logo
Westover: Remember the ice-bucket challenge? It's got an added cause

Westover: Remember the ice-bucket challenge? It's got an added cause

Ottawa Citizen3 days ago

June. It's a month that straddles the seasons between spring and summer. It's a celebration of Father's Day and the end of the school year. It's a month that can be rainy or windy or — as we were reminded this past week — as sultry as a sauna.
Article content
It's also ALS Awareness Month.
Article content
Article content
In the first week of June, the iconic 'Ottawa' sign was lit up in purple, the ALS Society's signature colour. This year, it set an admirable goal of raising $2,225,000 through virtual and in-real-life walks and other events.
Article content
Article content
But of course, the biggest push to raise awareness and dollars for ALS came in 2014.
Article content
That's when the Ice Bucket Challenge took the world by storm. For those who missed the phenomenon, it was simple and shockingly (pun intended) effective: participants dumped a bucket of ice water over their heads, posted the video online, and challenged others to do the same.
Article content
Those who chose to opt out were supposed to open their wallets instead. Many did both.
Article content
Everyone from Oprah to Bill Gates got in on the action. It was nothing short of a global movement, raising $220 million U.S. while galvanizing optimism and hope for a community with too little of both.
Article content
Fundraising challenge rebranded
Article content
Article content
In the U.S., these mental health donations go to Active Minds, a Washington-based mental health non-profit. In Canada, in the absence of a definitive counterpart, the Canadian Mental Health Association has stepped up to suggest donations to its local branches.
Article content
Article content
Yet many young people seem unaware there's supposed to be a fundraising component at all; for some of them, performance trumps philanthropy.
Article content
My first instinct on hearing about the new version was protective, because the Ice Bucket Challenge was to ALS what the Terry Fox Run is to cancer.
Article content
But then I recalled a 2019 column I wrote about my father's ALS diagnosis and lack of mental health support. Given his advanced age, he opted to forgo invasive interventions. His decline was steep and rapid. He died seven agonizing months after meeting his neurologist.
Article content
I reflected that his medical care centred entirely on his failing body, with too little given to his mental well-being. It's no surprise that many people living with ALS, as well as their caregivers and loved ones, face serious mental health challenges.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta judge grants temporary injunction blocking a transgender health-care bill
Alberta judge grants temporary injunction blocking a transgender health-care bill

Edmonton Journal

timea day ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Alberta judge grants temporary injunction blocking a transgender health-care bill

Article content 'This isn't just a win for trans youth, it is a win for Canada's health-care system,' Wells wrote on social media. 'No politician should be dictating or restricting your access to evidence-based medical care.' Egale and the Skipping Stone Foundation aren't the only groups challenging the bill. Last month, the Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors launched a legal case challenging the constitutionality of the bill, arguing it violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience. Alberta's other two pieces of transgender legislation _ banning transgender women from competing in womens sports and preventing youth under 16 from changing their name or pronouns in the school system without parental consent — have yet to be challenged in court. The education bill also requires parents to opt in for their children to receive lessons in school on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity. — with files from Aaron Sousa

Kennedy's vaccine committee endorses preservative-free fall flu shots
Kennedy's vaccine committee endorses preservative-free fall flu shots

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

Kennedy's vaccine committee endorses preservative-free fall flu shots

U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., testifies during a House Energy and Commerce Committee, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib) ATLANTA -- The Trump administration's new vaccine advisers on Thursday endorsed this fall's flu vaccinations for just about every American but threw in a twist: Only use certain shots free of an ingredient antivaccine groups have falsely tied to autism. What is normally a routine step in preparing for the upcoming flu season drew intense scrutiny after U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly fired the influential 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and handpicked replacements that include several vaccine skeptics. That seven-member panel bucked another norm Thursday: It deliberated the safety of a preservative used in less than five per cent of U.S. flu vaccinations based on a presentation from an antivaccine group's former leader -- without allowing the usual public presentation of scientific data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The preservative, thimerosal, has long been used in certain vaccines that come in multi-dose vials, to prevent contamination as each dose is withdrawn. But it has been controversial because it contains a small amount of a particular form of mercury. Study after study has found no evidence that it causes autism or other harm. Yet since 2001, vaccines used for U.S. children age six years or younger have come in thimerosal-free formulas -- including single-dose flu shots that account for the vast majority of influenza vaccinations. The panel voted 5-1, with one abstention, that people ages six months and older get a flu vaccination this fall only using single-dose formulas that are thimerosal-free. 'There is still no demonstrable evidence of harm,' one adviser, Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a psychiatrist formerly with the National Institutes of Health, said in acknowledging the panel wasn't following its usual practice of acting on evidence. But he added that 'whether the actual molecule is a risk or not, we have to respect the fear of mercury' that might dissuade some people from getting vaccinated. The ACIP, created more than 60 years ago, helps the CDC determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available. Kennedy has long held there was a tie between thimerosal and autism, and also accused the government of hiding the danger. Thimerosal was placed on the meeting agenda shortly after Kennedy's new vaccine advisory was named last week. Some public health experts contend the thimerosal discussion unnecessarily raised doubt in vaccines while possibly also making them more expensive and harder to get this fall. At the panel's meeting Wednesday, Chrissie Juliano, executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition, lamented the ouster of the former ACIP panel and the agenda of the new one. Her organization, which represents large city health departments, 'is deeply concerned that many routine vaccines may soon become inaccessible or unaffordable for millions of Americans if ACIP makes changes based on ideology rather than science,' she said. 'The stakes are simply too high to let that happen.' ------ By Mike Stobbe And Lauran Neergaard Neergaard reported from Washington. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

States can cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, the U.S. Supreme Court rules
States can cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, the U.S. Supreme Court rules

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

States can cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, the U.S. Supreme Court rules

The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 25, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) WASHINGTON -- A divided U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood in a ruling handed down Thursday amid a wider Republican-backed push to defund the country's biggest abortion provider. The case centres on funding for other health-care services Planned Parenthood provides in South Carolina, but the ruling could have broader implications for Medicaid patients. The court split 6-3 in the opinion, with the three liberal justices dissenting. Public health-care money generally can't be used to pay for abortions. Medicaid patients go to Planned Parenthood for things like contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing, in part because it can be tough to find a doctor who takes the publicly funded insurance, the organization has said. South Carolina's Republican governor says no taxpayer money should go to the organization. The budget bill backed by U.S. President Donald Trump in Congress would also cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. That could force the closure of about 200 centers, most of them in states where abortion is legal, the organization has said. Gov. Henry McMaster first moved to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood in 2018 but was blocked in court after a lawsuit from a patient named Julie Edwards. Edwards wanted to keep going there for birth control because her diabetes makes pregnancy potentially dangerous, so she sued over a provision in Medicaid law that allows patients to choose their own qualified provider. South Carolina, though, argued that patients shouldn't be able to file those lawsuits. The state pointed to lower courts that have been swayed by similar arguments and allowed states such as Texas to block Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood. Public health groups like the American Cancer Society, by contrast, said in court papers that lawsuits are the only real way that Medicaid patients have been able to enforce their right to choose their own doctor. Losing that right would reduce access to health care for people on the program, which is estimated to include one-quarter of everyone in the country. Rural areas could be especially affected, advocates said in court papers. In South Carolina, US$90,000 in Medicaid funding goes to Planned Parenthood every year, a tiny fraction of the state's total Medicaid spending. The state banned abortion at about six weeks' gestation after the high court overturned it as a nationwide right in 2022. ------ By Lindsay Whitehurst

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store