logo
Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

The former minister also criticised comments Mr Ewing made last weekend that independence should be put "on the back burner" for a decade while the Scottish Government focused on improving public services.
In a wide ranging interview, the MSP for the Highlands and Islands, 27, who was the youngest MSP to be elected in 2021, also spoke about how she responded to being on a "hit list" of female SNP MSPs some in the party reportedly wanted to oust.
READ MORE:
And she described how she felt after being sacked as equalities minister by First Minister John Swinney and her hopes for a return to government one day.
Mr Ewing, a former rural affairs secretary and the son of the late SNP trailblazer Winnie Ewing, shocked the world of Scottish politics last week, when he announced he would be standing against the SNP as an independent candidate in his seat of Inverness and Nairn at the Holyrood election next year.
The 67-year-old, who now sits as an independent MSP, has pointed to his prominent role and personal support in the constituency in his bid for re-election.
But speaking to The Herald Ms Roddick cast doubt on whether Mr Ewing's personal support in the constituency would help him win as she underlined her optimism she would retake the seat for the SNP.
READ MORE:
"What we have in Inverness is not a party built around any one person. It's a fantastic group of grassroots-led local activists which believes in a vision of an independent Scotland where we treat everybody more fairly, and the Highlands gets an equal say in national issues and policy decisions. So I will be relying on that campaign and we can win in the way we have won every election since 1999," she said.
"What is more important than any one person is what you are standing for. My message and the SNP's message has always been clear about what we are trying to do and I believe I can get that message across."
She was asked if she was concerned that a pro-UK party could win the seat with the pro-independence vote split by both the SNP and Mr Ewing.
She said: "I will certainly be making it very clear to SNP supporters that that's what we want to avoid. If they do vote on the basis of seeking Scotland's independence or even greater powers for the Highlands it needs to be the SNP and me who they go for."
SNP MSP Emma Roddick speaks to The Herald's Kathleen Nutt (Image: GordonTerris/Herald&Times) She was asked if she agreed with Mr Ewing's comments that independence should be put on the backburner for a decade.
"Absolutely not," she said arguing that independence "shouldn't be seen as an alternative to dealing with a crisis or immediate issues. Because the reason why we are not able to react in the way we want to to things like the Covid pandemic, the cost of living crisis, Brexit, is because we do not have full powers.
"I expect there will be events and crises in the next session, whether that is related to growing tensions in the world, the UK's part in those tensions, artificial intelligence, climate change, global challenges that we have and as a country we react to.
"It's very likely that we are going to face other situations, where we would want greater powers at our disposal to react. For me having independence as these things continue to come up is vital."
Ms Roddick highlighted differences between her and Mr Ewing's views on social and equality issues, and on fox hunting.
(Image: Gordon Terris) She is a strong advocate for equal marriage and supported the Scottish Government's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which was designed to make the process easier for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate.
Mr Ewing voted against both equal marriage and gender recognition reform, and opposed an outright ban on fox hunting in 2001 whilst a member of the rural development committee.
"I know this doesn't come across in descriptions of me online but I have never prioritised talking about social issues. For me it's quite a fundamental issue in the same way that independence is," she said.
"I just believe in equality for everyone, that Scotland should have its own say in decisions that are made for the country.
"I accept that I am very closely aligned to a lot of these issues that Fergus is on the absolute opposite [side] of. Being a member of the LGBTQ+ community I just will always stick up for others in that community, especially in the face of hate crime and attempts to remove rights."
She added: "I am not keen on fox hunting. I am happy with equal marriage ... he is happy with fox hunting."
Ms Roddick was highly critical of the SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn's decision to stand as a candidate for Aberdeen South and North Kincardine at the Holyrood election next year while holding onto his Aberdeen South seat until the next general election. He made his intention public in a newspaper interview in November last year. (Mr Flynn later backed down saying he will step down as an MP to become an MSP.)
Months after her criticism, in February this year, Ms Roddick appeared on a 'hit list' of female SNP MSPs. It had been reportedly drawn up by allies of Mr Flynn who wanted the five women listed to be replaced with ex-SNP MPs. Senior SNP figures denied Mr Flynn drew up such a list.
But Ms Roddick believed the list existed and that she was on it.
She said: "It wasn't surprised in the slightest. I am on a lot of lists. I experience a lot of misogyny in this role."
She pointed out she had criticised the former Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross for being both an MP and an MP and couldn't say "nothing" when someone in her party was "then trying to do the same."
She was asked how she would get on with Mr Flynn if they are both elected to Holyrood next year, she said: "I've just spent four years in a group with Fergus Ewing, I'm sure I'll cope. I will more than happily chat to him. I have good relationships with MSPs in every party in this place. It is harder when criticism comes from your own party."
Ms Roddick was appointed equalities minister by First Minister Humza Yousaf in 2023 but ceased to continue in the post under his successor Mr Swinney.
The Herald pointed out she was sacked as equalities minister when John Swinney became First Minister. At the time Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Greens co-leader, suggested her exit from government raised concerns over a potential watering down of equalities legislation.
"How did it feel being removed as a minister from a job you presumably much loved?" we asked.
"There were very mixed feelings around that at the time. I was excited to take on being a member of the rural affairs and islands committee," she said after a long pause.
"The week that I left government I joined the committee and was immediately immersed in the agriculture and rural communities bill."
Pressed if she was sad to leave the ministerial role, she said: "No I think I'm happy with what I achieved [as equalities minister] and since."
And asked if she would like to return to government? "If it were the right role," she said.
Mr Ewing said: "An answer to all of this would be almost as long as the A9 - which of course has not been dualled.
"Broken promises to the Highlands cannot be ignored; competent government must be restored; and the main parties must work together like non-politician grown-ups do if Scotland is to be a better place."
Mr Flynn was approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests
Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests

Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests

Rachel Reeves's radical pensions overhaul will only 'slightly' benefit savers, Labour's own research suggests. Unearthed government documents show that changes brought in by Pension Schemes Bill will provide just 'slightly greater expected returns', despite the Chancellor's promises to deliver 'bigger pots for savers.' The Bill, which is set to become law next year, proposes giving regulators the ability to force defined contribution schemes to invest in private markets. But in a best case scenario, this will only add £5,000 to an average pension pot after 30 years, Government forecasts show. Experts have repeatedly warned that the Chancellor risks 'sacrificing' people's long-term retirement goals in pursuit of economic growth. Meanwhile, Ms Reeves has claimed that the Bill is a 'game changer' that would deliver bigger returns. Currently, the majority of defined contribution schemes are invested in public markets, such as government and corporate bonds or stocks and shares. The private market, such as start-ups and infrastructure projects, only makes up a small portion of pension fund portfolios. But under Ms Reeves's changes, regulators could be given a reserve power to force schemes to invest in UK private markets. Mike Ambery, of Standard Life, said he did not expect the reserve power to be used, but he questioned why it was added to the Bill in the first place when already positively being actioned. Under the voluntary Mansion House Accord, 17 of the UK's largest defined contribution scheme providers pledged to invest at least 5pc of their assets in UK private markets by 2030. Defined contribution pensions are schemes that savers pay in to to build up a pot of money over time. Tom Selby, of AJ Bell, said: 'Pension schemes should fundamentally be investing to deliver the best possible returns for savers, regardless of where those assets are held.' 'There is a real danger in conflating the Government's increasingly desperate efforts to deliver economic growth with people's long-term retirement goals that the latter will be sacrificed in pursuit of the former. 'Ministers need to be straight with people about the risks inherent in this approach, rather than denying the uncertainty that exists and claiming this is somehow a guaranteed win-win for savers and the UK economy.' The Chancellor has already faced criticism over other parts of the Bill, namely allowing defined benefit pension schemes to transfer surplus funds back into businesses. Firms will be allowed to raid £160bn in defined benefit pension surpluses, loosening existing safeguards that protect pensions from riskier investments. Around 8.8 million savers are members of a defined benefit pension scheme. They provide a guaranteed income for life, typically based on someone's final salary. The majority of defined benefit schemes are now running at a surplus thanks to increased investment returns and higher interest rates. Steve Webb, partner at pension consultants LCP, said: 'The Government's primary objective in changing the way pension funds are invested is to boost the UK economy rather than to boost individual pensions. 'The Government's own projections suggest that even after several decades of the new approach, the impact on individual pension pots is likely to be slight. 'Given that we clearly have an under-saving crisis in the UK, with millions set for a disappointing retirement, there needs to be much greater urgency around measures to get more money flowing into pension savings'. The Department for Work and Pensions was contacted for comment.

How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills
How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills

Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Britons could soon buy cheap solar panels which can be put on balconies, sheds and terraces to cut their energy bills. The plan, using so-called plug-in solar modules which typically cut bills by 30 per cent in countries where they are already used, has been announced by the government as part of a broader plan to step up solar power access. Using balconies for solar panels is already common in Germany, where 1.5 million homes use the technology. Locals have named it Balkonkraftwerk, or balcony power plant. Using solar panels this way is a lot cheaper than installing them on a roof, where scaffolding and hiring specialist workers means that even a modest eight-panel array will cost about £5,000. It will also unlock solar power for many of Britian's 5.4m households which rent. Presently, only homeowners can opt to fit solar panels unless they agree a deal with their landlord. Even then, if they moved, they would lose their panels. The proposed system is portable. This so-called plug-in power plant also means no expensive fitting is required. Instead, the panels are attached to an inverter, which steps up the voltage to the 240v used by your home's mains supply. It is then attached by a regular plug. To avoid electric shock, the inverters detect when they are unplugged and isolate the plug and its exposed electrical pins. open image in gallery Rooftop panels still produce the most ebergy but they are expensive to fit ( Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ) The government is investigating whether a similar safe system can be deployed in the UK. Unlike a full rooftop solar system, no power can be sold back to the grid with plug-in panels. Instead, the aim is to cut electricity bills during the day from appliances like fridges, freezers and computers used by home workers. The panels also probably won't face upwards for the best power generation, since roofs are still the best for that. But plummeting solar panel prices and climbing prices for having them fitted to a roof mean that balcony panels are now a more attractive option than in previous years. Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero Ed Miliband said solar 'is one of the cheapest and quickest to build power sources we have.' He added: 'We will push ahead on a solar rooftop revolution, while tackling the barriers of planning, grid, supply chains and skills.' In Germany, a pair of 400-watt panels could save €120 to €240 a year in electricity costs, according to consumer website Finanztip, which could be 30 per cent off a smaller flat's usage, according to manufacturer estimates. Panels can last 30 years if looked after well, and the €540 they can cost can be recouped in a few years, depending on usage.

Revealed: Two-thirds of small businesses would now vote Remain after profits hit by Brexit
Revealed: Two-thirds of small businesses would now vote Remain after profits hit by Brexit

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Revealed: Two-thirds of small businesses would now vote Remain after profits hit by Brexit

Two-thirds of small and medium UK businesses would now vote to remain in the EU after seeing their profits harmed by Brexit, new analysis shows. A survey of more than 500 importers and exporters found 66 per cent would choose to stay in the bloc, up from 53 per cent who voted that way during the referendum in 2016. The percentage of those who would vote to leave was 29 per cent, down from 32 per cent. The findings, from research carried out by Critical Research, appear to be a direct response to the fact that costly rising regulations and red tape burdens have harmed the profitability of their businesses. 65 per cent of responders said the increased demands on them to comply with trade regulations have 'significantly' affected their overall profits. More than half (56 per cent) said Brexit has directly made their business less-competitive within the context of the global marketplace. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the UK usually have fewer than 250 employees and less than £44m in annual turnover, though there are further criteria relating to balance sheets, wider ownership structures and personnel. Small businesses, with fewer than 50 employees, made up 99.2 per cent of all UK businesses in 2024 – a total of around 5.5m of them which contribute more than an estimated £2 trillion between them in annual turnover. However, many of those who sell to or buy from abroad have been impacted by regulatory changes since the UK left the EU. An ensuing report on the figures by Bibby Financial Services suggested Keir Starmer 's reset talks with the EU in May could lead to improved prospects for the UK's small businesses. 'The recent (May) agreement secured with the EU, which seeks to reduce the red tape and increase the flow of trade, won't mean a return to the single market but may go some way to addressing the administrative and cost burden for business. Time will tell,' it read. The same report showed that importers or exporters looking for new partners this year were currently considering China and the US as their top target markets, but 8 per cent of exporters were also looking at each of Germany and France. Only 5 per cent of importers were targeting those nations, as well as the same figure for Spain, compared to 13 per cent for China and the US.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store