
EU tech rules not included in US trade talks, EU Commission says
BRUSSELS :The European Union's landmark rules reining in the power of Big Tech and requiring them to do more to police the Internet are not part of trade talks with the United States, a European Commission spokesperson said on Monday.
"The legislations will not be changed. The DMA (Digital Markets Act) and the DSA (Digital Services Act) are not on the table in the trade negotiations with the U.S.," spokesperson Thomas Regnier told a daily news conference.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
No country for Mad Men
THERE was a time when this marketing quip – 'Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half' – was good for a titter. Now, such a flippant statement must make even the most sanguine adman twitch nervously instead. The twitching would have intensified last month on the news that Meta aims to fully automate the generation of ads on its platforms with artificial intelligence (AI) by the end of 2026. All a prospective advertiser will need is a product image and a budget, and Meta will take it from there, generating copy, visuals and video that will be buttressed by the company's targeting and measurement abilities. TikTok, too, is making further incursions into Mad Men territory with tools that enable marketers to turn text or images into video ads on the platform. These features will join its existing arsenal of digital avatars and voice-overs that it already offers through its video-editing service for advertisers. The writing is on the wall for the ad industry, it seems, and it's being wrought by a large-language model. Upstream and downstream, the ranks of creatives, media planners and analytics people risk being hollowed out by this AI onslaught. Invariably, when Silicon Valley overturns an incumbent's apple cart, its bedraggled pitch is that the pie will ultimately get bigger, and there will be enough demand to go around. But somehow, it is Big Tech that often ends up with the largest slice. This has been illustrated across various kinds of upended apple carts. Alphabet, Meta and Amazon collectively account for more than half the global digital advertising expenditure. In the US, YouTube and Netflix, respectively, have the largest and second-largest share of all TV viewership. In e-commerce, Amazon was taking a cut of more than half of sellers' revenue by 2023, said a study by e-commerce intelligence firm Marketplace Pulse. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In advertising, the ice has started rattling ominously in major players' whisky glasses. Year to date, the share prices of the world's largest ad firms have fallen by between 7 and 40 per cent, a proxy for how unevenly the industry is absorbing the shock of evolving viewing habits and tech disruption. The AI scythe being wielded by Meta and its peers will produce similarly uneven outcomes. For now, ad firms servicing the largest corporate accounts remain relatively safe, because established brands continue to spend on full-suite services. But it is unclear how long such a moat will hold. No Fortune 500 firm is immune to AI's siren call of cheaper production and fatter margins. And while purists reflexively recoil from the prospect of 'AI slop' being churned out by Big Tech's ad machine, I rather suspect that people do not have a problem with AI per se, but simply with AI being deployed poorly. Make the quality gap between man-made and machine-generated content small enough, stuff whatever crevice remains with cost savings and a wad of novelty, and eventually, we will drink the new flavour of Kool-Aid being marketed through an AI-generated Instagram ad. Today, the concept of not knowing which half of advertising is wasted grows more anachronistic by the month. Instead, a far more pressing question is which half of the ad industry will survive this generative AI blitz.


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
‘Quality is key': Dior's CEO Delphine Arnault on opening a new chapter at the maison
Dior chief executive Delphine Arnault has said she is opening 'a new chapter' at LVMH's second-biggest brand, emphasising that 'quality is key' as new creative director Jonathan Anderson makes his runway debut amid a luxury downturn. The appointment of the Northern Ireland-born designer in May 2025 made him the first designer since the brand's founder, Christian Dior, to oversee both the men's and women's collections. He is assuming creative control of a brand with an estimated €9.5 billion (US$11.14 billion; S$14.21 billion) in revenues at a time of deteriorating luxury demand, especially in Asia. The choice of Anderson, 40, is the biggest bet by Arnault — eldest child and only daughter of LVMH chair and chief executive Bernard Arnault — since she took the helm in 2023 from former star executive Pietro Beccari, who moved to Louis Vuitton. Anderson, who grew up in the small town of Magherafelt during the Troubles, kicked off Dior's new era with a menswear show last Friday (Jun 27). 'Dior is a fascinating brand,' Arnault told the Financial Times from her office in Paris. 'I worked at Dior from 2001 until 2013, so it's the brand that I know. The growth was spectacular but I think my role as the CEO is to know when it's time to change. And now it's a new chapter.' 'I'm interested to see what is going to come up . . . in a way that's very elevated, very qualitative,' said Arnault of her hopes for Anderson's new designs. 'The next five years is going to be all about quality in the materials and the manufacturing. Quality is key.' Before the current downturn Dior had been one of the luxury industry's star performers. Revenues quadrupled to €9.5 billion between 2017 and 2023, according to estimates from HSBC, helped by extensive price rises. But Arnault's tenure has thus far coincided with a sharp slowdown in the luxury market, especially in China, and consumer pushback against price inflation. Already fragile consumer confidence could be damaged further by the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Meanwhile, a scandal involving labour practices at subcontractors in Italy — Dior agreed to settle a probe last month 'without establishing any infringement' — has tarnished the brand's image. 'The focus [for Arnault] is on reinvigorating sales growth in the aftermath of a period of booming sales,' said Zuzanna Pusz, European luxury goods analyst at UBS. 'But also focusing on re-establishing the value for money relationship in the eyes of the consumer, especially for leather goods.' In April, LVMH's chief financial officer Cecile Cabanis told analysts that Dior's first quarter organic sales growth was 'slightly below' the 5 per cent drop seen across its fashion and leather goods division. The appointment of Anderson is part of Dior's attempt to find a new creative impetus after nine years under outgoing designer Maria Grazia Chiuri. Anderson, formerly creative director of Loewe, left the Spanish brand last year with a catalogue of hits to his name, including its hammock and puzzle bags, as well as a series of critically acclaimed runway collections. Loewe's revenues rose from about €230 million to between €1.5 billion and €2 billion over the course of Anderson's 11-year stint, according to Bernstein analyst Luca Solca's estimates. At Dior, however, Anderson is overseeing a far bigger creative operation — especially in his combined role. Arnault does not expect the brand's new creative head to have an immediate impact on sales. 'I'm really excited about what's next but I think it takes a couple of seasons to understand the vision of a designer,' said Arnault, adding that Anderson was a choice that reflected 'long-term thinking'. Anderson's appointment coincides with a series of executive changes at Dior, including the appointment of former Louis Vuitton executive Pierre-Emmanuel Angeloglou as deputy chief executive. Following the subcontractor scandal in Italy, Dior has created a new industrial division to produce more designs in-house, overseen by Giorgio Striano, who was hired from EssilorLuxottica. Nicolas Carre, another former Louis Vuitton executive, joined Dior as industrial director for leather goods, shoes and fashion jewellery. 'It's about finding the best talents and making them work together,' said Arnault, who worked with many of the team in her previous role at Vuitton, from 2013 to 2022. 'I think we need to have the best teams in terms of creatives . . . but also in terms of the management of the company.' Arnault did not respond to questions about the impact of tariffs on the business but she reaffirmed that the US market — one of luxury's largest by sales — remained critical. Dior plans to open a new Manhattan flagship store in July, and another store on LA's Rodeo Drive in October. But the turbulence in the US under President Donald Trump — whose inauguration was attended by Delphine, Alexandre and Bernard Arnault — has blunted hopes that US shoppers would lead a luxury industry recovery this year. Pusz at UBS said that while the current environment was difficult for luxury Anderson 'seems well suited' for the challenge, citing his record of innovation, delivering a 'powerful brand message', as well as recruiting and managing teams of talented designers. Anderson, who is also creative director and majority owner of an eponymous brand, JW Anderson, will now deliver up to 18 collections every year. But Arnault seemed unfazed by the additional pressures on him, or the risk that the Northern Irishman could suffer creative burnout. 'He's 40, I think he's the most talented designer of his generation,' she said. 'I think he can do a lot of amazing things.'


CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Canada U-turn leaves Europe in the lurch on US tech taxes
PARIS: Canada's dropping of a tax on US tech giants under the pressure of Donald Trump is fuelling concern about the future of such levies in other countries, particularly in Europe. "Currently, about half of all European OECD countries have either announced, proposed, or implemented" a digital services tax pending global action, said the Tax Foundation, a think tank which supports the introduction of such taxes. But the future of such measures is unclear after the Group of Seven nations agreed Saturday (Jun 28) to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries. The move sparked a pointed reaction from Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz. "This is about more than trade - it's about whether democratically elected governments can regulate and tax powerful corporations or whether tech billionaires can dictate policy through political proxies," he said. WHO HAS IMPOSED SUCH A TAX? Austria, Brazil, Britain, France, India, Italy, Spain and Türkiye are a dozen large countries which have imposed or plan to impose special taxes on big tech firms. The objective is to force them to pay taxes where they carry out business, as well as to counter the tax optimisation strategies they often practice. Generally, the taxes target sales revenue and focus essentially on US firms like Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Facebook (Meta) and Microsoft. But they differ from one country to another in terms of sales that are taxed, with some targeting advertising revenue and others targeting sales of data. "Most of the proposed or adopted rates are in the 2-5 per cent range," of the revenue stream targeted, according to analysts at the Canadian Tax Foundation. Most nations adopted the taxes pending a global agreement which would see multinational companies pay some taxes in countries where they operate, but the prospects for such a deal now look bleak. WHAT THESE TAXES GENERATE The taxes tend to raise more money year after year, according to the latest data from the EU Tax Observatory, which dates from June 2023. Britain, France, India, Italy and Türkiye have seen steady increases in the revenue their taxes generate. Both Britain and France raised approximately US$1.1 billion last year via their digital services taxes. Italy saw its revenue from the tax jump by 90 per cent from 2021 to over $530 million last year, according to local media. But Spain, which hoped to raise more than a billion per year via its tax, only raised around US$350 million in 2023, according to La Vanguardia daily. OTHER DOMINOES TO FALL? Before Canada, India had already halted in April its six per cent tax on online advertising by foreign firms against the background of trade talks with the United States. The taxes may fall elsewhere. While Britain has reached a trade deal with the United States to avoid the worst tariffs, it wants to go further and has refused to rule out a modification or elimination of its digital services tax. EU nations so far haven't indicated that the tax is on the table. A German government spokesman said Monday that Canada's dropping its tech tax had "absolutely no bearing" on Berlin's position as it considers it considers its tax policies. But worries remain. National digital service taxes are "vulnerable to economic and political threats - particularly from the US, which has historically protected its digital multinationals from fair taxation abroad," said the Tax Justice Network, a coalition of researchers and activists.