I'm a saving expert – my savvy trick means you can get Boots products for a fraction of the price, anyone can do it
AISLE SAY I'm a saving expert – my savvy trick means you can get Boots products for a fraction of the price, anyone can do it
MANY of us love heading to Boots to pick up some beauty essentials - but there could be a way to save money each time.
A finance expert has shared that there is an easy hack many people can do next time they are in store.
Advertisement
4
Her favourite Hyaluronic Acid is £5.40 in the women's section
Credit: TikTok/@thefinancegurl
4
A similar product costs just £2.50 for more product in the men's section
Credit: TikTok/@thefinancegurl
4
A finance expert advised how you can save in Boots by switching aisles
Credit: Getty
She shared how women should not be tempted to 'pay more for pink packaging.'
In a clip on her @thefinancegurl account, she shared how she wanted to stock up on her favourite Hyaluronic Acid Moisturiser from Boots.
She explained: 'It costs £5.40 for the 30ml bottle but if you head over to the men's skincare section you can get exactly the same product for way cheaper.
'This one costs £2.50 for 50ml of product so you're actually getting more product for half the price.
Advertisement
'When you compare the ingredients side by side they are identical.
'Nothing is different apart from the fact that one is in green packaging and one is in pink packaging.'
She advised when you are shopping for toiletries that it is worth checking if the men's section has a cheaper alternative as 'pink tax' is 'very real.'
Her video has racked up a staggering 600,000 views, and sparked a debate in the comments.
Advertisement
One person wrote: 'BAN THE PINK TAX.'
Another added: 'Great info to know sis. Thank you.'
British skincare brand sold in Boots launches 50% off sale as it prepares to close down this month
However, one person theorised: 'Isn't most pink tax just because there's higher demand among women so they add a higher price?
'In which case the real issue isn't misogyny it's capitalism and exploitation of consumers that everyone should be mad at.'
Advertisement
And one shared: 'I feel like this issue applies to unnecessary products, too, like meds that are designed and sold as 'period pain relief' products when it's literally just paracetamol and ibuprofen in the one capsule.'
BOOTS BARGAINS
Kat Leech, who is better known online as Kat Saves, recently took to social media to share some of the best beauty buys from Boots for anyone on a budget.
The recommendations came from her own loyal followers, many of whom swear by the staples on the shelves.
First up, Kat showed off the Boots Everyday Shampoo and Conditioner, which are just 75p each and come in a delicious coconut and vanilla scent - what's not to love?
Advertisement
4
You can't go wrong with shampoo and conditioner for 75p
Credit: Instgram
"That is an absolute bargain," Kat said in the viral video.
And if you've got curly locks, the Boots Curl Creme might be the one for you.
It's just £1.99 for a large tub and one hair fan said it's "excellent if anyone is looking for something affordable."
Advertisement
One shopper even left a review online and wrote: "Have used this for many years, have dry highlighted soft fine hair and curls. My curls like it and it is not too sticky. It is very good value for money."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
UK politicians are in the pockets of the rich. Is that democracy?
At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Keir Starmer responded to a question from Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay about growing calls to introduce a tax on wealth for the super-rich – those with assets above £10 million – by saying he wouldn't 'take advice' from the Greens, and insisting that 'we can't just tax our way to growth'. We can, it seems, cut our way to growth though, as long as it's those already at the greatest risk of poverty who'll bear the brunt. On Wednesday evening, 333 Labour MPs voted to cut disability benefits by £2 billion per year, halving the health element of universal credit for new claimants, and cutting it altogether for new claimants aged under 22. At a certain point, when the faces and the colour of the rosettes change but the glaring injustices remain the same, we have to ask ourselves why. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Yui Mok) A common refrain among politicians is that right-wing policies that make life harder for social security claimants – or immigrants, or any other marginalised group – are popular. So popular that they have no choice but to implement them with gusto, because that's the will of the people, I guess. Meanwhile, I suppose we are to imagine that the average British voter is kept up at night worrying about the prospect of millionaires and billionaires being asked to pay more into our public services. As Tory leader Kemi Badenoch put it at PMQs, a wealth tax would be 'a tax on all of our constituents' savings, their houses, their pensions'. Who among us doesn't know and love someone with more than £10m in assets lying around? And surely we can all agree that they're the real victims? Back in the real world, a YouGov poll last week found that 75% of people in the UK would support introducing a wealth tax of 2% on wealth above £10m. Earlier this year, YouGov conducted another poll on behalf of Oxfam which found that 79% of over 16s in Scotland would rather the government tax the richest than make cuts to public spending. (Image: YouGov) And while it's true that some voters do believe that the welfare system is too generous, and the immigrants are draining the country of resources, it's important to remember that large sections of the British media, with their own vested interests, have spent not years but decades pushing precisely this narrative. It's disingenuous at best to persuade someone of something and then behave as though it was their idea all along. Alongside campaign groups Tax Justice UK and Patriotic Millionaires UK, Oxfam identified that the government could raise up to £24bn per year through a wealth tax which would apply to only 0.04% of the population. At the same time, charities and experts from across the UK and beyond – extending to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – have highlighted the damage that cuts to social security could cause to people's ability to make ends meet or simply live with dignity. So, if it's not the electorate telling politicians which policies to pursue, and it's not the data or the impassioned pleas of experts that persuade them, then what is it that drives them to make these decisions? READ MORE: Mark Brown: Why I plan to join Scotland's new radical left party Surely the answer is obvious by now. Time and again, right-wing and supposedly centrist politicians prove that nothing matters to them than the feelings of their rich donors and supporters – and nothing matters more to those wealthy individuals and large corporations than money. Successive governments' inaction on a range of urgent issues – from climate change, to energy prices, to raising taxes to fund crumbling public services – becomes far easier to understand once you realise that standing up to behemoth corporations and their numerous beneficiaries could cost these politicians dearly. If power for power's sake is the goal, if fuelling the party machine with big donations is a worthwhile end in and of itself, and if securing oneself a cushy position after – or perhaps during – your time in office is the ultimate prize, then making an enemy out of the 1% is a senseless endeavour. The dramatic decline in political party membership numbers over the past several decades mean that parties have become more and more reliant on a small pool of wealthy donors. Analysis by the Electoral Reform Society found that, during the 2024 election campaign, Labour received £6.7m from 'mega-donors', which made up 68.5% of their total donations up to polling day. This equates to 42 times the amount they took from the same type of donors during the 2019 election campaign. David Lammy secured a personal donor a job at the Foreign Office (Image: PA) When we ask ourselves how it is that the Labour Party have sold out on so many principles in such a short period of time, the answer is in the question. What chance does the average person – or community – stand to have their voice heard and acted upon by those in power while principles and policies are being sold to the highest bidder? Just last week, it was revealed by the Democracy for Sale substack that Foreign Secretary David Lammy gave a taxpayer-funded job in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to the former UK president of multinational PR company WPP after she donated £5000 to his office ahead of the election. This is only the latest in a series of jobs for donors that Labour have been scrutinised over. Under the ideal of democracy which we are encouraged to believe the UK represents, every eligible voter should have an equal say in elections and, by extension, an equal opportunity to have a say in the decisions the elected parliament makes. How far must our political leaders stray from this principle before we recognise that we are no longer ruled by democracy but plutocracy: a society controlled by people with great wealth or income? Consider that the UK's 50 richest families hold more wealth than 50% of the population, according to analysis from the Equality Trust. And while the top 20% hold 63% of the UK's wealth, the bottom fifth have only 0.5% of the wealth. READ MORE: The best way to defeat Reform UK? Expose the gaping holes in their politics Polls might show that the vast majority of the British public want to see the wealthy taxed more, but to imagine that this information would seize the Prime Minister with an urgency to act would be to believe that all views, experiences, voices or lives are equal. You only need to look at how this government – the progressive alternative to the old government – treats the most vulnerable to know that isn't true, not under this system. As long as money talks and those without are silenced, most of us will be out here screaming into the void. In case that seems too bleak a note to end on, a reminder: it doesn't have to be this way. Just look at the growing fervency with which the Tories and now Labour have sought to quash dissent through the criminalisation of peaceful protest, and the proscription of activist groups they don't like as terrorists. Even the frantic efforts of the Government to censor a rap group, Kneecap, over political statements is revealing. These are the actions of power under threat. They are terrified of ordinary people speaking their minds and telling them in no uncertain terms that enough is enough. That, alone, should act as motivation to keep doing just that.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Whinging water bosses plan to hit families with summer surge pricing after complaining too many are filling up pools
Furious campaigners slammed bosses for moaning about paddling pools while failing to fix pipes responsible for massive leaks PADDLING FOOLS! Whinging water bosses plan to hit families with summer surge pricing after complaining too many are filling up pools Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WHINGING water bosses have complained to ministers that too many Brits are filling up their paddling pools in the heatwave. They are also plotting to clobber families with higher summer charges under controversial surge pricing plans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Whinging water bosses have complained to ministers that too many Brits are filling up their paddling pools in the heatwave Credit: Getty 2 Feargal Sharkey said: 'Water company bosses are only too happy to pile the blame and pass the buck on to the customers' Credit: AFP Britain is baking in its third heatwave of the year, with temperatures soaring to a sweaty 33C yesterday — hotter than Barbados. But water company bosses have told the Government that families seeking respite with a paddling pool are putting a strain on supplies and harming water pressure. Furious campaigners slammed bosses for moaning about paddling pools while failing to fix pipes responsible for massive leaks. More than one trillion litres of water were lost to leaks in the year 2023/24. And fat cat bosses have bagged huge bonuses despite rising bills and sewage crises. Last year, Yorkshire Water CEO Nicola Shaw was paid salary and benefits worth £657,000 and a £371,000 bonus. But bosses there are now banned from getting bonuses amid fury over the sewage crisis. Thames Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water are also subject to the ban. Water campaigner Feargal Sharkey blasted greedy bosses. He said: 'Water company bosses are only too happy to pile the blame and pass the buck on to the customers. The hot weather has parched the land and drained reservoirs across the country as UK hit with hosepipe bans 'But they have woefully failed to build new pipes and fix old ones. That's why we are low on water. 'Rather than moan about paddling pools and hike prices in the summer, water bosses need to get their house in order, stop lining their own pockets and invest in new pipes to stop the leaks.' Yorkshire and South East water companies have both imposed a hosepipe ban and told their customers to stop filling up paddling pools. More than seven million Brits have been hit by the restrictions. More water firms are expected to follow. They have woefully failed to build new pipes and fix old ones. That's why we are low on water Feargal Sharkey, Water campaigner Announcing their hosepipe ban earlier this week, Yorkshire Water said: 'We are asking customers to put down their hosepipes, so we can let our reservoirs recover. 'Our reservoir levels haven't actually increased since the last week of January.' Customers must not use hosepipes to water gardens, or fill up swimming pools, paddling pools and hot tubs. They also must not be used to fill or maintain a pond or water fountain. But they are allowed to use a bucket of water or a watering can. Meanwhile, Thames Water plans to make customers who use more than 685 litres a day pay 'twice the current rate'. The firm is one of 15 carrying out or planning surge pricing trials, for customers with smart water meters, in the coming years.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Huge percentage of BBC staff in top-paying jobs that were privately educated revealed
News will increase claims of elitism at the broadcaster BEEB PAY ROW Huge percentage of BBC staff in top-paying jobs that were privately educated revealed Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE percentage of privately educated BBC staff is four times higher in top-paying jobs than in the lowest salary bracket, its own figures reveal. The news will increase claims of elitism at the broadcaster. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up Only seven per cent of Brits have a private education, but 32 per cent of BBC roles with a salary of £150,000 or more are occupied by those who do. And just 6.8 per cent of jobs there with pay of under £30,000 are taken by the privately educated. Social mobility expert Prof Lee Elliot Major said: 'The BBC's disproportionate representation of privately educated individuals in its highest-paying roles starkly illustrates the persistent class barriers in British society. 'The BBC was founded to serve the whole nation — yet we have a public institution that looks and sounds out of step with the lives of the people it is intended to serve and represent. 'It isn't healthy when the most powerful roles come from the same small slice of society. "It means news organisations are fishing in a narrow talent pool, missing out on the perspectives of people from different backgrounds.' The BBC said: 'We're doing more than ever to bring people to the BBC from all backgrounds.' In 2023, an Ofcom report said low-income audiences found the Beeb too 'politically correct'. Breakfast legend returns to BBC daytime for the first time four years after quitting sofa
