&w=3840&q=100)
First Australian-made rocket crashes 14 seconds after lift-off attempt
The rocket Eris, launched by Gilmour Space Technologies, was the first Australian-designed and manufactured orbital launch vehicle to lift off from the country and was designed to carry small satellites to orbit. It launched Wednesday morning local time in a test flight from a spaceport near the small town of Bowen in the north of Queensland state.
In videos published by Australian news outlets, the 23-meter (75-foot) rocket appeared to clear the launch tower and hovered in the air before falling out of sight. Plumes of smoke were seen rising above the site.
No injuries were reported.
The company hailed the launch as a success in a statement posted to Facebook. A spokesperson said all four hybrid-propelled engines ignited and the maiden flight included 23 seconds of engine burn time and 14 seconds of flight.
Gilmour Space Technologies had planned previous launches of the rocket, in May and earlier this month, but called off those operations because of technical issues and bad weather.
CEO Adam Gilmour said in a statement he was pleased the rocket got off the launchpad.
Of course I would have liked more flight time but happy with this, he wrote on LinkedIn. Gilmour said in February that it was almost unheard of for a private rocket company to successfully launch to orbit on its first attempt.
The firm had earlier said it would consider the launch a success if the rocket left the ground. The launch site infrastructure remained intact, the statement said.
Mayor Ry Collins of the local Whitsunday Regional Council said the completed launch was a huge achievement even though the vehicle didn't reach orbit.
This is an important first step towards the giant leap of a future commercial space industry right here in our region, he wrote on Facebook.
Gilmour Space Technologies has private funders and was awarded a 5 million Australian dollar ($3.2 million) grant this month from the country's federal government for the development of the Eris rocket.
It followed the firm's 52 million Australian dollar grant agreement with the government in 2023 to advance the development and commercialization of new space technologies in Australia.
The country has been the site of hundreds of suborbital vehicle launches but there have only been two successful launches to orbit from Australia before, according to the aerospace news platform NASASpaceFlight.
The maiden Eris test flight was the first orbital launch attempt from Australia in more than 50 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
The AI Boom's Hidden Risk to the Economy
In the past two weeks one big tech company after another reported blowout earnings amid a wholesale embrace of artificial intelligence. Look a little closer, and a more unsettling side to the AI boom emerges. All the spending on chips, data centers and other AI infrastructure is draining American corporations of cash. This underscores the hidden risks from the AI boom. No one doubts its potential to raise growth and productivity in the long run. But financing that boom is straining the companies and capital markets. The AI boom props up growth Since the first quarter of 2023, investment in information processing equipment has expanded 23%, after inflation, while total gross domestic product has expanded just 6%. In the first half of the year, information processing investment contributed more than half the sluggish 1.2% overall growth rate. In effect, AI spending propped up the economy while consumer spending stagnated. Much of that investment consists of the graphics-processing units, memory chips, servers, and networking gear to train and run the large language models at the heart of the boom. And all that computing power needs buildings, land and power generation. This is transforming big tech's business models. Chart For years, investors loved those models because they were 'asset-light.' They earned their profits on intangible assets such as intellectual property, software, and digital platforms with 'network effects.' Users flocked to Facebook, Google, the iPhone, and Windows because other users did. Adding revenue required little in the way of more buildings and equipment, making them cash-generating machines. This can be seen in a metric called free cash flow, roughly defined as cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures. It excludes things such as noncash impairment charges that can distort net income. This is arguably the purest measure of a business's underlying cash-generating potential. Amazon, for example, tells investors: 'Our financial focus is on long-term, sustainable growth in free cash flow.' From 2016 through 2023, free cash flow and net earnings of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft grew roughly in tandem. But since 2023, the two have diverged. The four companies' combined net income is up 73%, to $91 billion, in the second quarter from two years earlier, while free cash flow is down 30% to $40 billion, according to FactSet data. Apple, a relative piker on capital spending, has also seen free cash flow lag behind. For all of AI's obvious economic potential, the financial return remains a question mark. OpenAI and Anthropic, the two leading stand-alone developers of large language models, though growing fast, are losing money. Much of big tech companies' latest profits reflect their established franchises: ad spending for Meta and Alphabet, the iPhone for Apple. As to when their AI hardware will pay off, they counsel patience. Meta, parent of Facebook, reported a 36% rise in earnings for the second quarter, but a 22% drop in free cash flow. It said capital expenditure in 2025 would be roughly double last year's, with 'similarly significant' growth in 2026. Meta has said much of its AI-related capital spending supports core businesses, such as ads and content, and is already paying off. The balance goes toward generative AI such as its Llama model. 'We are early in the life cycle' of the latter investments, Chief Financial Officer Susan Li told analysts, and 'we don't expect that we are going to be realizing significant revenue from any of those things in the near term.' Amazon began tapering its build-out of fulfillment centers in 2022, allowing free cash flow to turn positive. But in the last year, it has ramped up investment in Amazon Web Services, which hosts data and runs AI models for outside clients, and free cash flow is down by two-thirds from the previous year. Meta is among the major tech companies making big AI-related capital expenditures. Dot-com echoes For now, investors are pricing big tech as if their asset-heavy business will be as profitable as their asset-light models. So far, 'we don't have any evidence of that,' said Jason Thomas, head of research at Carlyle Group. 'The variable people miss out on is the time horizon. All this capital spending may prove productive beyond their wildest dreams, but beyond the relevant time horizon for their shareholders,' he added. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the nascent internet boom had investors throwing cash at startup web companies and broadband telecommunications carriers. They were right the internet would drive a productivity boom, but wrong about the financial payoff. Many of those companies couldn't earn enough to cover their expenses and went bust. In broadband, excess capacity caused pricing to plunge. The resulting slump in capital spending helped cause a mild recession in 2001. A dot-com-style bust looks far-fetched now. AI's big spenders are mature and profitable companies, and the demand for computing power exceeds the supply. But if their revenue and profit assumptions prove too optimistic, their current pace of capital spending will be hard to sustain. Amazon Web Services is spending $11 billion on a data center campus near South Bend, Ind. The interest-rate effect After the global financial crisis of 2007-09, big tech was both a beneficiary of low interest rates, and a cause. Between that crisis and Covid, these companies were generating five to eight times as much cash from operations as they invested, and that spare cash was recycled back into the financial system, Thomas, of Carlyle Group, estimates. It helped hold down long-term interest rates amid high federal deficits, as did inflation below the Federal Reserve's 2% target and the Fed buying bonds. Low interest rates, in turn, made investors value these companies' future profits even more highly. Today, government deficits are even larger, inflation is above 2% and the Fed has been shrinking its bondholdings. Meanwhile, corporations face steep investment needs to exploit AI and reshore production to avoid tariffs. Thomas estimates that since 2020, their cumulative free cash flow has been 78% lower, relative to GDP, than in the equivalent period following 2009. All this suggests that interest rates need to be substantially higher in the years ahead than in the years before the pandemic. That is another risk to the economy and these companies that investors may not fully appreciate. Write to Greg Ip at The AI Boom's Hidden Risk to the Economy
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
5 Highest-Paid Indian IT Bosses
5 Highest-Paid Indian IT Bosses 4 Aug, 2025 Credit: Getty HCLTech's C Vijayakumar became the highest-paid Indian IT CEO with Rs 94.6 crore in annual pay for FY 2024–25. His salary rose 7.9% from last year and includes Rs 56.9 crore in restricted stock units. Credit: Linkedin C Vijayakumar Infosys CEO Salil Parekh received a 22% hike, taking his total annual compensation to Rs 80.6 crore. Credit: India Today Salil Parekh Wipro's Srinivas Pallia, in his debut year as CEO, earned Rs 53.6 crore after assuming the role in April 2024. Credit: PTI Srinivas Pallia TCS CEO K Krithivasan earned Rs 26.5 crore in FY24, marking a 4.6% year-on-year increase. K Krithivasan SN Subrahmanyan, L&T's CMD who earlier drew flak for backing a 90-hour work week, saw his FY25 pay jump nearly 50% to Rs 76.25 crore—mainly due to stock options exercised. SN Subrahmanyan
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tesla's July China-made EV sales fall 8.4%
Synopsis Deliveries of Tesla's China-made Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, including exports to Europe and other markets, reached 67,886 units last month, down 5.2% from June.
