GOP Rep Quotes Infamous Nazi Joseph Goebbels During Censorship Hearing
'A direct quote from Joseph Goebbels: 'It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion,' and I think that may be what we're discussing here,' said Texas' Keith Self.
Goebbels was the minister of propaganda for the Third Reich under Adolf Hitler. His role was to convince the German people to support Hitler's regime, which he did so by spreading anti-Semitism and orchestrating the 1933 burning of 'un-German' books in Berlin.
Self, 72, referenced Goebbels' words during a House subcommittee meeting aimed at determining whether a 'censorship industrial complex' existed. The Tuesday hearing was held after Republicans claimed that Biden-era policies aimed to stifle rightwing views.
Texas Democrat Rep. Julie Johnson heavily criticized Self's remarks.
'When you're quoting Joseph Goebbels about... the role of state in the public debate, we have a big problem,' Johnson said. 'I mean, that's as alarming as hell to me, when that becomes the gold standard of Hitler.'
She said it was concerning that he was referencing a quote associated with 'German atrocities during World War II.'
She later posted the clip of Self on X with the comment, 'Joseph Goebbels was a literal Nazi and one of Hitler's closest allies. To my Republican colleagues, it is probably best not to quote him during a congressional hearing.'
Self rebutted that Johnson's 'framing is completely misleading.'
He said: 'I was referring to the philosophy of Nina Jankowicz, the former head of Biden's Disinformation Governance Board. Probably best not to throw stones when your party supported funneling millions of dollars through Biden's State Dept. to shape public opinion.'
At the hearing, Jankowicz, the leader of a pro-democracy organization and former executive director of the Disinformation Governance Board, said that 'the premise of this hearing, the so called censorship industrial complex, is a fiction that has not only had profound impacts on my life and safety, but on our national security.' She later added that the 'fiction is itself suppressing speech and stymieing critical research that protects our country.'
DOGE leader Elon Musk later called Jankowicz and her colleague 'evil people.'
Despite Self's defense, it isn't the first time he's used Goebbel quotes.
He cited the Nazi in 2010 when he was running for reelection as Collin County Judge. At the time, he tried to bite back at his opponent by saying, 'if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.' At the time, he claimed he was only using the widely-circulated yet unsubstantiated Goebbels quote to show that his opponent was 'using the method.'
HuffPost reported that Self's office did not directly comment on his bizarre Nazi quotes but instead said: 'It is indisputable that the Biden administration weaponized its State Department to censor and suppress American citizens from their right to free speech.'
Self also recently received backlash after misgendering Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE), the first openly transgender congresswoman.
The outcries following Self's Goebbels quote comes after Democrats condemned Musk's gesture at the presidential inauguration, which looked like a Nazi salute. He did little to defend the move at the time but instead made Holocaust-related jokes and Nazi puns to his over 200 million X followers.
Musk also recently retweeted an X post saying that Hitler and other dictators like Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong did not murder millions of people, but 'their public sector workers did' instead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump ends trade talks with Canada, threatens higher tariffs
President Trump said Friday he was suspending trade talks with Canada and would announce within a week a higher tariff rate on the U.S.'s northern neighbor. In a post on social media, Trump said he was cutting off negotiations with Canada after its government confirmed it would keep in place a digital services tax despite a recent G7 agreement on such levies. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Digital services taxes are taxes on tech companies from countries where their products are used. Canada is requiring the first payment of its tech tax on Monday, which will charge 3 percent of revenues above $14.57 million, or 20 million Canadian dollars. House Republicans' domestic agenda bill included a retaliatory measure known as Section 899 specifically to ward off countries from instituting digital taxes against U.S. tech giants. The bill called the taxes 'unfair' and 'discriminatory' and threatened a retaliatory U.S. tax of up to 20 percent on investors from countries with digital services taxes. However, following an agreement with the Group of Seven countries with big economies, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called on the Senate on Thursday to remove the U.S. retaliatory tax from their version of the bill. He said that an agreement had been reached that would '[preserve the U.S.] tax base' and that would exempt U.S. companies from a global minimum tax agreement. 'OECD Pillar 2 taxes will not apply to U.S. companies,' Bessent wrote on social media Thursday. Several international business groups representing foreign investors in the U.S. responded positively to the announcement. Canada's big tech tax has been in the works for a while. Some commentators on Friday thought President Trump's social media announcement indicated a lack of planning on the part of the administration, which delivered country-specific tariffs in early April. 'This is a sign the work process on trade from the 2024-2025 presidential transition to April 2nd was horrifically flawed in even more ways than we thought,' Alan Cole of the Tax Foundation wrote on Friday. Getting agreement on how to tax big tech, whose products are used globally but whose headquarters are largely in the U.S., has been the driving force behind different international taxation initiatives in recent years. One initiative has been proceeding at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a group of wealthy countries, and there's another rival framework that's been slowly moving at the United Nations. The OECD framework has two main components, one that's about the location of where taxes are levied and another that puts in place a global minimum tax of 15 percent. The first component is dead in the water while the global minimum tax of 15 percent has been put in place internationally, although the U.S. has not implemented it due to Republican opposition. Republicans did leave the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) negotiated under the Biden administration in place, leaving the domestic U.S. tax structure for international corporate taxation largely consistent with the international framework, multiple sources have told The Hill. 'Pillar 1 is dead, so what we get instead is a set of digital services taxes, and that might increase in number,' University of Michigan tax law professor Reuven Avi-Yonah told The Hill. 'The administration might try to impose tariffs and do other things in order to dissuade more countries from continuing.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's big bill could have small economic impact, experts warn
The Senate version of President Trump's domestic policy bill will likely fall short of its ambitious promises for economic growth and fiscal responsibility, economists are warning. While the Senate version will have some substantial differences from the version passed in the House in May, the overall structure of the bill remains in place, with the big pieces of the 2017 Trump tax cuts featuring as the centerpiece. Republicans say the measures will boost growth, create jobs and won't balloon the deficit. The White House released a report Wednesday claiming the bill would boost economic growth by nearly 5 percent and create roughly 7 million jobs over the next four years — far higher than any independent analysis of the bill has found. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill is projected to deliver major economic gains in the first four years,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Wednesday social media post. Economists, investors and tax experts are telling a different story about the bill, tempering their expectations for growth and pointing to the bill's redistributive effects and its deficit expansion, much of which is being swept under the rug using some creative accounting. 'From a macroeconomic perspective, it probably has little effect,' Reuven Avi-Yonah, a professor of tax law at the University of Michigan, told The Hill. 'I'm always a bit skeptical of the growth potential resulting from tax cuts. And it increases the deficit significantly in a higher interest rate environment, and that's not ideal.' Official growth projections for the bill are modest. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), Congress's official tax scorer, predicted the House version of the bill would increase the average annual growth rate of real gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.03 percentage points, from 1.83 to 1.86 percent, through 2034. This is less than growth resulting from the tax cuts when they were first passed in 2017 and measured in 2018. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Congress's official legislative scorer, separated out the effects of the tax cuts in 2018 and found them to produce an increase in potential GDP of 0.2 percent, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS). GDP growth popped in the second quarter of 2018 above 4 percent, which may have been due to demand-side stimulus of the tax cuts. 'The growth effects tend to show a relatively small (if any) first-year effect on the economy,' the CRS concluded in 2018. The current bill includes additional tax cuts geared toward working Americans. As pledged by Trump, the House version canceled taxes on tips and overtime through 2028, though the Senate version institutes caps for those deductions. Tax experts say these provisions will have little to no effect on growth. 'With tax-free tips, all you're doing is encouraging people to earn their income through tips and not wages. You're not creating any new economic activity,' Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told The Hill. The House version of the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years, according to the CBO. The JCT estimated the Senate's version of the bill would add $440 billion to the deficit. However, that estimate works from the 'current policy baseline,' whereby revenue effects from the extension of the 2017 cuts, which have been in place since 2018, are ignored in the accounting. In other words, Senate Republicans have calculated the total cost of their bill without including the key provisions that would expire without it. With the cost of those tax cut extensions factored in, the true cost of the legislation is between $4 trillion and $5 trillion over 10 years. That's close to 14 percent of the total U.S. debt stock of $36 trillion. 'On a current law basis, we estimate the Senate-proposed tax cuts would increase deficits by $4.2 trillion — nearly $500 billion above the House's equivalent proposals. That figure would rise to $4.8 trillion if temporary tax cuts in the bill were ultimately made permanent,' the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found in an analysis. The massive deficit expansion of the bill, which will be subject to increased debt service costs from elevated interest rates, has heads spinning in the financial world. Credit ratings agencies have downgraded U.S. debt levels from their triple-A rating status to the double-A range. Moody's was the last major agency to do so in May. Fitch's downgrade came in 2023 after a congressional standoff over the U.S. debt ceiling and cited an 'erosion of governance.' Different models from the JCT show different effects on capital and investment coming from the House bill. One model delivers an average increase in the U.S. capital stock of 0.3 percent over the 10-year budget window, while another shows a decrease in the capital stock of 0.9 percent that reduces overall economic output. Capital growth improved from 2017 to 2018 but was well within historical ranges, and it's hard to say if it was directly related to the tax cuts. This was true for nonresidential investment, plants, equipment and patents. CRS said in 2019 that they couldn't conclude 'that the higher rate of growth of nonresidential fixed investment was due to the tax changes.' One 2024 study out of UCLA, the Federal Reserve and the JCT found that investment improved slightly in 2018 and then jumped way up in 2019 as a result of the 2017 tax cuts. While the net investment rate declined for pass-through S-corporations, it improved markedly for C-corporations. 'Tax cuts cause increases in sales, profits, investment, employment, and payrolls, with earnings gains concentrated among highly paid workers and executives,' the researchers found. Many of the business tax breaks in the bill — which include permanent R&D credits, bonus depreciation and interest deductibility — have varying degrees of efficacy. Different studies of the R&D credit, for example, have shown that one dollar of the credit stimulated, on average, one dollar of additional intended investment. 'There is widespread agreement that the [R&D] credit could be more effective than it is,' public finance analyst Gary Guenther wrote for the CRS in 2022. Tax experts also think that bonus depreciation is good for capital investment. 'Bonus depreciation may affect investment,' Bradley Borden, a real estate tax specialist at Brooklyn Law School, told The Hill. 'As the activity picked up across 2020 and 2021, people were purchasing property and taking bonus depreciation deductions.' All of the JCT's models of the House bill show the labor supply increasing as a result of legislation, which is the main driver of the bill's modest projected GDP contribution. The CBO agrees, seeing the bill's lower marginal effective tax rates as increasing the incentive to work. The law would boost the labor supply by 0.6 percent and peak at 0.9 percent in 2026 —equivalent to increasing the number of employed people by 1.5 million, according to the CBO. However, numerous analyses suggest that this won't necessarily mean that workers will get paid more, as most of the wage gains from the 2017 bill accrued at the top of the income spectrum. Nominal wage growth was 3.2 percent between 2017 and 2018, but real wage growth, as deflated by GDP, was 1.2 percent, marking a smaller rise than overall compensation growth. This 'indicates that ordinary workers had very little growth in wage rates,' according to CRS. 'Distributional analyses of the tax change suggested that the tax revision favored higher-income taxpayers, in part because most of the tax cut benefited corporations and in part because the individual income tax cut largely went to higher-income individuals,' the agency found in 2019, summarizing previous forecasts. These were confirmed by measurements of the bill's effects. 'Average earnings for workers at the 95th percentile increased by approximately $2,000 per year, while gains for workers below the 90th percentile are statistically indistinguishable from zero,' the study by UCLA's Patrick Kennedy and others concluded. Just as wage and salary gains from the bill are likely to amass at the top, according to projections, the bill is also expected to redistribute wealth and resources toward the upper echelons of the income spectrum. While the bill doesn't expressly increase taxes on the poor, it does shift wealth away from them, with the lowest tenth of earners losing resources and the top tenth gaining them. Gains from the bill are increasingly skewed toward the rich, according to the CBO. The highest tenth of earners will get an additional $12,000 per year, while the second-highest tenth will get about $3,200, the third tenth will get about $2,100, and the fourth tenth will get about $1,500. The trend continues down the line. The seventh-highest tenth won't see much of a change in their annual wealth, while the bottom three deciles will be worse off. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Will You Be Better Off Under Trump's Big Beautiful Bill? What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. After months of debate and political brinkmanship, a massive new Republican-led One Big Beautiful Bill Act is moving closer to becoming law. The sweeping package touches nearly every corner of American life—from taxes and healthcare to student loans and food assistance. The bill continues tax cuts from President Trump's first stint in the White House, funds his border wall plan, and increases defense spending. The associated fiscal impact of this is offset by reducing federal support for key components of the social safety net, including food assistance and health coverage programs. Its scale is matched only by its controversy. Democrats are firmly opposed to it, and numerous groups have warned it could have a devastating impact on America's neediest, as well as increasing the deficit - much to the chagrin of certain fiscal hawks in the GOP as well. Regardless of opinions, the sprawling megabill will impact all Americans. As the House prepares to cast its final vote, here are the most important elements of the bill that may impact your money: Taxes The OBBBA is loaded with new tax legislation, with several new tax breaks on the horizon - as well as some eliminations: State and Local Taxes (SALT) deduction : Expanded to $40,000, up from $10,000, through to 2029. : Expanded to $40,000, up from $10,000, through to 2029. Senior tax break : Those over 65 would receive a $6,000 boost to their standard deduction from 2025 through 2028. : Those over 65 would receive a $6,000 boost to their standard deduction from 2025 through 2028. Overtime income : Allows individuals to deduct up to $12,500 of overtime pay from their taxable income for tax years 2025 through 2028, while couples filing jointly could deduct up to $25,000. : Allows individuals to deduct up to $12,500 of overtime pay from their taxable income for tax years 2025 through 2028, while couples filing jointly could deduct up to $25,000. Tipped income : Allows tipped workers to deduct tip income from their federal taxable income, up to $25,000 annually. A full list of eligible occupations for tip deductions will be released within 90 days of the bill becoming law. : Allows tipped workers to deduct tip income from their federal taxable income, up to $25,000 annually. A full list of eligible occupations for tip deductions will be released within 90 days of the bill becoming law. American-made tax break : If you're buying a new car made in America, you will benefit from an annual $10,000 interest deduction. : If you're buying a new car made in America, you will benefit from an annual $10,000 interest deduction. Electric vehicle tax credits : If you're buying a new electric vehicle however, you will no longer be able to get the current $7,500 deduction. : If you're buying a new electric vehicle however, you will no longer be able to get the current $7,500 deduction. Boosted Child Tax Credit : Families with children will benefit from a $200 boost to the CTC, bringing it to $2,200. However, there is no boost to the $1,600 refundable portion of the credit, which could mean low-earners will not fully benefit compared to higher earners. : Families with children will benefit from a $200 boost to the CTC, bringing it to $2,200. However, there is no boost to the $1,600 refundable portion of the credit, which could mean low-earners will not fully benefit compared to higher earners. Estate taxes: The bill will raise the exemption threshold starting in 2026 to $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples—up from the current $13.99 million and $27.98 million. U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. Tasos Katopodis/GETTY Healthcare One of the most talked about elements of the bill has been its impact on Medicaid. Here's how it will change: Work requirements: Able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 enrolled through Medicaid expansion must work, volunteer, attend school, or participate in job training for at least 80 hours per month. Exemption for those with children aged 14 and under. Eligibility and cost changes : Expansion enrollees would undergo more frequent eligibility reviews. Enrollees could be required to pay up to $35 for certain types of care. : Federal funding cuts : States would receive less federal funding for Medicaid. This could lead to states eliminating benefits, tightening enrollment, or making other cost-cutting changes. : Increased administrative burden : Enrollees may face more paperwork and verification requirements, which could make it harder to apply for or maintain coverage. : Food Assistance Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit recipients will also face a slew of changes: Work requirements : Similar to Medicaid, able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 must work, volunteer, attend school, or participate in job training for at least 80 hours per month. Again, there is an exemption for those with children aged 14 and under. : Similar to Medicaid, able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64 must work, volunteer, attend school, or participate in job training for at least 80 hours per month. Again, there is an exemption for those with children aged 14 and under. States facing cost share: For the first time, states with high improper payment rates will be required to start paying a share of benefits, up to 15 percent. Many states have warned this is unaffordable, which could lead to states ending their participation in the program entirely. Student Loans There are some big changes coming for student borrowers. Here's the breakdown: Changes to payment plans : Several widely-used repayment plans—the Biden administration's SAVE plan, Income Contingent Repayment, and Pay As You Earn—would be discontinued. They will be replaced by the newly introduced Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), or the traditional standard repayment option, in July 2026. : Several widely-used repayment plans—the Biden administration's SAVE plan, Income Contingent Repayment, and Pay As You Earn—would be discontinued. They will be replaced by the newly introduced Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), or the traditional standard repayment option, in July 2026. Graduate PLUS loan program will be no more, also effective July 2026. It currently allows graduate and professional students to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. It will be replaced with a cap of $100,000 for most graduate students and $200,000 for those in medical or law programs. will be no more, also effective July 2026. It currently allows graduate and professional students to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. It will be replaced with a cap of $100,000 for most graduate students and $200,000 for those in medical or law programs. Parent PLUS loans would also face a borrowing limit of $65,000 and would no longer qualify for any income-driven repayment options. would also face a borrowing limit of $65,000 and would no longer qualify for any income-driven repayment options. No more deferment options for those in financial difficulty, although loan rehabilitation for those who are in default will be permitted twice instead of once. Trump Accounts Good news for newborn babies: they'll be getting $1,000 from the federal government. The so-called "Trump Accounts" will see babies born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028 who are U.S. citizens with parents that have Social Security numbers get a one-time government contribution of $1,000 into a dedicated account. The accounts will track a stock index and allow for additional private contributions of up to $5,000 every year. The money unlocks at 18 years of age, and according to PBS, can be spent on higher education expenses, small business or small farm expenses, or put toward purchasing a first home. Other Changes End of the Internal Revenue Service Direct File program : Totally free tax filing direct with the IRS under the Biden-administration's program will end. It was initially piloted in 2024, before being expanded to more than two dozen states in 2025. : Totally free tax filing direct with the IRS under the Biden-administration's program will end. It was initially piloted in 2024, before being expanded to more than two dozen states in 2025. Unemployment payments for millionaires: Federal funds cannot be used for unemployment compensation benefits for millionaires. Will Americans Be Better Off Under Trump's Bill? This depends on your own personal situation. Not all of the measures apply to everyone. For example, if you have student debt, collect SNAP benefits, and are on Medicaid, you may end up worse off under the OBBBA. But if you're a hospitality worker hoping to keep more of your own tips, or a couple about to have their first child, you could find your financial situation looking up. According to analysis by the Yale Budget Lab, this is how the bill will, on average, impact different income brackets, according to the Adjusted Gross Income (AGI): Lowest earners (AGI under $13,350): Average income loss: $600 Change: –2.5 percent Lower earners (AGI between $13,350 and $36,475): Average income loss: $65 Change: –0.2 percent Middle-income earners (AGI between $36,475 and $64,955): Average income gain: $720 Change: +1.4 percent Upper-middle earners (AGI between $64,955 and $120,390): Average income gain: $1,730 Change: +2.0 percent High earners (AGI over $120,390): Average income gain: $6,495 Change: +2.4 percent However, there may be some amendments to come before the House casts its final vote, meaning these estimates could change.
