Gov. JB Pritzker signs laws aimed at improving college accessibility and affordability
One law signed by the governor creates the Public University Direct Admissions Program, meaning students with a high grade point average will be able to automatically qualify for admission into some universities. The program will begin in the 2027-28 school year, with nine of the state's 11 public universities participating:
University of Illinois Springfield
Southern Illinois University
Chicago State University
Eastern Illinois University
Governors State University
Illinois State University
Northeastern Illinois University
Northern Illinois University
Western Illinois University
Another bill requires community colleges to work with high schools to make sure the college-credit classes they offer meet state standards.
The other two bills focus on student loans; one bill ensures every high school has a financial aid point of contact to support students and families, the other requires schools to offer financial aid assistance options during school hours to help them fill out their student loan forms. The new requirements go into effect in the 2025-26 school year.
"In order to ensure that every student of every background in every corner of our state gets the education that they deserve, we need to leave no stone unturned and no barrier unbroken," Pritzker said.
Pritzker had said college admissions and access to higher education are top priorities of his during this year's legislative session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas becomes battleground for Democratic presidential hopefuls
A slew of potential Democratic presidential candidates are taking front-line positions in the battle over Texas and redistricting, a fight with huge implications for the midterm elections that is giving ambitious politicians a chance to show their loyalty to the party base. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), who could both be heavyweights in a 2028 primary field, are both threatening to push through new congressional lines in response to Texas. Pritzker is also playing host to some of the Texas state Democrats who fled the state. Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, another potential presidential candidate, lacks the kind of office that would allow him to set up a redistricting fight. But he's making sure he's seen on the issue and hosted a live conversation on Instagram on Monday with a Democratic representative from Texas. The Texas redistricting battle comes as Democrats have been itching for an opportunity to show voters they can put up a fight. For 2028 hopefuls, it's a chance to stand out with the Democratic grassroots. 'This is an issue that may not necessarily animate the electorate, but it ignites the base and the donor community,' said former Rep. Steve Israel (N.Y.), who led the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee from 2011 to 2015. 'Democrats like Newsom, Pritzker … among others, are at least showing that rolling over isn't a strategy.' 'You have to fight fire with fire,' Israel added. Political observers say the motivation is twofold for Democrats. The party as a whole wants to show voters they are finding their footing on the heels of a devastating loss of the White House and both houses of Congress in 2024. And possible 2028 contenders want to display their leadership potential. An AP-NORC poll released last week revealed that 25 percent of surveyed Democrats view their party as 'weak' and 'ineffective,' among other negative traits that constitute the party's record-low approval ratings. As a result, strategists say the party should amp up its resistance efforts. Newsom is following suit by countering Texas and calling for a special election in November to redraw the maps in California. Other Democratic governors have thrown their support behind them and signaled they'll look at their own maps. On Monday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D), who is up for reelection next year but is not expected to run for president in 2028, said she would follow Newsom's approach. 'All is fair in love and war,' Hochul said. Strategists say they expect other Democrats to take a similar approach. 'The one thing Democrats are aligned on right now is you got to fight and you got to get caught trying,' said Democratic strategist Joel Payne. While Payne called the redistricting battle 'a process fight' with a 'limited shelf life,' he said Democrats can play hardball on the issue to make the point that their party can put up a fight. The issue gives potential 2028 candidates an opportunity to create a brand with voters. 'It's not a defining issue, but it's a defining characteristic of a candidate,' said Republican strategist Susan Del Percio, who does not support Trump. Still, Del Percio cautioned that it's a gamble for would-be candidates like Newsom and Pritzker. 'The problem is, of course, can they get it done?' said Del Percio. 'Because if they can't, then it's something that they didn't get done that they said they were going to fight for.' 'If they fancy themselves contenders … they have to deliver something, even if it's just taking it to court,' Del Percio added. 'They've got to go at it full throttle. They also then have to be willing to say, 'You know what, we're willing to play dirty too.' I don't think that hurts a candidate in this day and age.' Democratic strategist Basil Smikle, who served as executive director of the New York State Democratic Party, said the redistricting fight is 'an important moment for Democrats.' 'I think for over a decade, Democrats lived by the 'If they go low, we go high' mantra. … You play by the rules, sort of take the high road, and then eventually everybody will kind of see things their way,' said Smikle. 'But we're well past that point.' He said that for working-class voters, 'any moment of hesitation in stepping up to that fight will cause a voter to say, 'I don't think this person is there for me, is going to be fighting for me, is going to stand up for me.'' 'That's an opening Democrats, particularly at this moment, can't afford to provide,' Smikle added. At the same time, strategists caution that as soon as Democrats — including those who are weighing bids in 2028 — start to play dirty, they could lose a talking point that has been central to campaigns and rhetoric since President Trump first took office in 2016. 'If you're saying you have a core value, and one of them, for example, is democracy, which we heard Democrats talking about an awful lot over the last eight years … then you lose that,' Del Percio said. ''We're going to play and fight dirty like Republicans,' which means you can't complain when the Republicans fight dirty.' 'And that's a big decision to make. That's putting a lot on the table for them,' she added. But some political observers say that the issue of redistricting is too far removed from voters' everyday lives for it to push them in either direction. 'Redistricting is important to all the political geeks, be they in media, be they in academia, be they in actual politics itself,' said Jon Taylor, a professor of political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio. 'But the average voter probably couldn't care less … other than noticing their member of Congress may have changed.' Jared Gans and Julia Mueller contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
S&P Warns Chicago That Pension Cost-Hike to Pressure Budget
A new law aimed at raising pension benefits for some Chicago police and firefighters risks further straining the city's finances, according to S&P Global Ratings. S&P's warning, issued on Monday, comes nearly seven months after the firm cut the city's credit rating by one notch to BBB with a stable outlook. The latest report, which did not include a rating or outlook change, follows new legislation that Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed last week.
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Illinois is the first state to ban AI therapists
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has signed a bill into law banning AI therapy in the state. This makes Illinois the first state to regulate the use of AI in mental health services. The law highlights that only licensed professionals are allowed to offer counseling services in the state and forbids AI chatbots or tools from acting as a stand-alone therapist. HB 1806, titled the Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act, also specifies that licensed therapists cannot use AI to make 'therapeutic decisions' or perform any 'therapeutic communication.' It also places constraints on how mental health professionals may use AI in their work, such as specifying that its use for 'supplementary support,' such as managing appointments, billing or other administrative work, is allowed. In a statement to Mashable , Illinois State Representative Bob Morgan said, 'We have already heard the horror stories when artificial intelligence pretends to be a licensed therapist. Individuals in crisis unknowingly turned to AI for help and were pushed toward dangerous, even lethal, behaviors.' The law enshrines steep penalties in an effort to curb such outcomes, with companies or individuals facing $10,000 in fines per violation. 'This legislation stands as our commitment to safeguarding the well-being of our residents by ensuring that mental health services are delivered by trained experts who prioritize patient care above all else,' said Mario Treto Jr., secretary of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation. The bill passed the Illinois House and Senate unanimously in a sign of overwhelming bipartisan support. The legislation is particularly notable as the Trump administration's recently-revealed AI plan outlines a 10-year moratorium on any state-level AI regulation. It also comes as OpenAI has said it is improving the ability for its models to detect mental or emotional distress and will ask users to take a break during unusually long chats.
