Opinion: Navigating AI, technology and Musk in politics
Several bills regulating technology are making their way through the Utah Legislature. They include criminalizing ill-intentioned uses of AI, requiring age verification by app stores and, in essence, retooling the internet by allowing users to migrate their entire online experience to another platform. What is promulgating these policies?
COWLEY: The app store bill may seem well-intentioned, aimed at protecting children, but the impacts on businesses, the costs of changing complex technologies and invasions of personal privacy are a high price to pay for this noble intent.
AI bills, crafted in coordination with Utah's AI Policy Lab, provide guardrails for companies lawfully using AI to improve customer experiences and streamline processes. Other bills target nefarious uses of this new technology for deceptive and unauthorized purposes. Similar bills are being introduced nationwide, known as the 'Elvis Act.' As an Elvis enthusiast myself, this may be the most important bill of the session. #ElvisLives!
The internet is the Wild West of the information age, unlimited in its power to change lives. It's an entire frontier where no query is unanswerable and no crossword puzzle unsolvable. Social media, in particular, has given home-based businesses global reach. Regulations, intended to give users more control, change the premise of internet platforms and could have unintended consequences.
PIGNANELLI: 'To err is human — and to blame it on a computer is even more so.' — Robert Orben
In my last year of law school, I penned an article in a legal journal explaining why the 1983 Utah Cable Television Programming Decency Act was unconstitutional. I certainly was not advocating for indecent entertainment, just that the statute was not properly crafted in protecting children and was vulnerable to legal challenges.
In an interesting twist, three years later, as a newly minted lawmaker I sponsored legislation to repeal that Act. This paper opined against my effort and the bill failed.
The U.S. Supreme Court eventually ruled the law unconstitutional and only then did I secure passage. (Of course, the issue was moot, but I wanted some sense of accomplishment.)
I raise this small point of personal history because the issue of how technology intersects with children has been a feature of politics for many generations (over a hundred years ago, it was pool halls allegedly corrupting youth).
The issues confronting local solons in 2025 mirror the perennial conflict between freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution and the concerns of undeveloped minds. Thus, what legislation is not eventually compromised at the State Capitol will likely be litigated in the courts. Perhaps there is another young, obnoxious law student who will be writing about some of these bills.
These bills are all likely to pass. What will be the impact on Utahns?
COWLEY: Implementation of some well-intentioned bills will be delayed while we wait for the inevitable lawsuits, costing taxpayers millions. Some legislators pass bills knowing this is the outcome, but are lawsuits the best approach, rather than relying on congressional action?
Many businesses will have to adjust practices to comply with new regulations. Those come with a price tag. Other Utah companies will benefit from the ability to implement AI technologies without fear of regulatory recourse.
All businesses crave predictability, which is difficult with ever-evolving technologies. Legislators can help by implementing a broad framework to protect consumers, then stepping back and letting companies innovate and the free market flourish.
PIGNANELLI: I am unsure how this legislation will have an impact upon me and others. My old brain lacks the ability to articulate with specificity the technical details. I barely know the difference between telegram and Instagram.
But I do understand this dynamic. Thirty years ago, several months were required to initiate a business. Twenty years ago, it was several weeks. Today, new enterprises are created in days, if not hours. The incredible potential technology offers should not be constrained in many circumstances. Guardrails are important, but traffic must still flow fast.
Elon Musk appeared onstage at CPAC wielding a chainsaw. Nearly 1,000 Utahns employed by the IRS lost their jobs because of DOGE cuts. How are President Donald Trump's policies being viewed by Utahns?
COWLEY: Radically cutting government waste is exactly what Republicans like me voted for. However, I wish Musk had a bit more tact. I suggest he enroll in a 'Utah Way' crash course to hone his civility, respect and compassion. Musk's lack of empathy is the greatest threat to the success of Trump's administration.
Reining in spending sounds great until it's your neighbor, cousin or best friend receiving a pink slip (or in this case, perhaps a pink tweet), and the pain of these cuts is more acute. Fulfilling fantasies of federal frugality requires some discomfort. Nothing worth doing is ever easy. Saving our country's financial solvency takes sacrifices and belt-tightening from everyone.
PIGNANELLI: Surveys indicate Trump's approval is above 50% and 70% of Americans state he is fulfilling his promises. However, the cuts so far are federal employees and targeted grants. When trimming affects private contractors, military bases, entitlement programs, etc., local frustration may increase.
Note: The authors' firm represents companies impacted by these policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Texas is one of most restrictive states for birth control access
Texas is among states with the most restrictive access to contraception, a new scorecard from the Population Reference Bureau shows. Why it matters: Contraception access has become a political flashpoint since the U.S. Supreme Court ended Roe v. Wade, with Democrats unsuccessfully pressing to codify contraceptive access nationwide and some patients concerned that conservative state legislatures could enact new curbs. Zoom in: While Texas expanded Medicaid coverage for family-planning services through the Healthy Texas Women waiver, it hasn't adopted a broader expansion of the health insurance program for low-income residents. That has left gaps in coverage for men and people under 18, per the scorecard. The state requires insurers to cover prescription birth control if they cover other prescription drugs but doesn't mandate coverage of over-the-counter methods. Texas allows minors to consent to contraceptive services only if they're married or meet narrow exceptions. Texas also doesn't require sex education in schools, per the report. The big picture: Nearly 35% of Americans, or 121 million people, live in a state that actively restricts access. The most protective states included California, Washington, Connecticut, New York, New Mexico, Maryland and Oregon. What they're saying:"Reproductive health care access depends on where you live," said Cathryn Streifel, senior program director at PRB and co-author of the scorecard.
Business Wire
4 hours ago
- Business Wire
FiscalNote Provides Further Detail on Anticipated Stablecoin Integration for Global Payments After GENIUS Act Passage
WASHINGTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Following the recent enactment of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act and an increasingly favorable regulatory climate for digital assets, FiscalNote (NYSE: NOTE), a leading AI-driven policy and regulatory intelligence company, today provided an update on its anticipated integration of stablecoin-based payments as a means of facilitating future global product-led growth. With the GENIUS Act now signed into law, the United States has established a standardized and more transparent framework for digital assets. This legislation brings greater clarity and predictability to the cryptocurrency landscape, creating new opportunities for companies and customers to navigate the market with more confidence as the broader regulatory environment continues to evolve. FiscalNote is closely tracking additional legislative and regulatory developments such as the Clarity Act, a crypto market-structure bill recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. To do so, the Company is leveraging the same data and analysis it offers to its customers, including the proprietary, award-winning content from CQ. In parallel, the Company's PolicyNote platform is growing rapidly, with daily active users now exceeding the legacy FiscalNote platform. PolicyNote's intuitive interface and scalable architecture position it for rapid global adoption. The Company previously announced that in order to reduce friction for international customers, it is exploring stablecoins as an additional payment option. Gerry Campbell, who joined FiscalNote earlier this year as Strategic Advisor for Technology Acceleration, is leading those initial efforts. Campbell brings hands-on expertise as a founder, CTO, and CEO in a number of crypto and blockchain-based initiatives. The Company is currently evaluating potential platforms and partners for this global acceleration initiative. To reduce barriers and simplify transactions as PolicyNote grows, the Company plans to leverage stablecoins as a new payment option for incoming and existing customers. In particular, doing so would make it easier for international customers to start and expand their relationships with FiscalNote, thereby accelerating new customer acquisition, cross-sell, and upsell opportunities. 'This is a great example of FiscalNote putting our own policy expertise to work — spotting emerging regulatory change and turning it into a practical business opportunity,' said Josh Resnik, CEO & President of FiscalNote. 'As digital asset regulations evolve, we're moving quickly to explore ways to reduce friction for customers, expand internationally, and model the agility we deliver to clients every day.' For more information about FiscalNote's suite of AI-powered policy and regulatory solutions, visit About FiscalNote FiscalNote (NYSE: NOTE) is the leading provider of AI-driven policy and regulatory intelligence solutions. By uniquely combining proprietary AI technology, comprehensive data, and decades of trusted analysis, FiscalNote helps customers efficiently manage political and business risk. Since 2013, FiscalNote has pioneered solutions that deliver critical insights, enabling effective decision making and giving organizations the competitive edge they need. Home to PolicyNote, CQ, Roll Call, VoterVoice, and many other industry-leading products and brands, FiscalNote serves thousands of customers worldwide with global offices in North America, Europe, and Asia. To learn more about FiscalNote and its suite of solutions, visit and follow @FiscalNote.
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Eaton fire could wipe out California's $21-billion wildfire fund, documents show
Damage claims from the Eaton wildfire in Altadena could wipe out the $21-billion fund California created to shield utilities and their customers from the cost of wildfires sparked by electric lines, according to newly released state documents. Investigators are seeking to determine whether Southern California Edison's equipment sparked the Jan. 7 inferno, which killed 19 people and destroyed 9,000 homes. If Edison is found responsible, 'the resulting claims may be substantial enough to fully exhaust the Fund,' state officials who administer the wildfire fund wrote in a draft annual report to the Legislature. The seven-member state Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund, is scheduled to meet Thursday to discuss how potential damage claims from the Eaton fire could affect it. Concerns are already emerging that, should Edison be found liable, it would have little incentive to keep damage claims from becoming excessive since the utility itself would be spared from covering most of the costs. 'Are we impressing on the utilities that they need to settle claims with diligence?' wrote one of the council members, according to meeting materials released ahead of Thursday's meeting. 'Since the claims they settle are just passed on to us, they don't have much incentive to keep claims low.' Asked for comment on that statement, Edison spokeswoman Kathleen Dunleavy said that officials 'need to be wise and cautious about how this money is spent.' 'We agree that the wildfire fund should go to those directly affected by wildfires,' she said. The council member who raised the concern wasn't identified by name. Wade Crowfoot, California's secretary of Natural Resources, holds one of the nine council seats. His spokesman, Tony Andersen, said Crowfoot is 'engaged very closely' on the wildfire fund issue, but had no additional comment at this time. Other council members include Gov. Gavin Newsom, other state leaders and their appointees. According to the state documents, the insured property losses alone could amount to as much as $15.2 billion, according to materials released ahead of a Thursday meeting. That amount does not include uninsured losses or damages beyond those to property, such as wrongful-death claims. An earlier study by UCLA estimated losses from the fire at $24 billion to $45 billion. Newsom and legislative leaders are now talking about how to shore up the fund. The Times reported last month that one option under discussion behind closed doors is to have electricity customers pay billions of dollars more into the fund. Newsom and lawmakers created the wildfire fund in 2019, saying it was needed to protect the state's three biggest for-profit utilities from bankruptcy if their equipment sparked a catastrophic fire. Newsom said at the time that the legislation, known as Assembly Bill 1054, would 'move our state toward a safer, affordable and reliable energy future.' Six years later, however, utilities' electricity lines continue to be a top cause of wildfires in California. And in 2024, the state had the second highest electric rates in the country after Hawaii. Edison said in April that a leading theory of the cause of the Eaton fire is that one of its decades-old transmission lines, last used in 1971, somehow became reenergized and sparked the fire. The investigation into the cause of the fire is continuing. Already lawyers have filed dozens of lawsuits against Edison on behalf of families who lost their homes, nearby residents who say they were harmed by toxins in the smoke and governments that lost buildings and equipment. Under the 2019 law, Edison would be allowed to settle those lawsuits. Then the state fund would reimburse the company for all or most of those costs. The Palisades fire, which also ignited Jan. 7, isn't covered by the wildfire fund because Pacific Palisades is served by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, a municipal utility. Newsom's staff didn't respond to questions about how the fund's life could be extended and whether he believed AB 1054 should be amended so that excessive settlements or attorney fees aren't allowed to deplete the fund. One idea being debated is to have the 30 million Californians served by Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric, and San Diego Gas & Electric pay billions of dollars more into the fund. That plan could involve extending a monthly surcharge of about $3 on electricity bills beyond its planned expiration in 2035. Officials at the California Earthquake Authority, which serves as administrator of the wildfire fund, say they are also worried that attorney fees could eat up a large portion of the money. Attorneys can receive 30% to 40% of the victim settlements, according to a 2024 study. An additional 10% to 15% can go to lawyers defending the utility from fire claims, the study said. That means as much as 50% of settlement amounts could go to legal fees, the paper said. The consolidated lawsuit against Edison in Los Angeles County Superior Court lists more than 50 law firms involved in the litigation. Officials at the Earthquake Authority say the Legislature may have to change the 2019 law to limit attorney fees or give priority to some settlements over others. For example, Wall Street hedge funds have been offering to buy claims that insurance companies have against Edison. The funds are gambling that they can get more from the state's wildfire fund in the future than they are paying insurers for the claims now. Council members discussed in May whether AB 1054 should be amended so that claims from Californians who lost their homes be given precedence over those owned by Wall Street investors trying to profit from the fire.
