logo
Epic trial of Erin Patterson will drag on into its ninth week as judge continues his final address before sending the jury out to decide her fate

Epic trial of Erin Patterson will drag on into its ninth week as judge continues his final address before sending the jury out to decide her fate

Daily Mail​24-06-2025
The judge presiding over the epic trial of Erin Patterson has told jurors they can expect to hear at least another full day of his address before he finally sequesters them.
On Tuesday, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors not to pack their toothbrushes just yet as he intended to continue directing them on important matters of law before they retire to decide their verdict.
The jury has been told they will be sequestered at the conclusion of the trial, meaning they will be shielded from the outside world for as long as it takes for them to decide Patterson's fate.
Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to the murders of Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson.
They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in beef Wellingtons during lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023.
Only Pastor Ian Wilkinson survived the lunch, with a charge of attempted murder also hanging over Patterson's head.
In what has been an intense 36 day trial, the jury was treated to a spot of humour on Tuesday when Justice Beale referred to a doctor as 'Dr Mushroom'.
The mistake brought the rare sounds of laughter from within a courtroom that has heard weeks of harrowing evidence.
Justice Beale had been trying to refer to Dr Laura Muldoon, who gave evidence during the trial that she asked Patterson whether she used wild mushrooms in the beef Wellingtons she served at the lunch.
'Ms Patterson said she thinks she told Dr Mushroom, ah Muldoon, she had not used wild mushrooms,' Justice Beale said.
In what is referred to as the 'judge's charge', Justice Beale spent much of the day reminding the jury about what it had heard dating back to the very first witnesses in the trial.
Simon Patterson had been the first witness to enter the witness box, with Justice Beale reminding the jury about the key points of his evidence.
Justice Beale discussed Patterson's relationship with her husband over the years
The jury heard Simon said his friendship with Patterson had been 'strong' until late-2022.
He later said the lunch invite came off the back of information related to a 'medical issue'.
Simon told the jury Patterson had wanted to talk about 'this serious matter' at the lunch.
Justice Beale said Simon had been challenged on his recollection of the matter being described as 'important' or 'serious'.
The jury heard Simon had not used those words in his police statement.
Justice Beale also took the jury back through the evidence of Pastor Ian Wilkinson who survived the lunch after spending a period in intensive care.
The jury heard Mr Wilkinson said he remembered being invited to the lunch after a discussion with Gail and Don Patterson.
Justice Beale said Mr Wilkinson told the jury he thought the beef Wellingtons were on an oven tray and he had told police the same.
The jury was reminded about what Mr Wilkinson said about Patterson's cancer claims.
The pastor had told police Patterson said she had 'suspected cancer'.
He then gave evidence he thought she said she had cancer.
'I think she was saying she had cancer,' he said at trial.
Justice Beale continued to take the jury through evidence supplied from everyone from health officials to child protection officers who dealt with Patterson in the days following the lunch.
He told the jury the prosecution wanted him to highlight the eight 'topics' of alleged inconsistent statements.
The topics Justice Beale listed included:
1. Whether Patterson had a tendency to pick and eat wild mushrooms between 2020 and 2023.
2. Whether the children were invited to or free to attend the lunch on July 29.
3. The source of the mushrooms that went into the beef Wellingtons.
4. How much the accused ate of her beef Wellington.
5. How much Gail Patterson ate of her beef Wellington.
6. When Patterson claimed she started to experience diarrhoea.
7. Whether she knew or suspected the lunch was the cause of Don and Gail's illness only in the evening of Sunday July 30, 2023. and
8. Whether the accused knew that Donald and Gail Patterson were in comas by the morning of Tuesday, August 1, 2023.
The jury was reminded about Patterson's claims that she had developed an interest in foraging during Victoria's Covid lockdowns.
Justice Beale said Patterson claimed she would put the mushrooms in meals 'we all ate'.
Patterson told the jury she'd chop up the mushrooms into such small pieces the kids couldn't pick them out.
She claimed she foraged at the Korumburra botanical gardens and at her property.
Patterson claimed to have picked wild mushrooms at the gardens including slippery jacks and honey mushrooms.
Justice Beale lectured the the jury on how to treat someone that made an 'inconsistent statement'.
The jury was also told it 'could use which ever version of the account they wished'.
'[If a] witness' prior statement is inconsistent with his or her evidence in court, you will have two different accounts from the same witness,' Justice Beale said.
'It is for you to determine which accounts, if any, to believe.'
The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No-nonsense Aussie cop gets the ultimate revenge on idiot driver who was abusing him
No-nonsense Aussie cop gets the ultimate revenge on idiot driver who was abusing him

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

No-nonsense Aussie cop gets the ultimate revenge on idiot driver who was abusing him

A senior constable has been praised for staying calm during a heated clash with a foul-mouthed driver. The Victorian police officer had pulled the man over in the early hours to issue a defect notice, immediately putting the motorist on edge. When asked to provide his name, the driver exploded. 'Well, it will say on that f***ing thing you've got there, won't it?' the furious motorist replied - pointing at the constable's computer. 'You put the rego name in and it will say who is the registered name. 'Are you f***ing alright?' I've had you p***ks.' The senior constable attempted to calm the situation, but the man cut him off, launching into another tirade. 'I've absolutely had a gutful. What you did during Covid,' he continued. 'Back right off. You don't need to be in my presence. Back the f**k off.' The no-nonsense cop stood his ground as he tried to confirm the motorist's name, pointing out that they were more than a metre apart. 'I don't feel comfortable in my space,' the motorist yelled. 'That's fine,' the policeman calmly replied. He explained to the motorist that he would get a defect notice, which started him off again. 'Oh well done. A good Tuesday for you. You're a guru,' the man replied. By now, the cop had almost had enough and gave the motorist some advice as he returned to his car to fill out the paperwork. 'You don't need to act like a d***head mate,' the policeman said. The motorist fired back: 'You're the f***ing d***head. That whole uniform's a disgrace.' The policeman replied: 'Take a seat and shut up.' The two-minute video shared by former bodybuilding champion Zoltan Banyai has racked up hundreds of comments. The vast majority of viewers leapt to the defence of the officer and pointed out that he was just doing his job. 'Police should be respected mate. He's only doing his job. Cops are tops when we are in trouble and need help they do help,' one commented. Another added: 'My god. The poor cops. How embarrassing.' A third wrote: 'Bloke yelling needs to learn how to control his emotions. I don't care what happened before the video, that behaviour is embarrassing as a fully grown adult male.'

Young Aussie finds huge loophole in parking fines - and why he's now refusing to pay
Young Aussie finds huge loophole in parking fines - and why he's now refusing to pay

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Young Aussie finds huge loophole in parking fines - and why he's now refusing to pay

A young law student is disputing a parking fine he received while at university, claiming the parking meter did not give him the option to pay in cash. Oliver Griffiths, who is studying law at the University of Wollongong, received a $97 fine earlier this month after parking his car on campus. The university changed its parking policy last year, introducing digital parking machines that accept card-only payments. However, Mr Griffiths claimed there was signage visible in the car park that stated payment could be made with 'credit card or coins' at the time he received the fine. In a video shared to Facebook, Mr Griffiths outlined his plan to challenge the fine in his fight against a cashless society. 'My name is Oliver and I have fallen victim to the incoming cashless society,' Mr Griffiths said. 'Last year, my university made parking only available through digital payment. 'Instead of following along with the modern digital currency agenda I left notes on my dashboard offering to pay in cash.' The cash crusader had left a handwritten note on the dash of his car, explaining he was happy to organise a cash payment for the parking. He left a $10 note next to the message and also provided his phone number for the parking inspector to call so that he could organise payment. 'Dear parking inspector, cash is Australia's legal tender. I am not available to pay by card right, but I can only pay in cash, I'll come down right now and pay. Here's my number, give me a ring,' the note read. However, the note did not do the trick, and Mr Griffiths was still fined for parking without a ticket. Mr Griffiths, who wore a T-shirt with the slogan 'cash is king' in his social media video, outlined his pro-cash argument — one he said resonated with many Australians. 'I, like so many other Aussies out there, believe that cash is king,' Mr Griffiths said. 'Cash is essential to the economic freedoms of people, and it sustains everyday purchases of small businesses and individuals daily. 'It's available in emergencies, it protects your privacy, it doesn't cost you to use it, and it allows families to budget better.' If a magistrate orders Mr Griffiths to pay the fine, the young law student has vowed he will take out his wallet and pay in cash. 'I am going to keep fighting and if I have to go to the High Court I will, because cash is legal tender,' Mr Griffiths said. Last year, the federal government announced a cash mandate would come into force on January 1, 2026, requiring businesses to offer customers a cash option. Under that mandate, businesses that sell essential items like groceries and fuel must accept cash as payment. This comes as an estimated 1.5 million Australians still prefer to use cash over digital payments, despite one in four businesses no longer accepting cash. Cash use in Australia has steadily declined over the past decade—a trend that accelerated sharply following the Covid-19 pandemic. According to Reserve Bank data, the number of in-person cash transactions halved between 2019 and 2022, dropping from 32 per cent of transactions to 16 per cent. Currently, cash makes up about 10 per cent of all transactions, with projections suggesting it could fall to just seven per cent by 2030. Meanwhile, debit and credit card payments have remained strong, with debit card usage increasing over the same period. Jason Bryce, from advocacy group Cash Welcome, led an initiative known as 'Cash Out Day' on April 22, encouraging Aussies to withdraw cash from ATMs and banks to demonstrate its continued importance. An estimated 1.6 million people withdrew cash—totalling around $500 million—in 2024. Mr Bryce also started a 'Cash Welcome' petition on which has garnered almost 210,000 signatures. The petition calls on the government to introduce an Australian cash and banking guarantee. It calls for: 'all Australians [to] have reasonable local access to cash and full banking services,' and insists that 'all Australians must be able to choose cash when paying for food and essentials at physical retailers.' 'Millions of Australian consumers and businesses trust and rely on cash for their everyday needs and for budgeting purposes. 'Even Australians that don't attend banks or use cash regularly need access to face-to-face banking services and physical money sometimes.'

Conspiracy theories have leached into public life. Is it scepticism towards power or a complete worldview?
Conspiracy theories have leached into public life. Is it scepticism towards power or a complete worldview?

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Conspiracy theories have leached into public life. Is it scepticism towards power or a complete worldview?

On the edge of George Street in Sydney, a woman is wrapped in an upside-down Australian flag. She holds one side of a large banner that reads 'GROOM DOGS NOT KIDS', showing pictures of poodles with ears dyed rainbow and pink. There are young people, people in their sixties and seventies, parents with children in prams. There are t-shirts imploring you to 'think while it's still legal'. Another person holds a sign declaring their staunch opposition to a town planning initiative that's been erroneously linked to the rollout of a new surveillance regime, 'Aussies SAY NO to 15 minute cities. FREEDOM'. It is May 2023 and almost everyone has a smartphone in hand. They are live streaming, posting on the messaging app Telegram and waiting for the start of what is alternatively called the We Are Ready march or the Worldwide Rally for Freedom. What the crowd shares is a belief that something is very wrong. The sorry state of the world has an explanation both attractively simple and entirely complex: there are powerful and nefarious forces working secretly against us. Nothing is as it seems. Everything is connected. Did Australian prime minister Harold Holt drown at sea or was he kidnapped and taken away in a Chinese or Soviet submarine? Are Masonic symbols hidden among landmarks in Canberra? Is the government hiding UFOs at Pine Gap? These aren't just questions that interest people at events like the Worldwide Rally. We're all primed to dabble in these kinds of stories, the clues and coincidences that add up to something altogether fascinating. They can simply be a fun group activity on the internet. For most people they won't become an all-consuming worldview or a call to action – for others, they do. There isn't a great deal of available research about who believes in conspiracy theories in Australia and why – it's a difficult concept to measure. Based on our reporting, believers defy a neat categorisation of interest or class, even as members of these groups fear 'elites' who are conspiring against them, or categories of 'outsiders' taking what they deserve. It's hard to say whether one country's population is more conspiratorial than another but there are conditions that often correlate with conspiracy belief, including perceptions of inequality and corruption. Some research suggests Australians aren't more conspiracy theory-prone compared with other countries. A 2019 survey found a majority of the Australians surveyed endorsed at least one of the conspiracy theories included by the researchers, ranging from Holt being kidnapped by a Chinese submarine to the claim the Australian racehorse Phar Lap was poisoned by American gangsters. Others were more sinister. There were those who believed the Port Arthur massacre was orchestrated by the government as a cover to disarm the nation. Or that fluoride in the water is part of a plot to make Australians docile and easier to control. What did people mean when they said they agreed with these ideas? Was it a playful scepticism towards power or a complete worldview? Should we call them all conspiracy theorists? Clearly not. Conspiracy theories are not just for the 'fringe dwellers of society', the study concluded. 'Our results suggest that basic human motives may give rise to extraordinary beliefs for many ordinary people.' Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads Many people are suspicious about how power works, and they are right to be. In the United States, it's been argued that conspiracy theories about the 'deep state' – claims that there is a 'shadow government' in control no matter who is voted in – partly emerged from 'excessive state secrecy and official deception'. Australia's institutions, too, are notoriously secretive and insular. The revolving door between politics and lobbying is well known. Anyone with even the most passing familiarity with our history knows how cruel the state can be, how it was built on violence and displacement, and how it can organise itself against the interests of the people it claims to protect. But when this suspicion tips into an unyielding dedication to stories that can rationally be disproven, when grievance is nursed and monetised, when fear becomes an end in itself, common ground rapidly disappears, and any evidence that does not align with these beliefs, no matter how compelling, is rejected. Conspiracy theories point the finger at groups operating in secret against the people. They operate as 'accusatory and suspect, rather than as accepted knowledge', as author Joseph Uscinski writes. As we and others have found, conspiracy theories are often as much about creating enemies as unveiling some hidden truth. Sign up to Five Great Reads Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning after newsletter promotion Whatever their prevalence or how deeply these beliefs are held, there's something disturbing at work here. We've watched closely as once-fringe ideas and the language of conspiracy have become increasingly part of Australian public life, egged on by politicians and influencers in search of an audience, and by irresponsible journalism and new ways of communicating online. Terms such as 'QAnon' and 'sovereign citizens' have gone from internet jargon to common parlance. They are monetised and made into elaborate cover for racism. Believers harass nurses and election workers, clog up the courts, infiltrate councils and even get elected to parliament. In some cases, we see them take up weapons. Certainly, there are those whose experiences of living in Australia – a nation with a documented history of profound brutality to First Nations people, immigrants and other vulnerable groups – have created justifiable suspicion of those in power. Many of those we've spoken to have turned to these ideas after moments of profound disruption and tragedy, after they've fallen through the cracks. For others, it goes beyond scepticism into fantasy that does not lead anywhere useful. As the march crosses the Pyrmont Bridge, the crowd spots a drone filming the protests. 'How long before they put an AK-47 on it?' one man jokes. The march reaches a small stage near the Google offices. A grey-haired man materialises and tells the crowd to put aside their differences. 'Doesn't matter if you're . . . anti-vaccine or even, God forbid, pro-vaccine . . . as long as you're for freedom,' he says. It seems increasingly as though conspiracy theories are not about a singular event but an overarching interpretation of how the world works. They can create a sense of identity and group membership. At the Worldwide Rally for Freedom in 2023, like so many of the events we attended, no one seemed as if they were a single-issue protester – it was vaccines and child-predator cabals and a one-world government that would take all our freedoms one by one. If they hadn't personally lost something, they were about to. This is a feeling ripe for exploitation. Despite the appearance of standing up in the face of power, conspiratorial tropes are also useful to those with political, economic and social status because they are typically about something happening to 'us' because of an elusive 'them' – 'a virtuous group under threat from a nefarious enemy'. You can take on the position of victim without losing much of anything, and direct the vitriol in another direction. We're living in an era where conspiratorial ideas have leached into public life thanks to politicians and the media. They help make them mainstream for political purposes, from fake claims about climate science, to raising doubts about the safety of vaccines. Rather than reflecting a diffuse style of political paranoia, as historian Richard Hofstadter famously wrote about the United States in 1964, contemporary conspiracy theories in Australia are often used by those with power as a political weapon against vulnerable groups – a cynical inversion of the power structure they supposedly reveal. This is an edited extract from Conspiracy Nation by Ariel Bogle and Cam Wilson, out now through Ultimo Press (A$36.99).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store