
Japan's governing coalition likely to lose upper house election, exit polls show
Voters were deciding half of the 248 seats in the upper house, the less powerful of the two chambers in Japan's Diet.
Exit poll numbers
Ishiba has set the bar low, wanting a simple majority of 125 seats, which means his Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP, and its Buddhist-backed junior coalition partner Komeito need to win 50 to add to the 75 seats they already have.
That would mean a big retreat from the 141 seats they had before the election.
Exit poll results released seconds after the ballots closed Sunday night mostly showed a major setback for Ishiba's coalition. Japan's NHK television projected a range of 32-51 seats for the prime minister's coalition, while other networks projected it would win just over 40 seats.
Ishiba vows to stay on
The LDP alone is projected to win from 32 to 35 seats, the fewest won by the party, which still is the No. 1 party in the parliament.
'It's a tough situation. I take it humbly and sincerely,' Ishiba told a live interview with NHK. He said that the poor showing was because his government's measures to combat price increase have yet to reach many people.
Ishiba showed his determination to stay on to tackle economic and security challenges.
'I will fulfill my responsibility as head of the No. 1 party and work for the country.'
Economic worries
A poor performance in the election would not immediately trigger a change of government because the upper house lacks the power to file a no-confidence motion against a leader, but it would certainly deepen uncertainty over his fate and Japan's political stability. Ishiba would face calls from within the LDP party to step down or find another coalition partner.
Soaring prices, lagging incomes and burdensome social security payments are the top issues for frustrated, cash-strapped voters. Stricter measures targeting foreign residents and visitors have also emerged as a key issue, with a surging right-wing populist party leading the campaign.
Sunday's vote comes after Ishiba's coalition lost a majority in the October lower house election, stung by past corruption scandals, and his unpopular government has since been forced into making concessions to the opposition to get legislation through parliament. It has been unable to quickly deliver effective measures to mitigate rising prices, including Japan's traditional staple of rice, and dwindling wages.
Trade talks with Washington
U.S. President Donald Trump has added to the pressure, complaining about a lack of progress in trade negotiations and the lack of sales of U.S. autos and American-grown rice to Japan despite a shortfall in domestic stocks of the grain. A 25% tariff due to take effect Aug. 1 has been another blow for Ishiba.
Ishiba has resisted any compromise before the election, but the prospect for a breakthrough after the election is just as unclear because the minority government would have difficulty forming a consensus with the opposition.
Populism gains traction
Frustrated voters are rapidly turning to emerging populist parties. The eight main opposition groups, however, are too fractured to forge a common platform as a united front and gain voter support as a viable alternative.
The emerging populist party Sanseito stands out with the toughest anti-foreigner stance, with its 'Japanese First' platform that proposes a new agency to handle policies related to foreigners. The party's populist platform also includes anti-vaccine, anti-globalism and favors traditional gender roles.
Conservative to centrist opposition groups, including the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, or CDPJ, the DPP, and Sanseito have gained significant ground at the Liberal Democrats' expense. The CDPJ was projected to win up to 26 seats, while the DPP could quadruple to 17 seats from four, exit poll results show. Sanseito is expected to surge to 16 from just one.
None of the opposition parties said that they were open to cooperating with the governing coalition. CDPJ leader Yoshihiko Noda told NHK that his priority is to form an alliance among the opposition.
The spread of xenophobic rhetoric in the election campaign and on social media has triggered protests by human rights activists and alarmed foreign residents.
Choice between stability or change
LDP has almost continuously dominated Japan's postwar politics, contributing to its political stability and social conformity.
Voters are divided between stability and change, with some voicing concern about escalating xenophobia.
Yuko Tsuji, a 43-year-old consultant, who came to a polling station inside a downtown Tokyo gymnasium with her husband, said they both support LDP for stability and unity. and voted 'for candidates who won't fuel division.'
'If the ruling party doesn't govern properly, the conservative base will drift toward extremes. So I voted with the hope that the ruling party would tighten things up,' she said.
Self-employed Daiichi Nasu, 57, who came to vote with his dog, said that he hopes for a change toward a more inclusive and diverse society, with more open immigration and gender policies such as allowing married couples to keep separate surnames.
'That's why I voted for the CDPJ,' he said. 'I want to see progress on those fronts.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: Yen bounces as Japan PM hangs on
By Mike Dolan LONDON (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today By Mike Dolan, Editor-At-Large, Finance and Markets Japan's yen strengthened on Monday as embattled Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba vowed to stay on as leader even after his ruling coalition lost its majority in Sunday's upper house elections. I'll dive into this and the rest of today's market news below. Make sure to check out today's column, where I discuss why a sudden shift in the euro and the threat of U.S. tariffs may give the European Central Bank a reason to pause rate cuts, even as deeper tensions may be quietly building. Today's Market Minute * Japan's ruling coalition lost control of the upper house in an election on Sunday, further weakening Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's grip on power even as he vowed to remain party leader, citing a looming tariff deadline with the United States. * The fringe far-right Sanseito party emerged as one of the biggest winners in Japan's upper house election on Sunday, gaining support with warnings of a "silent invasion" of immigrants, and pledges for tax cuts and welfare spending. * BP named Albert Manifold, the former boss of building materials producer CRH, as its new chairman on Monday, as it looks to address investor concerns about its strategy and weak share performance. * The high-stakes clash between Exxon Mobil and Chevron over a prized South American oilfield may be a sign of what's to come in the oil and gas industry as competition for a shrinking pool of prime assets heats up, writes ROI energy columnist Ron Bousso. Yen bounces as Japan PM hangs on With markets rushing to price 'worst case' scenarios earlier this month, including the chance of a leadership hiatus just as next week's August 1 tariff deadline hits, the outcome was seen as something of a relief. Even though pressure remains on Ishiba, his pledge to remain as PM offers at least some focus for any last minute trade negotiations. Japanese markets were closed for a holiday and global currency markets offered the only clear sign of a reaction. The yen, which had hit a three-month low of 149.18 per dollar last week, firmed to just under 147.7 after the results. That dragged the dollar down across the board. The other big movers first thing have been in global bond markets, where U.S. Treasury yields and European equivalents - perhaps in some read-across to Japanese investor flows - fell notably. Treasury yields fell across the curve to 10-day lows - after rallying last week on a combination of benign producer price and inflation expectations readings as well as comments from Federal Reserve board dove Christopher Waller that he's still in favor of resuming interest rate cuts as soon as this month. Waller said on Friday he would accept the job as head of the U.S. central bank if asked by President Donald Trump, but so far Trump had not contacted him about it. With the Fed outlook now confused by persistent White House pressure on Chair Jerome Powell and the outside chance that Trump attempts to fire him before his term expires next year, last week's incoming price data has offered some comfort. Fed futures reflect a near 70% chance of another Fed cut by September. But the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had counseled Trump not to fire Powell, given the financial disruption that might cause. Trump, who sued the WSJ and its owners including Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion on Friday over the newspaper's report on a 2003 birthday greeting from Trump to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, denied the latest WSJ report on Bessent too. Stock markets were steady to higher across the world, with Wall Street stock futures up ahead Monday's bell. Helping the mood, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday he was confident that Washington can secure a trade deal with the European Union, but August 1 is a hard deadline for tariffs to kick in. Lutnick said he had just gotten off the phone with European trade negotiators and there was "plenty of room" for agreement. Meantime, China's foreign ministry said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. The corporate earnings season unfolds during the week, meantime, with Tesla and Alphabet - two underperforming megacaps this year - reporting on Wednesday. In Europe, Ryanair surged more than 6% as Europe's largest low-cost carrier's net profit more than doubled in its April-June quarter. Chart of the day China's exports of rare earth magnets to the United States in June soared to more than seven times their May level, marking a sharp recovery in the flow of critical minerals used in electric vehicles, wind turbines and missiles after a Sino-U.S. trade deal. China, which provides more than 90% of the global supply of rare earth magnets, decided in early April to add several rare earth items to its export restriction list in retaliation for U.S. tariffs - creating major supply chain problems for many firms and industries. But the two countries hammered out an agreement last month to resolve the issue - one in which Washington allowed chipmaker Nvidia to resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China. Separately, China has quietly issued its first 2025 rare earth mining and smelting quotas without the typical public statement - another sign of Beijing tightening its control over the crucial sector. Today's events to watch * U.S. June leading indicator (8:30 AM EDT); Canada June producer price report * U.S. corporate earnings: Verizon, Domino's Pizza, Steel Dynamics, WR Berkley, NXP, Roper, Alexandria Real Estate Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (by Mike Dolan; editing by Christina Fincher) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Cleveland-Cliffs: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
CLEVELAND (AP) — CLEVELAND (AP) — Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) on Monday reported a loss of $483 million in its second quarter. The Cleveland-based company said it had a loss of 97 cents per share. Losses, adjusted for one-time gains and costs, were 50 cents per share. The results topped Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of six analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for a loss of 68 cents per share. The mining company posted revenue of $4.93 billion in the period, which also topped Street forecasts. Five analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $4.9 billion. _____


San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Harvard is hoping court rules Trump administration's $2.6B research cuts were illegal
BOSTON (AP) — Harvard University will appear in federal court Monday to make the case that the Trump administration illegally cut $2.6 billion from the storied college — a pivotal moment in its battle against the federal government. If U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs decides in the university's favor, the ruling would reverse a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the Trump administration escalated its fight with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university. Such a ruling, if it stands, would revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects that lost federal money. 'This case involves the Government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard,' the university said in its complaint. 'All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: Allow the Government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions.' A second lawsuit over the cuts filed by the American Association of University Professors and its Harvard faculty chapter has been consolidated with the university's. Harvard's lawsuit accuses President Donald Trump's administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force. The letter demanded sweeping changes related to campus protests, academics and admissions. For example, the letter told Harvard to audit the viewpoints of students and faculty and admit more students or hire new professors if the campus was found to lack diverse points of view. The letter was meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment on campus. Harvard President Alan Garber pledged to fight antisemitism but said no government 'should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.' The same day Harvard rejected the demands, Trump officials moved to freeze $2.2 billion in research grants. Education Secretary Linda McMahon declared in May that Harvard would no longer be eligible for new grants, and weeks later the administration began canceling contracts with Harvard. As Harvard fought the funding freeze in court, individual agencies began sending letters announcing that the frozen research grants were being terminated. They cited a clause that allows grants to be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies. Harvard, which has the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, has moved to self-fund some of its research, but warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts. In court filings, the school said the government 'fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons. 'It is the policy of the United States under the Trump Administration not to fund institutions that fail to adequately address antisemitism in their programs,' it said in court documents. The research funding is only one front in Harvard's fight with the federal government. The Trump administration also has sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students, and Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. Finally, last month, the Trump administration formally issued a finding that the school tolerated antisemitism — a step that eventually could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including federal student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.'