Russia 'upgrades' its nuclear sites closest to the UK
Vladimir Putin is believed to store at least 100 atomic missiles in Kaliningrad, his most westerly region, on the Baltic Sea, around 880 miles from British soil.
It is among five key nuclear sites in the west of the country being upgraded by Russia amid fears of a third world war.
Satellite images from Planet Labs were highlighted by Swedish broadcaster SVT and show that in Kaliningrad, Putin's suspected nuclear weapons storage sites have undergone significant reconstruction.
Putin is known to station Iskander-M missiles in Kaliningrad, which has land borders with two NATO states, Poland and Lithuania.
These could not reach the UK, but a stash of Kalibr-NK cruise missiles has more than enough range to do so.
The 9M729 (SSC-8) cruise missile is also likely warehoused in Kaliningrad and could strike the UK.
Another key site, the Asipovichy base in Belarus, a former Soviet nuclear storage facility which is around 1,000 miles from the UK, is also being renovated.
Satellite imagery shows new air defence installations, a new loading platform for rail-based logistics, and high security fencing.
Radiation monitors are known to be here, and storage for iodine prophylaxis – indicating the likely basing of nuclear-capable Iskander-M missiles. Similar mystery buildings have been erected at both sites.
On the top-secret Kola Peninsula, Russian forces have built a dozen storage bunkers that have emerged over the past decade at Gadzhiyevo base, some 60 miles from NATO territory in Norway.
A new building is also underway at Novaya Zemlya, a remote Arctic archipelago where Putin is feared to be preparing for the first nuclear bomb tests since the Soviet era.
The site was inspected in recent days by Russian politicians with high-level military experience.
Lt-Gen Andrey Gurulev posted from the location: 'You know, there's a lot of fascinating stuff I could say about the test site – but sadly, I cannot. The only thing I can say is – we're fully combat-ready.'
Novaya Zemlya is notorious for its role as a Soviet nuclear test site in the Cold War. The Tsar Bomb – the most powerful nuclear bomb ever detonated – was tested there on October 30, 1961.
The explosion was so large that it caused shockwaves that circled the Earth multiple times, and its mushroom cloud reached more than 37 miles into the sky.
A total of 130 nuclear tests were conducted on Novaya Zemlya by the Soviet Union between 1955 and 1990.
Of these, 86 were atmospheric, 39 underground and three underwater, according to declassified documents.
Russia's improved military facilities come amid intense global tensions not just with Russia, but in other areas of the world. More Trending
Fears are rising that the US and even Gulf states will become involved in the war, but it is unlikely that it will result in a global conflict.
Jason Pack, fellow at Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and host of the Disorder Podcast, told Metro that the Iranian regime is 'really weakened'.
He said: 'The Iranians don't have the capability to bring us to World War III.
'It is much more likely to see the Iranian people rise up against the regime than we are to see the Iranians like land some decisive blow against Israel.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: All 9 countries on the UK Foreign Office 'no go' travel list
MORE: Putin calls Trump to say 'happy birthday' but there was 'no time to talk about Ukraine'
MORE: Moment one of Putin's warplanes crashes after wing falls off during bombing raid
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
28 minutes ago
- ITV News
The Evolution of Putin: Bullied Child, KGB Man, Autocrat
The Evolution of Putin: Bullied Child, KGB Man, Autocrat - The strange stories of Vladimir Putin's past, told by three people who encountered him. More info
New Statesman
29 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Trump is serious about getting tough on Putin. No, really.
Photo byDonald Trump appears, belatedly, to be reaching the conclusion that Vladimir Putin cannot be entirely trusted. 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' he remarked during a cabinet meeting last week (8 July). 'He's very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' He expanded on that theme during a meeting with Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte in the Oval Office on 14 July, where the US president was expected to deliver a 'major announcement' on Russia. After speaking to Putin on the phone, he said, 'I always hang up and say, well that was a nice phone call, and then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city, and I say, 'strange.' And after that happens three or four times, you say, 'the talk doesn't mean anything.'' Even the first lady, Melania Trump, had noted the discrepancy between his 'lovely' phone conversations with Putin and the devastating war he is waging against Ukraine. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'you know I spoke to Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation,'' Trump recounted. 'She said, 'oh, really? Another city was just hit.'' Since returning to power in January – whereupon he had promised to end the war within 24 hours – Trump had believed a peace deal with Putin was within reach 'about four times,' he opined, 'but it just keeps going on and on and on.' With this pattern so clearly established and Putin so demonstrably uninterested in serious peace talks, there was growing anticipation in Washington that Trump was about to signal a radically new approach. Perhaps the major announcement would turn out to be an unequivocal declaration of support for Ukraine and a commitment to pass the bipartisan sanctions package that is currently gathering momentum in the senate and would impose a 500 percent tariff on countries that buy Russian oil and uranium (such as China and India). Fool Trump four times, one might think, and, to quote George W. Bush, 'you can't get fooled again.' To be fair, Trump did announce that Ukraine would now receive the air defence systems and other crucial weaponry that Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly requested – and which his own administration had previously suspended – which is unequivocally good news for Kyiv. Although he was characteristically vague on the details of what, exactly, would be sent. 'Everything. It's Patriots [the US-made missile defence system]. It's all of them,' Trump said as Rutte nodded along encouragingly. The one detail he did want to stress was that the US would not be paying for them. Instead, they would be sending the weapons to Nato, where 'rich' European countries would apparently foot the bill, and then send the weapons on to Ukraine. 'This is really big,' Rutte interjected, demonstrating, once again, his fluency in Trumpian rhetoric and his apparent comfort with public acts of self-abasement in an attempt to secure the US president's support for European security. (During their previous meeting, Rutte referred to Trump as 'Daddy.') 'This is Europeans stepping up.' If he was Putin, Rutte suggested, he would now be left with little choice but to take these negotiations 'more seriously.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Alas, this is an unlikely outcome. Far from offering a stirring invocation of the need for Ukraine to prevail and Washington's unending commitment to standing with Europe against Russian aggression, Trump repeatedly distanced himself from the war. 'This is a Biden war. This is a Democrat war,' he said. 'Not a Republican or Trump war.' 'This is not Trump's,' he stressed again as he answered reporters' questions. 'We're here to get it finished and stopped.' Twice, he pointed out, 'they're not Americans dying,' noting that he and 'JD [Vance]' have a 'problem' with the war, which they had both campaigned on a promise to bring to an expedited end. 'There are no winners here,' Trump concluded, as though he was surveying a bad real estate deal. 'This is a loser.' His comments did not exactly signal robust support. As for the senate's sanctions package, which is being touted in DC as a 'sledgehammer' that will enable Trump to end the conflict, the president himself sounded noncommittal, offering only that it was 'good that they're doing it.' Instead, he promised to impose 'very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days.' Those tariffs would be set 'at about 100 percent,' Trump said, calling them 'secondary tariffs' but offering no further details as to what this meant. (Secondary sanctions are generally imposed on third countries trading with a targeted nation, so this could mean imposing 100 percent tariffs on US imports from countries that trade with Russia, but it is not clear.) Asked how much further he was prepared to go if Putin continued to escalate his attacks on Ukraine, which has been subjected in recent weeks to the heaviest aerial bombardment since the start of the war as the Russian military, Trump responded: 'Don't ask me a question like that.' For all the dramatic billing, the problem with Trump's latest strategy is that it is essentially the same strategy that he has already tried. He is threatening Putin with very serious consequences if he doesn't end the war, while signalling that he, personally, and the US in general, has no real interest in that war beyond ensuring that 'we get it finished.' Agreeing to continue supplying Ukraine with the weapons it needs to defend itself, or at least to sell those weapons to Nato, is better than the alternative for Kyiv and allows the Ukrainian military to keep fighting, but it is not the same as committing meaningful funds and political capital to ensure Ukraine's survival against the Russian onslaught and European security. Trump has the votes to pass a massive new military aid package in congress immediately if he so desires. Evidently, he does not. There is no doubt that Trump's tone on Putin has decidedly soured in recent days. Perhaps he is genuinely reconsidering his previously admiring assessment of the Russian president, and a more consequential policy shift will eventually follow. But for now, he is choosing to respond to Putin's habitual obfuscation and clear track record of stringing him along by giving him another chance – this time another 50 days – to mend his ways, and warning that this time is really serious about getting tough. Perhaps the fifth time will turn out to be the charm, and Putin will now be persuaded to enter serious negotiations and call an end to his assault. But it is more likely that he will interpret Trump's announcement as giving him another 50 days to bombard Ukraine and grind forward on the battlefield, where he believes the Russian military has the upper hand, albeit at a glacial pace and tremendous cost. Tellingly, the Russian stock market rose after Trump's announcement. Moscow, it seems, was bracing for much worse. [See also: Putin's endgame] Related
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tuesday briefing: What Trump's ‘massive' weapons deal for Ukraine means for the war
Good morning. It looks like the bromance between Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, is over. Maybe for good. Last night an exasperated Trump said he had finally had enough of 'tough guy' Putin's refusal to give him what he wants: an end to the war in Ukraine. The United States, he announced, will start selling what the Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, sitting alongside him at a White House press conference, called 'massive numbers' of weapons to Ukraine to help it defend itself against Russia. Trump also delivered an ultimatum to Putin: agree to a ceasefire within 50 days or face – you guessed it – tariffs. Yesterday's press conference with Rutte is a sign of just how much has changed in the past six months. It was only in February that the world witnessed the excruciating spectacle of Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, humiliating and belittling the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, at the Oval Office before a live global TV audience of millions. For Ukraine's supporters in Congress and in Europe, this is a moment of victory with the US now firmly diplomatically and militarily in Kyiv's corner. The issue is the extent to which Trump's antipathy towards Putin translates into long-term support for Kyiv, and whether the extra military clout ends up being enough to turn the conflict decisively in Ukraine's favour. For today's newsletter, I talked to Dan Sabbagh, the Guardian's defence and security editor, about what the breakdown in diplomatic relations between Trump and Putin could mean for Ukraine and the prospects for peace. That's after the headlines. Middle East crisis | A feud has broken out between the Israeli government and the military over the cost and impact of a planned camp for Palestinians in southern Gaza, as politicians attacked the former prime minister Ehud Olmert for warning that the project would create a 'concentration camp' if it goes ahead. UK news | A senior coroner's officer who first reviewed the deaths of babies at the Countess of Chester hospital for Cheshire police in 2017 has said she believes Lucy Letby has suffered a miscarriage of justice. Last month, Stephanie Davies wrote to Cheshire's senior coroner that: 'I am now extremely concerned that the convictions of Ms Letby are wholly unsafe.' NHS | Wes Streeting has said resident doctors' strikes would be 'a gift to Nigel Farage' before a meeting with the British Medical Association this week where he will seek to avert industrial action. UK news | Constance Marten and Mark Gordon have been found guilty of the manslaughter of their newborn daughter, who died after they took her to live in a tent in freezing wintry conditions to evade social services. Media | A report on the behaviour of Gregg Wallace has substantiated 45 allegations made against the former BBC presenter, including claims of inappropriate sexual language and one incident of unwelcome physical contact. As relationships go, it's fair to say Trump and Putin's status has now shifted from 'it's complicated' into more definitively hostile territory, as the former's frustration with Russia's refusal to budge in the stalled peace talks seems to have reached a crescendo. 'I don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a tough guy,' Trump said yesterday as he announced the new US arms sales to Ukraine, noting that several of his predecessors had also become disillusioned with Putin. 'Tonally, today we saw a very, very different Trump when it comes to Russia,' said Dan Sabbagh. 'Up until yesterday there was this feeling that he still believed he could get Putin to the table and make some kind of sweetheart peace deal but all of that seems to have gone away. Diplomatically it is a decisive shift.' What military support did Donald Trump announce? Although neither Trump nor Rutte put a number on the value of the weaponry heading Ukraine's way, Trump said 'top of the line' equipment, including Patriot missile systems and batteries, would be arriving to Ukraine's European allies very soon. The US will provide a number of Patriot missile systems – a long-range, all-altitude, all-weather air defence system to counter tactical ballistic missiles and aircraft – funded by Germany and other Nato partners. Considering the almost nightly bombardment Ukraine and its people are coming under, this is likely to be very welcomed by Ukraine and would be a significant step in helping Ukraine to defend itself. Trump also threatened tariffs of 'about 100%' if a deal isn't done to end the war in 50 days. How have relations soured between Trump and Putin? After Trump won his first term in 2016, his admiration for Putin's strongman image and insistence that the Russian president wasn't such a bad guy set the US on a wholly different course in terms of its willingness to engage with Russia. The start of his second term was characterised by hostility towards Ukraine and its president, Zelenskyy – whom Trump branded a 'dictator' – and a desire to negotiate one-to-one with Putin about a ceasefire and end to the war. Only this month the US briefly halted shipments of arms to Ukraine because it said its own stockpiles were too low. Still, over the past month Trump has been increasingly bewildered at Putin's refusal to give him the peace deal he so desperately needs to make good on his boast that he can end the Ukraine war – even if not in his promised 24 hours. While Ukraine has buckled to US demands such as signing a minerals deal, Putin has given Trump nothing of any substance (apart from, of course, a flattering portrait). Trump's sense of betrayal has only increased as Putin has stepped up his attacks on Ukrainian cities. Putin 'talks nice but then he bombs everybody in the evening', Trump said at the weekend. Dan said the new arms package that the US has announced for Ukraine was Trump's attempt to claw back some leverage over the Russian leader. While it remains to be seen what difference it can make militarily, this is a diplomatic turning point in relations between the two superpowers. 'For me, the fact that he's agreed in principle to sell weapons to Ukraine is more important than any threat about tariffs,' said Dan. 'Some Ukrainian analysts have been saying that they thought that Putin has overplayed his hand with Trump and I would agree with that.' What does this mean for Ukraine? Dan said that after his public humiliation in the Oval Office, Zelenskyy was quick to act on advice from European leaders to appeal to Donald Trump's ego. One fascinating detail in an Axios report yesterday was that one of the things that seems to have worked in Zelenskyy's favour with Trump was him wearing a suit instead of his usual military attire at the recent Nato summit. 'After Zelenskyy walked into that ambush he swiftly realised that he had to be patient because Putin himself would prove to Trump that he was not a good-faith actor, which so far appears to have played out,' said Dan. While the US arms sale for Ukraine is, undoubtedly, a sign of better relations with Washington, Dan also agreed with the assessment that the new shipment was probably more to do with Trump's anger and frustration at Putin than deep-seated support of Ukraine. 'I don't think Trump thinks he's fallen out with Putin,' said Dan. 'It could be that in a few days or weeks, if Putin starts making noises again about being prepared to make concessions, we could see Trump flexing back.' Dan thought it was significant that Trump brought up his wife, Melania, at the press conference saying that she had been sceptical about their friendly phone calls all along. 'Even if he was just musing aloud it was an acknowledgment that at the heart of his family there has been someone just prodding him out of the idea that Putin was serious about peace.' How could this influence the outcome of the war? Dan said that without a concrete dollar amount in the billions attached to what the US will sell Ukraine's European allies, it is hard to get a firm understanding of just how potentially decisive this military support to Ukraine could be. 'The real question is how much these new US weapons will make a difference to the war and improve Ukraine's ability to fight the kind of war it needs to fight, which is a hard defensive war that will allow it to remain stable and better counter these Russian missile attacks,' said Dan. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Dan said what is clear is that Russia is setting itself up for engaging in a 'forever war' until it achieves its objectives, whatever the cost. 'Russia just hopes to just grind Ukraine down,' said Dan. 'It seems prepared to stomach casualties of more than 1,000 per day and has organised itself around a war economy that could keep going for a long time.' Could the US starting to send 'massive' amounts of weaponry to Ukraine make the Kremlin think again? Dan doesn't think so. 'Militarily at the moment it doesn't appear to be a decisive intervention and my instinct is that Russia isn't going to stop and that Ukrainians have to come to terms with the fact that nothing is going to change any time soon.' This feature by Keith Stuart is a fascinating deep dive into how creative video games like Minecraft and Animal Crossing can help Ukrainian refugee children understand and cope with trauma. Craille Maguire Gillies, newsletters team This interview by Ruaridh Nicoll with the Guardian's Gaza diarist, the anonymous writer who catalogued his life during the five months of the war, is a devastating but urgent read about his life under fire and how he escaped into exile. Annie John Merrick is pointed on how 'a new chorus of 'declinism'' is becoming part of the national consciousness once again – and with it comes racialised undertones that distract us from the true causes (it's not migrants) and solutions (hello, wealth distribution). Craille I absolutely hoovered up this beautiful ode to Pamela Anderson by Caitlin Flanagan in the Atlantic (£). A gorgeous piece of writing about her love for Anderson and what she can teach us about resilience and grace in the face of industrial-levels of misogyny. Annie Thanks to Rukmini Iyer, who has not only solved supper at my house with her recipe for cashew rice bowls with stir-fried tofu, but helped me see what I might do with kimchi, an ingredient I enjoy but don't often reach for. Craille Cricket | England beat India at Lord's to take a 2-1 lead in the series after a tense final day. Third Test: England, 387 & 192, bt India, 387 & 170, by 22 runs Football | The president of Fifpro has described the Club World Cup as a 'fiction' and compared Gianni Infantino to the Roman emperor Nero, as the dispute between the players' union and Fifa continued to escalate. Cycling | Ben Healy rode himself into the ground to become the first Irishman in 38 years to wear the yellow jersey, as Simon Yates claimed victory in stage 10. The Guardian print edition leads with 'Trump issues warning to Putin as he does deal with Nato to arm Kyiv'. The Telegraph says 'Trump threatens China over Russian oil' and the Financial Times has 'Trump threatens 100% trade levies if Russia does not end war in 50 days'. The Daily Mail splashes on 'The killer aristocrat' and further offers 'Revealed: why daughter of privilege had four children taken into care'. 'Arrogance of monster parents' – that's the Metro about the same case. The Daily Mirror's top story is 'Sacked Gregg: I won't be the last' while the Times runs with 'New grant to push sales of electric cars for net zero' and the Express predicts 'Next tax raid will 'pick the pockets' of the grafters'. In the i paper you can read 'UK to offer new bumper mortgages for £30,000 earners as Reeves sweeps away crash rules'. The law change that could transform toxic workplaces Zelda Perkins was Harvey Weinstein's PA – and has spent the last eight years campaigning against the non-disclosure agreements used to silence abused employees. Now she has won a major victory. Alexandra Topping reports A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Fussy eaters are often mocked and, as Jason Okundaye writes, they are misunderstood. 'I am of Nigerian heritage after all, and I grew up eating and loving a range of dishes – abula, efo riro, bokoto – that would probably flip the stomachs of many Europeans on sight.' What stresses him out are ordinary foods with textures he finds unpleasant: nuts in desserts, cheese, oats, tuna, brown bread. 'But I eventually grew tired of my own fussiness', he admits, and so he made one small change: every week, he would eat as much of a food containing a single ingredient he had previously avoided, a kind of culinary exposure therapy. It's still a work in progress: he's overcome his nut aversion thanks to baklava but can't stomach the oats in Hobnobs. But while he 'recently braved the evil mayonnaise, and heaved so violently that I thought I was dying', Okundaye gives himself full points for trying. His old dislikes, he realises, are a matter of taste – not a reason to panic. When he's not forcing food down, Jason edits The Long Wave, our weekly Black life and culture newsletter – make sure you sign up here. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
