KCCI urges FBR to adopt pragmatic, tech-driven approach
'It is deeply troubling that numerous taxpayers are being unfairly labelled as inactive solely due to delays in filing returns for two consecutive periods, even though official extensions were granted,' stated President KCCI Muhammad Jawed Bilwani. 'This is causing unnecessary difficulties for honest taxpayers who are already trying to comply with the ever-changing regulatory environment.'
President Bilwani underscored that the sales tax return filing system is under immense strain, largely due to a series of recent and abrupt changes. 'The FBR's decision to extend the deadlines clearly reflects that the system is struggling to cope. Yet, instead of facilitating the taxpayers, they are being penalized, which is counterproductive,' he emphasized.
Commenting on the technical difficulties faced by taxpayers, President Bilwani noted, 'Over the past few months, FBR has introduced mandatory requirements such as eight-digit Harmonized System (H.S.) codes, precise units of measurement, and several new annexures like 'H-1', 'J', and 'C-1' in sales tax returns.'
He elaborated that while imported items can be easily linked with H.S. codes from Goods Declarations, manufacturers of local goods are facing major challenges. 'Many local producers are simply unaware of the correct H.S. codes for their products. The same item being assigned different codes by different suppliers is creating unnecessary confusion and inconsistency,' he said.
President Bilwani urged the FBR to reconsider this approach. 'Instead of placing the burden of identifying specific H.S. codes on taxpayers, the system should allow taxpayers to describe the item and then automatically assign the appropriate H.S. code. This would reduce confusion and improve standardization,' he suggested.
Highlighting another technical limitation, President Bilwani criticized the restriction of unit measurements to kilograms (K.G.) only. 'This is highly impractical. A dropdown menu should offer all standard units of measurement. If needed, the tax department can always request clarification at a later stage instead of enforcing rigid input criteria,' he proposed.
Addressing the sudden implementation of new annexures, he cautioned, 'Annex 'J' concerning production data and Annex 'H-1' related to stock reporting by non-manufacturers should not be enforced abruptly. These should be phased in with proper educational support through seminars and workshops, rather than being thrust upon taxpayer's mid-year.'
President Bilwani also highlighted the inconsistency between the legal status of filing extensions and the current behaviour of the IRS system. 'It is legally inappropriate to declare a taxpayer inactive for failing to file returns during months for which official extensions have already been granted. This mismatch between policy and system enforcement is deeply unfair and must be rectified immediately,' he asserted.
He concluded by urging the FBR to adopt a more pragmatic, technology-driven, and taxpayer-friendly approach. 'The current system creates undue hardship for compliant businesses. It is essential that reforms are introduced with proper planning, consultation, and support mechanisms to ensure fairness and ease of doing business,' said President Bilwani.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Finance Act restricts IRO's presence to business premises only
LAHORE: The Finance Act has restricted the presence of Inland Revenue Officer (IRO) to business premises only. Previously, the Bill had proposed that the Officer can be placed at the premises of the person. Tax experts have pointed out that a similar provision (Section 40B) is present in the Sales Tax Act 1990. However, it is restricted to registered persons and monitoring of taxable goods under the STA. This amendment in the ITO has given broad powers to the board or chief commissioner to post any officer or other official on the premises of any person to monitor production, supply of goods (even those goods that are exempt from sales tax by operation of primary legislation (Section 13) or delegated legislation (SRO, Notification etc). Further, they added, a similar provision (Section 54(1)) is present in the Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act (SSTSA) 2011, which allows the SRB Board to post an officer of the SRB to the premises of a registered person(s) or class of such persons to monitor the provision of services by such registered person(s). Compared to the SSTSA, the newly introduced Section 175A is broader in that it applies to any person(s). Now the officer posted shall also be at liberty to monitor production of all goods and services being provided even if they are not registered under the STA or SSTSA. This means that the FBR will now be empowered with more information than before in conducting sales tax audits. According to the taxonomists, the powers are against the foundational self assessment scheme of the ITO and will be prone to litigation on the plea of discrimination. They said it seemed that this amendment might have been introduced in light of the ad-interim orders issued by the courts of law, in various cases, including the case of Jadeed Feeds Industries v/s Federation of Pakistan and Others, wherein the FBR has been barred to post officers to premises where the taxpayer does not produce taxable supplies, so that the power to post officers to premises even where no taxable supplies are being produced, can be exercised under the ITO as opposed to the STA. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Overseas Pakistanis to be taxed as filers on property deals
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has clarified that the rate of advance income tax on purchase and sale of immovable properties by overseas Pakistanis would be 'filer rate' even if they are 'non-filer'. The FBR has issued frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the tax rates on buying and selling of immovable properties by overseas Pakistanis. According to the FBR, for overseas Pakistanis the rate of advance income tax on purchase and sale of immovable properties under sections 236C and 236K shall be 'filer rate' even if they are 'non-filer' subject to the following conditions:(I) They are holding POC or NICOP; (ii) They are non-resident in Pakistan meaning their stay in a financial year in Pakistan is less than 183 days. Investments in real estate: Overseas Pakistanis now eligible for exemption from higher tax rates The advance income tax under sections 236C and 236K at the time of transfer of immovable properties differ depending on the fair market value of the immovable properties, as well as the status of a person who has filed his income tax return and a person who filed late or did not file at all. The FBR explained that the overseas Pakistanis who are holding POC or NICOP can avail 'filer rate' under sections 236C and 236K by following procedure: The concerned Authority, Registrar or a housing Society who is responsible for registering, transferring or recording the immovable property shall click on the 'Overseas Pakistanis' link on FBR's web portal to create a PSID (payment slip identity). The system shall redirect the person to a form to declare his POC or NICOP No and the system will fetch automatically his details such as name and address; upload scanned copy of his POC or NICOP; and his status as 'resident' or 'non-resident' and can upload documents in support thereof. The system shall digitally make the PSID available in the IRIS digital inbox of the concerned Commissioner for approval. The Commissioner shall verify the documents attached, approve after verification and inform the person who created PSID by email and SMS. The system shall allow the person to make payment of advance income tax at 'filer rate' despite being a 'non-filer,' the FBR added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Salaried class paid Rs555b in FY24
Listen to article Salaried individuals have paid a staggering Rs555 billion in income tax in the last fiscal year, which were Rs188 billion more than the preceding year and also 100% more than the combined taxes paid by retailers and real estate sector. The record-high contributions by people, who pay income tax on the gross salaries without having the luxury to adjust their expenses, substantially reduced the home-take salaries of a larger segment of society. According to provisional figures compiled by the Federal Board of Revenue, the salaried persons paid Rs555 billion in income tax during the fiscal year 2024-25. The unwilling contributions were 51% or Rs188 billion more than the taxes collected from the salaried persons in the preceding fiscal year. In the fiscal year 2023-24, the government had collected Rs367 billion from the salaried persons. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had phenomenally increased the tax burden of the salaried class and claimed it would generate only Rs75 billion in additional income taxes. The highest ever contributions by the salaried persons in a single year showed how the voiceless people have been discriminated against the powerful sectors of the country. Last month, the government marginally reduced the tax burden of the people earning up to Rs3.2 million annually, which it said would give them a benefit of Rs56 billion. This nominal benefit of Rs56 billion compared to the current contributions is like a drop in the bucket, which would not address the fiscal woes of the salaried individuals. Despite putting enormous burden on the salaried class, the FBR missed its annual collection target by a margin of around Rs1.2 trillion. The details showed that non-corporate sector employees paid Rs236.5 billion income tax in the last fiscal year, which is higher by Rs67 billion or 40%. Corporate sector employees paid Rs165 billion in income tax, also higher by Rs54.6 billion or 49%. Employees of the provincial governments paid Rs99.5 billion in taxes, which was up by Rs49 billion or 98%. The federal government employees paid Rs54.2 billion, higher by Rs17 billion or 45%. Total income tax payments during the last fiscal year were Rs5.8 trillion and the salaried class paid Rs1 out of every Rs10 collected from the entire country under the head of income tax. In contrast to Rs555 billion paid by the salaried persons, the retailers, mostly unregistered, have contributed only Rs38 billion on account of withholding income tax on their purchases. The amount of tax that traders paid under section 236-H was 1,360% less than taxes paid by salaried persons. Besides, wholesalers and distributors also paid Rs25 billion withholding tax in the last fiscal year and almost half of them were unregistered with the FBR, said the sources. PM Sharif could not live up to his promise of collecting due taxes from the retailers. The Tajir Dost scheme failed to yield desired results and the government has not announced any new measure in the budget to bring the retailers in the tax net. Its biggest enforcement measure to ban the economic transactions by ineligible persons has become effectively useless after the government exempted more than 90% transactions from the purview of the new law. The government has allowed the ineligible persons, those having not enough declared resources, to buy up to Rs7 million worth of a car, Rs50 million worth plot and Rs100 million commercial property. In the budget, the government had imposed 2.5% withholding tax on traders, in the hope that this would force them to come into the tax system. Though the increase in the rate did help collect Rs21 billion more from the traders, the intended objective could not be achieved. The traders passed on the cost of the additional tax to the end consumers. In the last budget, the government had also substantially increased the tax burden of the real estate sector by increasing the rates for the non-filers and also introducing a new category of late filers in the budget. As a result, during the last fiscal year, the government collected Rs237 billion on sales and purchase of properties. This helped increase collection by 19% compared to the previous fiscal year but it was still below the mark. The combined taxes paid by both retailers and the real estate sector were 100% less than the total contributions by the salaried persons. On the sale of properties, the government collected Rs119 billion on account of withholding taxes, which were one-fourth more than the preceding fiscal year. On the purchases of the plots, the government collected another Rs118 billion, also higher by 14%. In the new budget, the government has abolished the federal excise duty on the real estate sector. The net taxes on the sales and purchases remained unchanged, although the government shifted higher burden towards the sellers by increasing their withholding tax rates.
