From Chest-Thumping To Panic: How Pakistan Unwittingly Admitted India's Op Sindoor Supremacy
For days after India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan's military and political establishment clung to its familiar playbook — denial, deflections and lofty claims of shooting down Indian jets. But in a series of awkward, contradictory, and ultimately revealing statements, key Pakistani leaders have inadvertently confirmed what India had signalled all along: that Operation Sindoor caught Islamabad off guard, hit critical military infrastructure, and left its leadership scrambling.
Rana Sanaullah's 45-Second Nuclear Panic
The most jarring admission came on July 3, when Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's close aide Rana Sanaullah revealed that Pakistan's armed forces had only 30-45 seconds to determine if the incoming BrahMos missile launched by India carried a nuclear warhead.
In a televised interview that is now making headlines across both sides of the border, Rana Sanaullah, special assistant to the prime minister, said: 'When India fired a BrahMos missile at our Nur Khan airbase, our military had just 30 or 45 seconds to determine if it carried a nuclear warhead. Such a limited timeframe is extremely dangerous. If there had been any miscalculation, it could have triggered a nuclear response, potentially leading to global disaster."
This was the first on-record confirmation from a senior Pakistani official of the chaos and indecision triggered by India's strikes. The missile, launched during Operation Sindoor, hit the Nur Khan Airbase in Chaklala, Rawalpindi — a key Pakistan Air Force installation.
But it wasn't just Nur Khan. Satellite images released days later showed extensive damage across several Pakistani airbases — including Sargodha, Bholari, Jacobabad, Sukkur, and Rahim Yar Khan — with visible destruction to runways, hangars, and key operational buildings. The scale and precision of the strikes suggested that India had carefully mapped and degraded Pakistan's offensive capacity in a matter of minutes.
This wasn't the first sign that Pakistan was caught off guard.
Back on May 16, PM Shehbaz Sharif stunned many by recounting how he was woken up at 2:30 AM by Army Chief Asim Munir, who informed him that India had launched missile strikes on key Pakistani airbases — including Nur Khan. 'At around 2:30 am on May 10, General Syed Asim Munir called me on the secure line and informed that India's ballistic missiles had hit Nur Khan Airbase and other areas," Sharif said, according to Geo News. He added that Pakistan's air force had responded using 'homegrown technology" on Chinese-origin jets.
The Prime Minister's admission directly contradicted weeks of official Pakistani statements claiming 'no damage," 'Indian jets repelled," and 'misinformation by Indian media." Sharif essentially confirmed what India had maintained — that Operation Sindoor was a limited but highly calibrated military strike meant to signal retribution for the Pahalgam terror attack.
Ishaq Dar's Blunt Confession
In what is arguably the most direct and damaging admission from the Pakistani establishment, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar publicly acknowledged that India struck two key airbases—Nur Khan near Rawalpindi and Shorkot in Punjab—during Operation Sindoor.
Speaking in an interview on Geo News, Dar said: 'India attacked the Nur Khan and Shorkot airbases. They launched missile strikes at 2:30 am, hitting our infrastructure just as we were preparing our response. India moved first, and they hit us."
He further revealed that Pakistan immediately sought diplomatic assistance to de-escalate: 'Within 45 minutes, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan called me and asked: 'Can I tell [Indian External Affairs Minister] Jaishankar that Pakistan is ready for a ceasefire if India stops?' I said, 'Yes, brother, you can.' He then called me back to confirm."
Dar's remarks dismantled weeks of official Pakistani denials that dismissed Indian claims of damage.
Khawaja Asif's Misfires And Mixed Messaging
Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif has played an unusually revealing role, often attempting to project strength, only to undermine it.
In an interview with CNN's Becky Anderson, Asif had claimed Pakistan shot down five Indian fighter jets during the operation—including a Rafale. When pressed, he cited 'social media posts" as evidence — only to be fact-checked live, with Anderson pointing out that the footage was taken from video games and archived war clips. Asif sheepishly admitted: 'I'm not saying it's authentic."
Adding to the inconsistency, Asif confirmed in late June that Pakistan remained on high alert after the strikes and that it was receiving intelligence support from China. Meant to reassure, the statement unintentionally revealed dependence on external surveillance, exposing vulnerability at the strategic level, especially for a nuclear-armed state that routinely champions its sovereignty.
Bottom Line: Pakistan's Own Words Confirm India's Win
Despite weeks of chest-thumping, Pakistan's top ministers have, in their own words, confirmed that India's military response was fast, sharp, and effective.
India's objective was to take out Pakistan-based terror camps — an infrastructure Islamabad has long denied. But Operation Sindoor also delivered a blow to Pakistan's military confidence and strategic narrative.
top videos
View all
The operation began on May 7, in direct response to the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, which claimed 26 lives, mostly civilians. In its initial phase, the Indian Air Force focused on dismantling terror camps linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Intelligence reports estimated that over 100 terrorists were neutralised in these strikes.
But when Pakistan attempted a retaliatory military response, including plans to target Indian cities and key installations, India escalated. In a decisive second phase, carried out on the night of May 9–10, Indian forces struck a string of major Pakistani airbases including Nur Khan, Sargodha, Jacobabad, Murid, and Rafiqui, inflicting damage that Islamabad is still struggling to publicly account for — even as its top ministers slowly, and inadvertently, begin to do so.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
BrahMos missile Operation Sindoor pahalgam terror attack
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 04, 2025, 13:44 IST
News india From Chest-Thumping To Panic: How Pakistan Unwittingly Admitted India's Op Sindoor Supremacy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump administration expands militarised zones to 1/3 of southern US border, stirs controversy
Orange no-entry signs posted by the US military in English and Spanish dot the New Mexico desert, where a border wall cuts past onion fields and parched ranches with tufts of tall grass growing amidst wiry brush and yucca trees. It's part of a major shift that has thrust the military into border enforcement with Mexico like never before.(AFP) The Army has posted thousands of the warnings in New Mexico and western Texas, declaring a 'restricted area by authority of the commander'. It's part of a major shift that has thrust the military into border enforcement with Mexico like never before. The move places long stretches of the border under the supervision of nearby military bases, empowering US troops to detain people who enter the country illegally and sidestep a law prohibiting military involvement in civilian law enforcement. It is done under the authority of the national emergency on the border declared by President Donald Trump on his first day in office. US authorities say the zones are needed to close gaps in border enforcement and help in the wider fight against human smuggling networks and brutal drug cartels. The militarisation is being challenged in court, and has been criticised by civil rights advocates, humanitarian aid groups and outdoor enthusiasts who object to being blocked from public lands while troops have free rein. Abbey Carpenter, a leader of a search-and-rescue group for missing migrants, said public access is being denied across sweltering stretches of desert where migrant deaths have surged. 'Maybe there are more deaths, but we don't know," she said. Military expansion Two militarised zones form a buffer along 230 miles of border, from Fort Hancock, Texas, through El Paso and westward across vast New Mexico ranchlands. The Defense Department added an additional 250-mile zone last week in Texas' Rio Grande Valley and plans another near Yuma, Arizona. Combined, the zones will cover nearly one-third of the US border with Mexico. They are patrolled by at least 7,600 members of the armed forces, vastly expanding the US government presence on the border. Reaction to the military buffer has been mixed among residents of New Mexico's rural Luna County, where a strong culture of individual liberty is tempered by the desire to squelch networks bringing migrants and contraband across the border. 'We as a family have always been very supportive of the mission, and very supportive of border security,' said James Johnson, a fourth-generation farmer overseeing seasonal labourers as they filled giant plastic crates with onions, earning USD 22 per container. Military deployments under prior presidents put 'eyes and ears' on the border, Johnson said. This version is 'trying to give some teeth'. But some hunters and hikers fear they're being locked out of a rugged and cherished landscape. 'I don't want to go down there with my hunting rifle and all of a sudden somebody rolls up on me and says that I'm in a military zone,' said Ray Trejo, a coordinator for the New Mexico Wildlife Federation and a Luna County commissioner. 'I don't know if these folks have been taught to deescalate situations.' A former public school teacher of English as a second language, Trejo said military trespassing charges seem inhumane in an economy built on immigrant farm labour. 'If the Army, Border Patrol, law enforcement in general are detaining people for reasons of transporting, of human smuggling, I don't have a problem,' he said. 'But people are coming into our country to work, stepping now all of a sudden into a military zone, and they have no idea.' Nicole Wieman, an Army command spokesperson, said the Army is negotiating possible public access for recreation and hunting, and will honour private rights to grazing and mining. Increased punishment More than 1,400 migrants have been charged with trespassing on military territory, facing a possible 18-month prison sentence for a first offense. That's on top of an illegal entry charge that brings up to six months in custody. After that, most are turned over to US Customs and Border Protection for likely deportation. There have been no apparent arrests of US citizens. At a federal courthouse in Las Cruces, New Mexico, on the banks of the Upper Rio Grande, migrants in drab county jail jumpsuits and chains filed before a magistrate judge on a recent weekday. A 29-year-old Guatemalan woman struggled to understand instructions through a Spanish interpreter as she pleaded guilty to illegal entry. A judge set aside military trespassing charges for lack of evidence, but sentenced her to two weeks in jail before being transferred for likely deportation. 'She sells pottery, she's a very simple woman with a sixth-grade education,' a public defence attorney told the judge. 'She told me she's going back and she's going to stay there.' Border crossings Border Patrol arrests along the southern border this year have dropped to the lowest level in six decades, including a 30 per cent decrease in June from the prior month as attempted crossings dwindle. On June 28, the Border Patrol made only 137 arrests, a stark contrast with late 2023, when arrests topped 10,000 on the busiest days. The first militarised zones, introduced in April and May, extend west of El Paso past factories and cattle yards to partially encircle the New Mexico border village of Columbus, and its 1,450 residents. It was here that Mexican revolutionary forces led by Pancho Villa crossed into the US in a deadly 1916 raid. These days, a port of entry at Columbus is where hundreds of children with US citizenship cross daily from a bedroom community in Mexico to board public school buses and attend classes nearby. Columbus Mayor Philip Skinner, a Republican, says he's seen the occasional military vehicle but no evidence of disruption in an area where illegal crossings have been rare. 'We're kind of not tuned in to this national politics,' Skinner said. Oversight is divided between US Army commands in Fort Bliss, Texas, and Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The militarised zones sidestep the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that prohibits the military from conducting civilian law enforcement on US soil. Russell Johnson, a rancher and former Border Patrol agent, said he welcomes the new militarised zone where his ranch borders Mexico on land leased from the Bureau of Land Management. 'We have seen absolutely almost everything imaginable that can happen on the border, and most of it's bad,' he said, recalling off-road vehicle chases on his ranch and lifeless bodies recovered by Border Patrol. In late April, he said, five armoured military vehicles spent several days at a gap in the border wall, where construction was suspended at the outset of the Biden presidency. But, he said, he hasn't seen much of the military in recent weeks. 'The only thing that's really changed is the little extra signage,' he said. 'We're not seeing the military presence out here like we kind of anticipated." Court challenges Federal public defenders have challenged the military's new oversight of public land in New Mexico, seizing on the arrest of a Mexican man for trespassing through remote terrain to test the legal waters. They decried the designation of a new military zone without congressional authorization 'for the sole purpose of enabling military action on American soil' as "a matter of staggering and unpreceded political significance.' A judge has not ruled on the issue. In the meantime, court challenges to trespassing charges in the militarised zone have met with a mixture of convictions and acquittals at trial. Ryan Ellison, the top federal prosecutor in New Mexico, won trespassing convictions in June against two immigrants who entered a militarised zone again after an initial warning. 'There's not going to be an issue as to whether or not they were on notice,' he told a recent news conference. American Civil Liberties Union attorney Rebecca Sheff says the federal government is testing a more punitive approach to border enforcement with the new military zones and worries it will be expanded border-wide. 'To the extent the federal government has aspirations to establish a much more hostile military presence along the border, this is a vehicle that they're pushing on to potentially do so. … And that's very concerning,' she said.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Millionaire wishes ‘adopted country' US on 4th of July while advising Indians: ‘The way I see it…'
Sabeer Bhatia, the Indian-American co-founder of Hotmail, has irked social media with his latest post. In his Fourth of July message, commemorating US Independence Day, Bhatia also directed a piece of advice toward his Indian followers. Sabeer Bhatia has attracted intense criticism for his tweets on India. (Instagram/ Bhatia started his post with an American flag emoticon and wrote, 'Happy 250th Anniversary to my adopted country.' He completed the line with an Indian flag emoji. In the next line, he shared advice for Indian citizens on how they can turn their country into a nation like America: 'The way I see it, India can become as prosperous as the US—all it takes is a change in the way its citizens think.' Take a look at the post: Sabeer Bhatia's post on the 4th of July. (X/@sabeer) What did social media say? The share prompted mixed reactions. While some enraged social media users called out Bhatia for his tweet, a few supported him. An individual remarked, 'Your adopted country, the USA, has clearly demonstrated its insatiable appetite for committing genocide. It has waged wars more than 100 times across the world, directly or by proxy, after the end of WW2. Millions of innocent civilians have died as a result of these conflicts.' Bhatia responded, 'I don't think you should want to come to the US. Remain in your tricked out planet.' Another commented, '100%. The only problem is MINDSET.' A third expressed, 'When are you shifting to India then?' A fourth wrote, 'Sabeer, we Indians are hypocrites. Unless that changes at the grassroots, it's going to be tough. We can blame our governments, etc., but it is always the people who accept mediocrity, who are double-faced in their own dealings—the day-to-day is what matters.'
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘I did it my way': Vijay Mallya, Lalit Modi's karaoke at London party fails to impress internet
Lalit Modi was captured partying with his 'good friend' Vijay Mallya at a lavish London party. What piqued people's interest was a moment when the duo dished out a karaoke performance. They sang Frank Sinatra's iconic music number "My Way'. Lalit Modi hosted a lavish summer party in London. Vijay Mallya was among the guets. (X/@LalitKModi) 'I did it #myway - a few memories from my annual summer party past Sunday at my house in London,' Lalit Modi wrote. He continued that he invited 310 people for the 'amazing night', and the guest list consisted of his 'friends and family'. In addition to Vijay Mallya, Chris Gayle was also spotted at the event. Modi also wrote a few words for Mallya. After thanking his guests, he shared, 'And to Vijay Mallya for his everlasting spirit of being there for me. Hope this video does not break the internet. Controversial for sure. But that what I do best.' Take a look at the video: What did social media say? While many reacted with hilarity, a few slammed and labelled them 'fugitives.' An individual posted, 'Sad reality that all fugitives are enjoying lavish lives after looting money from the Indian public.' Another added, 'I was waiting for the invitation. Hope I get it next summer.' A third commented, 'All, Please visit India.' A fourth wrote, 'Nazar na lage app dono ko.' In another post, Lalit Modi wrote about meeting Chris Gayle at his home in London. 'With the man himself the one and only #universeboss Chris Gayle at my home in London for my summer party. Presented me with his bat with which he scored the highest ever total by an individual person in an T20 match in 2013 for the Royal Challengers Bengaluru of 175 runs in just 66 balls. What an inning that was. And he was not out. The greatest entertainer in cricket of all times. I salute him (sic).'
