program is the longest running children's health program in U.S. history, and it has an outsized impact on nutritional health,' said Andrew R. Ruis, author of the book 'Eating to Learn, Learning to Eat: The Origins of School Lunch in the United States,' which Smith used as a resource for the exhibit. 'Research in the '20s and '30s showed overwhelmingly that school lunch programs had a huge impact on student health, on educational attainment, on behavior and attitude.'
As farmers faced ruin in the wake of the Great Depression, the Department of Agriculture purchased surplus crops to distribute to U.S. schools and as foreign aid. This decades-old partnership made headlines in March when the U.S.D.A. announced plans to cut $1 billion in funding to schools and food banks.
School lunch programs have wide public support, but that has never stopped them from being a political football. In the 1960s, the civil rights movement drew attention to the fact that many poor children were still going hungry. The Black Panthers' free breakfast program helped fill the gap and put pressure on politicians.
A table in the exhibition piled with Spam, TV dinners, bagged salad and Cheetos explained how military research into preservation created iconic American foods. These advancements, however, also helped put nutrition back under the microscope and led to the concern that young people were getting too much of the wrong kinds of foods.
The 1973 board game 'Super Sandwich' tried to make nutrition fun, with players competing to collect foods that met recommended dietary allowances. Remember the controversy in the 1980s over whether ketchup qualified as a vegetable? It erupted in a larger battle over school lunch program cuts under the Reagan administration and further inflamed the national debate over school lunch quality.
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, and the public health campaign for children by the first lady, Michelle Obama, resulted in more fruits and vegetables, more whole grains and less sodium and sugar on lunch trays. But balancing those regulations with what young people will eat is a challenge, said Elizabeth Keegan, the coordinator of dietetic services for the Philadelphia school district who advised on the exhibition. Especially when median lunch prices, according to the School Nutrition Association, hover around $3.
'We always say, for less than what you pay for a latte, schools have to serve a full meal,' said Diane Pratt-Heavner, the association's director of media relations.
Following their tour, the Octorara students reflected on the tales of wood shavings in food. They debated the quality of their own school lunches and what they would prefer: more variety, more vegetarian and vegan options, less junk food.
'It made me feel like we should get better food,' said Malia Maxie, 16. 'When she was talking about 1914, like how they got salmon — we don't get that anymore.'
Those from generations raised on rectangular pizza may see it differently.
'From the days when I was in school, the meal program has totally transformed,' said Aleshia Hall-Campbell, executive director of the Institute of Child Nutrition. 'You have some districts out here that are actually growing produce and incorporating it in the menus. You have edamame at salad bars. They are trying to recreate what kids are eating out in restaurants and fast-food places, incorporating it from a healthier level.'
Everyone has memories of school lunch. Boyce remembers 'the best macaroni and cheese on the planet' and the names of the cafeteria ladies. Smith remembers the Salisbury steak and that distinct cafeteria smell. For Ruis, the best day of the year was when his Bay Area school had IT'S-IT, a local ice-cream sandwich with oatmeal cookies.
'So much has changed, standards have changed, and what is considered healthy has changed,' Keegan said. 'But something that has never changed is that feeding kids a nutritious meal is important.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Red, white and blue on the Red Planet
Red, white and blue on the Red Planet

UPI

time7 hours ago

  • UPI

Red, white and blue on the Red Planet

July 3 (UPI) -- On the eve of the 249th anniversary of American independence, NASA on Tuesday showcased a patriotic image of Old Glory as seen from hundreds of millions of miles away. A plaque bearing the United States flag is on an aluminum plate at the base of the mast, or "head," of NASA's Perseverance rover on the Red Planet. An image of the flag was taken on June 28 by the WATSON (Wide Angle Topographic Sensor for Operations and eNgineering) camera on the end of the rover's robotic arm. On Tuesday, NASA published an image of the flag on the rover, as seen during its 1,548th day of its mission. WATSON was built by Malin Space Science Systems in San Diego and is operated jointly by Malin Space Science Systems and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California. JPL, managed by Caltech, built and manages operations of Perseverance. The first U.S. flag planted somewhere besides Earth was the one planted on the moon by Buzz Aldrin in 1969. It signaled the United States had won the so-called Space Race with the Soviet Union.

Trump's science cuts are great news — for other countries
Trump's science cuts are great news — for other countries

Miami Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump's science cuts are great news — for other countries

Of all the questionable things President Trump has done recently — such as starting trade wars with traditional U.S. allies, threatening to invade friendly countries and pushing for bills that would balloon the U.S. deficit — one of the most important, yet least discussed, is his defunding of U.S. science programs. Since the start of his second term on Jan. 20, Trump has set in motion the most sweeping cuts to scientific research in modern U.S. history, including public grants for research into Alzheimer's, cancer and other major diseases. In addition to cutting research funds for leading U.S. universities, such as Harvard and Princeton, Trump's 2026 budget has led to the planned layoffs of thousands of scientists at some of the world's leading scientific institutions. Many U.S. scientists are now moving to Canada and Europe, where leaders in France and other countries have already opened their doors —and their budgets— to America's scientific refugees. A White House document proposing the 2026 budget calls for a 57% reduction for the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), which supports basic research in science and engineering, from $9 billion to $3.9 billion. It also calls for a 40% cut in the funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the world's biggest public funder of biomedical research, from $47 billion to $27 billion. To put these figures in perspective, Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill,' which was close to being passed by Congress at the time of this writing, included $45 billion in new funds to build detention facilities — critics call them 'concentration camps' — for undocumented immigrants. As I have shown in previous columns, most current immigration detainees are not violent criminals, but hard-working people seeking a better life. Already, the NIH has canceled more than 2,400 research projects, the respected journal Nature reported on June 27. Trump's budget cuts to U.S. science are 'unprecedented,' and could have 'catastrophic effects,' Nature said in an earlier report on May. 15. The Trump administration says the NIH, NSF, NASA and other government-funded scientific institutions were rife with waste and politically-motivated 'woke' programs, and needed to be made more efficient. Many grants were awarded under non-scientific diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requirements that the Trump administration has now terminated, administration officials say. But most scientists say that, while there's probably some degree of waste in any large organization, Trump's budget cuts are a catastrophic overreaction. The administration is killing research programs that could save millions of lives in America and around the world, as well as crippling U.S. innovation in cutting-edge industries. Rep. Bill Foster, D-Illinois, the only member of Congress with a PhD in physics, told me in an interview that 'Trump is wrecking American science.' He added, 'I understand why you would have to cut things, including science. But this is done in a very sloppy and, frankly, stupid way.' Trump's budget cutters have simply looked for science programs that had the terms 'diversity,' or 'inclusion' somewhere in their paperwork, regardless of their merit, critics say. In many cases, such words were just included pro forma in top-quality scientific research programs. Foster told me he already knows of cases in which professors working on five-year research programs have just learned that their last year of funding is being cut off. They have had to lay off their research teams, leading many scientists to seek jobs abroad. 'Right now, America is bleeding scientific talent,' Foster told me. While much of the U.S. scientific leadership was built thanks to European scientists who moved to America in World War II, such as Nobel laureate Albert Einstein, the reverse trend is taking place now, he added. Indeed, French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently announced a $566 million plan at Sorbonne University to lure U.S. science refugees. The program is officially called 'Choose Europe for Science.' In an obvious reference to the United States, Macron said at the announcement ceremony that 'Nobody could imagine a few years ago that one of the great democracies of the world would eliminate research programs on the pretext that the word 'diversity' appeared in its program,' according to a New York Times report. When I asked Foster why he thinks Trump is crippling America's scientific programs, he said, 'I think he's trying to achieve popularity with his base, which comes largely from rural areas.' He added that people living in rural areas may not be fully aware of the benefits of science, and are more likely to blame intellectuals and scientists for the country's problems. Maybe so. But whatever the reason, crippling U.S. science will have dire consequences. America will pay not just in lost discoveries, but in lost lives, lost leadership and a diminished future for generations to come. Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog:

Bald Eagles Are Thriving. Could Trump Change That?
Bald Eagles Are Thriving. Could Trump Change That?

Time​ Magazine

time12 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Bald Eagles Are Thriving. Could Trump Change That?

It was only a few decades ago that the bald eagle, which has long been an American icon, was on the brink of extinction. Its comeback is largely credited to the Endangered Species Act, a 1973 law that established protections for threatened species—including the bald eagle. 'The bald eagle has been a poster child for the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act,' says Bill Bowerman, professor of wildlife ecology and toxicology at the University of Maryland. It was only on Christmas Eve last year that the Biden Administration officially designated the bird as America's national bird. But now, as the Trump Administration proposes a rule change that would alter the definition of 'harm' under the act, the Endangered Species Act's power to preserve habitats and protected species around the country could be at risk. The goal of the Endangered Species Act is to provide a framework for saving threatened animals and their environments. The act ended up recovering the bald eagle, considered near extinction in the 1960s, with only 417 known nesting pairs recorded in the lower 48 states in 1963. Now, the bird is no longer under threat; they were delisted from the Endangered Species Act in 2007. Today, there are over 71,400 nesting pairs of bald eagles in the wild. These birds of prey seem to be thriving. Many might not know, but bald eagles are migratory birds. While some choose to live in the same region year-round, others travel far distances during the year. And their range is expanding with our changing climate; during their migration season, the birds are now moving further north than in previous years, and are laying their eggs earlier. Scientists say they are keeping an eye on these changes, though. While they are not yet impacting the bird's reproduction or food sources, they are seeing new challenges emerge. 'This year, at the end of March in Michigan, there was a three day freezing rain event, and it put up to one inch thick ice on trees,' says Bowerman. 'So it brought down some nest sites.' During their migrations they also rely heavily on National Parks—many of which have been facing cuts under the Trump Administration. 'When they migrate, it appears that they use state, national, county, federal parks, or protected lands as stepping stones,' says Scott Rush, associate professor the department of wildlife, fisheries, and aquaculture at Mississippi State University. 'If we lose some of these areas, we don't have the support mechanisms for these birds over these large places.' It's not just the likely elimination of protections to National Parks, however, that could impact the birds. Opening up more forests to industry is also a potential threat to their habitats. In April, the Trump Administration proposed a rule change that would continue to prohibit actions that harm or kill endangered species, but rescind protections for their habitats. Habitat destruction is the greatest threat to endangered species—and could put others at risk. The move is part of the administration's plan to increase drilling and logging in the United States. Regardless of whether these changes come into effect, our daily habits could also be impacting bald eagles. These days, one of the leading killers for bald eagles is electrocution from power lines. 'As temperature changes, whether it be hotter or colder, there's a greater need for more electricity, and a lot of bald eagles nest on utility towers, and some of the issues with utility towers is that the birds can get electrocuted or they can cause outages,' says Rush. Bowerman says that it serves as a reminder that we should be doing more, not less, when it comes to protecting the species that live alongside us. 'We need to have greater appreciation for species and learn about them before we discount them and just write them off.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store