Planned Powys holiday pods finally set for decision
Tony Davies and his wife Angela submitted the proposal in March 2021 for four holiday pods in a field at Cae Henfron off the A470.
The pods will all have one bedroom, and the part-retrospective proposal includes an access road and associated works.
The plans are coming before the council's planning, taxi licensing and rights of way committee on Thursday, July 17, because Mrs Davies is now a senior Powys councillor.
The Liberal Democrat was elected to represent Rhayader at the 2022 local election, and is herself a member of the planning committee.
The application was discussed by Nantmel Community Council in April 2021 when no objections were raised, but new interim phosphate standards for Special Areas for Conservation (SACs) in Wales since in 2021 have stalled progress.
Any planned development in the SAC catchments that might increase phosphate levels within the catchment must be screened.
The River Wye flows nearby meaning the application has been caught up by the interim standards.
Senior planning officer Rhian Griffiths said. 'This guidance has now changed, and the application has been considered against the most up-to-date guidance.
'The application is made part-retrospectively, as the access track and ground levelling works have been undertaken.
'The Powys Local Development Plan (LDP) recognises the high-quality beauty and variety of the Powys landscape, which creates an area of great attractiveness and potential for high value tourism.
'The LDP further notes that tourism is one of the county's main employment sectors.
'It is an important component of the rural economy and can help to provide new jobs and it is therefore desirable to support appropriate tourism related developments in principle, whilst sustaining the outstanding natural beauty."
Another issue with the application is that it will mean a loss of agricultural land, and national policy in Wales is geared towards preserving the best land. The patch at Rhayader is considered "moderate".
Ms Griffiths said: 'Given the classification of the application site, the location of the proposed development is considered appropriate as development will not be undertaken on the most versatile land.
'On balance it is considered that the proposal complies with relevant planning policies, and the recommendation is therefore one of consent subject to conditions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
12 hours ago
- Spectator
Japan's Shigeru Ishiba is losing power, fast
For the country known as the 'Land of the Rising Sun', the sun is only just still shining on the prime ministership of Shigeru Ishiba. When will it set? The recent legislative elections will go down in history for all the wrong reasons, marking the first time in 70 years that Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has lost control of both chambers of the legislature. Ishiba's crisis of popularity comes at a precarious moment for Japan, as it continues to be engulfed by an unholy trinity of domestic economic woes, threats of tariffs from Washington, and ongoing security challenges across East Asia. The LDP was already struggling to lead a minority coalition government with its junior coalition partner, Komeito, but now the LDP-Komeito coalition only holds 122 of the 248 seats in the Japanese parliament. For a country which has gained infamy for its 'one-and-a-half party system', wherein the LDP has been in power almost continuously since 1955 – bar two occasions – this was the first time in its history that it was no longer in control of the upper and lower houses. A day before the election, I encountered a rally outside a subway station in Osaka, where a fringe right-wing movement was taking centre stage to rapturous applause. Volunteers from other minority parties were tempting passers-by with leaflets. For all their differences in creed, all these parties opposed Ishiba, in no small part owing to the country's current economic and social maladies. Visitors to Japan may rejoice in a weak yen, but rising inflation, social security reforms, and lowering wages are just a few of the problems facing Asia's third-largest economy. Taking a leaf out of the playbook of none other than Keir Starmer, Ishiba wrongly hoped that taxation, particularly consumption tax, would catalyse stability. It was not just Japan's economic woes that compelled many voters to shun the ruling party on election day. Although foreign-born residents amount to only 3 per cent of Japan's 124 million population, immigration became a highly pervasive talking point as voters headed to the polls. The rise of minority fringe parties was in part responsible. Sohei Kamiya, the leader of a right-wing party, Sanseito, gained global attention having declared his admiration for Donald Trump. Sanseito's anti-globalist, anti-elite, and 'Japan First' stance resonated with voters: the party gained 14 seats in the upper house. Japan's economic malaise has consequences beyond its borders. For the first time in over 25 years, it has had to import rice from South Korea, which has recently experienced political tumult of its own. While Seoul may fill Tokyo's rice bowls for now, historic tensions between the two countries rumble on. The current leftist South Korean president, Lee Jae-myung, has previously criticised his conservative predecessors for being 'pro-Japanese', not least with respect to the necessary military exercises between the United States, South Korea and Japan. Tokyo's ties with Pyongyang remain another minefield of unresolved issues. Walking through a subway station, I saw a government sign calling for the return of all Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea in the 1970s and 1980s. Nearly 50 years later, Ishiba's calls for dialogue with North Korea to initiate their return have fallen on deaf ears. Despite their divisions, Japan and South Korea face an increasingly threatening regional security environment. While Japan constitutionally renounces belligerence, questions of its acquisition of nuclear weapons – which have lingered for over five decades – are hardly abating. Although South Korea would be more likely to nuclearise first, given the immediate nuclear threat faced from North Korea, the fact that North Korean missiles land in Japanese waters only highlights how the nuclear threat from North Korea is anything but far away from Tokyo. While Japan's fringe parties of left and right remain minority parties for now, the fact that they are starting to capitalise upon voter frustrations means suggests that they are on the up, not the down. When the sun sets on Ishiba, who will follow him?
Evening Standard
a day ago
- Evening Standard
Heathrow delivers 'urgent' £49 billion third runway expansion plan to Government
Munira Wilson, the Liberal Democrat MP for Twickenham, said: 'The Government claims that Heathrow expansion will deliver growth. Yet the less than 0.5% growth it would add to GDP is miniscule compared to the 4% wiped off the UK's GDP by Brexit. There are also serious questions around how on earth a debt-laden Heathrow can actually finance the massive costs, and how much will end up coming from taxpayers' pockets.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
I taste tested milk chocolate from 8 supermarkets including Aldi and M&S - one bar beat Cadbury
One reporter decided to try eight supermarket brands of milk chocolate – and one bar tasted even better than Cadbury. Cadbury may be the nation's go-to chocolate fix, but with prices ranging from £1.50 to £2, it got one reporter thinking about how supermarket own brands stack up against them. To keep things fair, Angela Patrone – based at – sampled milk chocolate from both high-end and budget supermarkets, including Aldi, Lidl, Sainsbury's, Tesco, Asda, Morrisons, M&S and Waitrose. Angela ranked each supermarket chocolate bar and gave them a rating out of 10. She also shared the cost of each supermarket chocolate bar and how it tasted. This is how each supermarket faired: Morrisons Priced at 80p, this was your typical chocolate bar - a bit sweet, a bit creamy, but nothing to write home about, Angela noted. "The texture was pleasingly smooth, but unfortunately, the flavour didn't follow suit, lacking any standout notes or lingering aftertaste," she said. Rating: 5/10 Sainsbury's Described as a step up from Morrisons' chocolate bar, this one melt much more readily in the mouth. At 75p, it had a "pleasant taste" that avoided the artificial tang some chocolates can have. Rating: 6/10 Tesco Tesco's 55p offering reminded Angela of cooking chocolate, and not in a positive sense. It tasted like a failed attempt to mimic Galaxy and Dairy Milk, complete with an off-putting chemical undertone. Instead of melting into a luscious pool of chocolate, it quickly thinned out. Rating: 3/10 Aldi Aldi is famed for its budget-friendly offerings that won't break the bank, and its Everyday Essentials range is touted as even more affordable than its other in-house brands. However, at 59p for a 100g bar, the chocolate left much to be desired. It had an oddly salty flavour with a peculiar aftertaste. Rather than tasting like chocolate, it seemed more akin to overly sweetened confectionery. Rating: 3/10 Lidl Following the Aldi experience, Angela wasn't holding out much hope for Lidl's offering, but it proved to be a pleasant surprise. Known for its low-cost products, Lidl was her first port of call when considering affordable chocolate bars. Priced slightly higher than Aldi at £1.09 for a 100g bar, it exceeded expectations in terms of taste and quality. The chocolate was "sweet, smooth, and melted delightfully in the mouth". It evoked memories of Magic Stars from Angela's childhood and, surprisingly, the chocolate bar surpassed Cadbury in both taste and value. Rating: 9/10 Asda In Angela's opinion, Asda's chocolate bar just about edges out Tesco and Aldi. Priced at 59p per 100g, the chocolate was sweet but lacked the melt-in-the-mouth quality you'd expect from a typical chocolate bar. Rating: 3.5/10 Waitrose At £2.75, this was one of the priciest chocolate bars in the taste test, and unfortunately, it also ranked as the worst. While Angela could appreciate its thick and smooth texture, the overpowering taste was not to her liking. Rating: 2/10 M&S M&S was the final supermarket brand on Angela's list, and she had high hopes for this one. M&S is known for its range of scrumptious chocolate goodies that garner rave reviews all year round. However, their most affordable milk chocolate left her underwhelmed and she expressed that is unlikely to buy it again. Priced at £2.75, the same as the Waitrose bar, it "lacked the expected sweetness and creaminess of a good milk chocolate bar". Rating: 4/10 Cadbury Finally, we come to Cadbury. The moment you unwrap the bar, you're greeted with a rich, chocolaty aroma. Milk chocolate often has a fatty layer in the harder centre, something Cadbury usually nails. But how did the iconic brand measure up this time? Quite well, although for Angela's taste, it was a tad too sweet. Rating: 8/10 Verdict After sampling all the chocolate bars, Lidl emerged as the top dog. While the Cadbury bar was enjoyable, the Lidl chocolate bar just pipped it to the post.
