Experts Mock MTG's Controversial Weather Bill
In a Saturday morning post on X, formerly Twitter, the far-right Republican announced that she was introducing a bill that prohibits 'the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.'
I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense.
I have been researching weather…
— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) July 5, 2025
@RepMTG / Via x.com
'It will be a felony offense,' she said. 'I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,' the legislator continued, adding that the legislation will be similar to Florida's Senate Bill 56.
'We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,' she concluded.
Though she didn't mention the tragedy directly, the post seemed to be a response to the horrific flash floods, which killed at least 66 people after sweeping through central Texas on Friday.
Conspiracy theorists have long claimed that the government or other shadowy organizations have been manipulating the weather by releasing chemicals in the air, leaving white streaks in the sky that they call chemtrails.
The Environmental Protection Agency has explained that the cloud-like lines are condensation trails left behind after hot exhaust from aircrafts collides with cold air at high altitudes.
More weather manipulation conspiracies have been fueled by the practice of cloud seeding, a way of triggering rain or snow by adding tiny particles into the air.
Meteorologist and journalist Matthew Cappucci tried to debunk misinformation online around cloud seeding before calling out Greene for her lack of knowledge.
In January, I teamed up with @VICENews to explain why cloud seeding is entirely unrelated to floods.
'Conspiracy theorists don't understand scale,' I explained.
That discussion is very relevant tonight. Cloud seeding is for a tiny cloud — not a 4,000,000,000,000 gallon flood. pic.twitter.com/R49jPmOSrN
— Matthew Cappucci (@MatthewCappucci) July 6, 2025
@MatthewCappucci / Via x.com
'It's not a political statement for me as a Harvard-degreed atmospheric scientist to say that elected representative Marjorie Taylor Green doesn't know what the hell she's talking about,' he wrote on X. 'She'd be equally qualified to fly a Boeing-737, practice nuclear medicine or train zebras.'
It's not a political statement for me as a Harvard-degreed atmospheric scientist to say that elected representative Marjorie Taylor Green doesn't know what the hell she's talking about.
She'd be equally qualified to fly a Boeing-737, practice nuclear medicine or train zebras. https://t.co/FQrj6FvXKE
— Matthew Cappucci (@MatthewCappucci) July 5, 2025
@MatthewCappucci / Via
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major garment producer Bangladesh seeks deal after 35% US tariff
Bangladesh, the world's second-biggest garment manufacturer, holds hope to reduce the 35 percent tariff that US President Donald Trump said he will impose, the country's top commerce official told AFP on Tuesday. Textile and garment production accounts for about 80 percent of exports in Bangladesh and the industry has been rebuilding after it was hit hard in a student-led revolution that toppled the government last year. "There is a hope for getting a reduced rate of tariffs as USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative) sent another draft document for review," Commerce Secretary Mahbubur Rahman told AFP. Rahman said the South Asia nation's national security adviser and commerce adviser were "working on the issue" in the United States. Bangladesh exported $8.36 billion worth of goods to the United States in 2024, while imports from there amounted to $2.21 billion, according to the Bangladesh Bank and the National Board of Revenue. US clothing companies that source products from Bangladesh range from Fruit of the Loom to Levi Strauss to VF Corp -- whose brands include Vans, Timberland and The North Face. Trump hit Bangladesh with 37 percent tariffs in an April 2 announcement, but in a letter issued Tuesday, the US leader said it would now be 35 percent. That is more than double the 16 percent already placed on cotton products. Dhaka has proposed to buy Boeing planes and boost imports of US wheat, cotton and oil in a bid to reduce the trade deficit, which Trump has used as justification for imposing painful levies. Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), called it "a big challenge for the garment sector". "We had expected the tariff imposed on us to be between 10 to 20 percent," he said, adding he expected Dhaka's interim leader Muhammad Yunus to "raise the issue with the United States". Former BGMEA director Mohiuddin Rubel warned the impact as tariffs stand would be dire. "The new tariffs raise worries about job losses in Bangladesh as the US is its main export market," he said. "Bangladesh needs to act quickly by engaging US importers to push for policy changes, resuming high-level trade talks, and highlighting the importance of its products." es-sa-pjm/sco
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russian Passenger Planes Are Nearly Doubling In Price As Sanctions Take Their Toll
Civilian airliners made in Russia are skyrocketing in price, sometimes nearly doubling, as Western sanctions imposed in response to the Ukraine War continue to bite. In particular, the costs of basic materials and electrical components have gone through the stratosphere, which makes Russia's long-term goal of weaning itself off of Western planes a pretty long stretch. The MS-21, Russia's answer to the Boeing 737, has increased in price nearly 60% in just a year, the Moscow Times reports. A smaller turboprop airliner, the Il-114, is nearly twice what it was just a year ago. Other Russian-made planes are seeing increases of 45% and up. Inflation might be bad all over, but this is just killer. The Russian aviation sector is claiming that as production ramps up, economies of scale will kick in and save the day. It ought to be getting a lot of business, at least in its own country, since the driving factor here is the fact that Russian airlines can no longer purchase from Western companies like Boeing and Airbus. When the sanctions were first thrown down, Russian airlines simply stole over 400 such planes that they were leasing by refusing to return them. But in the long run, Russia will want to fly its own planes and so as to not have to deal with the West. At these prices, though, that plan is looking less plausible. Read more: These Are The Most Annoying Things About Your Cars When Russia kicked off its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russian-made planes only accounted for 37% of the entire Russian civilian air fleet, per the Novaya Gazeta Europe. That made the country's civil aviation sector hugely dependent on foreign manufacturers, particularly in the West. Indeed, entire fleets had to be grounded for lack of access to engine parts so Russia need to figure out how to replace two things: spare parts for the planes, and the planes themselves. To build its own actual planes, Russia's domestic industry will need to step up its game, which is a lot harder when basic materials are also sanctioned. For the parts, though, Russia has figured out a few solutions, in the most Russian way possible. First up was to simply smuggle the parts into the country, sanctions be damned. As detailed in a report by Finnish outlet Yle, there is a nearly one billion euro (about $1.2 billion) gray market for Western plane parts in Russia. The trick is to buy these parts from aviation companies in other countries, such as Turkey, China, and the United Arab Emirates. They aren't supposed to sell sanctioned components to Russia, but here we are. The second scheme is for Russia to just manufacture foreign parts themselves, essentially making counterfeit Boeing and Airbus components. As Politico notes, this is in violation of international rules, which as we all know, are something that Russia deeply cares about. These parts ought to be as reliable as, say, that counterfeit Rolex you bought for $20. Except they're going on planes with people on them. Obviously, it's better to make your own planes than make fake parts of somebody else's. Unless of course, your planes have a habit of not staying airborne. The Novaya Gazeta Europe found that from 2000 to 2022, 80% of crash fatalities in Russia were on planes registered in the country (meaning they were serviced and maintained to Russian standards, regardless of where the plane was originally made). Would you want to get on a Russian plane, then? Didn't think so. This is only going to get worse as Russian airlines fly foreign planes with fake parts or domestic ones that cut corners to save costs. Obviously that's bad for anybody who lives there, but it's also bad for any country that still accepts flights from Russia. Though the West doesn't these days, many nations in the Middle East and Asia still do. A bad plane is as likely to crash there as in its home country. All together, the Russian civilian aviation sector is in really turbulent weather. It has to produce a lot of new planes to replace Western ones, but they are both less safe and more expensive than they used to be. Makes Boeing's problems look like smooth flying by comparison. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Pastors who endorse political candidates shouldn't lose tax-exempt status, IRS says in filing
The Johnson Amendment is a 1954 amendment to the U.S. tax code that prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from endorsing or opposing political candidates. Advertisement The Christian media group and others filed suit against the IRS last August, stating that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights to the freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, among other legal protections. On Monday, the IRS and plaintiffs wrote that the Johnson Amendment should be interpreted 'so that it does not reach communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The New York Times was first to report the news of the court filing. The IRS has generally not enforced the Johnson Amendment against houses of worship for speech related to electoral politics. President Donald Trump has said he wanted to get rid of the Johnson Amendment and signed an executive order in 2017 directing Treasury to disregard the rule. Advertisement 'I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,' Trump said at a National Prayer Breakfast in 2017, which is a high-profile event bringing together faith leaders, politicians and dignitaries. Representatives from the IRS and the National Religious Broadcasters Association did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation to remove the Johnson Amendment.
