logo
Iran remains interested in diplomacy, foreign minister writes in FT

Iran remains interested in diplomacy, foreign minister writes in FT

Al Arabiya7 hours ago
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Tuesday said that Iran remains interested in diplomacy but 'we have good reason to have doubts about further dialogue.'
In recent days, Iran received messages indicating that the United States may be ready to return to negotiations, Araghchi wrote in an opinion piece published in the Financial Times newspaper.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's previous tariff push terrified the world economy. He's betting this time is different
Trump's previous tariff push terrified the world economy. He's betting this time is different

Arab News

time23 minutes ago

  • Arab News

Trump's previous tariff push terrified the world economy. He's betting this time is different

WASHINGTON: When President Donald Trump last rolled out tariffs this high, financial markets quaked, consumer confidence crashed and his popularity plunged. Only three months later, he's betting this time is different. In his new round of tariffs being announced this week, Trump is essentially tethering the entire world economy to his instinctual belief that import taxes will deliver factory jobs and stronger growth in the US, rather than the inflation and slowdown predicted by many economists. On Tuesday, he told his Cabinet that past presidents who hadn't aggressively deployed tariffs were 'stupid.' Ever the salesman, Trump added that it was 'too time-consuming' to try to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world, so it was just easier to send them letters, as he's doing this week, that list the tariff rates on their goods. The letters marked a change from his self-proclaimed April 2 'Liberation Day' event at the White House, where he had posterboards with the rates displayed, a choice that led to a brief market meltdown and the 90-day negotiating period with baseline 10 percent tariffs that will end Wednesday. Trump, instead, chose to send form letters with random capitalizations and punctuation and other formatting issues. 'It's a better way,' Trump said of his letters. 'It's a more powerful way. And we send them a letter. You read the letter. I think it was well crafted. And, mostly it's just a little number in there: You'll pay 25 percent, 35 percent. We have some of at 60, 70.' When Trump said those words, he had yet to issue a letter with a tariff rate higher than 40 percent, which he levied Monday on Laos and Myanmar. He plans to put 25 percent tariffs on Japan and South Korea, two major trading partners and allies deemed crucial for curbing China's economic influence. Leaders of the 14 countries tariffed so far hope to negotiate over the next three weeks before the higher rates are charged on imports. 'I would say that every case I'm treating them better than they treated us over the years,' Trump said. Three possible outcomes His approach is at odds with how major trade agreements have been produced over the last half-century, detailed sessions that could sometimes take years to solve complex differences between nations. There are three possible outcomes to this political and economic wager, each of which could drastically reshape international affairs and Trump's legacy. Trump could prove most economic experts wrong and the tariffs could deliver growth as promised. Or he could retreat again on tariffs before their Aug. 1 start in a repeat of the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' phenomenon, also known as TACO. Or he could damage the economy in ways that could boomerang against the communities that helped return him to the White House last year, as well as hurt countries that are put at a financial disadvantage by the tariffs. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, said Trump's letters had 'extended his tariff purgatory for another month,' essentially freezing in place the US economy as CEOs, foreign leaders and consumers are unclear of Trump's actual strategy on foreign trade. 'The TACO negotiating tactic pioneered by Trump is making his threats less and less credible and reducing our trading partners' willingness to even meet us halfway,' Wyden said. 'There's no sign that he's any closer to striking durable trade deals that would actually help American workers and businesses.' So far, the stock and bond markets are relatively calm, with the S&P 500 stock index essentially flat Tuesday after a Monday decline. Trump is coming off a legislative win with his multitrillion-dollar income tax cuts. And he's confidently levying tariffs at levels that previously rocked global markets, buoyed by the fact that inflation has eased so far instead of accelerating as many economists and Democratic rivals had warned. 'By floating tariffs as high as 40 percent to even 100 percent, the administration has 'normalized' the 25 percent tariff hikes — yet this is still one of the most aggressive and disruptive tariff moves in modern history,' said Wendong Zhang, an economist at Cornell University. 'This gradual unveiling, paradoxically, risks normalizing what would otherwise be considered exceptionally large tariff hikes.' Others simply see Trump as a source of nonstop chaos, with the letters and their somewhat random tariff rates showing the absence of a genuine policy process inside his administration. 'It's really just a validation that this policy is all over the place, that they're running this by the seat of their pants, that there is no real strategy,' said Desmond Lachman, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. Questions about how much money tariffs will generate With Trump's 90-day tariff negotiation period ending, he has so far sent letters to 14 countries that place taxes on imported goods ranging from 25 percent to 40 percent. He said he would sign an order Tuesday to place 50 percent tariffs on copper and said at the Cabinet meeting that at some point pharmaceutical drugs could face tariffs of as much as 200 percent. All of that is on top of his existing 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum, 25 percent tariffs on autos and his separate import taxes on Canada, Mexico and China. 'The obvious inference is that markets for now are somewhat skeptical that Trump will go through with it, or alternatively they think compromises will be reached,' said Ben May, a director of global economic research at the consultancy Oxford Economics. 'That's probably the key element.' May said the tariffs are likely to reduce the growth in US household incomes, but not cause those incomes to shrink outright. Trump has said his tariffs would close US trade imbalances, though it's unclear why he would target nations such as Tunisia that do relatively little trade with America. Administration officials say trillions of dollars in tariff revenues over the next decade would help offset the revenue losses from the continuation and expansion of his 2017 tax cuts that were signed into law Friday. The federal government has collected $98.2 billion in tariff revenues so far this year, more than double what it collected last year, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the tariff revenues could be 'well over $300 billion by the end of the year.' Bessent added that 'we don't agree' with the Congressional Budget Office estimate that tariffs would bring in $2.8 trillion over 10 years, 'which we think is probably low.' The governments of Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and South Africa have each said they hope for further negotiations on tariffs with Trump, though it's unclear how that's possible as Trump has said it would be too 'complicated' to hold all those meetings. Instead on Tuesday, Trump posted on social media that the tariffs would be charged as scheduled starting Aug. 1. 'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'No extensions will be granted. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'

Saudi Crown Prince upbeat about ceasefire opening door to regional stability, in meeting with Iranian FM
Saudi Crown Prince upbeat about ceasefire opening door to regional stability, in meeting with Iranian FM

Saudi Gazette

time38 minutes ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Saudi Crown Prince upbeat about ceasefire opening door to regional stability, in meeting with Iranian FM

Saudi Gazette report JEDDAH — Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman met with Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr. Abbas Araghchi and his accompanying delegation at Al-Salam Palace in Jeddah on Tuesday. During the meeting, Araghchi thanked Saudi Arabia for its position in condemning the Israeli aggression. The Iranian minister appreciated the Crown Prince's efforts to enhance security and stability in the region. The two leaders reviewed bilateral relations between the two countries. They also discussed the latest regional developments and the efforts being made to address them. The Crown Prince expressed Saudi Arabia's hope that the ceasefire agreement would contribute to creating the conditions for enhancing security and stability in the region. He reaffirmed the Kingdom's position in supporting dialogue through diplomatic means as a means of settling disputes. The meeting was attended by Saudi Minister of Defense Prince Khalid bin Salman; Minister of Foreign Affairs Prince Faisal bin Farhan; and Minister of State, Member of the Cabinet, and National Security Advisor Dr. Musaed Al-Aiban.

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce
Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce

WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs. The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency. The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a 'demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.' Jackson warned of enormous real-world consequences. 'This executive action promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancelation of federal programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as Congress has created it,' she wrote. The high court action continued a remarkable winning streak for Trump, who the justices have allowed to move forward with significant parts of his plan to remake the federal government. The Supreme Court's intervention so far has been on the frequent emergency appeals the Justice Department has filed objecting to lower-court rulings as improperly intruding on presidential authority. The Republican president has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate for the work, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Musk recently left his role. Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go. In May, US District Judge Susan Illston found that Trump's administration needs congressional approval to make sizable reductions to the federal workforce. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Illston's order, finding that the downsizing could have broader effects, including on the nation's food-safety system and health care for veterans. Illston directed numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management. Illston was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton. The labor unions and nonprofit groups that sued over the downsizing offered the justices several examples of what would happen if it were allowed to take effect, including cuts of 40 percent to 50 percent at several agencies. Baltimore, Chicago and San Francisco were among cities that also sued. Among the agencies affected by the order are the departments of Agriculture, Energy, Labor, the Interior, State, the Treasury and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to the National Science Foundation, Small Business Association, Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. The case now continues in Illston's court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store