Chisato Iwai wins Mexico Riviera Maya Open by 6 shots for first LPGA title
Iwai led from the opening hole at El Camaleon when she made birdie and Jenny Bae made bogey, and the 22-year-old from Japan was on her way.
'My mental is so calm — calm every day, every time,' Iwai said.
She ran off four straight birdies, poured in every putt that mattered and then cruised home to become the third LPGA rookie to win this season.
Iwai, whose twin sister Akie Iwai has been runner-up twice this year, finished at 12-under 276.
Bae had a one-shot lead going into the final round at Mayakoba, and the 10 players behind her also had never experienced winning on the LPGA Tour.
It didn't take long for Iwai, who had eight wins on the Japan LPGA before getting her LPGA card, to turn this into a rout.
She hit wedge to 4 feet on the third hole for birdie. She rolled in a 7-foot birdie putt on the fourth. Her approach to the par-5 fifth was right of the green, close to the water, and she calmly chipped that to 2 feet for a third straight birdie. Iwai finished the big birdie run with a 15-foot putt on No. 6.
Bae bogeyed the opening two holes and never caught up. She steadied herself on the back nine to salvage a 73 and a runner-up finish.
'It just tells me that I have a long ways to go but also I'm also getting there, too,' Bae said. 'So I'm happy. I definitely know what I need to work on for the week off for me. Hopefully I'll be able to score better at the next tournament.'
The six-shot victory for Iwai matched the largest margin this year. Rio Takeda of Japan also won by six at the Blue Bay LPGA in China.
Iwai took off early and it seemed as though everyone simply cleared out of her way. Gabriela Ruffels, who birdied five of her last six holes on Saturday to get within two shots of the lead, made only one birdie in her round of 76.
Miranda Wang, who stayed in the game with clutch par putts down the stretch in the third round, closed with a 76 without making a birdie. Yahui Zhang made bogey on six of her last seven holes for a 78.
Iwai won $375,000 for her first title. It's the first time in 10 years the LPGA has had three rookies win before the end of May.
The LPGA returned to Mexico for the first time since 2017 and didn't attract a strong field with the U.S. Women's Open next week at Erin Hills is Wisconsin. Charley Hull at No. 15 was the highest-ranked player in the field. She didn't break 70 all week and tied for 32nd.
___
AP golf: https://apnews.com/hub/golf
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
2025 Copa América Femenina Review: Marta Magic Causes Colombian Heartbreak
For the third time in its last five editions, the Copa América Femenina was held in Ecuador. The entire tournament was held in just one city this time around, namely Quito. Organisational and logistical challenges affected the teams in what appeared to be a 'disregard for women's football', in the words of Brazilian midfielder Ary Borges. Most notably, they were made to warm up in cramped indoor spaces prior to the first couple of rounds of fixtures, with the pitch's condition cited as the reason. Nevertheless, the players delivered on the field to produce some enthralling action, which was capped off by an unforgettable finale. Group stage Argentina topped Group A as expected, and they did it with four wins out of four. However, it was not all smooth sailing for La Albiceleste as they needed late winners in each of their first three matches. Florencia Bonsegundo scored the winner against Uruguay with less than 15 minutes left on the clock, but a more dramatic game was to follow as Chile's early opener was only cancelled out in the 75th minute before Aldana Cometti's 90th-minute winner. Yamila Rodríguez struck very late on against Peru, paving the way for a more comfortable 2-0 win over Ecuador in the final group game with progression to the knockouts already secured. There was a lot to play for behind them as Ecuador's 2-2 draw with Uruguay in the tournament opener set the stage for a three-way fight for the remaining semi-final spot. Peru were the only team not seriously involved as they went home pointless, so Chile's win over the hosts in the penultimate round placed them in pole position. All La Roja had to do was avoid defeat against Uruguay, who had done well to stay in the hunt despite boycotting training in the lead up to the tournament as a means of protest against inadequate support from their football association over basic things like training facilities and wages. On the field, they delivered at crunch time with a 3-0 win over Chile to reach the semi-finals for just the second time in tournament history. The two tournament favorites advanced comfortably from Group B. Brazil scored 12 goals and conceded just one, while Colombia recovered from a goalless draw against Venezuela with emphatic wins over Paraguay and Bolivia. The latter had a torrid time as they lost all four games and let in 25 goals, though La Guaraníes otherwise impressed as they notched up six points. 17-year-old Claudia Martínez certainly caught the eye as she netted six times and finished as the tournament's joint top-scorer. Knockouts Argentina put up a serious fight against Colombia in the first semi-final, even starting the game on the front-foot thanks to some disciplined and well-drilled work out of possession. Las Cafeteras always had the potential to pose problems and showed more of it after the half-time break, but no goals were scored. With no extra time, the match went straight to a penalty shoot-out. Saves from either keeper in succession added to the drama, so Eliana Stábile's miss proved decisive as Argentina bowed out. Brazil had no such troubles in their match against Uruguay as they raced to a two-goal lead in 13 minutes. They were firmly in control throughout, ultimately notching up a 5-1 win to join Colombia in the final and the 2028 Olympics in the process. Uruguay would lose on penalties to Argentina after an entertaining 2-2 draw in the third-place match, but an even more eventful match was to follow. Colombia sought a first title against eight-time champions Brazil, who preserved their record of playing in every single Copa América final. The challengers got off to a good start and went on to open the scoring through young star Linda Caicedo, taking the game in a different direction than the scrappy goalless draw the two teams had played out at the end of the group stage. Brazil equalised with a penalty on the stroke of half-time and took the initiative on the other side of the break, but suffered a setback due to a freak own goal. Amanda Gutierres levelled the scores in the 80th minute, setting up a thrilling conclusion. Mayra Ramírez surely must have thought she won it with her strike in the 88th minute, but Marta had other ideas as she did this at the very end of stoppage time: The Orlando Pride forward found the back of the net once more about midway through the extra time period, but Colombia were not done. They pushed for an equaliser in the second half of extra time and got one with just five minutes to spare through Leicy Santos, heading to penalties once again. This shoot-out was even more dramatic as Brazil blinked first, Colombia failed to score two in a row, and Marta's potential winner was stopped by Katherine Tapia. Lorena had the last word as she saved Jorelyn Carabalí's attempt, condemning Colombia to a fourth final defeat in the last five Copas América.
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
How GolfRoots Is Making Golf Clubs (And The Game) More Accessible
What started as a college side hustle in a Dallas garage has evolved into a mission to facilitate access to one of America's most popular participation sports. Four years after its founding, GolfRoots is reshaping how people access golf equipment by connecting unused clubs gathering dust in garages with newcomers eager to try the game. The company's roots trace back to 2021, when founder Benjamin Stromberg, now 26, was a senior at Texas A&M and as an army cadet helped found the school's club team to play and compete recreationally. With friends who were set to commission as officers in need of clubs, Stromberg, who had worked at a club in New Mexico and accumulated old demo stock and items that were never retrieved from the lost-and-found, began selling equipment to his fellow cadets and on Facebook Marketplace. Today, the company coordinates trade-in programs with private clubs across the country, continuing to grow through a business model that benefits both sides of the market: golfers who have excess equipment they'll never use again, and newcomers who need affordable entry points into what can be an expensive sport. Comedian Larry David, the avid golfer who helped create 'Seinfeld' and 'Curb Your Enthusiasm,' is among the private club golfers who have traded in clubs with GolfRoots. "Helping people offload unwanted clubs while also helping people get into the game, those two things meshed together really well," Stromberg said, adding that he was inspired to facilitate greater equipment access by personal experience, having gotten his earliest clubs as hand-me-downs from his grandfather. What began as individual club sales evolved when Stromberg recognized new golfers wanted complete sets but had no idea what to buy. The pandemic golf boom intensified that need. "I was curating full sets for people from what I had in my parents' garage," he recalls. His co-founder, Jake Hoffman, suggested creating a website, leading to their current model of selling both curated full sets and individual clubs. GolfRoots now operates from a 61,000-square-foot Dallas headquarters with 22 full-time employees, partnering with 375 to 400 private clubs nationwide for trade-in events. Their most popular items are complete sets and specific high-demand drivers like the TaylorMade SIM2 Max and PING G400 models. The company serves three distinct customer segments: complete beginners, golfers upgrading for the first time, and experienced players seeking specific clubs. Stromberg notes they often see customers progress through all three categories, creating lasting relationships rather than one-time transactions. GolfRoots has introduced innovative products like the "Just the Roots" starter set for $90, which includes four essential clubs and five balls. And the company's trade-in program is one of the secrets to its success, with customers receiving 100% credit toward a full set when they're ready to upgrade. As Stromberg says, it's a way to 'de-risk golf' for those who want to give it a try and hopefully successfully set the hook for newcomers to experience that feeling of shot euphoria. "We don't want the cost of equipment to be the reason why people don't play this game," Stromberg says of the company's philosophy. "Golf clubs are tools. Golf itself is our destination. You can't get to that destination without those tools and the vehicle to get you there. It's where you end up, and that's playing golf and having those experiences." Stromberg is hoping to eventually partner with pro shops and equipment manufacturers. While he hasn't made significant inroads on that front yet, it hasn't deterred the company's growth trajectory. "We're creating a whole new customer. It's not fighting for a customer that's already buying from Callaway or Titleist,' Stromberg says. 'This customer has never owned golf clubs before; they're completely new and fresh.' As golf continues to enjoy a wave of increased participation and play – one that involves near record levels of beginners – GolfRoots is effectively expanding the sport's ecosystem by helping both ends of the spectrum: making it more accessible to newcomers while creating value for existing players. And the company's roots continue to spread.
New York Times
40 minutes ago
- New York Times
NCAA Tournament expansion was tabled, but we should still scrutinize how the field is picked
The main reason a majority of college basketball fans did not want the NCAA Tournament field expanded is that they did not see a need for more middling high-major teams getting additional at-large bids. They got their wish on Monday, at least for now. The tournament will remain at 68 teams in 2026; however, conversations about whether to expand to 72 or 76 in 2027 will continue. Currently, the tournament selection committee uses a collection of different data sets — both resume and metric-based — to select and seed the field. How they weigh each is subjective. Ken Pomeroy, a leading analytic voice who runs the popular rankings site believes there should be a more objective means of selecting the field and sees the Wins Above Bubble (WAB) metric as the fairest way to do so. Unlike his rankings and the NET, WAB does not factor in scoring margin. Advertisement Essentially, it's a team's record compared to the expected win total of a team on the bubble playing that team's schedule. Had the field been expanded to 76 last year, these would have been the eight teams added by WAB: West Virginia, Indiana, Wake Forest, San Francisco, Boise State, UC Irvine, Ohio State and George Mason. Four more places for power-conference teams, but four for mid-majors who did not win their conference tournaments as well. 'I don't know if that's perfect, but it's much closer to perfection than the current process,' said Pomeroy, who added that the current setup dings a mid-major team that 'racks up a bunch of wins that aren't Quad 1 wins or aren't Quad 2 wins.' 'They're playing (more) Quad 3 teams on the road, and if you win 30 of those games, it's actually pretty impressive,' he said. Even if the selection committee continues to choose teams using its current criteria, an expanded tournament would present opportunities for mid-majors. I looked at the last five tournaments, using Bart Torvik's sorting tool to pull the top eight non-tourney teams in the NET, the top eight with the highest average resume ranking and the top eight with the highest average quality rating. Every year, there were two to five teams outside of the power conferences that would have been in consideration. Most likely, one or two of those teams would have made an expanded field each season. One negative of expansion could be forcing more of these mid-major at-large teams to the play-in round (currently known as the First Four), which has lacked the fanfare of the Round of 64 since its creation in 2011. In the past, the committee has pushed most conference tourney winners — with the exception of four 16 seeds — into the field of 64. I'd propose they take that a step further to protect the mid-majors who earn their way in with great regular seasons: If you won your conference's regular-season title, you are also exempt from the play-in round. Advertisement Another argument against expansion is that it would devalue the regular season. Pomeroy argues it will have the opposite effect. With more teams on the bubble, more teams would play meaningful games down the stretch. In a 76-team tournament, only 52 teams would automatically make the field of 64, compared to 60 now. It makes it more difficult to get a bye to Thursday and Friday, so even some of the teams safely 'in' will have more at stake. The pro-expansion view is that it's necessary because of the growth of the sport. Since 1985, when the field grew from 53 to 64, the number of Division I teams has expanded by almost 100. The counterargument is that adding teams to Division I should not mean adding teams to the tournament, because those teams are low- or mid-majors who aren't competing for at-large spots. But there have been breakthroughs. Florida Atlantic joined DI in 1993-94 and has made a Final Four. UC San Diego, in its first year of tourney eligibility in 2025, was a top-40 team at KenPom. Had the Tritons not won the Big West tournament, they likely would have been excluded from a 68-team field, similar to Indiana State's snub in 2024. But with an expanded field, they likely would have made it. Those of us who love college basketball see Selection Sunday and the first two days of the tournament as holidays, and the tournament captures the attention of the casual fan because almost everyone fills out a bracket. The sanctity of the 64-team bracket, a model that feels like perfection, likely wouldn't actually go anywhere with expansion. Just like when the field expanded to 65 and then 68, 64 teams would likely still tip off Thursday and Friday. Adding more teams would make it slightly harder to immediately fill out a bracket because of an expanded play-in round. But is that really going to stop people from filling out brackets? Advertisement And it's the great games, moments and upsets that make the tournament so popular. It's Valparaiso and Bryce Drew hitting a miracle shot to beat Ole Miss. It's UMBC over Virginia. It's George Mason and Florida Atlantic to the Final Four. It's the parity! 'Teams that you've never heard of can beat really good teams on any given night, and that's what makes it great,' Pomeroy said. Now, if the presidents at the big schools and power-conference commissioners find a way to drive out those smaller schools altogether, then yes, they will be taking the soul of the NCAA Tournament. That's worth fighting against. But if it's nostalgia that makes you hate expansion, that fight was lost when the first play-in games were created. And if you don't like watching those games on Tuesday and Wednesday, then just ignore them and tune in on Thursday. The magic wouldn't go anywhere. A few more teams would just have a chance to make the field. The energy should be spent making sure the mid-majors have a fair crack at those spots.
