logo
Deleting your entire Instagram like Lauren Sánchez Bezos is the ultimate power m

Deleting your entire Instagram like Lauren Sánchez Bezos is the ultimate power m

Metro2 days ago
Amid the vows, the yachts, and the threats of inflatable crocodiles, Lauren Sánchez Bezos did something quietly radical: she wiped her entire Instagram profile.
Her account, which has 1.1 million followers, now contains just two photos from her wedding extravaganza to billionaire Jeff Bezos: a solo shot showcasing her Dolce & Gabbana dress, and a pair of the smiling newlyweds walking hand in hand.
Though her bio still lists her as an Emmy award-winning journalist and NYT bestselling author, any further evidence of a former professional or personal life has been deleted.
It's a relationship rebrand we've seen before, most famously with Meghan Markle, who deleted her Lifestyle blog and personal social media accounts shortly after announcing her engagement to Prince Harry in 2018.
And, like every high profile Instagram hiatus that came before it, Mrs Amazon's evolution has led to a debate in the group chat.
Is this another example of a woman making herself quieter, more palatable, to fulfill the public persona of 'the good wife'?
Or could it actually be the ultimate power move, from a woman who is increasingly telling the world that she does not care what you think. Like, at all.
Psychotherapist and relationship author Lucy Beresford says she frequently sees clients – women in particular – rebranding themselves on social media at the end of one relationship or the start of another. But it's not about pretending the past didn't happen.
'I don't think we should necessarily see it as fake,' she tells Metro. 'It's very much about women owning their story. They're in control of their finances, they're in control of their careers. Why would they not want to be in control of the stories about their relationships?'
It's women who make headlines when they make public statements about who they are, because society has a history of putting 'women in boxes'.
It's for this very reason that a social media purge can feel cathartic, argues Lucy, noting that it has become the modern day equivalent of getting a new haircut to mark new beginnings.
'It's almost like clearing out the attic, right? It's about saying: 'I'm fully embracing the me that I am now, and nothing's going to stop me. This is the next chapter of my life and time.'' https://www.instagram.com/p/DLa1ycPSPWm/
We all know social media is a performative highlights reel, not an accurate archive of daily life. As Lucy puts it, you wouldn't expect to see someone picking up their dog's poo, but we all know it happens.
So, why do we expect the profiles of the rich and famous to reflect every aspect of their life? And does it really matter if we choose to curate ours by removing an ex or an old memory or two?
'It's about saying somewhere in my heart, that relationship is part of me, but I don't need to have it now on my Instagram page,' she argues.
For Lauren Sanchez Bezos in particular, this dramatic move seems aligned with her own unapologetic brand. Her fashion choices have contributed to British Vogue declaring that 'chic is dead'. And rightly or oh-so wrongly, she pushed ahead with the $46 million Venice wedding, in a dispay of wealth so ostentatious, so tonally absurd in a world where thousands are trapped in war or starving, that it led to weeks of protests and widespread criticism.
This is a woman who – like it or not – has the world at her disposal. Maybe she just wanted a clean slate, or an aesthetically pleasing grid. Maybe, it's just not that deep?
For mere mortals considering a mass social media deletion, Lucy recommends some self scrutiny. 'Are trying to perform for a particular audience?' she asks.
If you're tempted to delete old friendships, relationships and work-related posts, pause to think about why and avoid any kneejerk decisions. And of course, you should never feel pressure to present a certain way online because a new partner has told you to.
'If somebody wanted to end their therapeutic relationship with me, I would advise them to not end there and then that day, we would work towards it,' Lucy says. 'Similarly, funerals take time, because you need to process emotions. More Trending
'If you're going to do deletions on social media, build up to it. Have a sense of gratitude for everything that's gone before.'
Ultimately, we won't know whether Lauren has gone full tradwife or billionaire baddie until she makes her next move. But her social media move has gained her some fans – whether she cares or not is another matter.
'Letting go is a really hard thing to do, so I really admire her for that, actually,' says Lucy.
'There are so many people who hold onto memories, but what Lauren has done can be very empowering.'
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: I'm a luxury wedding planner — we should all be thrilled by Jeff Bezos' celebrations
MORE: Who's who at Jeff Bezos's $10,000,000 wedding as A-list guests 'descend on Venice'
MORE: Jeff Bezos's foam party proves all the money in the world can't buy taste
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caitlin Clark is shocked as teammate performs lewd sexual act on her during locker-room live stream
Caitlin Clark is shocked as teammate performs lewd sexual act on her during locker-room live stream

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Caitlin Clark is shocked as teammate performs lewd sexual act on her during locker-room live stream

Caitlin Clark was left stunned after one of her Indiana Fever teammates performed a lewd sexual act on her while celebrating their WNBA Commissioner's Cup triumph. Despite Clark being ruled out of Tuesday night's final with a groin injury, Indiana still ran out 74-59 winners over the Minnesota Lynx to claim the trophy, with Natasha Howard putting up a game-high 16 points in the victory. And after getting their hands on silverware, Fever players headed back to the locker room for a wild party which caused quite a stir online. Clark, who has been out of action for the past week, was at the center of the most viral moment from the locker-room festivities after joining her teammates to celebrate the victory on Tuesday night. The reigning WNBA Rookie of the Year was leaning over to talk to the camera during an Instagram live recording when Fever guard Sydney Colson snuck up from behind and jokingly tried to dry hump her. 'Woah bro,' Clark said as she jumped up in shock before laughing, 'absolutely not, no thank you!' Syd hit Caitlin Clark from the back 😭💀 — BricksCenter (@BricksCenter) July 2, 2025 Sophie Cunningham twerking after winning the Cup 😭 — BricksCenter (@BricksCenter) July 2, 2025 Elsewhere in the celebrations, new Indiana hero Sophie Cunningham was also seen twerking in front of the camera during the same Instagram live session. Cunningham has become a fan favorite in recent weeks after coming to Clark's rescue when tempers flared during last month's game against the Connecticut Sun. After her star teammate was brutally shoved to the ground by Connecticut's Marina Mabrey following an altercation with Jacy Sheldon, the Fever guard was later praised for committing a hard and blatant foul of her own on the latter. 'It was a buildup for a couple of years now of [referees] just not protecting the star player of the WNBA,' Cunningham said after the game about Clark. 'And so at the end of the day, I'm going to protect my teammates. That's what I do. And I'm a team player, so it's all good.' Tuesday night's WNBA Cup win means Cunningham, Clark and Co will share a $500,000 prize pool while also taking home the trophy. Indiana last clinched the WNBA Championship back in 2012, meaning it was the first time the franchise has been able to celebrate a title win for over a decade.

Celebs react as Diddy is found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering
Celebs react as Diddy is found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering

Daily Mirror

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Celebs react as Diddy is found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering

50 Cent and Aubrey O'Day were among the celebrities sharing their reaction to the news Sean 'P Diddy' Combs has been found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering Famous faces have joined the public in sharing their shock at Sean ' P Diddy ' Combs being found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering. The rapper, 55, dropped to his knees in court as a jury of eight men and four women acquitted him of the two most serious counts against him today (Wednesday, July 2). The Bad Boy Records founder was found guilty of transportation to engage in prostitution, relating to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and a woman referred to as Jane. During the two month trial, the court heard how Combs had flown people around the country, including his girlfriends and paid male sex workers, to engage in sexual encounters, a felony violation of the federal Mann Act. However, Combs has now been acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges, relating to allegations that he forced his former girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex encounters – known as 'Freak-Offs.' And following the announcement, celebrities took to social media to let their feelings be known. Among them was singer Aubrey O'Day. Taking to her Instagram Stories, she shared a clip of reports of the verdict. She captioned the post: "Wow." And she could be heard saying: "Oh my God. Not guilty on Cassie. Not guilty on Rico. No way is Jane going to be guilty. This makes me physically ill." 50 Cent also shared an image of himself, created using AI, as he wrote: "Diddy beat the Feds that boy a bad man ! beat the Rico, he the Gay John Gotti." Piers Morgan also typed: "Wow...." as he reshared the verdict on Twitter/X. He had earlier penned: "Diddy's going down. Just a question now of how many convictions he gets, and how long a sentence… The reactions come as Cassie also spoke out after the verdict. Her lawyer issued a statement saying: "This entire criminal process started when our client Cassie Ventura had the courage to file her civil complaint in November 2023. "Although the jury did not find Combs guilty of sex trafficking Cassie beyond a reasonable doubt, she paved the way for a jury to find him guilty of transportation to engage in prostitution. "By coming forward with her experience, Cassie has left an indelible mark on both the entertainment industry and the fight for justice. "We must repeat – with no reservation – that we believe and support our client who showed exemplary courage throughout this trial. "She displayed unquestionable strength and brought attention to the realities of powerful men in our orbit and the misconduct that has persisted for decades without repercussion. This case proved that change is long overdue, and we will continue to fight on behalf of survivors.'

Mystery over rock band 'that doesn't exist' with over 600,000 streams
Mystery over rock band 'that doesn't exist' with over 600,000 streams

Metro

time31 minutes ago

  • Metro

Mystery over rock band 'that doesn't exist' with over 600,000 streams

A mysterious new band is climbing the charts on Spotify, racking up over half a million listens in just a few days. The Velvet Sundown sound familiar, and their songs are perfectly listenable, if not the next Sweet Jane. But they're causing controversy because people think they're entirely AI-generated, and you can see why. They either don't exist at all, or they're pretending to be AI for a marketing gimmick. According to their 'verified artist' Spotify profile, the band was 'formed by singer and mellotron player Gabe Farrow, guitarist Lennie West, Milo Rains, who crafts the band's textured synth sounds, and free-spirited percussionist Orion 'Rio' Del Mar'. Only problem is, none of them have any social media presence or evidence of existing outside of this bio, and the band itself only started posting on X and Instragram three days ago. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Not quite what you'd expect if they'd been gigging and promoting themselves for years before their big break. Their official Instagram account references the controversy with a video captioned: 'They said we're not real. Maybe you aren't either.' Equally enigmatically, their bio reads: 'A band you might have heard once in a dream. This one has only just begun.' But their online presence is even odder than this, as there are several different accounts claiming to be them on both X and Instagram, one of which has been very outspoken insisting they are not AI. They wrote: 'This is not a joke. This is our music, written in long, sweaty nights in a cramped bungalow in California with real instruments, real minds, and real soul. Every chord, every lyric, every mistake — HUMAN.' But the plot thickens, as a different Velvet Sundown account on X (the one linked to in the band's Spotify profile) indicated the first account wasn't even them at all. They wrote: 'To all the journalists who wrote about us — Thank you for listening. However, these are the only official pages of the band. All others are reflections, echoes, projections. Don't amplify what isn't us.' The possibly fake X account has more followers than the official X account, and also started posting first, so you can see why people are getting confused about all of this. 🚨 Absolutely crazy that so-called 'journalists' keep pushing the lazy, baseless theory that The Velvet Sundown is 'AI-generated' with zero evidence. Not a single one of these "writers" has reached out, visited a show, or listened beyond the Spotify algorithm. 1/ — The Velvet Sundown (Band) – Official 🎸🎶🎧 (@Velvet_Sundown) June 29, 2025 We asked to speak to the people behind the (fake?) X account and they agreed to talk, but did not yet reply when we asked if it could be a video call. The band also has at least five Instagram accounts, one of which is filled with what looks like AI generated images. These images are part of the reason the band has been accused of being fake, with oddities in the images like fudged fingers or a guitar with disappearing strings. But again, the band now say this is not their official account, which has only one promo video on the grid. Deezer, a rival music streaming service, has tagged the Velvet Sundown's music as being AI generated. This had nothing to do with the images or promotion surrounding them, but was down to analysis of the music itself. Aurelien Herault, Chief Innovation Officer at Deezer, told Metro: We have trained our detection tool using datasets from a number of generative models, including Suno and Udio, which means that our detection tool is able to recognise the signals and sounds in fully AI-generated music that you don't find in authentic tracks. 'We have also made significant progress in training our detection tool to identify AI tracks even without a specific dataset to train on. 'Thanks to our tool, we are confident that the album pages that are currently tagged generated by AI on our platform are generated by AI.' Their software flagged The Velvet Sundown as being AI before the contoversy erupted, and so a label is now shown to users warning 'AI generated content. Some tracks on this album may have been created using artificial intelligence.' It's growing, and Deezer say they now see 20,000 tracks which are 100% AI generated submitted every single day, which has doubled from the start of the year. Mr Herault told Metro that artifically generated music now makes up approximately 18% of all tracks delivered to the platform. He said: 'At Deezer we want to prioritise revenues going to real artists, which is why we remove fully AI-generated tracks from algorithmic or editorial recommendations. 'We don't believe AI music is inherently good or bad, but we believe music fans have a right to know what they are listening to, which is why we opt for a transparent approach and tag AI-generated music on Deezer, in order to build trust with our users.' As the tech continues to improve, we will no doubt get tracks which sound great and are made by AI, at the same time as becomes more integrated in filmmaking and yes, maybe takes your white collar job. Spotify has been investing heavily in AI, and you can now use it to make you playlists or listen to a DJ curating songs for you. But it has also been accused of adding AI generated music to popular playlists like Ambient Chill and Peaceful Piano, without it being obvious to users. The company has not commented on this, but previously said it was 'categorically untrue' that it was creating AI music itself to fill playlists. Instagram has introduced a tag to show if something is made using AI, and videos made by Google Veo are watermarked. However, the industry standard is less clear when it comes to AI music, with Deezer currently the only streaming platform to tag it as such. One way scammers might benefit from uploading AI music to streaming platforms is by getting enough streams to earn them royalties. There are even so-called 'streaming farms' where tracks are listened to over and over again to try and game the system. So a song could be made by AI and listened to by bots on repeat, with humans barely part of the musical process at all. It would be too obvious if an unknown artist suddenly racked up millions of streams (much like with the Velvet Sundown). So to get around this, fraudsters flood streaming platforms with lots of fake songs which are each streamed just a few thousands times: enough to make money, but less likely to make people suspicious. Explaining the problem, Mr Herault said: If an artist is able to gain a significant number of users streaming their music, they then become entitled to a bigger share of the royalty pool. More Trending 'This is true whether an artist is using AI or not; the only difference being that AI music is significantly easier to produce.' He said that fraudulent streams 'are often generated by streaming farms or bots, which repeatedly 'listen' to tracks in order to inflate their streams and increase their share of the royalty pool.' Deezer said that up to 70% of streams of fully AI tracks are fraudulent, though currently AI tracks only make up 0.5% of overall streams. The company said: 'When detecting stream manipulation of any kind, Deezer excludes the streams from the royalty payments.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Legendary 70s rock band tease reunion tour after retiring over frontman's serious injury MORE: Rock star shares hospital bed update after 'very aggressive' cancer diagnosis MORE: I worked at Wimbledon for 40 years — now a machine has taken my job

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store