
How UnitedHealthcare became the face of America's health insurance frustrations
Cover, 46, said she was overbilled for emergency room visits for her and her son, along with a standard ultrasound. While Cover said her family would eventually have been able to pay the sum, she said it would have been a financial strain on them.
Cover, a San Diego benefits advocate, said she had conversations with UnitedHealthcare that "felt like a circular dance." Cover said she picked through dense policy language and fielded frequent calls from creditors. She said the experience felt designed to exhaust patients into submission.
"It sometimes took my entire day of just sitting on the phone, being on hold with the hospital or the insurance company," Cover said.
Cover's experience is familiar to many Americans. And it embodies rising public furor toward insurers and in particular UnitedHealthcare, the largest private health insurer in the U.S., which has become the poster child for problems with the U.S. insurance industry and the nation's sprawling health-care system.
The company and other insurers have faced backlash from patients who say they were denied necessary care, providers who say they are buried in red tape and lawmakers who say they are alarmed by its vast influence.
UnitedHealthcare in a statement said it is working with Cover's provider to "understand the facts of these claims." The company said it is "unfortunate that CNBC rushed to publish this story without allowing us and the provider adequate time to review." CNBC provided the company several days to review Cover's situation before publication.
Andrew Witty, CEO of UnitedHealthcare's company, UnitedHealth Group, stepped down earlier this month for what the company called "personal reasons." Witty had led the company through the thick of public and investor blowback. The insurer also pulled its 2025 earnings guidance this month, partly due to rising medical costs, it said.
UnitedHealth Group is by far the biggest company in the insurance industry by market cap, worth nearly $275 billion. It controls an estimated 15% of the U.S. health insurance market, serving more than 29 million Americans, according to a 2024 report from the American Medical Association. Meanwhile, competitors Elevance Health and CVS Health control an estimated 12% of the market each.
It's no surprise that a company with such a wide reach faces public blowback. But the personal and financial sensitivity of health care makes the venom directed at UnitedHealth unique, some experts told CNBC.
Shares of UnitedHealth Group are down about 40% this year following a string of setbacks for the company, despite a temporary reprieve sparked in part by share purchases by company insiders. In the last month alone, UnitedHealth Group has lost nearly $300 billion of its $600 billion market cap following Witty's exit, the company's rough first-quarter earnings and a reported criminal probe into possible Medicare fraud.
In a statement about the investigation, UnitedHealth Group said, "We stand by the integrity of our Medicare Advantage program."
Over the years, UnitedHealthcare and other insurers have also faced numerous patient and shareholder lawsuits and several other government investigations.
UnitedHealth Group is also contending with the fallout from a February 2024 ransomware attack on Change Healthcare, a subsidiary that processes a significant portion of the country's medical claims.
More recently, UnitedHealthcare became a symbol for outrage toward insurers following the fatal shooting of its CEO, Brian Thompson, in December. Thompson's death reignited calls to reform what many advocates and lawmakers say is an opaque industry that puts profits above patients.
The problems go deeper than UnitedHealth Group: Insurers are just one piece of what some experts call a broken U.S. health-care system, where many stakeholders, including drugmakers and pharmacy benefit managers, are trying to balance patient care with making money. Still, experts emphasized that insurers' cost-cutting tactics — from denying claims to charging higher premiums — can delay or block crucial treatment, leave patients with unexpected bills, they say, or in some cases, even mean the difference between life and death.
In a statement, UnitedHealthcare said it is unfortunate that CNBC appears to be drawing broad conclusions based on a small number of anecdotes."
Frustration with insurers is a symptom of a broader problem: a convoluted health-care system that costs the U.S. more than $4 trillion annually.
U.S. patients spend far more on health care than people anywhere else in the world, yet have the lowest life expectancy among large, wealthy countries, according to the Commonwealth Fund, an independent research group. Over the past five years, U.S. spending on insurance premiums, out-of-pocket co-payments, pharmaceuticals and hospital services has also increased, government data show.
While many developed countries have significant control over costs because they provide universal coverage, the U.S. relies on a patchwork of public and private insurance, often using profit-driven middlemen to manage care, said Howard Lapin, adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
But the biggest driver of U.S. health spending isn't how much patients use care — it's prices, said Richard Hirth, professor of health management and policy at the University of Michigan.
There is "unbelievable inflation of the prices that are being charged primarily by hospitals, but also drug companies and other providers in the system," said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University.
Lapin said factors such as overtreatment, fraud, health-care consolidation and administrative overhead raise costs for payers and providers, who then pass those on through higher prices. U.S. prescription drug prices are also two to three times higher than those in other developed countries, partly due to limited price regulation and pharmaceutical industry practices such as patent extensions.
While patients often blame insurers, the companies are only part of the problem. Some experts argue that eliminating their profits wouldn't drastically lower U.S. health-care costs.
Still, UnitedHealthcare and other insurers have become easy targets for patient frustration — and not without reason, according to industry experts.
Their for-profit business model centers on managing claims to limit payouts, while complying with regulations and keeping customers content. That often means denying services deemed medically unnecessary, experts said. But at times, insurers reject care that patients need, leaving them without vital treatment or saddled with hefty bills, they added.
Insurers use tools such as deductibles, co-pays, and prior authorization — or requiring approval before certain treatments — to control costs. Industry experts say companies are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence to review claims, and that can sometimes lead to inaccurate denials.
"It's all part of the same business model — to avoid paying as many claims as possible in a timely fashion," said Dylan Roby, an affiliate at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
While other private U.S. insurers employ many of the same tactics, UnitedHealth Group appears to have faced the most public backlash due to its size and visibility.
UnitedHealth Group's market value dwarfs the sub-$100 billion market caps of competitors such as CVS, Cigna and Elevance. UnitedHealth Group booked more than $400 billion in revenue in 2024 alone, up from roughly $100 billion in 2012.
It has expanded into many parts of the health-care system, sparking more criticism of other segments of its business — and the company's ability to use one unit to benefit another.
UnitedHealth Group grew by buying smaller companies and building them into its growing health-care business. The company now serves nearly 150 million people and controls everything from insurance and medical services to sensitive health-care data.
UnitedHealth Group owns a powerful pharmacy benefit manager, or PBM, called Optum Rx, which gives it even more sway over the market.
PBMs act as middlemen, negotiating drug rebates on behalf of insurers, managing lists of drugs covered by health plans and reimbursing pharmacies for prescriptions. But lawmakers and drugmakers accuse them of overcharging plans, underpaying pharmacies and failing to pass savings on to patients.
Owning a PBM gives UnitedHealth Group control over both supply and demand, Corlette said. Its insurance arm influences what care is covered, while Optum Rx determines what drugs are offered and at what price. UnitedHealth Group can maximize profits by steering patients to lower-cost or higher-margin treatments and keeping rebates, she said.
The company's reach goes even further, Corlette added: Optum Health now employs or affiliates with about 90,000 doctors — nearly 10% of U.S. physicians — allowing UnitedHealth Group to direct patients to its own providers and essentially pay itself for care.
A STAT investigation last year found that UnitedHealth uses its physicians to squeeze profits from patients. But the company in response said its "providers and partners make independent clinical decisions, and we expect them to diagnose and document patient information completely and accurately in compliance with [federal] guidelines."
Other insurers, such as CVS and Cigna, also own large PBMs and offer care services. But UnitedHealth Group has achieved greater scale and stronger financial returns.
"I think the company is certainly best in class when it comes to insurers, in terms of providing profits for shareholders," said Roby. "But people on the consumer side probably say otherwise when it comes to their experience."
No one knows exactly how often private insurers deny claims, since they aren't generally required to report that data. But some analyses suggest that UnitedHealthcare has rejected care at higher rates than its peers for certain types of plans.
A January report by nonprofit group KFF found that UnitedHealthcare denied 33% of in-network claims across Affordable Care Act plans in 20 states in 2023, one of the highest rates among major insurers. CVS denied 22% of claims across 11 states, and Cigna denied 21% in eight states.
UnitedHealth did not respond to a request for comment on that report. But in December, the company also pushed back on public criticism around its denial rates, saying it approves and pays about 90% of claims upon submission. UnitedHealthcare's website says the remaining 10% go through an additional review process. The company says its claims approval rate stands at 98% after that review.
In addition, UnitedHealth Group is facing lawsuits over denials. In November, families of two deceased Medicare Advantage patients sued the company and its subsidiary, alleging it used an AI model with a "90% error rate" to deny their claims. UnitedHealth Group has argued it should be dismissed from the case because the families didn't complete Medicare's appeals process.
A spokesperson for the company's subsidiary, NaviHealth, also previously told news outlets that the lawsuit "has no merit" and that the AI tool is used to help providers understand what care a patient may need. It does not help make coverage decisions, which are ultimately based on the terms of a member's plan and criteria from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the spokesperson said.
Meanwhile, the reported Justice Department criminal probe outlined by the Wall Street Journal targets the company's Medicare Advantage business practices. In its statement, the company said the Justice Department has not notified it about the reported probe, and called the newspaper's reporting "deeply irresponsible."
Inside the company, employees say customers and workers alike face hurdles.
One worker, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation, said UnitedHealthcare's provider website often includes doctors listed as in-network or accepting new patients when they're not, leading to frequent complaints. Management often replies that it's too difficult to keep provider statuses up to date, the person said.
UnitedHealthcare told CNBC it believes "maintaining accurate provider directories is a shared responsibility among health plans and providers," and that it "proactively verifies provider data on a regular basis." The vast majority of all inaccuracies are due to errors or lack of up-to-date information submitted by providers, the company added.
Emily Baack, a clinical administrative coordinator at UMR, a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare, criticized the length of time it can take a provider to reach a real support worker over the phone who can help assess claims or prior authorization requests. She said the company's automated phone system can misroute people's calls or leave them waiting for a support person for over an hour.
But Baack emphasized that similar issues occur across all insurance companies.
She said providers feel compelled to submit unnecessary prior authorization requests out of fear that claims won't be paid on time. Baack said that leads to a massive backlog of paperwork on her end and delays care for patients.
UnitedHealthcare said prior authorization is "an important checkpoint" that helps ensure members are receiving coverage for safe and effective care.
The company noted it is "continually taking action to simplify and modernize the prior authorization process." That includes reducing the number of services and procedures that require prior authorization and exempting qualified provider groups from needing to submit prior authorization requests for certain services.
While UnitedHealthcare is not the only insurer facing criticism from patients, Thompson's killing in December reinforced the company's unique position in the public eye. Thousands of people took to social media to express outrage toward the company, sharing examples of their own struggles.
The public's hostile reaction to Thompson's death did not surprise many industry insiders.
Alicia Graham, co-founder and chief operating officer of the startup Claimable, said Thompson's murder was "a horrible crime." She also acknowledged that anger has been bubbling up in various online health communities "for years."
Claimable is one of several startups trying to address pain points within insurance. It's not an easy corner of the market to enter, and many of these companies, including Claimable, have been using the AI boom to their advantage.
Claimable, founded in 2024, said it helps patients challenge denials by submitting customized, AI-generated appeal letters on their behalf. The company can submit appeals for conditions such as migraines and certain pediatric and autoimmune diseases, though Graham said it is expanding those offerings quickly.
Many patients aren't aware that they have a right to appeal, and those who do can spend hours combing through records to draft one, Graham said. If patients are eligible to submit an appeal letter through Claimable, she said they can often do so in minutes. Each appeal costs users $39.95 plus shipping, according to the company's website.
"A lot of patients are afraid, a lot of patients are frustrated, a lot of patients are confused about the process, so what we've tried to do is make it all as easy as possible," Graham told CNBC.
Some experts have warned about the possibility of health-care "bot wars," where all parties are using AI to try to gain an edge.
Mike Desjadon, CEO of the startup Anomaly, said he's concerned about the potential for an AI arms race in the sector, but he remains optimistic. Anomaly, founded in 2020, uses AI to help providers determine what insurers are and aren't paying for in advance of care, he said.
"I run a technology company and I want to win, and I want our customers to win, and that's all very true, but at the same time, I'm a citizen and a patient and a husband and a father and a taxpayer, and I just want health care to be rational and be paid for appropriately," Desjadon told CNBC.
Dr. Jeremy Friese, founder and CEO of the startup Humata Health, said patients tend to interact with insurers only once something goes wrong, which contributes to their frustrations. Requirements such as prior authorization can be a "huge black box" for patients, but they're also cumbersome for doctors, he said.
Friese said his business was inspired by his work as an interventional radiologist. In 2017, he co-founded a prior-authorization company called Verata Health, which was acquired by the now-defunct health-care AI startup Olive. Friese bought back his technology and founded his latest venture, Humata, in 2023.
Humata uses AI to automate prior authorization for all specialties and payers, Friese said. The company primarily works with medium and large health systems, and it announced a $25 million funding round in June.
"There's just a lot of pent-up anger and angst, frankly, on all aspects of the health-care ecosystem," Friese told CNBC.
UnitedHealth Group also set a grim record last year that did little to help public perception. The company's subsidiary Change Healthcare suffered a cyberattack that affected around 190 million Americans, the largest reported health-care data breach in U.S. history.
Change Healthcare offers payment and revenue cycle management tools, as well as other solutions, such as electronic prescription software. In 2022, it merged with UnitedHealth Group's Optum unit, which touches more than 100 million patients in the U.S.
In February 2024, a ransomware group called Blackcat breached part of Change Healthcare's information technology network. UnitedHealth Group isolated and disconnected the affected systems "immediately upon detection" of the threat, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, but the ensuing disruption rocked the health-care sector.
Money stopped flowing while the company's systems were offline, so a major revenue source for thousands of providers across the U.S. screeched to a halt. Some doctors pulled thousands of dollars out of their personal savings to keep their practices afloat.
"It was and remains the largest and most consequential cyberattack against health care in history," John Riggi, the national advisor for cybersecurity and risk at the American Hospital Association, told CNBC.
Ransomware is a type of malicious software that blocks victims from accessing their computer files, systems and networks, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Ransomware groups such as Blackcat, which are often based in countries such as Russia, China and North Korea, will deploy this software, steal sensitive data and then demand a payment for its return.
Ransomware attacks within the health-care sector have climbed in recent years, in part because patient data is valuable and relatively easy for cybercriminals to exploit, said Steve Cagle, CEO of the health-care cybersecurity and compliance firm Clearwater.
"It's been a very lucrative and successful business for them," Cagle told CNBC. "Unfortunately, we'll continue to see that type of activity until something changes."
UnitedHealth Group paid the hackers a $22 million ransom to try to protect patients' data, then-CEO Witty said during a Senate hearing in May 2024.
In March 2024, UnitedHealth Group launched a temporary funding assistance program to help providers with short-term cash flow.
The program got off to a rocky start, several doctors told CNBC, and the initial deposits did not cover their mounting expenses.
UnitedHealth Group ultimately paid out more than $9 billion to providers in 2024, according to the company's fourth-quarter earnings report in January.
Witty said in his congressional testimony that providers would only be required to repay the loans when "they, not me, but they confirm that their cash flow is normalized."
Almost a year later, however, the company is aggressively going after borrowers, demanding they "immediately repay" their outstanding balances, according to documents viewed by CNBC and providers who received funding. Some groups have been asked to repay hundreds of thousands of dollars in a matter of days, according to documents viewed by CNBC.
A spokesperson for Change Healthcare confirmed to CNBC in April that the company has started recouping the loans.
We continue to work with providers on repayment and other options, and continue to reach out to those providers that have not been responsive to previous calls or email requests for more information," the spokesperson said.
The pressure for repayment drew more ire toward UnitedHealth Group on social media, and some providers told CNBC that dealing with the company was a "very frustrating experience."
The vast majority of Change Healthcare's services have been restored over the last year, but three products are still listed as "partial service available," according to UnitedHealth's cyberattack response website.
Witty's departure and the company's warning about elevated medical costs, combined with the fallout from Thompson's murder and the Change Healthcare cyberattack, could mean UnitedHealth faces an uphill battle.
UnitedHealth Group appears to be trying to regain the public's trust. For example, Optum Rx in March announced plans to eliminate prior authorizations on dozens of drugs, easing a pain point for physicians and patients.
But policy changes at UnitedHealth Group and other insurers may not drastically improve care for patients, health insurance industry experts previously told CNBC.
They said there will need to be structural changes to the entire insurance industry, which will require legislation that may not be high on the priority list for the closely divided Congress.
The spotlight on UnitedHealth Group may only grow brighter in the coming months. The trial date for Luigi Mangione, the man facing federal stalking and murder charges in connection with Thompson's shooting, is expected to be set in December. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
24 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
How Leaders Can Uphold the Ideals America Was Founded On
As America's 250th anniversary approaches, business leaders are called to help reclaim the values that once defined the nation. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. This July, Americans are not only celebrating independence but are also being called to reflect on what freedom truly means in today's world. This country was built by brave visionaries who dared to imagine a society rooted in liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness. Yet as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, these ideals feel more fragile than ever. Global leadership is shifting. Trust in business and government is eroding. At home, we face polarization, anxiety and a cultural drift away from the values that once made our country a beacon to the world. The question facing all of us, especially entrepreneurs and business leaders, is this: How do we reclaim these ideals and carry them forward? Freedom is not merely the absence of constraint; it is the presence of opportunity — the ability to thrive, to speak, to build, to contribute or simply to be. But this pursuit of happiness falters when people feel insecure, unheard or unable to make an impact. Related: Study Reveals American Trust Crisis With Government, Business and the Media Ethical leadership We often celebrate open markets and open societies, but they cannot flourish without open hearts and ethical leadership. Leading with purpose and ethics requires looking beyond revenue and actually acting on the needs of your employees and the planet. Ethical leadership means making decisions for long-term impact, not merely short-term gain, fostering trust by making ethics a part of daily business, not just lip service, and putting people at the center of progress by really listening to their needs. It's this kind of leadership that anchors us to our values and reminds us what this is all about in the first place. Capitalism at its best is not about unchecked profiteering. It's about building prosperity for people and the planet alike. That's the promise of conscious capitalism. Right now, it's a promise we must urgently renew as we edge closer to completely losing our way. In recent years, America's moral authority has been shaken. We've seen the growth of cronyism, unchecked corruption and the normalization of self-interest at the expense of shared progress. When trust collapses, so does the global social contract. The effects are far-reaching: Transaction costs go up with other countries Borrowing becomes more difficult Innovation within slows as ideas and goods flow less freely The cost-of-living climbs Our platform to promote new ideas diminishes Productivity collapses and talent hemorrhages Ignoring the needs of people and the planet carries staggering costs that impact beyond the bottom line. This is not just bad economics. It's a spiritual crisis. A nation that loses sight of its values cannot lead — not at home, and certainly not on the world stage. Related: 10 Inspirational Quotes About Independence From Successful Entrepreneurs Conscious capitalism To reverse this trend, we need leaders who are not just successful, but also conscious and aware. According to Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, founder of the World Forum for Ethics in Business, the antidote to corruption and decay lies in five foundational values that he calls the "Five Cs of Conscious Capitalism:" Connectedness: Recognizing that we are more interconnected than we realize Courage: Doing what is right, even when it's not easy Compassion: Especially for the underserved and overlooked Caring and sharing: Prioritizing collaboration over accumulation Cosmic understanding: Seeing life from a larger context of purpose These are not merely abstract concepts. They are essential for leadership. When we embody them, we build trust — not just in our companies, but also in our communities. Ethical leadership and conscious capitalism lead to conscious consumerism and waves of awareness that shift societal actions in larger ways. As America turns 250, we have the opportunity to redefine what success looks like. Not one merely driven by material success, such as GDP growth or shareholder return. It's about having a thriving, creative, values-driven society where freedom means the chance to be one's fullest, healthiest, happiest self, and to be able to help others do the same. Yes, the world is complex. Yes, corruption exists. But we are not powerless. By rooting our actions in ethics, empathy and awareness, we can restore the kind of leadership the world looks to, not with fear, but with hope. Related: Sage Business Advice From America's Founding Fathers We do this by cultivating resilience, staying anchored in purpose and choosing clarity over reaction. Navigating uncertainty requires us to pause, assess the landscape and make mindful choices. This is a critical first step when the path ahead is unclear. Leaders who thrive in chaotic environments are those who stay centered in their values, communicate transparently and create stability not by control, but by inspiring trust. That is the kind of leadership this moment calls for. The founders of this country were dreamers. They risked everything for an idea of freedom far bigger than themselves. As stewards of this legacy, business leaders today must do the same. Carpe diem is not just a motivational slogan; it's a call to lead with integrity, build with purpose and live with courage. Let us reclaim that spirit — not just for America, but also for the entire world.


Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Prices Are Down, But Buying A Home Is Still Out of Reach
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations. Yes, home prices are rising more slowly. No, that doesn't mean homes are any easier to afford. According to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Index, U.S. home prices rose 2.3% year-over-year, down from April's 2.7% gain. Month-over-month, prices ticked up just 0.4% before seasonal adjustment. But even with that 'cooling,' the National Association of Realtors (NAR) says the median existing-home price hit a record high of $435,300 in June. Existing home sales fell 2.7% month-over-month, despite a modest bump in inventory. Experts say these challenges are likely to persist through the year . Still, those willing to be flexible on location may find more budget-friendly options, especially in areas where local conditions now carry more weight than national housing trends. In other words: homes still cost more, buyers are fewer and the rising price slowdown isn't helping most Americans unless they're willing to relocate to more affordable areas. Here's the hard math: In Florida, the median income for a single earner is $65,801, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Following the commonly recommended rule of spending no more than three times your annual income on a home, that would suggest buying a home priced around $197,400. But the actual median sales price for a single-family home in Florida was $412,000 in June, according to Florida Realtors—more than six times the median income. Even though that price is down 3.5% from a year earlier, it's still far above what many Floridians can afford without taking on significant debt. In California, a one-earner household brings in about $76,190, which should put their target home price near $228,570. Yet California's actual statewide median price for existing single‑family homes stood at $899,560 in June, according to the California Association of Realtors. That's nearly 12 times the median income—an affordability gap that even seasoned financial advisers would call unsustainable. Financial advisers may still recommend the three-times guideline, but for many Americans in 2025, the numbers no longer add up, even before accounting for interest, taxes and insurance. New York once again led all Case-Shiller cities with a 7.4% year-over-year gain in May. Chicago followed with 6.1%, and Detroit came in at 4.9%. These increases continue the trend of stronger growth in the Midwest and Northeast metro areas. On the other end of the spectrum, Tampa's home prices dropped by 2.4%—the seventh straight month of annual declines for the city. Several Western cities also showed signs of weakening; San Francisco prices slipped by 0.6%. Los Angeles increased just 1.1%, while San Diego and Phoenix posted minimal gains of 0.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Nationally, prices rose 2.3% from a year ago. But nearly all of that growth happened in the last six months. Monthly trends suggest fatigue is setting in. After seasonal adjustment, prices declined 0.3% in May. That was the third month in a row of adjusted price drops. Even in cooling markets, buyers are not seeing much relief. The problem is not just the sale price of a home. It is the mortgage rate, the cost of insurance, the property taxes and the growing gap between wages and what homes actually cost. As of mid-July, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate sits at 6.74%, according to Freddie Mac. That's only slightly lower than this time last year, but still high enough to choke affordability. If rates were to fall to 6%, NAR's Lawrence Yun estimates 160,000 more renters could become homeowners. But until then, rising home prices and elevated borrowing costs are working in tandem to keep the market locked up. A $400,000 home with a 30-year mortgage at a 7% rate with a 20% down payment equals a monthly mortgage payment of nearly $2,130, excluding taxes and insurance. That payment alone can eat up 40% or more of a median earner's take-home pay in states like Arizona, Nevada or North Carolina. Borrowers who comparison shop often get better deals than those who don't. Lenders reserve the best rates for those with a credit score above 740. According to Experian, those with a 780 or higher get the best rates. Even a 20-point bump can cut your payment significantly. Sellers in slower markets may offer credits, rate buydowns or pay closing costs just to get deals done. FHA, VA and local agencies (like CalHFA or MassHousing) offer lower down payments, better rates, down payment assistance programs and even grants for qualified buyers. If you're open to relocating, aim for places where paychecks and home prices actually make sense. Prices aren't crashing—but they're not accelerating, either. This is a market of sharp elbows and thin margins. Here's where preparation beats timing, and compromise is king. If you're waiting for a big drop, you might miss your window. But if you're strategic about your budget, your lender, and your location, you can still get in the door. Just maybe not your dream door. Yet.


Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Fears Become Reality In The Tech Industry
This is a published version of Forbes' Careers Newsletter. Click here to subscribe and get it in your inbox every Tuesday. Fears of AI taking over jobs is already becoming a reality in tech. Fears of artificial intelligence costing people their jobs are already proving to be true. Or at the very least, CEOs are now admitting to the technology's impact as AI-related layoffs ramp up, especially in the tech industry, reports Forbes' Richard Nieva. Fiverr CEO Micha Kaufman is just the latest to say out loud that AI is already a threat to all kinds of jobs—including his. In an April memo to his 1,200 employees, he wrote: 'AI is coming for your jobs. Heck, it's coming for my job too.' 'I hear the conversation around the office. I hear developers ask each other, 'Guys, are we going to have a job in two years?'' Kaufman tells Forbes now. 'I felt like this needed validation from me—that they aren't imagining stuff.' He joins the likes of Andy Jassy at Amazon, Anthropic's Dario Amodei and Shopify's Tobi Lutke in admitting that AI will replace humans in white-collar jobs, some going as far as predicting a 'white-collar bloodbath.' The impacts are already being felt, particularly for young coders and entry-level workers. The total number of employed entry-level developers from ages 18 to 25 has dropped 'slightly' since 2022, after the launch of ChatGPT, said Ruyu Chen, a postdoctoral fellow at the Digital Economy Lab of Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered AI. But not everything can, or should, be automated just yet. Take the buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna, for example, which last year slashed its workforce by 40% in part to the company's investments in AI. A year later, it launched a massive recruiting push for human customer service agents. 'We have noticed that in a world where everything is automated,' Klarna spokesperson Clare Nordstrom told Forbes, 'people put a premium on the human experience.' Happy reading, and hope you have a lovely week! WORK SMARTER Practical insights and advice from Forbes staff and contributors to help you succeed in your job, accelerate your career and lead smarter. Why mastering 'systems-thinking' skills could protect your job from AI. What to do when someone is hired above you. Amid all the hype, here's why you may not need an AI agent. TOUCH BASE News from the world of work. Looking for lower costs, different lifestyles and less toxic politics, more Americans are considering retiring abroad. In its annual Best Places To Retire Abroad, list, Forbes ranked the 24 countries and 96 spots that could make the most sense for retirees looking outside the U.S. Beloved office snacks might soon be a thing of the past, thanks to Congress. Despite luring workers back into the office with the promise of free food, employers will no longer be able to deduct the cost of the food they provide for their employees as part of President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. The only exceptions: restaurants and the Alaskan fishing industry. One seemingly innocuous kiss cam at a Boston Coldplay concert has caused quite the workplace drama at tech startup Astronomer, pushing the company into the internet's spotlight. Former CEO Andy Byron stepped down after being caught embracing chief people officer Kristin Cabot at the concert, while the company's cofounder and chief product officer Pete DeJoy has stepped up as interim chief executive. More than half of U.S. companies are looking to pare back on health benefits as weight loss spending soars, according to Reuters. Increased cost sharing means employers could raise deductibles or maximum out-of-pocket costs, or even look beyond traditional pharmacy benefit managers, which act as middlemen between patients and insurers. NUMBER TO NOTE 9.3% VIDEO Could Tesla's Board Oust Elon Musk? QUIZ What bank joined JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs in cracking down on junior bankers accepting early private equity job offers? A. Bank of America B. Barclays C. Citi D. Morgan Stanley Check if you got it right here.